RE: [Samba] can samba keep uid/gid/permission on a per-file-base?

2009-06-09 Thread Alex Harrington
 Is there a trick to copy files via smbfs and keep uid/gid/permissions?
 
 Usually uid/gid/permission of a transfered file depends on 
 the uid used when mounting the remote share.  But maybe there 
 is a trick/patch whatever ... 

I've used xcopy on Windows before to transfer files between shares
maintaining permissions, owner, times etc. You need permission on the
destination to be able to change those values though. I've never done
that with Samba (always when doing Win32 server migrations) but I don't
see any reason why it might not work...

Cheers

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Development Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 391672 e: a...@longhill.org.uk 
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba + RAID + High speed...

2009-02-05 Thread Alex Harrington
 I still feel this configuration could be running faster, 
 anyone has any idea where I could optimize it ? (the XFS 
 format paramaters, Areca setup, bonding parameters, etc).

My experience says that the SATA/RAID5 will bottleneck the system well
before you hit the limits of your 6GB trunk.

RAID10 is less computationally expensive for the RAID controller and
gives greater access concurrency (ie any given data can be read from a
choice of drives).

SAS drives/controllers are full duplex which means the bus can be
reading/writing at the same time, and so is much faster for high
read/write setups. It depends a lot on how the box is to be used.

Cheers

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Development Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 391672 e: a...@longhill.org.uk 
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


RE: [Samba] server change

2008-12-01 Thread Alex Harrington
 If anyone can shed some light on this I would appreciate it.

Is the old server still running? I've seen clients connect to an old DC
and change their machine account passwords with that server in a similar
scenario..

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Development Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 391672 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] How to share [homes] in a more flexible way?

2008-11-17 Thread Alex Harrington
 I've attempted 
 various approaches but I've failed to achieve my goal, so I 
 wonder if it's even possible. Sharing homes one-by-one is out 
 of question: too many people in my department. Can you help me?

Assuming all the people in your department are in a group, you can just include 
a separate configuration based on group membership:

Eg:

In smb.conf:

include = /etc/samba/%G_smb.conf

For your group, you should then create /etc/samba/mygroup_smb.conf:
[homes]
  comment = Homes
  browsable = no
  valid users = %S
  path = %H

Etc etc etc

You might have problems with this if your department group is not your primary 
group membership...

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Development Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 391672 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Vista - Profile - Local

2008-11-12 Thread Alex Harrington
 -
  It's not possible so far as I know.
 -
 
 I can tell you it is possible with XP.
 I can log on my computer: 
 as my_computer_hostname\lmhelp
 as well as a_samba_domain_name\lmelp
 using exactly the same profile located at C:\Documents and 
 Settings\lmhelp.
 It is very convenient.
 But to do so, one has to edit the registry.

I don't understand how that's possible. Your machine cannot be logging
on to the other domain, so the only way this is possible so far as I
know is if the two domains you're logging on to trust each other?

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Development Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 391672 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Vista - Profile - Local

2008-11-12 Thread Alex Harrington
 Has anyone ever got the same problem as I:
 - having a LAPTOP running VISTA,
 - being the ONLY user of that laptop,
 - having to log SOMETIMES on a given Samba domain, SOMETIMES 
 on another,
 - wanting to use always the SAME PROFILE whichever the login may be,
 - wanting that profile to be LOCAL.

It's not possible so far as I know. A domain profile, local or
otherwise, is specific to that domain. As soon as you unjoin/rejoin a
new domain, XP will create a username.NEWDOMAIN profile on your laptop.

The closest I can suggest is to have the laptop in a workgroup, and just
map drives as required?

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Development Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 391672 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Vista - Profile - Local

2008-11-12 Thread Alex Harrington
  I can tell you it is possible with XP.
  I can log on my computer: 
  as my_computer_hostname\lmhelp
  as well as a_samba_domain_name\lmelp
  using exactly the same profile located at C:\Documents and 
  Settings\lmhelp.
  It is very convenient.
  But to do so, one has to edit the registry.
 
 I don't understand how that's possible. Your machine cannot be logging

 on to the other domain, so the only way this is possible so far as I 
 know is if the two domains you're logging on to trust each other?

I just re-read that. OK, so in your example you're using the same
profile to log on to your local machine, and the domain. That's quite
different from using the profile to log on to a second domain too.

