Re: [Samba] samba 3 / AD / krb5_cc_get_principal failed
Update your kerberos5 to version 1.3.* . Best Regards! Jacky Kim . >Hi all, > >I successfully joined my Samba 3.0.6 box to our AD tree. wbinfo -t and -u >work as expected. But when I try to access a share on the samba box (Windows >AD controller), I am asked for a password, Samba then logs > >[2004/09/06 11:49:28, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(173) > Failed to verify incoming ticket! > > >winbindd sometimes logs > >[2004/09/06 11:42:55, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(313) > krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found) > > >What is wrong here? Any ideas? > >Regards >Olaf >-- >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] [HELP!!!]: Fail to mount with NULL password in samba 3.0.6
Can anybody answer me?! Thanks in advance!!!
I have patch 3.0.6 with all patchs in http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.6/ ,
and set null passwords = yes in smb.conf. It works well to mount samba share in
linux box when user alpha have non-empty password.
But when set alpha's passwork as NULL, I get the follow messages:
# mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password="" //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt
Anonymous login successful
24968: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess
SMB connection failed
And what samba log say:
[2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)
check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [alpha] -> [alpha] FAILED with
error NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbpasswd in samba 3.0
Try it: # (echo password; echo password) | smbpasswd -s -a username Best Regards! Jacky Kim . >For scripting then, what would the appropriate syntax be? > >smbpasswd -s -a username password > >this was working fine for me in 2.2.x and 3.0.x until the upgrade 3.0.6 > >If I want to change password with a script - i.e. single line of code. >what is the appropriate command syntax in 3.0.6? > >Jake Holmquist >Manhattan College >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] [HELP 3.0.6]: Fail to mount with NULL password
# mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password="" //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt Anonymous login successful 24968: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess SMB connection failed # mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt Password: [ENTER] Anonymous login successful 24977: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess SMB connection failed I have set: null passwords = yes And it works well if set alpha's password as non-empty password. > Hi, I failed to mount samba 3.0.6's share with NULL password: > > # mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password="" //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt > > And what samba log say: > [2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312) > check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [alpha] -> [alpha] FAILED with > errorNT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > But it is ok when using samba 2.2.8a! Best Regards! Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] [3.0.6]: Fail to mount with NULL password
I have set: null passwords = yes And it works well if set alpha's password as non-empty password. > Hi, I failed to mount samba 3.0.6's share with NULL password: > > # mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password="" //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt > > And what samba log say: > [2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312) > check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [alpha] -> [alpha] FAILED with > errorNT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > But it is ok when using samba 2.2.8a! Best Regards! Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] [3.0.6]: Fail to mount with NULL password
Hi, I failed to mount samba 3.0.6's share with NULL password:
# mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password="" //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt
And what samba log say:
[2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)
check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [alpha] -> [alpha] FAILED with
errorNT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
But it is ok when using samba 2.2.8a!
Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] mount with NULL password
Hi, I failed to mount samba 3.0.6's share with NULL password:
# mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password="" //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt
And what samba log say:
[2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)
check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [alpha] -> [alpha] FAILED with
errorNT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
But it is ok when using samba 2.2.8a!
Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbpasswd in samba 3.0
In samba 2.2.8, smbpasswd can change a user's smb password without prompt: # smbpasswd username newpswd How to do it in samba 3.0? I do want to change user's password without prompt! Best regards! Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] init_iconv Conversion problem
When I reload samba 3.0.5, I got the follow messages: [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 1] smbd/server.c:open_sockets_smbd(348) Reloading services after SIGHUP [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134) init_iconv: Conversion from UCS-2LE to CP850 not supported [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142) init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from UCS-2LE to ASCII [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134) init_iconv: Conversion from UTF-8 to CP850 not supported [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142) init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134) init_iconv: Conversion from ANSI_X3.4-1968 to CP850 not supported [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142) init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134) init_iconv: Conversion from CP850 to UCS-2LE not supported [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142) init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to UCS-2LE [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134) init_iconv: Conversion from CP850 to UTF-8 not supported [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142) init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134) init_iconv: Conversion from CP850 to ANSI_X3.4-1968 not supported [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142) init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134) init_iconv: Conversion from CP850 to UTF8 not supported [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142) init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134) init_iconv: Conversion from UTF8 to CP850 not supported [2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142) init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII Best Regards! Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.5 stable?
