Re: [Samba] compiling samba 3.4.8 on CentOS_6.2
You would better consult the Samba Core Team about this particular issue. Maybe that feature is broken in recent releases. --- wbr, Denis. On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Randy Rue wrote: > With help from members here I've successfully installed 3.6.6 to a test > machine and reproduced the same problem as with 3.5. So now I'm back to > trying to install 3.4.8 to see if the problem exists there. > > Any guidance on a failure for the compiled binaries to launch with no clues > in any log? > > Or a pointer toward rpms for 3.4.8 and CentOS_6? > > Randy > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] compiling samba 3.4.8 on CentOS_6.2
I have been using them on servers, so there are no KDE/Gnome specific stuff there. They work fine, although I haven't tested them in GUI environment. Probably, samba packages could be uninstalled with `--nodeps` flag and then replaced with the SerNet ones. Anyway, rebuilding yourself from SRPMS and installing, or compiling from source you impact on your system the same way. --- wbr, Denis. On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Randy Rue wrote: > It looks like to install these rpm's I first need to use yum to remove > all samba-related packages and a bunch of KDE and gnome stuff, is there a > way to make this work without gutting too much of the rest of the OS? > > ** ** > > Randy**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Denis Fateyev [mailto:de...@fateyev.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:47 PM > > *To:* Randy Rue > *Cc:* samba@lists.samba.org > *Subject:* Re: [Samba] compiling samba 3.4.8 on CentOS_6.2 > > ** ** > > Hello there, > > > In general, you may save efforts using precompiled binaries from the > SerNet team. > For example: http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/6/x86_64/ > > --- > wbr, Denis. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] compiling samba 3.4.8 on CentOS_6.2
Hello there, In general, you may save efforts using precompiled binaries from the SerNet team. For example: http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/6/x86_64/ --- wbr, Denis. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Help with migration
Hello Alejandro, Probably to check all the details you need to create a build environment, at first. It's the general advice. As for your question, I had samba-3.5 server (upgraded from 3.0.28) which was able to authenticate all windows: from win98 to win7 (domain members). So I think it's possible to do. Actually I cannot recall any problems I had during the upgrade process, except very little ones. I used 'SerNet' samba builds (btw, many thanks to them!) --- wbr, Denis. On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Alejandro Iacobelli < aiacobe...@khutech.com.ar> wrote: > Hello to all, my name is Alejandro and I have a little question to anyone > of this list. > > I´ve created ,6 years ago, an ldap+smb proyect for a big company. Back > then, samba (Lenny server) only worked with NT hashes but now (Squeeze > server) they want to authenticate with Win7 (ntlm2 protocols) And > configurating windows7 to accept old NT hashes is not an exit. I want to > update ONLY the smb package from samba (2:3.2.5-4lenny15) to samba > (2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze8). > PD: I'm using an OLD and modified by myself openldap version so i cant > touch it. > > My question is this: > > > Have someone of you did this kind of migration any time? can you give me > advices? > > i need to know if something could go wrong in the relation with openldap. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem with softlinks under samba on RHEL
Hello, Seems you have faced with security restrictions introduced in new samba versions. You may look at 'follow symlinks', 'wide links', 'unix extensions' parameters in 'smb.conf'. --- wbr, Denis. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] local users in a domain...
Hello, Use smbldap-tools. It also contains the script to migrate system users to ldap. --- wbr, Denis. On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Christ Schlacta wrote: > so I have some local users that I'd like to show up in my samba domain a > bit more properly, but it's infeasable to add their accounts to the ldap > directory proper. > > I've tried to create an idmap entry (probably wrong) and a structural SID > with a sam account pointing to the numeric UID and a proper name for the > unix account, but it still shows up as UNIX-USER/accountname. what am I in > need of doing to make this show up as a user in the domain short of adding > an actual user for it? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] still confused about domains and SIDs
Hello, When creating a new samba domain, its domain SID usually goes from local SID of this potential PDC. In other words, when you organize PDC on clean Samba, it will adopt domain SID from machine's local SID. Therefore, it looks likelocal SID and domain SID on PDC are equal. BDC machines are usual client machines and domain members. They preserve local SID and additionally adopt a domain SID, when join. There is no need to change anything with local SID to join or exit from / to domain. Basically, the difference between domain controllers (PDC, BDC) and usual domain members, that they declare their role in the network. They have different rights in SID area, where they were joined: DCs are full, others are lesser. The difference between PDC and BDC, that BDC isn't domain master browser and will act as reserve. Additionally, for BDC it's allowed to act as domain logon server. --- wbr, Denis. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] PDC (CentOS 5.5, Samba 3.5.6): no domain group names sent to Windows 2003 members
Hello, Have you tried the build from SerNet? --- wbr, Denis. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Konstantin Boyandin wrote: > Hello, > > After setting up Samba 3.5.6 on CentOS 5.5 (built from sources) I have > noticed a strange problem. > > Windows 2003 servers participating in this Samba domain do not receive > domain groups list when I, say, try to assign security credentials for a > file/folder. When I choose domain as source, search reveals only > technical group names and individual domain users names. No domain group > names at all. > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] RHEL 5
Hello Travis, We're using Samba 3.5 from SerNet (3.5.4, to be exact) with RHEL 4 and CentOS 5 for a long time without any issues. --- wbr, Denis. On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Kuter, Travis L wrote: > Hi Samba, > > My name is Travis Kuter and I'm with HP's Solution Alliance org. > > I've got a client asking if Samba Internet Services 3.5 is supported under > REHL 5. > > Would you mind helping with some clarification? > > Many thanks and Best Regards, > > Travis > > Travis Kuter > WW ISV Business Development > ESS Solution Alliances > Hewlett-Packard Company > travis.ku...@hp.com > +404-664-2596 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] How can Samba both work, and, suddenly stop working, simultaneously?
