Re: [Samba] Problems with wins server

2006-11-27 Thread Noc Phibee

No other solution ?




Noc Phibee a écrit :

Hi

i have a smaal problems ... :

I have two samba server connected by a VPN.

One, are the master, the config are:

[global]
  workgroup = LOCAL
  netbios name = SMB1
  server string = Linux Smb Server 1
  os level = 33
  log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
  max log size = 500
  log level = 3
  map to guest = bad user
  security = user
  encrypt passwords = yes
  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
  local master = no
  domain master = no
  dns proxy = no
  wins support = yes
  unix password sync=yes
  hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.75. 192.160.150. 192.168.151. 
192.168.3. 127.


into the log i have:

[2006/11/23 07:01:50, 3] 
nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_multihomed_register_query_fail(1097)
 wins_multihomed_register_query_fail: Registering machine at IP 
192.168.75.254 failed to answer query successfully for name SMB2<03>.



The second server are:
[global]
  workgroup = LOCAL
  netbios name = SMB2
  server string = Linux Smb Server 2
  os level = 33
  log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
  max log size = 500
  log level = 3
  map to guest = bad user
  security = user
  encrypt passwords = yes
  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
  local master = no
  domain master = no
  dns proxy = yes
  wins support = no
  wins server = 192.168.0.1
  wins proxy = yes
  unix password sync=yes

192.168.0.1 are the ip of the first server 
my computer, on the network of Smb2 have in wins server the SMB2

into the log of smb2 i have:

Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   register_name_response: WINS server 
at IP 192.168.0.1 rejected our name registration of SMB2<20> IP 
192.168.75.254 with error code 5.
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   standard_fail_register: Failed to 
register/refresh name SMB2<20> on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   register_name_response: WINS server 
at IP 192.168.0.1 rejected our name registration of SMB2<03> IP 
192.168.75.254 with error code 5.
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   standard_fail_register: Failed to 
register/refresh name SMB2<03> on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)


and for all user:
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name DELL_7<20> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name DELL_7<03> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name LOCAL<00> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.



where is my error ?

thanks



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[NO ANSWER] Anyone have this problems ??????? Re: [Samba] Problems with wins server

2006-11-25 Thread Noc Phibee

Anyone use Wins Server of Samba in a VPN environment ?


Noc Phibee a écrit :

Hi

i have a smaal problems ... :

I have two samba server connected by a VPN.

One, are the master, the config are:

[global]
  workgroup = LOCAL
  netbios name = SMB1
  server string = Linux Smb Server 1
  os level = 33
  log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
  max log size = 500
  log level = 3
  map to guest = bad user
  security = user
  encrypt passwords = yes
  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
  local master = no
  domain master = no
  dns proxy = no
  wins support = yes
  unix password sync=yes
  hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.75. 192.160.150. 192.168.151. 
192.168.3. 127.


into the log i have:

[2006/11/23 07:01:50, 3] 
nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_multihomed_register_query_fail(1097)
 wins_multihomed_register_query_fail: Registering machine at IP 
192.168.75.254 failed to answer query successfully for name SMB2<03>.



The second server are:
[global]
  workgroup = LOCAL
  netbios name = SMB2
  server string = Linux Smb Server 2
  os level = 33
  log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
  max log size = 500
  log level = 3
  map to guest = bad user
  security = user
  encrypt passwords = yes
  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
  local master = no
  domain master = no
  dns proxy = yes
  wins support = no
  wins server = 192.168.0.1
  wins proxy = yes
  unix password sync=yes

192.168.0.1 are the ip of the first server 
my computer, on the network of Smb2 have in wins server the SMB2

into the log of smb2 i have:

Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   register_name_response: WINS server 
at IP 192.168.0.1 rejected our name registration of SMB2<20> IP 
192.168.75.254 with error code 5.
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   standard_fail_register: Failed to 
register/refresh name SMB2<20> on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   register_name_response: WINS server 
at IP 192.168.0.1 rejected our name registration of SMB2<03> IP 
192.168.75.254 with error code 5.
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   standard_fail_register: Failed to 
register/refresh name SMB2<03> on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)


and for all user:
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name DELL_7<20> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name DELL_7<03> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name LOCAL<00> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.



where is my error ?

thanks



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Know all user of one group with winbind/wbinfo ?

