Re: [Samba] Timestamp problem
> bash-2.03# ls -al > total 20096 > drwxrwxrwx 2 dcenter hermes 13312 Oct 18 09:48 . > dr-xr-xr-x 13 dcenter hermes 512 Oct 14 17:03 .. > -rwxr--r-- 1 jblanco hermes30 Oct 18 2004 22626.log > -rwxr--r-- 1 jblanco hermes503011 Oct 18 2004 22626.pdf > > See the different timestamps, first two entries (local and parent dir) > have timestamps with "hour stamp" in the ls command output. > > The third and fourth entries do not shows hour stamp but only the date. These files probably have "future" timestamp. Wait an hour or two and try it again. Gabor -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Filename problem (filenames containing slashes aka. \ and /)
> i had this problems too, when i worked with some grafics , > i wrote a bash script which renamed there special filenames every day. > Maybe a guru has an solution for you , but in case of /\ i dont know any Any non-alphanumeric chars should be encoded. E.g. as printed quotable encoding does. Gabor -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] wrong create mask on files
> problem i have is that files are not created with the proper permissions set. i have > a > user "lilly" who creates files. these files should have rwx for the group "users" > (mapped to "DOMAIN\Users") as well as for the users. so on the appropriate share i > said: "create mask = 0770" and "security mask = 0700". But it doesn't work as > expected. > the files only have rwx for the user and no permissions for the group. any > suggestions? create mask = 0770 security mask = 0770 Gabor -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] printing = lprng working?
> I updated samba today to 3.0.5. Printing stopped working. The log says: > > [2004/08/02 14:28:57, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_printer_fn(108) >Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost - Verbindungsaufbau abgelehnt > > I'm using lprng not cups. Is samba ignoring printing = lprng? I have similar messages if I run 'swat' but this does not interfere with lprgn. I can print well. (Except that XP clients cannot see the print queues. :-( ) Try to configure some test commands. Here is my config: [dummy] comment = file path = /var/spool/samba guest ok = Yes printable = Yes print command = /tmp/test lpr -r -P'%p' %s lpq command = /tmp/test lpq -P'%p' lprm command = /tmp/test lprm -P'%p' %j lppause command = /tmp/test lpc hold '%p' %j lpresume command = /tmp/test lpc release '%p' %j queuepause command = /tmp/test lpc stop '%p' queueresume command = /tmp/test lpc start '%p' printer name = lp Where /tmp/test is a shell script: #!/bin/sh date >> /tmp/testlog echo $* >> /tmp/testlog ps u $PPID >> /tmp/testlog PROG=$1 shift $PROG "$@" 2>&1 | tee -a /tmp/testlog And I have an "lp" entry in printcap: lp|dummy :cm=/tmp/lp file :create_files :filter=/usr/lib/ifhp/ifhp :ifhp=model=default,status,sync,pagecount,waitend :lp=/tmp/lp :lprngtooloptions=FILTERTYPE="IFHP" IFHP_OPTIONS="status,sync,pagecount,waitend" PRINTERDB_ENTRY="default" :mc=0 :mx=0 :prefix_z=a4 :rw :sd=/var/spool/lpd/%P :sh Gabor -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux smbfs differences
> > but my 2.4 config is here:
> > #
> > # Network File Systems
> > #
> > ...
> > CONFIG_SMB_FS=m
> > CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT=y
> > CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE="utf8"
> > CONFIG_SMB_UNIX=y
>
> I think your Linux vendor has patched your sources. Because if I look
> in the original sources
I compile myself my kernels from original sources.
> (http://lxr.linux.no/source/arch/i386/defconfig?v=2.4.26) there is no
> such option.
This because "CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set".
Check the _original_ source:
$ ls -l linux-2.4.26/fs/smbfs/proc.c
-rw-r--r--1 root root 83490 Apr 14 15:05 linux-2.4.26/fs/smbfs/proc.c
$
Its content:
int
smb_newconn(struct smb_sb_info *server, struct smb_conn_opt *opt)
{
...