Hello Paul, I think, `/tmp` in your filesystem is not not a good place to hold and share your files anyway. Try with another place. By the way, you have an old samba version (`3.0.20`), probably it's better to update it at first. As I know, there are a lot of issues with old `3.0.x` branch and Vista / Seven. It's very old version that isn't supported currently. --- wbr, Denis. 2010/6/29 Paul Branon > testparm -s > > Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf > Processing section "[tmp]" > Loaded services file OK. > [global] >workgroup = WORKGROUP >server string = Samba Server >security = SHARE >log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m > > [tmp] >comment = Temporary data On Samba Server >path = /tmp >read only = No >guest ok = Yes > > > > > Thanks for getting back to me guys. No, it's not an ipaddress conflict > issue. I can ssh onto the server, I can access the server on port 80, etc. > It's not a cabling issue. Samba has just stopped exporting its file > systems. > It's running on the server itself and I can access the share(s) but only > locally. I can't understand it. I have no access/deny restrictions in the > config. (You can see the config above.) > > === > As for logfiles > [2010/06/20 22:31:24, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(718) > Netbios nameserver version 3.0.20 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2004 > [2010/06/20 22:37:02, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(396) > * > > Samba name server SambaServer1 is now a local master browser for workgroup > WORKGROUP on subnet 10.10.10.22 > > * > [2010/06/20 22:37:02, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(396) > * > > Samba name server SambaServer1 is now a local master browser for workgroup > WORKGROUP on subnet 192.168.1.22 > > * > [2010/06/20 23:51:34, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(58) > Got SIGTERM: going down... > [2010/06/21 12:41:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(718) > Netbios nameserver version 3.0.20 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2004 > [2010/06/21 12:46:50, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(396) > * > > Samba name server SambaServer1 is now a local master browser for workgroup > WORKGROUP on subnet 10.10.10.22 > > * > [2010/06/21 12:46:50, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(396) > * > > Samba name server SambaServer1 is now a local master browser for workgroup > WORKGROUP on subnet 192.168.1.22 > > * > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] xls file locked for editing by unknown user
Hello Dave, `lsof | grep "your-file-name"` If it locked with any of smbd process, try `kill PID`, where `pid` - smbd pid you've got previously. --- wbr, Denis. 2010/6/29 Dave Coventry > Hi Moray, thanks for the assistance! > > On 29 June 2010 10:41, Moray Henderson (ICT) > wrote: > > Which version of Samba? > > Samba version 3.2.5 > > > Does smbstatus(1) list the file as being locked? If so, it should give a > pid you can examine. The fuser(1) and lsof(8) commands can track which > process has a file open. > > No. smbstatus returns "No locked files" > > > If rebooting the server does not clear the lock, there's either a lock > file > > or a cached lock record somewhere. Try /var/lib/samba/locking.tdb. > > Although it's binary, you can grep(1) it for the filename, or use > > tdbdump(8) to display the contents. According to > > > http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_are_tdb_files.3F > , > > locking.tdb is not required to persist across restarts. I wouldn't try > deleting > > this when Samba is running; even with Samba shut down I would rename it > > rather than deleting it. > > There is no file in /var/lib/samba/ called 'locking.tdb' > The only files in that directory bearing a date later than 14th Dec > 2009 are these three: > passdb.tdb > registry.tdb > wins.dat > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] [non-technical] Get samba t-shirts
Hello all, I tried to find any Internet store, that sells samba stuff (like t-shirts, mugs, etc.), but haven't found no one. Probably I missed some ot them. I would like to have samba t-shirt, but don't know, where I can buy it. Any ideas? Thanks. wbr, Denis. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] "usrmgr.exe" issues after upgrade samba
Hello Volker, Thanks for the quick answer. Yes, I'm using LDAP backend with samba. I will test the issue when 5.3.4 will be released. 2010/6/13 Volker Lendecke > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 02:03:08PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote: > > After upgrade samba on my 64-bit RHEL4 server from version `3.0.31` to > > `3.5.3` everything just works fine, but I only have issues with > > `usrmgr.exe`. > > Before upgrade, I could manage domain accounts with this utility. Now it > say > > "Access denied" after running without any detailed information. > > I checked out samba logs and didn't found any errors related. How to get > it > > working again? > > If you're running with LDAP backend, > > http://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=f66cc8270 > > might be for you. Will be in 3.5.4. > > Volker > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] "usrmgr.exe" issues after upgrade samba
Hello, After upgrade samba on my 64-bit RHEL4 server from version `3.0.31` to `3.5.3` everything just works fine, but I only have issues with `usrmgr.exe`. Before upgrade, I could manage domain accounts with this utility. Now it say "Access denied" after running without any detailed information. I checked out samba logs and didn't found any errors related. How to get it working again? Thanks, wbr, Denis. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] URGENT! Issues after upgrade from Ubuntu Dapper to Lucid
Hello, 2010/5/30 Igor R. > hello! > > I need urgent help. I upgraded from dapper to lucid (samba version 3.0 -> > 3.4). Now I cannot log in to domain anymore (domain controller not available > message), also new clients cannot join domain (semaphore timeout message > after typing root username and password). If I take LAN cable out, so i can > login, then shares work normally. What could have changed so i have issues? Take a look at this: http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg108209.html Basically, try to re-join machines into domain at first. --- wbr, Denis. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