2006-11-23 Thread Noc Phibee
Thanks, but me i thinks that only "net ads" works and i don't have net 
ads group members ;=)




Thorsten Hamester a écrit :

Hello

Hi

do you know if they have a solution with best performance
for know all username of one Active Directory group ?


use: net rpc group MEMBERS  -S 

Hth

--Thorsten Hamester




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Know all user of one group with winbind/wbinfo ?

2006-11-23 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

do you know if they have a solution with best performance
for know all username of one Active Directory group ?

Thanks bye


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problems with wins server

2006-11-23 Thread Noc Phibee



anyone know this errors ??







Noc Phibee a écrit :

Hi

i have a smaal problems ... :

I have two samba server connected by a VPN.

One, are the master, the config are:

[global]
  workgroup = LOCAL
  netbios name = SMB1
  server string = Linux Smb Server 1
  os level = 33
  log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
  max log size = 500
  log level = 3
  map to guest = bad user
  security = user
  encrypt passwords = yes
  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
  local master = no
  domain master = no
  dns proxy = no
  wins support = yes
  unix password sync=yes
  hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.75. 192.160.150. 192.168.151. 
192.168.3. 127.


into the log i have:

[2006/11/23 07:01:50, 3] 
nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_multihomed_register_query_fail(1097)
 wins_multihomed_register_query_fail: Registering machine at IP 
192.168.75.254 failed to answer query successfully for name SMB2<03>.



The second server are:
[global]
  workgroup = LOCAL
  netbios name = SMB2
  server string = Linux Smb Server 2
  os level = 33
  log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
  max log size = 500
  log level = 3
  map to guest = bad user
  security = user
  encrypt passwords = yes
  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
  local master = no
  domain master = no
  dns proxy = yes
  wins support = no
  wins server = 192.168.0.1
  wins proxy = yes
  unix password sync=yes

192.168.0.1 are the ip of the first server 
my computer, on the network of Smb2 have in wins server the SMB2

into the log of smb2 i have:

Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   register_name_response: WINS server 
at IP 192.168.0.1 rejected our name registration of SMB2<20> IP 
192.168.75.254 with error code 5.
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   standard_fail_register: Failed to 
register/refresh name SMB2<20> on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   register_name_response: WINS server 
at IP 192.168.0.1 rejected our name registration of SMB2<03> IP 
192.168.75.254 with error code 5.
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   standard_fail_register: Failed to 
register/refresh name SMB2<03> on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)


and for all user:
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name DELL_7<20> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name DELL_7<03> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name LOCAL<00> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.



where is my error ?

thanks



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Problems with wins server

2006-11-22 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

i have a smaal problems ... :

I have two samba server connected by a VPN.

One, are the master, the config are:

[global]
  workgroup = LOCAL
  netbios name = SMB1
  server string = Linux Smb Server 1
  os level = 33
  log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
  max log size = 500
  log level = 3
  map to guest = bad user
  security = user
  encrypt passwords = yes
  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
  local master = no
  domain master = no
  dns proxy = no
  wins support = yes
  unix password sync=yes
  hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.75. 192.160.150. 192.168.151. 
192.168.3. 127.


into the log i have:

[2006/11/23 07:01:50, 3] 
nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_multihomed_register_query_fail(1097)
 wins_multihomed_register_query_fail: Registering machine at IP 
192.168.75.254 failed to answer query successfully for name SMB2<03>.