Whatever you've managed to make XP do, I'm pretty sure it isn't a
Microsoft-supported configuration - unless someone else here knows
better?

Alex

--
Alex Harrington - Network Development Manager Longhill High School
t: 01273 391672 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Remote announce

2008-10-21 Thread Alex Harrington
 Is there anything else that I need to add or could debian be 
 confgiured to send multicast traffic on mutiple interfaces so 
 that a broadcast (192.168.1.255) get to both eth1 and ppp0. 

192.168.1.255 is the broadcast address on 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 network. 
Your ppp0 interface is a point-to-point address 192.168.1.128/255.255.255.255 
in a completely different network (despite sharing its ip address with one in 
your existing network).

Broadcasts for one network are not going to appear on another...

Cheers

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: WG: [Samba] Strange!!! Clients only log on to samba bdc

2008-09-24 Thread Alex Harrington
 Ist there no one concerning this behaviour?
 I did my setup following the man pages.
 There must be a serious bug in samba 3.031.

As I understand it, clients will prefer logging on to a BDC over a PDC,
and then use whichever responds quickest, so certainly all the clients
should not be logging in to one box or other - and probably least likely
to log on to the PDC of the two options.

I know that we see about a 60/40 split logins to BDC/PDC.

I don't think you should have domain master = yes set on the BDC.

Here's the settings from my BDC

[global]
netbios name = CORE02
server string = Longhill BDC (%v,%h)
workgroup = LONGHILL
interfaces = 10.108.1.8/255.255.255.0
name resolve order = host bcast wins
os level = 65
domain master = no
domain logons = yes
local master = no
preferred master = no
guest ok = yes
wins server = 10.108.1.32

Hope that helps

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: WG: [Samba] Strange!!! Clients only log on to samba bdc

2008-09-24 Thread Alex Harrington
 This is the strange thing I have set on the BDC
 
 Security=user
 Domain logons=yes
 Domain master= no --- not yes!!!
 Os level=190
 Preferred master=no
 
 And when I do a testparm it results Role Domain PDC???!!

Can you post again exactly the global section from both PDC and BDC.
Several other settings have changed between your two posts which makes
it impossible to know exactly what the situation is!

Thanks

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] SAMBA and VLAN

2008-07-16 Thread Alex Harrington
 Is there anyway to make 
 my PDC server work without forwarding the UDP broadcast ports 
 (137, 138)?

As long as you have a WINS server and the PDC and your clients are using
it, it should work. That's the setup we have here and it's fine.

Cheers

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Development Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 391672 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Permissions Issue

2008-06-25 Thread Alex Harrington
Doug Tucker wrote:
 From the man 
 pages, it looks like I can set the share  to read only, and use the 
 directive write list = @groupname to allow certain users write access 
 to this read only share, but, I don't want to allow everyone read 
 access, I want to only allow certain other users (that I can put in a 
 group) read only access.  Any ideas?

valid users = @groupthatcanread,@groupthatcanwrite
read only = yes
write list = @groupthatcanwrite

As other posters have mentioned, it's good practice to enforce this at
the filesystem level too.

Cheers

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Fwd: Add permission? (was How to create awrite-onlyshare?)

2008-05-23 Thread Alex Harrington
Ash

My understanding is that admin users should make that user effectively root, 
and therefore able to access files that aren't owned by them or with no 
permissions granted.

If you directly access a file you know exists - say open in notepad 
\\server\append\test.txt as michael, I think it will still allow you access.

One option would be to have a second share called appendadm which only Michael 
has permission to access which forces either permissions or drops the hide 
unreadable statement.

eg:
 [appendadm]
  path = /home/append
  valid users = michael
  writeable = yes
  write list = michael
  admin users = michael
  hide unreadable = no
  create mode = 200
  directory mode = 770
  force group = office

If you have security=share set then the admin users line will have no effect - 
so that may be why you aren't seeing the initial share working properly.

Cheers

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 304086 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Ash Gosh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 23/05/2008 21:31
To: Alex Harrington
Subject: Re: [Samba] Fwd: Add permission? (was How to create awrite-onlyshare?)
 
Hello!

I'm sorry, I was out unfortunatley, was in hospital without internet :(

This variant works but... But michael becomes unable to read newly
added data because file has been created under user.office -w---
permissions. I'm tried to add setfacl -m default:user:michael:wrx
/home/apeend but new files does not inherit this rule... what to do
here?

