Re: [Samba] '/tmp' does not exist or permission denied ...: /tmp has 777 permission SOLVED
> I have no idea, but could it be that 'tmp' is not the directory /tmp, > but one of your samba shares, called 'tmp'? > > MJ Nope, but thx anyway. I changed the permission in the /root dir yesterday with chmod 700 .* I only wanted to change the hidden files that started with . (like .ssh) This caused .. to have wrong permissions. It should have 755 so anything can cd out of the directory. How something small like this, can cause so many problems. Lesson learned here! Koen Linders -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] '/tmp' does not exist or permission denied ...: /tmp has 777 permission
Not sure what caused it. It must be some change to permissions. I know I changed the root password with passwd and changed it back afterwards when problems started. I know for sure I didn't change a thing to the samba config. No firewall running atm. This morning I did smbpasswd as root and set it (to be sure) to same passwd as the original one. But I don't think this matters anymore. I did hope so when I went to sleep :) Debian Etch Samba 3.0.24 All worked well as PDC Exact message: SMBD/SERVICE.C:MAKE_CONNECTION_SNUM(920) 'tmp' does not exist or permission denied when connecting to [IPC$]. Error was permission denied. Permission on /tmp Ls -al / /tmp drwxrwxrwt The weird thing is. I can access 2 out 3 shares even after restarting server and workstation. Netlogon is not accessible and I can't browse the server. The 2 shares are in the same directory as the main share which is inaccessible atm. When I try to login as different user (koenl) on the server (not via workstation), I get can't cd to /data/home/koenl Permissions /data: 775 root.root /data/home 775 root.root /data/home/koenl 755 koenl.ICT /data/shares 755 root.root /data/shares/newton 775 root.root (main directory of share is meant to be readable by world) (This is the inaccessible share) /data/shares/ict770 g+s (accessible share) (Any application to change ALL permissions to default on debian? I can umount the data partition before) Any idea? Koen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link
> Oh, I thought the NAS was in the 192.168.5 network. If it is on the > same network as the clients, that would be fast. > > In that case, do NOT try to mount the NAS on the PDC. What you'd > actually accomplish is this: > > Client --SLOW-> PDC SLOW---> NAS > > Instead, do this: > > Client -FAST--> NAS > > In other words, have the NAS appear as just another Samba server on the > same network. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba Is there no other way to mount the drive somehow and still have the clients access it over the fast link instead of going over the slow link main site? I hoped not having to install another server :) Maybe other solutions. It would be great if users authenticated at the main site over the slow link, but still be able to access resources local over the fast link. Thanks for the fast replies so far! Koen Linders -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba- > boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Kevin Keane > Verzonden: donderdag 26 november 2009 9:20 > Aan: samba@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link > > I take it that the slow link is between the 192.168.1 and the 192.168.5 > subnets? > > So you currently have: > > Client --SLOW> NAS > > If you mount the NAS directory on your PDC, the data doesn't magically > travel to the other end of your slow link. > > You are, of course, right that the clients would have a fast connection > - but the PDC still has a slow connection. > > Client -FAST-> PDC -SLOW---> NAS > > Installing a second server on site B also wouldn't solve the problem. > You would then have: > > Client -SLOW-> new server ---FAST---> NAS > > Basically, you need to focus on the slow link instead of on clients > connect. > > What I was thinking: > > Client -FAST-> cache > Cache --SLOW-> NAS > > This would decouple the client's data transfer from the NAS device. > The slow link is between 192.168.1. & 192.168.5. indeed. But the clients will be accessing the data Client -FAST-> NAS -SLOW---> PDC -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link
When I say: Accessing the data would be from Explorer in Windows XP SP3 I mean: They should access it like a normal data share (not IE) > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba- > boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Koen Linders > Verzonden: donderdag 26 november 2009 8:56 > Aan: samba@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link > > I hope I'm clear about what I try to do and what I hope would happen :) > I thought the data didn't had to be transferred over the link. > > Lets say > Site A: PDC 192.168.1.2/24 > Site B: NAS 192.168.5.2/24 > > I thought I could mount the NAS on a directory defined as share on the > PDC. > And when mounted that when they log on to the PDC and copy/access the > data > on the share (NAS) traffic stays local because it happens all in the > same > subnet? > Accessing the data would be from Explorer in Windows XP SP3. > > I'm probably