Then where or when are the patchs available? Jacky Kim . >On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 08:21:39PM +0800, Jacky Kim wrote: >> Why does samba 3.0.5 have so many ploblem? After I copy several files to samba >> server, >> I got the follow message in samba log! > >Samba 3.0.5 is a security release *only*. It only contains the two known >security fixes over the 3.0.4 release. It does not contain any of the >bug fixes that were discovered and fixed since 3.0.4. > >Jeremy. > >. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 3.0.5 stable?
Why does samba 3.0.5 have so many ploblem? After I copy several files to samba server,
I got the follow message in samba log!
And where can i get 3.0.6 pre-releases version?
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)
register_name_response: server at IP 192.168.0.102 rejected our name registration of
MYG
ROUP<1d> IP 192.168.0.202 with error code 6.
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_fail2(417)
become_local_master_fail2: failed to register name MYGROUP<1d> on subnet
192.168.0.202.
Failed to become a local master browser.
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_fail2(417)
become_local_master_fail2: failed to register name MYGROUP<1d> on subnet
192.168.0.202.
Failed to become a local master browser.
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_success_release(384)
standard_success_release: Name release for name __MSBROWSE__<01> IP 192.168.0.202 on
sub
net 192.168.0.202. Name was not found on subnet.
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
standard_fail_register: Failed to register/refresh name MYGROUP<1d> on subnet
192.168.0.
202
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
===
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 10323 (3.0.5)
Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
===
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398)
PANIC: internal error
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406)
BACKTRACE: 1 stack frames:
#0 nmbd(smb_panic2+0xef) [0x80ab28d]
[2004/08/05 19:18:13, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619)
abc (192.168.0.3) connect to service abc initially as user abc (uid=503, gid=100)
(pid 1
0387)
Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: win2k server "the specified network name is invalid"
Hi, it is resolved by "Enable NetBIOS over TCP/IP" : Open Windows Explorer Right-click on My Network Places Select: Properties Right-click on Local Area Network Select: Properties Select: Internet Protocol TCP/IP Click on Properties Click on Advanced Select the WINS tab Select Enable NetBIOS over TCP/IP Click OK >I have 2 win2k servers and 1 samba(2.2.8a) server in my LAN. >The 2 win2k servers are samba and can access each other. >The 1st win2k server can access samba server, but the 2nd win2k server can't >access samba server: it say "the specified network name is invalid" >I check samba log(log level = 2), and get no information! >But when the 1st win2k server access samba server, the log is as follows: > >[2004/08/04 17:32:43, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(92) > netbios connect: name1=*SMBSERV name2=SRV1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] win2k server "the specified network name is invalid"
I have 2 win2k servers and 1 samba(2.2.8a) server in my LAN. The 2 win2k servers are samba and can access each other. The 1st win2k server can access samba server, but the 2nd win2k server can't access samba server: it say "the specified network name is invalid" I check samba log(log level = 2), and get no information! But when the 1st win2k server access samba server, the log is as follows: [2004/08/04 17:32:43, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(92) netbios connect: name1=*SMBSERV name2=SRV1 Best Regards! Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.5 PANIC
Hi, David: I don't use printers at all. so i think it has nothing with printer lock. Best Regards! Jacky Kim . >Hi, > >This is worrying as we have had exactly the same error with 3.0.2a on >Solaris/cups. > >Have you had a problem with printers as well? I believe our error was caused >by printing crashing samba, and a quick fix was to delete the printer lock >file. However, when I emailed the problem, we were told by Samba.org to >upgrade to 3.0.5! > >David -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.5 PANIC
Hi, all: I am using Samba 3.0.5 with patch at http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.4/. But I found the follow messages in samba log: === [2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: internal error [2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 3 stack frames: #0 smbd(smb_panic2+0xef) [0x8179111] #1 /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x18b) [0x4016389b] #2 smbd(readdirname+0) [0x81791d1] [2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) tdb(/var/samba/ntforms.tdb): tdb_reopen: open failed (No such file or directory) [2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] smbd/server.c:open_sockets_smbd(419) tdb_reopen_all failed. [2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398) PANIC: tdb_reopen_all failed. [2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406) BACKTRACE: 1 stack frames: #0 smbd(smb_panic2+0xef) [0x8179111] [2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6 in pid 4711 (3.0.5) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === Best Regards! Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 3.0.5 "force user" problem
Hi, all: The follow parameters work well in samba 2.2.8a, But I updated samba from 2.2.8a to the latest samba 3.0.5 , I can't write 'test' share! What is the ploblem? [test] path = /pub/test force user = abc write list = jacky valid users = jacky,abc create mode = 0664 directory mode = 0775 Best Regards! Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?