The second server are:
[global]
  workgroup = LOCAL
  netbios name = SMB2
  server string = Linux Smb Server 2
  os level = 33
  log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
  max log size = 500
  log level = 3
  map to guest = bad user
  security = user
  encrypt passwords = yes
  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
  local master = no
  domain master = no
  dns proxy = yes
  wins support = no
  wins server = 192.168.0.1
  wins proxy = yes
  unix password sync=yes

192.168.0.1 are the ip of the first server 
my computer, on the network of Smb2 have in wins server the SMB2

into the log of smb2 i have:

Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   register_name_response: WINS server at 
IP 192.168.0.1 rejected our name registration of SMB2<20> IP 
192.168.75.254 with error code 5.
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   standard_fail_register: Failed to 
register/refresh name SMB2<20> on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   register_name_response: WINS server at 
IP 192.168.0.1 rejected our name registration of SMB2<03> IP 
192.168.75.254 with error code 5.
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]:   standard_fail_register: Failed to 
register/refresh name SMB2<03> on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
Nov 23 07:01:50 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:01:50, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)


and for all user:
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name DELL_7<20> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name DELL_7<03> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(173)

Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   Error - should be sent to WINS server
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]: [2006/11/23 07:03:48, 0] 
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(172)
Nov 23 07:03:48 gw nmbd[3768]:   process_name_refresh_request: unicast 
name registration request received for name LOCAL<00> from IP 
192.168.75.103 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.



where is my error ?

thanks

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] URGENT: erreur "oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds" ???

2006-10-19 Thread Noc Phibee
Hi  

Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]: [2006/10/19 11:47:58, 0] 
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(866)
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]:   oplock_break: receive_smb timed out 
after 30 seconds.
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]:   oplock_break failed for file 
SINS/Textes.mmo (dev = 306, inode = 1556602, file_id = 644).
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]: [2006/10/19 11:47:58, 0] 
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(943)
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]:   oplock_break: client failure in oplock 
break in file SINS/Textes.mmo




anyone know this errors on Samba ?

Thanks for your help

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] error winbind ?

2006-09-04 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi


I have this in my logs of winbond:


[2006/09/04 15:25:05, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_loop(863)
 winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found


and

[2006/09/04 15:23:10, 0] 
rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth(2229)
 cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth: rpc_pipe_bind for pipe \NETLOGON failed with 
error NT_STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL



Anyone know this problems ?

thanks bye


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] A question on Windows XP with Samba Linux ?

2006-03-16 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

i have a small problems:

  I have a Linux Samba File server, on this, i have one directory 
where a

authentification are requested.

   That's work on all workstation, but only one can't connect.
  
I have only this into the log:


[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(619)
 NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 2 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 
5.1] PrimaryDomain=[]

[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:ntlmssp_server_auth(606)
 Got user=[] domain=[] workstation=[ACERJLS] len1=1 len2=0
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(219)
 check_ntlm_password:  Checking password for unmapped user 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the new password interface

[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(222)
 check_ntlm_password:  mapped user is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(268)
 check_ntlm_password: guest authentication for user [] succeeded
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp_sign.c:ntlmssp_sign_init(319)
 NTLMSSP Sign/Seal - Initialising with flags:
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:debug_ntlmssp_flags(62)
 Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x60088215
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(257)
 User name: nobody Real name: nobody
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276)
 UNIX uid 65534 is UNIX user nobody, and will be vuid 133
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1114)
 Transaction 4192 of length 92
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(900)
 switch message SMBtconX (pid 9003) conn 0x0
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(477)
 Connect path is '/var/tmp' for service [IPC$]
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(250)
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251)
 se_access_check: user sid is S-1-5-21-2957750683-620060279-44140246-501
 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-2957750683-620060279-44140246-514
 se_access_check: also S-1-1-0
 se_access_check: also S-1-5-2
 se_access_check: also S-1-5-32-546
 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-2957750683-620060279-44140246-132069
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_default(215)
 Initialising default vfs hooks
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(250)
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251)
 se_access_check: user sid is S-1-5-21-2957750683-620060279-44140246-501
 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-2957750683-620060279-44140246-514
 se_access_check: also S-1-1-0
 se_access_check: also S-1-5-2
 se_access_check: also S-1-5-32-546
 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-2957750683-620060279-44140246-132069
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
 setting sec ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2006/03/16 13:51:43, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(662)
 acerjls (192.168.250.81) connect to service IPC$ initially as user 
nobody (uid=65534, gid=65534) (pid 9003)