wrong reading your reaction. So maybe I'm better off > installing > a 2d server on site B? > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > > Van: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba- > > boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Kevin Keane > > Verzonden: donderdag 26 november 2009 8:41 > > Aan: samba@lists.samba.org > > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link > > > > Seems like a nightmare in the making... Basically, no matter what you > > do, the data has to be transferred. > > > > How are users going to access the files on site B? If it is through a > > Web browser, then a caching proxy in Site A might be your best > answer. > > > > Your best option might be to cache the files on Site A, and use rsync > > to copy them to/from site B. If the NAS doesn't support rsync, look > > into FTP - it's probably the fastest data transfer protocol around. > > > > Don't use NFS over slow links. It's one of the weaknesses of NFS. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba- > > > boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Koen Linders > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:38 PM > > > To: samba@lists.samba.org > > > Subject: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link > > > > > > Lets say: 2 sites: 2 subnets connected via slow link (1M) > > > Site A: Samba 3 PDC > > > Site B: NAS for large videofiles > > > > > > People will work with/view the files on site B. Data will grow in > > time. > > > I want to mount the NAS on the PDC so I can integrate it in a share > > on > > > site > > > A. > > > > > > Anyone has good/bad experience with this kind of situation? Maybe a > > NAS > > > system which works without a problem? > > > Anything I should check for (NFS support I guess)? > > > > > > Greeting, > > > Koen Linders > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link
I hope I'm clear about what I try to do and what I hope would happen :) I thought the data didn't had to be transferred over the link. Lets say Site A: PDC 192.168.1.2/24 Site B: NAS 192.168.5.2/24 I thought I could mount the NAS on a directory defined as share on the PDC. And when mounted that when they log on to the PDC and copy/access the data on the share (NAS) traffic stays local because it happens all in the same subnet? Accessing the data would be from Explorer in Windows XP SP3. I'm probably wrong reading your reaction. So maybe I'm better off installing a 2d server on site B? > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba- > boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Kevin Keane > Verzonden: donderdag 26 november 2009 8:41 > Aan: samba@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link > > Seems like a nightmare in the making... Basically, no matter what you > do, the data has to be transferred. > > How are users going to access the files on site B? If it is through a > Web browser, then a caching proxy in Site A might be your best answer. > > Your best option might be to cache the files on Site A, and use rsync > to copy them to/from site B. If the NAS doesn't support rsync, look > into FTP - it's probably the fastest data transfer protocol around. > > Don't use NFS over slow links. It's one of the weaknesses of NFS. > > > -Original Message- > > From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba- > > boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Koen Linders > > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:38 PM > > To: samba@lists.samba.org > > Subject: [Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link > > > > Lets say: 2 sites: 2 subnets connected via slow link (1M) > > Site A: Samba 3 PDC > > Site B: NAS for large videofiles > > > > People will work with/view the files on site B. Data will grow in > time. > > I want to mount the NAS on the PDC so I can integrate it in a share > on > > site > > A. > > > > Anyone has good/bad experience with this kind of situation? Maybe a > NAS > > system which works without a problem? > > Anything I should check for (NFS support I guess)? > > > > Greeting, > > Koen Linders > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] NAS on 2 sites connected via slow link
Lets say: 2 sites: 2 subnets connected via slow link (1M) Site A: Samba 3 PDC Site B: NAS for large videofiles People will work with/view the files on site B. Data will grow in time. I want to mount the NAS on the PDC so I can integrate it in a share on site A. Anyone has good/bad experience with this kind of situation? Maybe a NAS system which works without a problem? Anything I should check for (NFS support I guess)? Greeting, Koen Linders -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba-Cups: all works except browsing when printer is not defined in smb.conf
Noone has an idea why normal share browsing works, connecting to printers
via "\\servername\printername" works, but not browsing for the shared CUPS
printers (Win2K, XP or Vista)? They also don't show up for smbclient -L
localhost -N (of smbclient -L servername -U root). I've been searching
through the MARC.info and someone suggests the length of the name, but the
printer names are short like 2420N-240.