Thank Mark.
I have tried another test program in Linux, it call 2 C lib functions
(open & fstat) to small files, and I compute the time they take via
gettimeofday system call.
// C code ...
ret = gettimeofday(&before, &zone);
fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY);
ret = gettimeofday(&after, &zone);
interval1 = (after.tv_usec - before.tv_usec);
ret = fstat(fd, &buf);
ret = gettimeofday(&before, &zone);
interval2 = (before.tv_usec - after.tv_usec);
// C code ...
Linux Test results(time unit is usec):
case open fstat
-
1 800 240
1 757 239
2 18175 245
2 17240 246
Case 1: smbmount Linux/samba's share that contains 20,000 small files
set 'case sensitive = Yes' in smb.conf
Case 2: smbmount Windows's share that contains 20,000 small file
Test analysis:
1. Linux/samba performs much better than Windows as for open system call.
2. The 2 Operation systems have same performance with fstat system call.
But when VB test program in Windows is used, Windows has much better
perpormance then linux/samba
// VB code ...
Set objFSO = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
thistime = thisnow
If objFSO.FileExists(fn) Then
totle = totle & "Check file time " & CStr(thisnow - thistime) + " ms"
+ vbCrLf
thistime = thisnow
Set objFile = objFSO.GetFile(fn)
totle = totle & "Get object time " & CStr(thisnow - thistime) + " ms"
+ vbCrLf
thistime = thisnow
temp = DateValue(CStr(objFile.DateLastModified))
totle = totle & "Get date time " & CStr(thisnow - thistime) + " ms" +
vbCrLf
End If
// VB code ...
Windows Test results(time unit is msec):
case FileExists GetFile DateLastModified
-- ---
1 20 0100
1 00120
1 0061
2 30 10 0
2 30 00
2 10 00
Case 1: map Linux/samba's share that contains 20,000 small files
set 'case sensitive = Yes' in smb.conf
Case 2: map Windows's share that contains 20,000 small file
Can we get the follow conclusions as for check small file's property:
1. Windows client can get much better performance from Windows's share than others'
2. Linux client can get much better performance from Linux/Samba's share than others'
Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.
>Hi,
>
>The next step is probably to capture some network traces of your
>benchmarking test and compare and contrast the NT and Samba backends.
>
>Playing with the negotiated protocol level might win you some more
>performance by simplifying the transactions. It may lose you a lot too
>though. (See max protocol option)
>
>There are the max xmit/socket options/stat cache tweakables. If you
>have logging wound up on the linux box, that can affect performance
>greatly too.
>
>How does performance of the filesystem on the linux machine vary with
>number of files in the directory ? Ie, take samba out of the equation
>and see if you're running into underlying issues with your file layout.
>
>Splitting your directory into a hierarchical structure is certainly more
>scalable than a flat directory.
>
>Mark
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?