AG.



On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Alex Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In this case I still can't add a file from Windows machine into the
 share append...
 Seems it can't be done with Samba and posix permissions?

 Try this:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# chown -R michael.office append
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# chmod -R 770 append

 smb.conf:
 [append]
  path = /home/append
  valid users = +office
  writeable = yes
  write list = +office
  admin users = michael
  hide unreadable = yes
  create mode = 200
  directory mode = 770
  force group = office

 I can't see any reason why that config won't do exactly what you want it
 to.

 If it still doesn't work, you need to start narrowing the problem down -
 so logon to the console of the server first as michael. Can you cd in to
 /home/append? If so, can you touch a new file? Repeat the process for a
 different user in the office group. What is the result? As root, what is
 the contents of that folder now? If that all works, the POSIX
 permissions are working fine so it makes it a Samba problem. Visa versa
 then the POSIX permissions are the ones to look at.

 Alex

 --
 Alex Harrington - Network Manager, Longhill High School

 t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] samba server maxing out cpu, load up to 10

2008-05-20 Thread Alex Harrington
 I reboot the server and sometimes it seems to help for a couple days,
and sometimes the
 load immediately comes back and we just have to wait till the next
day.

We used to have a similar problem - but I've not seen it in a long time.

It was always a badly behaved PC and often involved a Publisher document
being stuck open.

Running top, see if one smbd process is hogging the CPU. You should be
able to work that back to a PC using smbstatus, and I think that's where
the problem will be...

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Manager, Longhill High School

t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Fwd: Add permission? (was How to create awrite-onlyshare?)

2008-05-08 Thread Alex Harrington
 In this case I still can't add a file from Windows machine into the
share append...
 Seems it can't be done with Samba and posix permissions? 

Try this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# chown -R michael.office append
[EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# chmod -R 770 append

smb.conf:
[append]
  path = /home/append
  valid users = +office
  writeable = yes
  write list = +office
  admin users = michael
  hide unreadable = yes
  create mode = 200
  directory mode = 770
  force group = office

I can't see any reason why that config won't do exactly what you want it
to.

If it still doesn't work, you need to start narrowing the problem down -
so logon to the console of the server first as michael. Can you cd in to
/home/append? If so, can you touch a new file? Repeat the process for a
different user in the office group. What is the result? As root, what is
the contents of that folder now? If that all works, the POSIX
permissions are working fine so it makes it a Samba problem. Visa versa
then the POSIX permissions are the ones to look at.

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Manager, Longhill High School

t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Fwd: Add permission? (was How to create a write-onlyshare?)

2008-05-07 Thread Alex Harrington
Try:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# chown -R michael.office append
[EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# chmod -R 700 append

smb.conf:
[append]
   path = /home/append
   valid users = +office
   writeable = yes
   write list = +office
   admin users = michael
   hide unreadable = yes
   create mode = 600
   directory mode = 700
   force group = office

I think that will do what you want - but users will still be able to see
what they've put in the share - by virtue of the fact they own the file
and it has 600 permissions.

You could force a create mode of say 200 which would leave the file
writable by the user but not readable. I've not tested how Windows will
deal with that though...

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Manager, Longhill High School

t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Maxtor NAS share problem

2008-04-30 Thread Alex Harrington
 What's the exact command line you're using to rsync?
 

 I was using a command of the form:

 rsync -avz /source /destination 

OK the -a in your command line tells rsync to copy file owners,
permissions and groups. Your NAS is not capable of allowing you to
change these things in its current configuration - that is a limitation
of the NAS you bought, not of SAMBA which it is running, or of rsync.

If you need things to work this way, drop the -a and use -r instead.
This will copy your files but they will all be owned by whoever you
connect to the NAS as.

If you need to backup permissions too, you should use getfacl/setfacl to
backup just the permissions of all your files to a single text file -
which you can then write to the NAS.

Failing that, try using something like duplicity to do the job all in
one step...

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Manager, Longhill High School

t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Maxtor NAS share problem

2008-04-29 Thread Alex Harrington
 I was talking about saving the Linux filesystem info. Do your rsync
to 
 the NAS, then do a recursive getfacl,  redirecting the output to a 
 file on the NAS.
 When you do an rsync back from the NAS, correct the owner/perms with 
 setfacl.
 