When I add this printer to smb.conf, browsing works. And it shows up with
smbclient -L servername -N.
[KonicaMinolta]
comment = LM 1ste
path = /data/spool
guest ok = Yes
printable = Yes
More info lower.
When changing log lvl to 3 and per machine I get these to parts when
clicking the Printers and Faxes section from the server.
* Vista browsing on log lvl. 3
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 1] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_pipe_open()
cli_rpc_pipe_open: cli_nt_create failed on pipe \spoolss to machine
MPI1337. Error was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 2]
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(2568)
spoolss_connect_to_client: unable to open the spoolss pipe on machine
MPI1337. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED.
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(529)
free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 120
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb()
Transaction 4064 of length 156
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(915)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 22610) conn 0x84186b8
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 3] smbd/ipc.c:handle_trans(373)
trans <\PIPE\> data=68 params=0 setup=2
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(340)
named pipe command on <> name
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(300)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "spoolss" (pnum 713e)
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(529)
free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(2265)
api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SPOOLSS_RFNPCNEX
[2009/07/02 10:42:30, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(529)
free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 24
* WinXP browsing on log lvl. 3
[2009/07/02 10:43:43, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(340)
named pipe command on <> name
[2009/07/02 10:43:43, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(300)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "spoolss" (pnum 709a)
[2009/07/02 10:43:43, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(529)
free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0
[2009/07/02 10:43:43, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(2265)
api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SPOOLSS_RFNPCNEX
[2009/07/02 10:43:43, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(529)
free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 24
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: samba-bounces+koen.linders=koca...@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-bounces+koen.linders=koca...@lists.samba.org] Namens Koen
Linders
Verzonden: dinsdag 30 juni 2009 12:10
Aan: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: [Samba] Samba-Cups: all works except browsing when printer is not
defined in smb.conf
Cups 1.2.7
Debian Etch with Samba 3.0.24
Clients: WinXP SP3 (with Firewall completely off for testing)
When I define a printer specifically in smb.conf, they show up as shared
printers in WinXP. But when I follow the normal way (see below) to load all
from cups they don't.
I followed mainly the latest SAMBA-HOWTO (chapter 21-22)
The only error I see in log.smbd when accessing the Printers&Faxes where
they should be, is:
[2009/06/30 11:13:50, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection()
mpi025 (192.168.1.106) couldn't find service
::{2227a280-3aea-1069-a2de-08002b30309d}
When I add them by name instead of via browsing all works, but I wish to
understand what goes wrong and where.
This works:
runas /netonly /user:root "rundll32 printui.dll,PrintUIEntry /p /t3 /n
"\\newton\2420N-240"
rundll32 printui.dll,PrintUIEntry /in /n "\\newton\2420N-240"
Any suggestions would be very welcome.
Koen Linders
Extra relevant stuff.
*Checking cups support for samba: ldd `which smbd`
-snip-
libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0xb7d9b000)
-snip-
*relevant samba sections
smb.conf
printing = cups
printcap name = cups
load printers = yes
[printers]
comment = Samba Printers Spool
path = /data/spool
printable = yes
guest ok = yes
browseable = no
writable = no
[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /data/printers
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
read only = yes
write list = root +domadmins
*permissions on maps
drwxrwsrwx 3 root domadmins 4096 2009-06-29 13:25 printers
drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 2009-06-29 13:50 spool
*driver installation from cups to samba
I did put following items in /usr/share/cups/drivers
cups6.inf (from www.cups.org)
cups6.ini (from www.cups.org)
[Samba] Samba-Cups: all works except browsing when printer is not defined in smb.conf
Cups 1.2.7
Debian Etch with Samba 3.0.24
Clients: WinXP SP3 (with Firewall completely off for testing)
When I define a printer specifically in smb.conf, they show up as shared
printers in WinXP. But when I follow the normal way (see below) to load all
from cups they don't.