Thank Mark. Yeah, it gains about 30% performance raise to set 'case sensitive=yes'. But Windows's share is still about 8 times faster than Linux/Samba's . After several tests, I find that XFS's performance is very near to Reisfer when checking files' property. So I think the main problem is caused by samba not File system. Is there any other config I can set? Best Regards! Jacky Kim . >You can use the configuration options to force filenames to a particular >case, and then bypass the slow case-insensitive matching by forcing case >sensitivity: > > mangle case = yes > case sensitive = yes > default case = lower > preserve case = no > short preserve case = no > > >However, on sharing a VFAT filesystem, perhaps you can preserve case, >and gain the speed increase by just setting 'case sensitive=yes'. > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?
>> Sorry, I miss the follow informations: >> 1. There are 100,000 files in shared directory. > >That's the problem. Because Samba has to present a case insensitive >view of a case-sensitive filesystem we have to scan the entire >directory to ensure a file doesn't exist. > >The answer to the "why is Samba slow" question in this case is >"don't do that" (put 100,000 files in a directory). I trid 20,000 files in a directory too, and found the same result: Windows's share is about 10 times faster than Linux/samba's one when get small file's property(NOT content). Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?
I just want to get small files' property, NOT content. I heve compared XFS and Reiserfs just now, and found that the results are very likely too. >Here, I have seen sub 700MHz P3 systems with IDE disks blow away a dual >900MHz 2K system with SCSI drives in every manner. > >I would recommend trying reiserfs, it is superior at handling small >files. This is what we are using. > >> >>I want to check small files' property(such as date, path, and so on) >> frequently. The files are stored in netwrok driver and their sizes >> vary from 2KB to 5KB. >> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?
Sorry, I miss the follow informations: 1. There are 100,000 files in shared directory. 2. Mkfs.xfs data device in linux server, and mount it with noatime option Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?
Hi, all:
I want to check small files' property(such as date, path, and so on)
frequently. The files are stored in netwrok driver and their sizes
vary from 2KB to 5KB.
I found that Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much after I
campared the bench results. I am very confused about it and who can
explain it?
The computers' configurations are as follows:
1. PC Client
It runs the follow VB program to compute the time when check files' property
Operation System:
Windows 2000 professional
// ...
Set objFSO = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
thistime = thisnow
If objFSO.FileExists(fn) Then
totle = totle & "Check file time " & CStr(thisnow - thistime) + " ms"
+ vbCrLf
thistime = thisnow
Set objFile = objFSO.GetFile(fn)
totle = totle & "Get object time " & CStr(thisnow - thistime) + " ms"
+ vbCrLf
thistime = thisnow
temp = DateValue(CStr(objFile.DateLastModified))
totle = totle & "Get date time " & CStr(thisnow - thistime) + " ms" +
vbCrLf
End If
2. Linux PC Server:
It provide Linux/Samba shared directory for the client
(1) Operation System
kernel = 2.6.6
file system = xfs
nic = intel pro 100
Samba 2.2.8a (I have tried samba 3.0.4, and the result is likely)
(2) smb.conf
[global]
encrypt passwords = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=4096 SO_SNDBUF=4096
max xmit = 4096
read raw = No
wide links = No
[pub]
path = /pub
guest ok = no
write list = test
create mode = 0664
directory mode = 0775
3. Windows PC Server:
It provide Windows shared directory for the client
Operation System:
Windows 2000 professional
4. Bench results
Windows Linux/Samba
CHECK OBJECT DATE CHECK OBJECT DATE
- -- - --
760 10 120 10 0 203
750 10 80 20 0 363
780 10 50 20 761 632
750 10 50 10 0 173
800 0 10 40 0 711
90 0 140 240 212 871
60 40 90 240 212 821
90 0 50 210 30 162
60 50 10 20 220 150
10 30 20 30 30 160
0 50 80 741 50 412
10 40 110 781 10 412
20 0 70 20 781 381
10 0 70 10 791 81
20 20 0 50 21 691
NOTE: the unit is ms.
Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
