Re: [Samba] SOLVED: Re: 2.2.7 compile error using--with-acl-support
thanks! it worked. and for me:
~# ldd /usr/sbin/smbd
libacl.so.1 = /lib/libacl.so.1 (0x40019000)
--^
libcups.so.2 = /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0x4001f000)
libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x40037000)
libcrypt.so.1 = /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x4004b000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40078000)
libpam.so.0 = /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x4007b000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40083000)
libattr.so.1 = /lib/libattr.so.1 (0x4019f000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)
so it seems ok.
Thanks to all for your help
Francesco
Il mar, 2002-11-26 alle 18:19, Tom Hallewell ha scritto:
If you are using the debian/rules from apt-get or the source tarball, you
need to not only include
--with-acl-support in debian/rules, you also need to
vi debian/config.cache
-- replace ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=${ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=no}
with ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=${ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=yes}
This will allow it to compile.
Unfortunately, for me, anyway, smbd,nmbd and winbindd are still not linking
to libacl.so (according to ldd). The output is below.
If you have any luck actually getting this to work once you have
successfully compiled, please let me know.
PS-thanks to Max for the link to his page
http://homex.subnet.at/~max/comp-12_xfs.php
Tom Hallewell
Radio Free Asia
Washington, DC USA
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 2.2.7 compile error using --with-acl-support on debian
Il mar, 2002-11-26 alle 13:44, Frank Matthieß ha scritto: On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 11:45:17AM +0100, Francesco Mosca wrote: hi, i'm trying to package samba2.2.7 on a debian woody, using --with-acl-support. the configure part seems ok, but when the compile starts i get a lot of errors.. what's wrong? attached the sensitive part of the dpkg-buildpackage output. thanks You have installed libacl1 and libacl1-dev on compile system? libacl1-dev is not in woody yet, i was using acl-dev instead. anyway, i just installed libacl1 and libacl1-dev from sid, but, even if this time (i noticed) the configure says Using posix ACLs, i got the same errors at compile time... -- Frank Matthieß[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Francesco Mosca [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2.2.7 compile error using --with-acl-support on debian
hi, i'm trying to package samba2.2.7 on a debian woody, using --with-acl-support. the configure part seems ok, but when the compile starts i get a lot of errors.. what's wrong? attached the sensitive part of the dpkg-buildpackage output. thanks -- Francesco Mosca [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin/make -C source all nsswitch/libnss_wins.so make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/samba-2.2.7/source' Using FLAGS = -O -O2 -D_REENTRANT -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DLOGFILEBASE=/var/log/samba -DCONFIGFILE=/etc/samba/smb.conf -DLMHOSTSFILE=/etc/samba/lmhosts -DSWATDIR=/usr/share/samba/swat -DSBINDIR=/usr/sbin -DLOCKDIR=/var/run/samba -DCODEPAGEDIR=/usr/share/samba/codepages -DDRIVERFILE=/etc/samba/printers.def -DBINDIR=/usr/bin -DPIDDIR=/var/run/samba -DLIBDIR=/usr/lib -DVARDIR=/var -DHAVE_INCLUDES_H -DPASSWD_PROGRAM=/usr/bin/passwd -DSMB_PASSWD_FILE=/etc/samba/smbpasswd -DTDB_PASSWD_FILE=/etc/samba/smbpasswd.tdb Using FLAGS32 = -O -O2 -D_REENTRANT -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DLOGFILEBASE=/var/log/samba -DCONFIGFILE=/etc/samba/smb.conf -DLMHOSTSFILE=/etc/samba/lmhosts -DSWATDIR=/usr/share/samba/swat -DSBINDIR=/usr/sbin -DLOCKDIR=/var/run/samba -DCODEPAGEDIR=/usr/share/samba/codepages -DDRIVERFILE=/etc/samba/printers.def -DBINDIR=/usr/bin -DPIDDIR=/var/run/samba -DLIBDIR=/usr/lib -DVARDIR=/var -DHAVE_INCLUDES_H -DPASSWD_PROGRAM=/usr/bin/passwd -DSMB_PASSWD_FILE=/etc/samba/smbpasswd -DTDB_PASSWD_FILE=/etc/samba/smbpasswd.tdb Using LIBS = -lacl -lcups -lnsl -lcrypt -ldl -lpam Compiling smbd/server.c In file included from include/smb.h:462, from include/includes.h:677, from smbd/server.c:22: include/vfs.h:111: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:112: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:113: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:114: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:115: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union include/vfs.h:116: parse error before `*' include/vfs.h:116: `acl_t' declared as function returning a function include/vfs.h:116: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/vfs.h:117: parse error before `acl_permset_t' include/vfs.h:118: parse error before `acl_permset_t' include/vfs.h:119: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:120: parse error before `*' include/vfs.h:120: `acl_t' declared as function returning a function include/vfs.h:120: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/vfs.h:121: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:122: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:123: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:124: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:125: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:126: parse error before `acl_type_t' include/vfs.h:127: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:129: parse error before `acl_permset_t' include/vfs.h:131: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:132: parse error before `acl_tag_t' In file included from include/includes.h:677, from smbd/server.c:22: include/smb.h:480: field `vfs_ops' has incomplete type In file included from include/includes.h:737, from smbd/server.c:22: include/proto.h:211: parse error before `the_acl' include/proto.h:212: parse error before `entry_d' include/proto.h:213: parse error before `entry_d' include/proto.h:214: parse error before `entry_d' include/proto.h:215: parse error before `sys_acl_get_file' include/proto.h:215: parse error before `acl_type_t' include/proto.h:215: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/proto.h:216: parse error before `sys_acl_get_fd' include/proto.h:216: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/proto.h:217: parse error before `permset' include/proto.h:217: `sys_acl_clear_perms' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:117: previous declaration of `sys_acl_clear_perms' include/proto.h:218: parse error before `permset' include/proto.h:218: `sys_acl_add_perm' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:118: previous declaration of `sys_acl_add_perm' include/proto.h:219: parse error before `permset' include/proto.h:219: `sys_acl_get_perm' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:129: previous declaration of `sys_acl_get_perm' include/proto.h:220: parse error before `the_acl' include/proto.h:220: `sys_acl_to_text' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:119: previous declaration of `sys_acl_to_text' include/proto.h:221: parse error before `sys_acl_init' include/proto.h:221: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/proto.h:222: parse error before `*' include/proto.h:222: `sys_acl_create_entry' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:121: previous declaration of `sys_acl_create_entry' include/proto.h:223: parse error
stange w98 behaviour downloading printer drivers
i've set up some printers in my samba domain (2.2.6pre2) and successfully uploaded drivers from a w2k workstation, according to the how-to, both for win2000 and win98. I used AppleLW Color 12/600 PS drivers, because i need _color_ postscript support. the problem is: win2000 gets the correct drivers, enabling the color printing. win98 instead gets the drivers, but they are not color enabled i can only print b/w, no color-tab in the printer settings). I've also tried with several other ps color drivers, but none of them worked. Another interesting point is that if i install the drivers locally on the win98 boxes, they present all the color-management related properties and they actually print with correct colors. all of these properties are not present in the samba-automagically-installed version (_same_ drivers).. i think that the automagic drivers don't get the .ppd installed correctly, even if it is placed in c:\windows\system, and that win falls back to the default (bad) ps driver properties.. i think so because reading the .ppd, it contains all the driver switches that appears in the local version but not in the remote.. sorry for my english, i hope i won't have to manually configure my printers in all the (many :/ ) win98 boxes, and no, to install a _real_ OS on the clients is unfortunately not an option:( thanks, Francesco