I followed mainly the latest SAMBA-HOWTO (chapter 21-22)
The only error I see in log.smbd when accessing the Printers&Faxes where
they should be, is:
[2009/06/30 11:13:50, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection()
mpi025 (192.168.1.106) couldn't find service
::{2227a280-3aea-1069-a2de-08002b30309d}
When I add them by name instead of via browsing all works, but I wish to
understand what goes wrong and where.
This works:
runas /netonly /user:root "rundll32 printui.dll,PrintUIEntry /p /t3 /n
"\\newton\2420N-240"
rundll32 printui.dll,PrintUIEntry /in /n "\\newton\2420N-240"
Any suggestions would be very welcome.
Koen Linders
Extra relevant stuff.
*Checking cups support for samba: ldd `which smbd`
-snip-
libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0xb7d9b000)
-snip-
*relevant samba sections
smb.conf
printing = cups
printcap name = cups
load printers = yes
[printers]
comment = Samba Printers Spool
path = /data/spool
printable = yes
guest ok = yes
browseable = no
writable = no
[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /data/printers
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
read only = yes
write list = root +domadmins
*permissions on maps
drwxrwsrwx 3 root domadmins 4096 2009-06-29 13:25 printers
drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 2009-06-29 13:50 spool
*driver installation from cups to samba
I did put following items in /usr/share/cups/drivers
cups6.inf (from www.cups.org)
cups6.ini (from www.cups.org)
cupsps6.dll (from www.cups.org)
cupsui6.dll (from www.cups.org)
ps5ui.dll (from your Windows system)
pscript.hlp (from your Windows system)
pscript.ntf (from your Windows system)
pscript5.dll (from your Windows system)
And to confirm to add drivers to [print$]
cupsaddsmb -U root -v -a -H newton
-snipped all extra info showing only one printer-
Printer Driver 2420N-240 successfully installed.
Succesfully set 2420N-240 to driver 2420N-240.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Lots of "smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985)" in log.smbd
Hi. I subscripted just now to the mailing list, but I've been using a Samba file server (PDC) on Debian for about 2.5 years now. Users are almost all WinXP SP3. No users are complaining but since I changed everything to one share with group permission on underlying directories I see a lot of errors in log.smbd. Anyone knows what the log message exactly means? I guess it has something to do with permissions. Maybe WinXP trying to access subdirectories it can't? It's all about this folder: drwxrwxr-x 14 root root 4096 2009-06-26 13:36 newton_share Subdirectories are restricted to specific groups. Some people are part of one or more groups. drwxrws--- 8 root aankoopdienst 4096 2009-02-05 13:23 aankoopdienst drwxrws--- 10 root boekhouding4096 2009-06-09 12:00 boekhouding drwxrws--- 5 root directie 4096 2009-06-16 10:58 directie drwxrws--- 9 root kindadministratie 4096 2009-06-09 08:31 kindadministratie drwxrws--- 2 root ortho_sociale 4096 2009-06-25 17:21 ortho_en_sociale drwxrws--- 2 root orthopedagogen 4096 2009-06-18 16:18 orthopedagogen drwxrws--- 30 root personeelsdienst 4096 2009-06-26 12:52 personeelsdienst drwxr-s--- 4 root plannen_koca 4096 2009-06-09 08:35 plannen_koca drwxrws--- 5 root sociale_dienst 4096 2009-02-03 16:05 sociale_dienst drwxrws--- 8 root technische_dienst 4096 2009-03-13 09:17 technische_dienst drwxrws--- 5 root uurrooster 4096 2009-06-09 08:33 uurrooster drwxrws--- 16 root veiligheid16384 2009-06-09 08:33 veiligheid [Newton] comment = Gedeelde map op server Newton browseable = yes writeable = yes wide links = no write list = +domusers +domadmins path= /data/shares/newton_share force directory mode = 770 force create mode = 770 valid users = +domusers +domadmins create mode = 770 directory mode = 770 A sample of last hour: [2009/06/29 08:37:40, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for veiligheid/* [2009/06/29 09:02:17, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for orthopedagogen/* [2009/06/29 09:09:19, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for sociale_dienst/* [2009/06/29 09:11:18, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for personeelsdienst/* [2009/06/29 09:11:19, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for orthopedagogen/* [2009/06/29 09:11:22, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for personeelsdienst/* [2009/06/29 09:12:34, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for personeelsdienst/* [2009/06/29 09:12:58, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for sociale_dienst/* [2009/06/29 09:23:30, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for technische_dienst/* [2009/06/29 09:23:30, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for sociale_dienst/* [2009/06/29 09:30:31, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for technische_dienst/* [2009/06/29 09:30:31, 1] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(985) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for sociale_dienst/* Greetings, Koen Linders -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Which antivirus for a Samba (Debian) fileserver?
I'm looking for an antivirus program for a Samba fileserver (PDC). Is ClamAV good enough? It seems to be mainly used for mail servers... Any other suggestion, free or non-free? I tried F-secure antivirus for linux servers but it keeps giving problems. All clients use F-secure which i centrally manage from another linux server which is pretty good imo. I read other people suggesting to use a different one for the server to have a different "angle" for catching stuff instead of just one program. Any suggestions? Koen Linders -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] PDC: random problems, especially NETLOGON script not always loading
Debian Latest stable. Linux newton 2.6.18-4-686 Samba 3.0.24 PDC 3Com 3812 Gigabit switch (connection between WinXP client & server) Others connect through 3Com 3225 100 Mbit -> 3Com 3812 -> Server Windows XP SP2 fully updated. F-Secure client security (look down for firewall settings) In advance, thanks for reading this. Any suggestions are welcome! I'm having a hard time here. I read a whole lot, browses, searched. I try to provide as much info as possible but if you need more, Let me know. The main problem is the "randomness". Or atleast it looks random for me. People with mapped shares working for +1 year don't have connection problems. So most of the time it seems to work fine. But i really want to troubleshoot & get all errors out. I guess the problem i describe next also is the cause of random Roaming profile problems, but lets not focus on that part, too many random factors in my opinion. And they were only a part of the test. It might work if i get this problem solved. I got a script in the netlogon mapping drives dynamically depending on groups. I don't want them permanent. I don't want a workaround! Everything works fine, most of the time... Sometimes it seems the test pc doesn't see the netlogon during boot. But it's still accesible when browsing to the share and is executable. Through policy i tried setting: 1)I tried setting detecting slow network (1Gbit though) on. or 2) Also run script synchronously No changes. Firewall: Even when i change allow all trafic to Samba server in both directions. Firewall has all necessary port open in both directions: SMB (TCP) 445 SMB over TCP/IP (TCP) SMB (UDP) 445 SMB over TCP/IP (UDP) Windows Networking (1) 137-138 Both broadcast and multicast Windows network browsing Windows Networking (2) 139 Windows file sharing and network printers WINS(1) 42 Both broadcast and multicast WINS / Windows Internet Name Service (UDP) WINS(2) 42 WINS / Windows Internet Name Service (TCP) Windows doesn't show an error in the log, except the autoenrollment one, which is normal (no AD). Samba log file when it goes wrong (a bit lower). The error when it goes wrong: 1) Error writing 5 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer): => has to do with client going over NETBIOS (139) & 445 and closing one of 2 connections Nothing wrong here. The weird part: For test: i blocked 137-138-139 on firewall and i couldn't connect to samba share... Server is listening on both 139 & 445: netstat -an | egrep '(137|138|139|445)' tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:139 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp0 0 192.168.1.2:139 192.168.1.59:1075 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 192.168.1.2:445 192.168.1.82:4409 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 192.168.1.2:445 192.168.1.4:40578 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 192.168.1.2:445 192.168.1.44:3465 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 192.168.1.2:139 192.168.1.109:1209 ESTABLISHED udp0 0 192.168.1.2:137 0.0.0.0:* udp0 0 0.0.0.0:137 0.0.0.0:* udp0 0 192.168.1.2:138 0.0.0.0:* udp0 0 0.0.0.0:138 0.0.0.0:* 2) lib/util_sock.c:write_data(562) write_data: write failure in writing to client 192.168.1.98. Error Connection reset by peer => Could this error point somewhere? Samba log: [2008/01/29 13:13:27, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2008/01/29 13:13:27, 0] lib/access.c:check_access(327) [2008/01/29 13:13:27, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Denied connection from (0.0.0.0) [2008/01/29 13:13:27, 1] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1103) [2008/01/29 13:13:27, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Connection denied from 0.0.0.0 [2008/01/29 13:13:27, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(562) write_data: write failure in writing to client 192.168.1.98. Error Connection reset by peer [2008/01/29 13:13:27, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(769) Error writing 5 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2008/01/29 13:13:27, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) connect to service profiles initially as user verah (uid=1003, gid=1001) (pid 12835) [2008/01/29 13:13:27, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1150) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) closed connection to service profiles [2008/01/29 13:13:30, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) Smb.conf: #=== Global Settings === [global] netbios name = NEWTON workgroup = KOCALM domain master = yes domain logons = yes loca
[Samba] Samba PDC windows XP logon scripts
Server: Debian etch (kernel 2.6.18-4-686) Samba 3.0.24 (PDC) Workstations: Windows XP Pro SP2 fully updated I want to have my windows xp users to login locally to their machine, but still have them automaticly check the netlogon share or something like that to apply network mappings and policies per group or user. I have this working when the user logs onto the domain. He gets a profile (which i keep local through gpedit.msc). I also know of a way to apply all those things locally to every machine, but obviously i want to have this another way. Domain login could be ok if it's a new user, but i'm talking about +- 50 workstations with local profiles already in use. And it would be the best to manage them centrally via the server. Anyway to apply this some way? I've been searching a lot, and it seems to me at the moment i have to change everything to every workstations (policy and network drive mapping) without having to do a lot of jiggling locally with their profiles. I rather don't. I guess i'm not the only one who encountered this problem. Any suggestions would be very welcome. Thx for reading, Koen Linders -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Weird disconnection problems
i'm seeing same problems here. A very specific problem is clients sometimes can't get their roaming profile. Error message is the same so i guess the problem may be somewhat the same. Sometimes it happens with shares too. System Debian etch Samba 3.024 smbd log: Around 9:14 i'm seeing the same errors. 2007/10/19 09:03:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2007/10/19 09:03:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2007/10/19 09:03:56, 0] lib/access.c:check_access(327) [2007/10/19 09:03:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Denied connection from (0.0.0.0) [2007/10/19 09:03:56, 1] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1103) [2007/10/19 09:03:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Connection denied from 0.0.0.0 [2007/10/19 09:03:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(562) write_data: write failure in writing to client 192.168.1.98. Error Connection reset by peer [2007/10/19 09:03:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(769) Error writing 5 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2007/10/19 09:04:28, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2007/10/19 09:04:28, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2007/10/19 09:04:28, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(534) read_data: read failure for 4 bytes to client 0.0.0.0. Error = Connection reset by peer [2007/10/19 09:04:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection() mpi057 (192.168.1.98) couldn't find service verah [2007/10/19 09:04:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection() mpi057 (192.168.1.98) couldn't find service verah [2007/10/19 09:04:30, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) connect to service netlogon initially as user verah (uid=1003, gid=1001) (pid 10356) [2007/10/19 09:04:30, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(150) chdir (/data/netlogon) failed [2007/10/19 09:04:30, 0] smbd/service.c:set_current_service(150) chdir (/data/netlogon) failed [2007/10/19 09:04:38, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1150) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) closed connection to service netlogon [2007/10/19 09:04:39, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) connect to service profiles initially as user verah (uid=1003, gid=1001) (pid 10360) [2007/10/19 09:04:39, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1150) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) closed connection to service profiles [2007/10/19 09:04:41, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) connect to service ICT initially as user verah (uid=1003, gid=1004) (pid 10361) [2007/10/19 