I see that this xp pro don't sent the login/password no ?

thanks for your help

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Get all user of one groups ? with winbindd/ads

2005-12-15 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

before, i use
   getent group "name of the group"
for know all user on the groups ..

I have upgraded in 3.0.21rc2 and change security domain to ADS and now i 
can get it.

He have other solution for get with best speed all user of one groups ?

Thanks bye

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] New Winbind crash but only with a specific user ..

2005-12-14 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

i don't have answer to my question, but for archives ;=)

I thinks that he have a serious bug into Winbindd but i can see it.

i start smb/winbindd ... good that's work ...
wbinfo -t => Ok
wbinfo -g=> Ok

But:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -a GROUPE/christ%briquet
plaintext password authentication succeeded
challenge/response password authentication succeeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#

ok That's work !


[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -a GROUPE/jmcol%basique
no answer and process of Winbindd use 100% of cpu

i duplicate the account "jmcol" on my active directory ...
same name, same password, same group only login change ..
and that's work !

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -a GROUPE/jmcol2%basique
plaintext password authentication succeeded
challenge/response password authentication succeeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#




Anyone have this problems ??

In log level 10, the latest line when he use 100% of cpu is:

[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32s(898)
 0240 sub_auths : 0015 087e60f9 5a3924ad 6dd83d7d 
0692

[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82)
 000254 smb_io_dom_sid2
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(671)
 0254 num_auths: 0005
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 8] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82)
 000258 smb_io_dom_sid sid
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 0258 sid_rev_num: 01
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 0259 num_auths  : 05
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 025a id_auth[0] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 025b id_auth[1] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 025c id_auth[2] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 025d id_auth[3] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 025e id_auth[4] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 025f id_auth[5] : 05
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32s(898)
 0260 sub_auths : 0015 087e60f9 5a3924ad 6dd83d7d 
06bb

[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82)
 000274 smb_io_dom_sid2
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(671)
 0274 num_auths: 0005
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 8] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82)
 000278 smb_io_dom_sid sid
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 0278 sid_rev_num: 01
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 0279 num_auths  : 05
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 027a id_auth[0] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 027b id_auth[1] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 027c id_auth[2] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 027d id_auth[3] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 027e id_auth[4] : 00
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(582)
 027f id_auth[5] : 05
[2005/12/14 16:37:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32s(898)
 0280 sub_auths : 0015 087e60f9 5a3924ad 6dd83d7d 
05d2












--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Limit user authentification into Winbind ?

2005-12-09 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

i see on my log, two informations :


1- Into my log, i see a very big quantity of :
 [19391]: lookupname ECTPP/root
[2005/12/09 14:28:46, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_lookupname(695)

 [19391]: lookupname ECTPP/root
[2005/12/09 14:28:46, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_lookupname(695)


10x per s  600x/minutes .. it's very very big no ?
It's possible that is Spamassassin that create this request ?
i use winbind only for squid, can i del into pam winbind for no other 
process use it ?


2- Into my log, i have a new logs created :
  log.wb-BUILTIN
i see that winbind create a log file for each domain, but i don't have
a domain BUILTIN

and i have into this files a big quantity of this line :
 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:51:49, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:51:49, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:51:49, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:51:56, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:51:58, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:51:58, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:52:00, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:52:04, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:52:35, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:52:35, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:52:35, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:52:36, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:52:37, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases
[2005/12/09 13:52:40, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_getsidaliases(847)

 [19391]: getsidaliases



thanks for your help



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] First in the word that Winbind use 100% of CPU

2005-12-08 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

anyone know a solution for my problems of Winbind at 100% ?
Anyone know a list of library used by WInbind ?

Thanks bye

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba in Secondary Domain Controler ? Urgent Please Help me

2005-12-07 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

for my big problems of winbindd crash, i want know if it's possible
to replicate a Domain Controler Active Directory ?

Actually, My Samba/Winbind use a Primary Domain Control based on the network
but not in the same LAN. The traffic use a VPN ... i thinks that the 
number of request

are big for the VPN tunnel.

Can i say to my Samba that duplication the Active directory in local for 
the winbind/squid

authentifie with local request ?

thanks bye


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Other solution of Winbindd ? because he don't work ..

2005-12-06 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi,

for my problems (i never received a idea of the problems), i am thinks 
that it's a

problems into code of winbindd.

I have tested the 3.0.14a 3.0.14b 3.0.20b 3.0.21rc1 and i have the same 
problems.

tested on 2 server, sames problems ...

Winbind work for a very small network, not for a large, after 1mn, 
winbindd don't answer

and use 100% of CPU
latest logs info:

[2005/12/06 16:28:41, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(470)
 client_read: read 0 bytes. Need 1824 more for a full request.
[2005/12/06 16:28:41, 5] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(477)
 read failed on sock 9, pid 20943: EOF

after ... no other

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Big into winbindd ? 100% of cpu after 5mn of utilisation

2005-12-06 Thread Noc Phibee

No solutions ? it's a bug into 3.0.20b version ??



Noc Phibee a écrit :

Hi

anyone know if they have a big bug to winbindd ? :

After 5 mn of utilisation, winbindd use 100% of cpu resource :

PID USER   PR  NI  VIRTRES   SHR  S  %CPU   %MEMTIME+  
COMMAND
17096  root  25   010700  3556  9432  R  99.3   
0.7   1:03.02   winbindd



and we have into the log:

[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 5] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_loop(817)
 winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, removing idle connection.
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_loop(822)
 winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 6] nsswitch/winbindd.c:new_connection(596)
 accepted socket 229
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_request(325)
 process_request: request fn AUTH_CRAP
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_pam.c:winbindd_pam_auth_crap(538)

 [0]: pam auth crap domain: [LINUX] user: MAIRE
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 8] lib/util.c:is_myname(1874)
 is_myname("LINUX") returns 0




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Big into winbindd ? 100% of cpu after 5mn of utilisation

2005-12-05 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

anyone know if they have a big bug to winbindd ? :

After 5 mn of utilisation, winbindd use 100% of cpu resource :

PID USER   PR  NI  VIRTRES   SHR  S  %CPU   %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
17096  root  25   010700  3556  9432  R  99.3   
0.7   1:03.02   winbindd



and we have into the log:

[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 5] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_loop(817)
 winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, removing idle connection.
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_loop(822)
 winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 6] nsswitch/winbindd.c:new_connection(596)
 accepted socket 229
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_request(325)
 process_request: request fn AUTH_CRAP
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_pam.c:winbindd_pam_auth_crap(538)
 [0]: pam auth crap domain: [LINUX] user: MAIRE
[2005/12/05 16:29:06, 8] lib/util.c:is_myname(1874)
 is_myname("LINUX") returns 0


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Kerberos Errors with winbind?

2005-12-05 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

i have this error now into my logs :

[2005/12/05 13:39:43, 3] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(478)
 ads_krb5_mk_req: krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found)
[2005/12/05 13:39:43, 0] libads/kerberos.c:ads_kinit_password(164)
 kerberos_kinit_password host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed: Client not 
found in Kerberos database

[2005/12/05 13:39:43, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c:ads_cached_connection(109)
 ads_connect for domain LINUX failed: Client not found in Kerberos database

Anyone know this problems ?

I don't know Active Directory, but for my linux samba server can access 
to Kerberos

on my W2000 Server Ads, what is the parametter into W2000K ? or only
net join ads are suffisient ?

on other server, i have another message :
[2005/12/05 13:20:47, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1826)
 fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable)
[2005/12/05 13:20:47, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1845)
 fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 0 count 1 op 13 type 0 (Resource 
temporarily unavailable)

[2005/12/05 13:20:47, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_cm.c:cm_get_ipc_userpass(105)
 cm_get_ipc_userpass: No auth-user defined


Thanks bye



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] No aswer to my winbind problems ?

2005-12-01 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

anyone can help me to resol my big problems ?

thanks bye

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] wbinfo -g and -u problems ? no answer at my first post ?

2005-11-30 Thread Noc Phibee
] nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:name_to_sid(965)
 name_to_sid: [Cached] - cached name for domain LOCAL status 
NT_STATUS_NONE_MAPPED
[2005/11/30 14:55:26, 10] nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:cache_store_response(1502)
 Storing response for pid 8115, len 1300
[2005/11/30 14:56:56, 4] nsswitch/winbindd_dual.c:fork_domain_child(512)
 child daemon request 17
[2005/11/30 14:56:56, 10] nsswitch/winbindd_dual.c:child_process_request(388)
 process_request: request fn LIST_TRUSTDOM
[2005/11/30 14:56:56, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_dual_list_trusted_domains(120)
 [ 8114]: list trusted domains
[2005/11/30 14:56:56, 10] nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:trusted_domains(1397)
 trusted_domains: [Cached] - doing backend query for info for domain LOCAL
[2005/11/30 14:56:56, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c:trusted_domains(879)
 ads: trusted_domains

 refresh_sequence_number: LOCAL seq number is now -1



On the W2000 server, what is the right of the user for get group/user ?

Thanks for your help














Gerald (Jerry) Carter a écrit :

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Noc Phibee wrote:

| I have upgraded from 3.0.14a to 3.0.20b and now when i put
| wbinfo -u or wbinfo -g i have a error message :
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -g
| Error looking up domain groups
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -u
| Error looking up domain users
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#
|
|
| and into the log.winbind:
| [2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3]
| nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(461)
|  [0]: request interface version
| [2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3]
| nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(494)
|  [0]: request location of privileged pipe
| [2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3]
| nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_list_groups(813)
|  [0]: list groups
| [2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3]
| nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:get_sam_group_entries(528)
|  get_sam_group_entries: Failed to enumerate domain local groups!

Can you send me a level 10 debug log?




cheers, jerry


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] My linux server with samba sent a big quantity of request to the DC ...

2005-11-30 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

i see on the log that my linux server with Samba and Winbind
sent a request for root user :

Anyone know why and where i can limit this ?

Thanks for your help





[2005/11/30 12:11:00, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_lookupname(695)

 [30633]: lookupname LOCAL/root
[2005/11/30 12:11:00, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_lookupname(695)

 [30633]: lookupname LOCAL/root
[2005/11/30 12:11:00, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_lookupname(695)

 [30633]: lookupname LOCAL/root
[2005/11/30 12:11:00, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_lookupname(695)

 [30633]: lookupname LOCAL/root
[2005/11/30 12:11:00, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_lookupname(695)


[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(453)

 [0]: request interface version
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(486)

 [0]: request location of privileged pipe
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(453)

 [0]: request interface version
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(486)

 [0]: request location of privileged pipe
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(453)

 [0]: request interface version
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(486)

 [0]: request location of privileged pipe
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(453)

 [0]: request interface version
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(486)

 [0]: request location of privileged pipe
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(453)

 [0]: request interface version
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(486)

 [0]: request location of privileged pipe
[2005/11/30 12:11:18, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:19, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(453)

 [0]: request interface version
[2005/11/30 12:11:19, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(486)

 [0]: request location of privileged pipe
[2005/11/30 12:11:19, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:19, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root
[2005/11/30 12:11:19, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(453)

 [0]: request interface version
[2005/11/30 12:11:19, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(486)

 [0]: request location of privileged pipe
[2005/11/30 12:11:19, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(925)
 [0]: getgroups root


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Create rpm for Mandriva of Samba 3.0.21rc1 ?

2005-11-29 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

i want create the rpm of the 3.0.21rc1 release for my Mandriva.

i have used the same spec of 3.0.20b but i have a small problems :

Requires: perl-base >= 2:5.8.5 perl-base perl(Crypt::SmbHash) 
perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(Exporter) perl(FindBin) 
perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Net::LDAP) 
perl(Net::LDAP::LDIF)

Conflicts: smbldap-tools > 0.9.1 samba-server < 3.0.11-1mdk


Erreur de construction de RPM:

This rpm has build options available, use --with options to see them

   Fichier non trouvé: /var/tmp/samba-3.0.21-root/usr/bin/smbget3
   Fichier non trouvé par la substitution: 
/var/tmp/samba-3.0.21-root/*bin/*mount.cifs3



anyone have a idea ?

thanks

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] wbinfo -g and -u problems ? no answer at my first post ?

2005-11-27 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

Anyone know my problems ? i don't have receive a answer or idea ;=<

=
I have upgraded from 3.0.14a to 3.0.20b and now when i put wbinfo -u or
wbinfo -g i have a error message :

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -g
Error looking up domain groups
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -u
Error looking up domain users
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#


and into the log.winbind:
[2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(461)

 [0]: request interface version
[2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(494)

 [0]: request location of privileged pipe
[2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_list_groups(813)
 [0]: list groups
[2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:get_sam_group_entries(528)

 get_sam_group_entries: Failed to enumerate domain local groups!
[2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:get_sam_group_entries(528)

 get_sam_group_entries: Failed to enumerate domain local groups!
[2005/11/28 06:13:20, 3] 
nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:get_sam_group_entries(528)

 get_sam_group_entries: Failed to enumerate domain local groups!


but a /usr/bin/ntlm_auth works !

tyhanks for your help

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Change of samba 3.0.14a to 3.0.20b ?

2005-11-23 Thread Noc Phibee

Hi

i have updraged one of my server on Mandrake :

Before Samba 3.0.14a now Samba 3.0.20b

and i see :

[EMAIL PROTECTED] squid]# wbinfo -t
checking the trust secret via RPC calls succeeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] squid]#

ok it's good, but on when:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -g
Error looking up domain groups
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -u
Error looking up domain users
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#

on 3.0.20b i have this error, but not on 3.0.14a

it's a new features ? where is my problemes ?

thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Question concernant le logiciel Samba

2005-06-17 Thread Noc Phibee

Bonjour,

Conseil sur cette liste, ecrivez en Anglais ;=) ou utilisez les 
newsgroups français


Je pense qu'il s'agit plus d'un probleme de parametrage de votre Samba ..
Deux grandes questions qu'il faut aborder :
  1- Vos utilisateurs sont ils authentifies ? ou c'est un mode 
"public" (vous autorisez toute la classe ip)
  2- Si mode public, n'ont ils pas les droits Root affectés 
d'office par votre config ?


Perso j'utilise Samba 3.0.14a avec des repertoires "public", des homes 
privés et des

repertoires commun ou les droits sont geres par "groupes"

A+



Chris Perrel a écrit :


Bonjour,

En utilisant le logiciel Samba je me suis rendue compte qu'il est 
possible

de supprimer n'importe quel dossier ou fichier, qu'il soit ou non protégé
contre l'écriture, ce qui pose un énorme problème de sécurité.

Avez-vous connaissance de ce problème ?

S'agit-t'il d'un simple problème de paramétrage ?

Dans le cas d'un bug, avez-vous une solution à nous proposer ?

Dans l'espoir de vous lire,
Cordialement

Christiane PERREL
Responsable Informatique
Frédéric Chocolatier
Tél : 03.89.20.99.99



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba