[Samba] Cannot share MSAccess DB after upgrade 3.0.5 to 3.0.8

2004-12-20 Thread Lane Beneke
) NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
[2004/12/17 12:21:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(464)
[2004/12/17 12:21:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(474)
  size=35
  smb_com=0xa2
  smb_rcls=52
  smb_reh=0
  smb_err=49152
  smb_flg=136
  smb_flg2=51201
  smb_tid=1
  smb_pid=1268
  smb_uid=100
  smb_mid=2048
  smt_wct=0
  smb_bcc=0
[2004/12/17 12:21:08, 6]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(449)
  write_socket(5,39)
[2004/12/17 12:21:08, 6]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(452)
  write_socket(5,39) wrote 39




Note the error message
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND.

Can someone more familiar with the log content help me
understand why Samba is refusing to acknowledge the
file's existence to its users?

Thanks,
Lane Beneke

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: Cannot share MSAccess DB after upgrade 3.0.5 to 3.0.8

2004-12-16 Thread Lane Beneke
Well, it turns out that the smbstatus/Access
column/0x3 condition is not the cause of the problem. 
(I still don't understand the significance of that
column.)

A simple upgrade from 3.0.5 to 3.0.8 broke file
sharing on a MSAccess 2k database (Win2k and WinXP
clients.)  There are Paradox databases on the same
file-share that are working fine.  The log files show
no errors.  I'm about to try increasing the debug
level, but can anyone give me a clue in the meantime?

Thanks,
Lane Beneke


--- Lane Beneke wrote:

 This is really strange.
 
 The samba server in question is a domain member
 server
 on a Windows NT 4.0 Domain network.  It runs Gentoo
 2004.3 with a 2.4.24 kernel.
 
 The Gentoo server was upgraded from Samba 3.0.5 to
 3.0.8 last night.  After the upgrade, the server had
 to be re-joined to the domain.  After that,
 everything
 appeared to be working.
 
 This morning we found that the MSAccess database
 files
 can no longer be shared if the database users open
 the
 MDB file containing the tables.  The first user in
 can
 use the database, and databases that are externally
 linked to the database in question can share the
 data
 just fine. (Weirdness)
 
 A quick look at smbstatus output reveals that no
 oplocks are placed on the MDB or the LDB files. 
 However, the Access column of the smbstatus output
 shows 0x2019f for all files except the MDB files,
 which show 0x3.  Does anyone know what this means?
 
 32748 DENY_NONE 0x3 RDWR NONE
 /samba/common/smc.mdb
 32748 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR NONE
 /samba/common/smc.ldb
 
 Help!
 Lane Beneke
 
 
 
   
 __ 
 Do you Yahoo!? 
 Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search.
 Learn more.
 http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
 




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Cannot share MSAccess DB after upgrade 3.0.5 to 3.0.8

2004-12-16 Thread Lane Beneke
This is really strange.

The samba server in question is a domain member server
on a Windows NT 4.0 Domain network.  It runs Gentoo
2004.3 with a 2.4.24 kernel.

The Gentoo server was upgraded from Samba 3.0.5 to
3.0.8 last night.  After the upgrade, the server had
to be re-joined to the domain.  After that, everything
appeared to be working.

This morning we found that the MSAccess database files
can no longer be shared if the database users open the
MDB file containing the tables.  The first user in can
use the database, and databases that are externally
linked to the database in question can share the data
just fine. (Weirdness)

A quick look at smbstatus output reveals that no
oplocks are placed on the MDB or the LDB files. 
However, the Access column of the smbstatus output
shows 0x2019f for all files except the MDB files,
which show 0x3.  Does anyone know what this means?

32748 DENY_NONE 0x3 RDWR NONE
/samba/common/smc.mdb
32748 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR NONE
/samba/common/smc.ldb

Help!
Lane Beneke




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] XP Pro timeout

2004-07-28 Thread Lane Beneke
Windows XP Pro clients are timing out when attempting to use either a file
or printer share on my Samba 3.0.5 server.

Any graphical application will fall into a seemingly endless timeout when
attempting to access the Samba server.  Print jobs will stay in the XP print
queue for as much as 1/2 hour, and then print normally.  The odd thing is
that access from any non-graphical application (cmd.exe) on the XP clients
is instantaneous.

Two XP Pro workstations (version 2002, SP1) are exhibiting this behaviour.
The rest of the company (Win2k, Win98, Win95, WinNT) is working fine.  There
are no other XP workstations on the network.

The Samba server was upgraded from 2.2.8a last Friday.  The upgrade worked
fine for two working days before this problem showing up today.