09:04:50, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1150) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) closed connection to service ICT [2007/10/19 09:06:10, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) connect to service ICT initially as user verah (uid=1003, gid=1004) (pid 10371) [2007/10/19 09:06:10, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) connect to service Backup initially as user verah (uid=1003, gid=1004) (pid 10371) [2007/10/19 09:14:26, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) connect to service profiles initially as user verah (uid=1003, gid=1001) (pid 10371) [2007/10/19 09:14:30, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1150) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) closed connection to service profiles [2007/10/19 09:14:30, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1150) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) closed connection to service Backup [2007/10/19 09:14:30, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1150) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) closed connection to service ICT [2007/10/19 09:14:43, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) connect to service profiles initially as user verah (uid=1003, gid=1001) (pid 10405) [2007/10/19 09:14:47, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1150) mpi057 (192.168.1.98) closed connection to service profiles [2007/10/19 09:14:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2007/10/19 09:14:47, 0] lib/access.c:check_access(327) [2007/10/19 09:14:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Denied connection from (0.0.0.0) [2007/10/19 09:14:47, 1] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1103) [2007/10/19 09:14:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Connection denied from 0.0.0.0 [2007/10/19 09:14:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(562) write_data: write failure in writing to client 192.168.1.98. Error Connection reset by peer [2007/10/19 09:14:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(769) Error writing 5 bytes to client. -1. (Connectio
[Samba] Re: read_data: read failure for 4 bytes
I've been looking around for the same problem for some time. I'm quite sure, but anyone correct me if I'm wrong. It has something to do with windows clients (win2K, XP) trying to get a connection on port 139 and 445. If windows gets a connection on port 445, port 139 is dropped and the error appears in the log. Microsoft OS prefer 445 over 139 (bypassing NetBIOS overhead). You could avoid this by putting smb ports = 139 in the [global], it forces clients to use NetBIOS services. However smbd and nmbd daemon failed to start for me that way, but it should really work. I didn't gave it a lot time testing, since the error is more of a notification. I hope this helps. Koen Linders On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:11:33 +0200, Alexandre Domont - AUF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I 've messages in my log...it's regular...but I don’t know if this is a serious problem ! My conf : Samba 3.0.24 and Debian Etch Security Events =-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Aug 20 17:17:08 dios smbd[9051]: read_data: read failure for 4 bytes to client 10.x.x.x. Error = Aucun chemin d'accès pour atteindre l'hôte cible System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-= Aug 20 17:17:08 dios smbd[9051]: [2007/08/20 17:17:08, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(534) Extract smb.conf : [global] security = ads realm = BUREAUTIQUE.FR.AUF password server = 10.x.x.x workgroup = BUREAUTIQUE idmap uid = 1-2 idmap gid = 1-2 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes template homedir = /home/%D/%U template shell = /bin/bash client use spnego = yes client ntlmv2 auth = yes encrypt passwords = yes winbind use default domain = yes restrict anonymous = 2 domain master = no local master = no preferred master = no os level = 0 smb ports = 445 #msdfs racine DFS Microsoft host msdfs = No msdfs root = No # Gestion des logs. Attention à partir de level 3 : ralentissement de perf log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 3 max log size = 1000 #Permission inherit acls = Yes map acl inherit = Yes #Print Cups printing = cups printcap name = cups load printers = yes printer admin = root, @"admins du domaine" cups options = "raw" #Optimisation socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 [Intranet_Save$] path = /srv/public/intranet browseable=yes writeable=yes Thank you, --- Alexander -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