#ifndef CONFIG_SMB_UNIX
server->opt.capabilities &= ~SMB_CAP_UNIX;
#endif
if (server->opt.capabilities & SMB_CAP_UNIX) {
struct inode *inode;
VERBOSE("Using UNIX CIFS extensions\n");
install_ops(server->ops, &smb_ops_unix);
inode = SB_of(server)->s_root->d_inode;
if (inode)
inode->i_op = &smb_dir_inode_operations_unix;
}
linux-2.4.26/fs/smbfs/Changelog writes:
2004-01-24 John Newbigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* *.c: Implementation of CIFS Extensions for UNIX systems
> such option. On the other hand, it doesn't make clear why several
> options need to be ignored.
I've no inten^H^H^Hformation to answer this question. ;-)
I just pointed out that you CAN achieve identical (however unwanted)
behavior of 2.4 and 2.6 smbfs implementation.
Gabor
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux smbfs differences
> >> smbmount //server/share /mountpoint -o uid=100,gid=100 > >> makes all the files owned by uid 100 on a 2.4 kernel. The same command > >> on a 2.6 kernel makes the mountpoint owned by uid 100, the rest of the > >> files have the uid's as set on the server. > > > > Is CONFIG_SMB_UNIX enabled in 2.4 kernels? > > > > | CONFIG_SMB_UNIX: > > | > > | Enabling this will make smbfs use the CIFS Unix Extensions if > > | supported by the server. These extensions allows use of unix user > > | ids, permissions, file modes, symlinks, etc that normally do not > > | work on smbfs. > > | > > | Samba 3.0 servers supports these extensions. > > No, that is not enabled, but I can't find the option in the .config of > 2.4 or 2.6. This is true for 2.6 (I guess extensions are always enabled) but my 2.4 config is here: # # Network File Systems # ... CONFIG_SMB_FS=m CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE="utf8" CONFIG_SMB_UNIX=y Gabor -- E-mail = m-mail * c-mail ^ 2 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Empty print queue
> Users can also print on shared printers. > But > - (Windows XP) clients mostly report printers as unaccessable, > - Opening printer icon produces empty list of queued jobs. > I need some debugging help. > What to check now? > Is there any client for Linux that an also gets job list? Progress report: - Version 3.0.5-Debian produces the same result as 3.0.4-Debian. - the Linux client I wanted is: $ rpcclient -c 'enumjobs _printername_' -U _username_ _servername_ Password: 0: jobid[5]: _myuser_ Microsoft Word - XXX.doc 0/0 pages $ This means XPs use slightly different protocol than rpcclient. Gabor No smoke, no drugs, no vindoze. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] passdb requires /etc/passwd entry?
> I can't comment on the intentions of the samba authors as to the reasons > that they have required the samba user to be a local unix user. I would > venture to guess that a search of the samba archives would give you a > lot of history on that. OK, but I want at least these unix accounts to be locked. So samba password is different than stored in /etc/shadow. However these users cannot use swat at this moment because it checks the normal unix password instead of samba content of /var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb. How can I reach swat to ignore /etc/shadow? (It is no LDAP here.) Gabor -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux smbfs differences
> For example: > smbmount //server/share /mountpoint -o uid=100,gid=100 > makes all the files owned by uid 100 on a 2.4 kernel. The same command > on a 2.6 kernel makes the mountpoint owned by uid 100, the rest of the > files have the uid's as set on the server. Is CONFIG_SMB_UNIX enabled in 2.4 kernels? | CONFIG_SMB_UNIX: | | Enabling this will make smbfs use the CIFS Unix Extensions if | supported by the server. These extensions allows use of unix user | ids, permissions, file modes, symlinks, etc that normally do not | work on smbfs. | | Samba 3.0 servers supports these extensions. Gabor -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Empty print queue
Folks, (I'm a quite new Samba user. I.e. lamer. ;-) File sharing works well. Users can also print on shared printers. But - (Windows XP) clients mostly report printers as unaccessable, - Opening printer icon produces empty list of queued jobs. I spent half a day with debugging smbd. I found, that the configured 'lpq command' runs well, its output is parsed correctly. However the list of pending jobs isn't sent back to client at least I cannot see it in tcpdump's output. Of course the other printer related commands (lprm, lppause, etc.) are unusable in lack of job list. I need some debugging help. What to check now? Is there any client for Linux that an also gets job list? Environment: - Samba version: 3.0.4-Debian - Spooler: lprng - Kernel: 2.6.7 Any help, idea or suggestion will be appreciated. Gabor -- E-mail = m-mail * c-mail ^ 2 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