Included below are many of the specifics of my installation, and current log
file excerpts for your scrutiny.

Thanks in advance for any help you may provide.

Lane Beneke; IT Manager
Stephenson Millwork Co., Inc.

- THE PLAYERS -
Problem Clients - Windows XP Pro Version 2002 SP1
PDC - Windows NT Server Version 4.0 SP6
File Server - Linux 2.4.24 w/Samba 3.0.5

- RECENT EVENTS -
5 days ago - Samba upgraded from 2.2.8a to 3.0.5
Yesterday - Everything working fine, including XP clients
Today - Several reboots of XP clients

- LOG.SMBD LOG FILE -
[2004/07/28 09:48:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(978)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected

- CLIENT LOG FILE -
[2004/07/28 09:20:20, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619)
  smc158 (192.168.42.109) connect to service WorkOrder3 initially as user
rick (uid=1026, gid=100) (pid 28420)
[2004/07/28 09:21:13, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(801)
  smc158 (192.168.42.109) closed connection to service WorkOrder3
[2004/07/28 09:32:05, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(801)
  smc158 (192.168.42.109) closed connection to service estimating
[2004/07/28 09:32:13, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(801)
  smc158 (192.168.42.109) closed connection to service rick
[2004/07/28 09:32:13, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(801)
  smc158 (192.168.42.109) closed connection to service common
[2004/07/28 09:37:13, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(978)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
[2004/07/28 09:37:13, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(413)
  write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2004/07/28 09:37:13, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(438)
  write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 22: ERRNO = Connection reset
by peer
[2004/07/28 09:37:13, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(630)
  Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)
[2004/07/28 09:37:13, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619)
  smc158 (192.168.42.109) connect to service rick initially as user rick
(uid=1026, gid=100) (pid 30492)
[2004/07/28 09:37:15, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619)
  smc158 (192.168.42.109) connect to service estimating initially as user
rick (uid=1026, gid=100) (pid 30492)


- SAMBA CONFIGURATION FILE -
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 192.168.42.108 (192.168.42.108)
# Date: 2004/07/23 21:56:29

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = DOMAIN
netbios name = SERVER-BACKUP
server string = Backup Server
security = DOMAIN
update encrypted = Yes
null passwords = Yes
password server = server
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New\sUNIX\spassword:*
%n\n*Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n .
unix password sync = Yes
syslog = 0
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
time server = Yes
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /home/%u -g 100 -m %u ;
smbpasswd -a %u 
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
dns proxy = No
wins server = 192.168.42.250
idmap uid = 1-10999
idmap gid = 11000-11999
invalid users = root
printer admin = root, Administrator, lane
create mask = 0770
hosts allow = 192.168.42
hosts deny = 192.168.42.254

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
veto files = /Maildir/
browseable = No

[common]
comment = Open Share (G: Drive)
path = /home/samba/common
read only = No
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
guest ok = Yes

[print$]
comment = Point-n-Print Drivers
path = /var/cache/samba/print
invalid users =
admin users = lane
write list = root, Administrator, lane
create mask = 0774
guest ok = Yes

[pplabels]
comment = Used only by DOS version of Product Planner
path = /tmp
printable = Yes
printing = lprng
print command = /usr/bin/pplabels %s %U %J 

[print2pdf

[Samba] RE: XP Pro timeout; we have a winner - webclient service

2004-07-28 Thread Lane Beneke
Thanks to Jason Balicki for the correct fix to this problem.

The 'webclient' service in Windows XP, somehow interferes with access to the
Samba server.  With the service stopped and disabled, the clients are
working again.

Lane Beneke; IT Manager
Stephenson Millwork Co., Inc.

-Original Message-
From: Lane Beneke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:42 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: XP Pro timeout


Windows XP Pro clients are timing out when attempting to use either a file
or printer share on my Samba 3.0.5 server.

Any graphical application will fall into a seemingly endless timeout when
attempting to access the Samba server.  Print jobs will stay in the XP print
queue for as much as 1/2 hour, and then print normally.  The odd thing is
that access from any non-graphical application (cmd.exe) on the XP clients
is instantaneous.

Two XP Pro workstations (version 2002, SP1) are exhibiting this behaviour.
The rest of the company (Win2k, Win98, Win95, WinNT) is working fine.  There
are no other XP workstations on the network.

The Samba server was upgraded from 2.2.8a last Friday.  The upgrade worked
fine for two working days before this problem showing up today.

Included below are many of the specifics of my installation, and current log
file excerpts for your scrutiny.

Thanks in advance for any help you may provide.

Lane Beneke; IT Manager
Stephenson Millwork Co., Inc.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba