Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

2008-04-29 Thread Jewelyn Catingub
Help, anyone?
Your responses will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!


- Original Message 
From: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:00:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON


Hi Jerry,

In section 4.1.1 of the SNIA CIFS tech reference,
it is not explicitly says that  extended security bit == spnego support.
Is it right?




- Original Message 
From: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 6:48:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON




- Original Message 
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:53:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jewelyn Catingub wrote:
 
 - Original Message 
 From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:40:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON
 
 Jewelyn Catingub wrote:
 Thanks for your reply.
 
 But in Windows, we encountered Raw NTLMSSP (not wrapped by spnego)
 even if Extended Security bit is ON when there is no KDC in the
 workgroup.
 (Well, we are not sure if that was really the reason)
 Why is that so?
 
 Hmm...What clients ?
 
 Windows clients

 yes.  I figured that.  But what versions and service packs?

Client: Windows XP SP2
Server: Windows 2003 Server



 cheers, jerry
- --
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software  -  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
What man is a man who does not make the world better?  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIDfvgIR7qMdg1EfYRAinKAJ4/7g8moK3Kq98kgK5ykcy/seJOfwCfXisi
OU47EbjF9zbpRiqiJudLaH4=
=4Vjh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

2008-04-24 Thread Jewelyn Catingub
Hi Jerry,

In section 4.1.1 of the SNIA CIFS tech reference,
it is not explicitly says that  extended security bit == spnego support.
Is it right?




- Original Message 
From: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 6:48:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON




- Original Message 
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:53:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jewelyn Catingub wrote:
 
 - Original Message 
 From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:40:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON
 
 Jewelyn Catingub wrote:
 Thanks for your reply.
 
 But in Windows, we encountered Raw NTLMSSP (not wrapped by spnego)
 even if Extended Security bit is ON when there is no KDC in the
 workgroup.
 (Well, we are not sure if that was really the reason)
 Why is that so?
 
 Hmm...What clients ?
 
 Windows clients

 yes.  I figured that.  But what versions and service packs?

Client: Windows XP SP2
Server: Windows 2003 Server



 cheers, jerry
- --
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software  -  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
What man is a man who does not make the world better?  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIDfvgIR7qMdg1EfYRAinKAJ4/7g8moK3Kq98kgK5ykcy/seJOfwCfXisi
OU47EbjF9zbpRiqiJudLaH4=
=4Vjh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

2008-04-22 Thread Jewelyn Catingub
Thanks for your reply.

But in Windows, we encountered Raw NTLMSSP (not wrapped by spnego)
even if Extended Security bit is ON when there is no KDC in the workgroup. 
(Well, we are not sure if that was really the reason)
Why is that so?



- Original Message 
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:18:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jewelyn Catingub wrote:
 I've checked the samba code (sessetup) and found out that samba 
 always send spnego packet when Extended Security capability is ON.
 (This can't be turned off/on ie. use spnego = false)
 
 Does it mean I can never connect to smb server that doesn't 
 support spnego if Extended Security is supported by server?
 Is my understanding correct?

The extended security bit == spnego support.  See section 4.1.1
in the SNIA CIFS tech reference.






cheers, jerry
- --
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software  -  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
What man is a man who does not make the world better?  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIDKIrIR7qMdg1EfYRAsTNAKCT1HGkR463ksmWGmvRYE31AJq0KgCfapcM
GbAuxzGltsPLa5qIOhdiwqc=
=0lTR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

2008-04-22 Thread Jewelyn Catingub


- Original Message 
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:40:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jewelyn Catingub wrote:
 Thanks for your reply.
 
 But in Windows, we encountered Raw NTLMSSP (not wrapped by spnego)
 even if Extended Security bit is ON when there is no KDC in the workgroup. 
 (Well, we are not sure if that was really the reason)
 Why is that so?

Hmm...What clients ?

Windows clients






cheers, jerry
- --
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software  -  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
What man is a man who does not make the world better?  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIDdy3IR7qMdg1EfYRAnErAKDf1MQHPNcq7Mtt8TKc22DKY5EcjwCg0Ue9
Ta/07h63sBNVc2Vs1pubMFA=
=8Bw6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

2008-04-22 Thread Jewelyn Catingub



- Original Message 
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:53:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jewelyn Catingub wrote:
 
 - Original Message 
 From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Jewelyn Catingub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:40:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON
 
 Jewelyn Catingub wrote:
 Thanks for your reply.
 
 But in Windows, we encountered Raw NTLMSSP (not wrapped by spnego)
 even if Extended Security bit is ON when there is no KDC in the
 workgroup.
 (Well, we are not sure if that was really the reason)
 Why is that so?
 
 Hmm...What clients ?
 
 Windows clients

 yes.  I figured that.  But what versions and service packs?

Client: Windows XP SP2
Server: Windows 2003 Server



 cheers, jerry
- --
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software  -  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
What man is a man who does not make the world better?  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIDfvgIR7qMdg1EfYRAinKAJ4/7g8moK3Kq98kgK5ykcy/seJOfwCfXisi
OU47EbjF9zbpRiqiJudLaH4=
=4Vjh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba send SPNEGO if Extended Security is ON

2008-04-21 Thread Jewelyn Catingub
I've checked the samba code (sessetup) and found out that samba always send 
spnego packet when Extended Security capability is ON. 
(This can't be turned off/on ie. use spnego = false)

Does it mean I can never connect to smb server that doesn't support spnego if 
Extended Security is supported by server?
Is my understanding correct?


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[SAMBA] how to disable SPNEGO

2008-03-25 Thread Jewelyn Catingub
How will I disable SPNEGO in my linux pc (Fedora w/ Samba 3.0.26a version 
installed acting as a client)?
I also don't know what settings should I change in the Linux server (Fedora).

When I joined the linux server and client in windows server workgroup w/o 
spnego 
the result is there is no extended security at all. (I did this by changing 
smb.conf workgroup)
I only want NTLMSSP(Extended security) w/o SPNEGO.

I also tried client use spnego = no and use spnego = no, but I don't see 
the effect. 
I've read in other post:
 | even though I tried to set client use spnego = no

 The applies only to Samba's client code and not the
 capability bits set by the server when replying to
 clients.  Besides, you really should not disable spnego.
 Generally if it doesn't work it would be considered a bug.

Thanks in advance.







  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[SAMBA] smbtorture Failed in Windows 2003 server

2008-03-25 Thread Jewelyn Catingub
Why does th following smbtorture test cases failed in Windows 2003 server
using Fedora with Samba 3.0.26 installed?
All other test cases succeed except these 4: EATEST, NBENCH, W2K, IOCTL

And also, what are these test for?
I want to know detailed description but I can't find detailed documents for all 
smbtorture
testcases.
1. EATEST - test extended attribute
2. NBENCH - ?
3. W2K - test for new w2k calls, what w2k calls?
4.  IOCTL - test I/O controls, what specific I/O controls?




Thanks in advance.




  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba