Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP caching when LDAP server unavailable - possible?

2006-01-26 Thread Christopher Smith
We've used slave ldap servers as our "local office" solution, it seems 
like PITA at first, but really its not much trouble... we redistribute 
old Optiplex GX100's with bigger IDE drives as the local pdc.


Chris Smith

Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:


Michael Gasch schrieb:

you could set up openldap to do syncrepl and have a full copy of 
your samba domain stuff that's in ldap.  if the connection goes 
down, the ldap stuff is there and if you have it set up like a bdc, 
you can still login, etc.




Yep, that's how it's normally done.



what about setting up a BDC in the subnet the router can access by 
ethernet (builtin switch, subnet behind the router). this connection 
is alays "on", isnĀ“t it?



It's a solution for a small office.

A couple of workstations, this tiny router running Samba instead of a 
server; connection to the outside through ADSL, nothing more.


When ADSL doesn't connect (because an employee disconnected the modem, 
because he needed a power outlet to make tee), we're in trouble.




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] pushing out files or installs

2005-10-31 Thread Christopher Smith

Symantec's Ghost Autoinstaller, works great.

Chris


Anne wrote:


I've got 20 windows desktop machines in a lab on a samba network. Throughout
the semester instructors usually find some software they want installed. Has
anyone come up with a good way to push out files to all these machines? I've
seen demos of software management in Windows 2003. Or any inexpensive
commercial product for software management for networks that are not Windows
AD?
I think I've seen some setup using .rhost files in windows.
Thanks,
Anne
 

  
--

To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] what's the best filesystem

2005-10-04 Thread Christopher Smith
I vote for XFS, it is much faster than EXT3 with lower processor load when
you get up over 100gigs of storage. I've had some stability issues with
software RAID5 though.





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Deryck Hodge
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:12 PM
To: Eric A. Hall
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] what's the best filesystem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Eric A. Hall wrote:
> I'm using Reiser now but its slow and doesn't work good XP attributes.
> I've also used XFS (a couple of years ago) and liked it but had some 
> troubles with cross-platform Unix and the extended ACLs.
> 

As a wise man once said to me -- Reiser eats files.  I had to learn the hard
way.  Don't make the same mistake I did. :-)

Cheers,
deryck
- --
Deryck Hodgehttp://www.devurandom.org/
Samba Team  http://www.samba.org/
"This is the 21st century ... Magic isn't dead." --Marillion (2001)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDQsXg4glRK0DaE8gRAsXgAKDZLd2lt7mR1HLxnapPN2PmIDw1GACg0TT8
VPOfA0dYG/3h85ZYoHj0yZc=
=TXKf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba