RE: [Samba] smbpasswd -d nobody, listing still possible?
Julius, Set 'security = user'. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- kanarip -Original Message- Subject: [Samba] smbpasswd -d nobody, listing still possible? hi, i wondered why i can still list my shares with smbclient -NL localip, security = SHARE i just disable the user nobody? my conf: [global] workgroup = MIDEARTH netbios name = GANDALF security = SHARE message command = sh -c '/usr/kde/3.4/bin/winpopup-send.sh %s %m' bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = eth0 lo passdb backend = tdbsam guest account = nobody #logging log file = /tmp/samba.log log level = 3 [data] comment = Data path = /home/metalfan/Windows guest only = Yes writeable = Yes and the smbclient -NL localip output: Domain=[MIDEARTH] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.20b] Sharename Type Comment - --- dataDisk Data data2 Disk IPC$IPC IPC Service (Samba 3.0.20b) ADMIN$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 3.0.20b) Domain=[MIDEARTH] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.20b] Server Comment ---- GANDALF Samba 3.0.20b WorkgroupMaster ---- MIDEARTH shouldnt i just get some error like..no user.. ? greets Julius -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] The single WINS problem
I don't understand what you mean with DOMAIN1B or DOMAIN1C... Does it concern, for example, machine 1B in domain DOMAIN? If it is, you're still in the Netbios context, which I don't use... My queries are alike 1B.DOMAIN. Please clarify for I find it a very interesting issue... Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- kanarip -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 23:43 To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] The single WINS problem On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:31:01PM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: So you can't use DNS for that sixteenth field of netbios names (like 1C, 1B, etc). Or can you? Dynamic DNS is a setup primarily for networks with DHCP. Using DHCP, you can only have 1 IP lease per physical interface. This IP, along with the system's hostname, are registered in DNS, and that's were we resolve the names you currently use in a Netbios/WINS environment. I understood this part. What I didn't understand is how a DNS server can answer queries like DOMAIN1C and DOMAIN1B. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] The single WINS problem
You seem to forget that my 'master browsers' are in fact DNS Servers, and there is no such thing as Netbios querying for logon servers. That is DNS integrated in Windows 2003. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- kanarip -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Hasenack Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 11:44 To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] The single WINS problem On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:11:50AM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: I don't understand what you mean with DOMAIN1B or DOMAIN1C... Does It means finding the Domain Master Browser (PDC) and all the logon servers (1C) for DOMAIN. It is done with a netbios query, but since you don't use netbios I was wondering how these netbios specific attributes (1C, 1B, 00, 20, etc) are stored in DNS. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] The single WINS problem
Subject: [Samba] The single WINS problem Everybody encourages Samba admins to enable WINS whenever possible, and I agree that it helps a lot to solve these networks' problems. It's so good that, when it fails, it's a disaster. How are people coping with the samba limitation of not being able to replicate the WINS database and thus its inability to have more than one WINS server in a domain? I'm in a hybrid environment using both linux and Windows, and I prefer not to use WINS. It would mess up the DDNS environment I currently have set up, since at some point Windows still gives WINS a higher priority over DNS. Linux, of course, doesn't really care ;) Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- kanarip -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] The single WINS problem
Subject: Re: [Samba] The single WINS problem On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 09:38:29PM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: Subject: [Samba] The single WINS problem Everybody encourages Samba admins to enable WINS whenever possible, and I agree that it helps a lot to solve these networks' problems. It's so good that, when it fails, it's a disaster. How are people coping with the samba limitation of not being able to replicate the WINS database and thus its inability to have more than one WINS server in a domain? I'm in a hybrid environment using both linux and Windows, and I prefer not Who is the PDC? Linux or Windows? In fact, there is no real PDC, but I understand what you mean. My two Windows 2003 boxes are Domain Controllers, DNS runs on a bind-9.3.1 linux box. to use WINS. It would mess up the DDNS environment I currently have set up, since at some point Windows still gives WINS a higher priority over DNS. Linux, of course, doesn't really care ;) So you use DNS for netbios name resolution? Or have you configured samba to not use netbios? Is it a single network (i.e., broadcast name resolution works)? The Netbios names that are set in smbd/nmbd, are already registered with DNS when the network comes up (Dynamic DNS). This will only work properly if you have one single Netbios name per machine (Or run several instances on a multi-homed box). Windows boxes (NT 5.1 and later) are used to primarily look up 'simple hostnames' (hostnames without a DNS suffix, whether in a Netbios context or not), suffixed with the system DNS Domain suffix (list), or connection specific domain suffix (set by, for example, DHCP). I find that Windows is 'confused' as soon as I also provide a WINS server (but hey, didn't I expect at least one undocumented feature??). Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- kanarip -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] The single WINS problem
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:04:10PM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: The Netbios names that are set in smbd/nmbd, are already registered with DNS when the network comes up (Dynamic DNS). This will only work properly if you have one single Netbios name per machine (Or run several instances on a multi-homed box). So you can't use DNS for that sixteenth field of netbios names (like 1C, 1B, etc). Or can you? Dynamic DNS is a setup primarily for networks with DHCP. Using DHCP, you can only have 1 IP lease per physical interface. This IP, along with the system's hostname, are registered in DNS, and that's were we resolve the names you currently use in a Netbios/WINS environment. What I said, though, is not entirely true. I could of course add interfaces with different MAC addresses, which would be considered spoofing, and thus lease more IP's and register more DNS records. Or I create interface aliases with static IPs and configure a static IN A record. I could also use a multi-homed box with several NICs, thus lease more IPs, thus registering more DNS records. In all these setups, I also could run several instances of smbd/nmbd, each bound to one interface (or one IP, if you will). Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- kanarip -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