 Trouble is that I CAN'T do my rsync to the NAS drive because it
doesn't
 give me the access privileges I need to write to the NAS. The rsync
 wants to change owner and the NAS won't let it do that.

There are switches to modify that behaviour - -p, -o, -t, -g - and there
are aliases (eg -a)that switch combinations of those on or off.

What's the exact command line you're using to rsync?

Something like rsync -r /source/ /destination should work, regardless of
the permissions, because rsync will write everything as whoever you're
logged on as (or whoever the NAS translates that to be).

As previously suggested you can then do a recursive getfacl over /source
and write the output to /destination. That will create a text file with
all your permissions etc included in it so they can be restored by
setfacl if required.

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Manager, Longhill High School

t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] write list vs read list

2008-04-09 Thread Alex Harrington
 However, the @estero group cannot access the share at all 
 (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED). What am I doing wrong?

Most likely the filesystem permissions prevent users in @estero from
executing or reading the /home/samba/lab_smb folder and/or the files in
it.

Cheers

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Re: How to create a write-only share?

2008-04-09 Thread Alex Harrington
 Please please please! Any indeas are highly welcome!
 
Ash - did you try setting hide unreadable = yes on the share as per my 
previous email?
 
Alex
-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 304086 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Re: How to create a write-only share?

2008-04-07 Thread Alex Harrington
 
 Thanks for the answer but in this case anyone can look into the folder
and see the file 
 list. Sometimes even a filenames could be the secret. So this is not
helps us.

Set hide unreadable = yes on the share.

Alex
-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Manager, Longhill High School

t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Poor performance on open/copy/close/rename file operationsvia remote/VPN connection

2008-03-26 Thread Alex Harrington
 All clients accessing samba shares via LAN have no problems. Samba 
 server works perfectly and fast.
 We are instead experiencing serious performance issues when accessing

 samba shares from remote clients (WAN), via VPN.

I've had this before and never solved it. I always put it down to
Windows Explorer touching the files for thumbnails etc.

Try mapping a drive from the VPN client to the Samba box, then drop to a
command prompt and try copy/deleting files from there. Is the speed any
better?

Alex 

-- 
Alex Harrington - Network Manager, Longhill High School

t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Domain Authentication Issue - Bug Found

2008-03-20 Thread Alex Harrington
 This does not seem logical, it does not seem real, but the results
have proven themselves to be true.

Hi Dalton

It sounds very strange. I'm no Samba dev but I do have a fair experience
with AD.

Could it be that the Windows server in question has somehow got one of
the FSMO roles assigned to it? If it were say a RID master then nothing
would be able to make any form of account on the domain until the RID
master has synced with other domain controllers. The time difference
could have been sufficient to stop that replication happening.

Does the output of netdom query fsmo on the corporate domain
controllers and on the server with time problems agree?

It also strikes me that you say you have the issue affect both Samba and
XP clients? Or was the problem on XP described substantially different
for the XP boxes?

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Moving user accounts from a domain to another - andchanging their logins

2007-06-26 Thread Alex Harrington
Hi Francis

 I don't know that much about Windows accounts, but one thing I 
 learned is that the SID is hugely important. As some 
 directories/files are named after the SID in a user's profile, I 
 figure that they are part of the problem, if not the main problem.

It's not something I've done personally - but the place I used to work
used the MS Migration Tool for migrating profiles etc...

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=4af2d2c9-f16c-4
c52-a203-8daf944dd555displaylang=en 

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - IT Support, Longhill High School

t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] PDC over PPTP VPN

2007-04-25 Thread Alex Harrington
 Someone could have some ideas about how to solve this problem?
 I tried and tried but I didn't managed in solving it... :-( 

Is this Microsoft PPTP DUN or Poptop PPTPD?

There have been two new fixes for Poptop of late to fix packet ordering
bugs that cause some very strange behaviour. Perhaps this is an example?
Otherwise try lowering the MTU on the PPP link. If that still doesn't
work, you need to look at the traffic flowing over the link with a
packet sniffer and see where things break down. It's unlikely to be a
problem with the PDC based on your assertion that it works fine on the
LAN. I'd suggest that maybe you might get more help from the Poptop
users group?

Alex

-- 
Alex Harrington - IT Support, Longhill High School

t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba