[Samba] Point and Print with 3.6.1
Hello everyone, after upgrading a samba 3.5.x with the 3.6.1 Version (from sernet) under centos it seems that the printer driver download does not work. The Client is told that the server does not have the right driver installed. But the driver is on the server as seen with the management tools and the driver can be accessed via print$. On the samba side I see: [2011/10/26 10:27:04.055865, 10] smbd/mangle_hash2.c:357(is_mangled_component) is_mangled_component unidrv.dll (len 10) ? [2011/10/26 10:27:04.055917, 5] smbd/statcache.c:143(stat_cache_add) stat_cache_add: Added entry (8dca100:size 6) W32X86 -> W32X86 [2011/10/26 10:27:04.055969, 5] smbd/statcache.c:143(stat_cache_add) stat_cache_add: Added entry (8dca140:size 8) W32X86/3 -> W32X86/3 [2011/10/26 10:27:04.056030, 10] smbd/mangle_hash2.c:418(is_mangled) is_mangled print$ ? [2011/10/26 10:27:04.056073, 10] smbd/mangle_hash2.c:357(is_mangled_component) is_mangled_component print$ (len 6) ? [2011/10/26 10:27:04.056811, 5] smbd/filename.c:675(unix_convert) Intermediate not found print$ [2011/10/26 10:27:04.056857, 10] smbd/filename.c:958(unix_convert) dirpath = [W32X86/3] start = [print$/W32X86/3/unidrv.dll] [2011/10/26 10:27:04.056903, 10] smbd/filename.c:1313(filename_convert) filename_convert: unix_convert failed for name W32X86/3/print$/W32X86/3/unidrv.dll with NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND Is this correct that W32X86/3 is seen before print$ ?? Thanks for help -- NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] wbinfo -u fails (but not wbinfo -t and wbinfo -g)
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Mauro (INTERFREE) wrote: > > wbinfo -t and wbinfo -g work fine but wbinfo -u gives me error: > Error looking up domain users > > Please could you help me to find correct way to solve my problems? Hi ! You could try 3.0.14 of course. Else there seems to be a problem with w2k SP4 Update Rollup 1 which causes this. Deinstallation of this on the w2k-machine did help in my case. Oktay -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] after upgrade from 3.0.7 -> 3.0.14 extrem slow access from window s 2000
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Karasavvidis Stefanos wrote: > We had samba 3.0.7 (on debian woody) installed, and upgraded to 3.0.14a (we > used the sernet packages on debian sarge). > > Now access to files from windows 2000 clients is extremely slow, especially > on .exe files. Simply selecting a exe file from windows explorer may freeze > it for 2-10 seconds. Other file types are not affected that much, although > their access is slow, too. > > We have also some XP workstations, and they work just fine! I have seen the same behavior with our w2k terminal servers. But I don't know, if it is reproducible and only on w2k and not xp. You are right. .exe are extremely slow. I will check, if I can make a difference from xp. Oktay Akbal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
There may the the point, that you are using Kerberos. We do not. We migrated a 2.2.x-Samba to 3.0 that was running without before. Oktay On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Lars Roland wrote: > On 7/15/05, Oktay Akbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Our nsswitch is correct and btw. it does not have anything todo with > > the wbinfo -u command that is not working. > > > > Oktay > > Well it did in my case, but that may be other stuff - anyhow "wbinfo > -u" works with this smb.conf on samba 3.14a in a AD controlled by a > win2k with the rollup applied: > > > [global] > security = ads > password server = win2000 > encrypt passwords = yes > workgroup = testdomain > realm = TESTDOMAIN.LOCAL > netbios name = testserver > idmap uid = 1-2 > idmap gid = 1-2 > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum groups = yes > winbind use default domain = Yes > > > Samba is build with: > > > ./configure \ > --prefix=/usr \ > --localstatedir=/var \ > --with-configdir=/etc/samba \ > --with-privatedir=/etc/samba \ > --with-fhs \ > --with-quotas \ > --with-msdfs \ > --with-smbmount \ > --with-automount \ > --with-ads \ > --with-syslog \ > --with-utmp \ > --with-sambabook=/usr/share/swat/using_samba \ > --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat \ > --with-libsmbclient \ > --with-winbind \ > --with-winbind-auth-challenge \ > --with-manpages-langs=en \ > --with-idmap \ > --with-acl-support \ > --with-ldap \ > > > > Regards. > > Lars Roland > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
Our nsswitch is correct and btw. it does not have anything todo with the wbinfo -u command that is not working. Oktay Am Fr 15.07.2005 09:34 schrieb Lars Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 7/15/05, Oktay Akbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I forgot to mention. Our Version is 3.0.14a and worked before the > > Rollup. > > > > Oktay > > > > have you updated /etc/nsswitch.conf > > > -- > Lars Roland > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
I forgot to mention. Our Version is 3.0.14a and worked before the Rollup. Oktay On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lars Roland wrote: > On 7/1/05, Oktay Akbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Anyone else experiencing Problems with this update ? > > > > We do have W2k AD. And Samba Member-Server. This is done via Winbind > > without using Kerberos. > > > > After installing the Update to our AD-Servers. It seems that winbind lost > > its connectivity. > > wbinfo -t worked. > > wbinfo -u showed errors. > > I can confirm this - it does however seam somewhat samba related > because winbind does not work with samba 3.0.8 but it does work in > 3.14a - note that it first works in 3.14a after adding the following > to /etc/nsswitch.conf > > passwd: files winbind > group: files winbind > hosts: files winbind dns > > > Regards. > > Lars Roland > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
The Information is at: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B891861 The Download: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?amp;amp;displaylang=en&familyid=c0a2ca36-1179-431c-80e6-60a494d3823d&displaylang=en or via windowsupdate. Thanks. Oktay -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
Hello. Anyone else experiencing Problems with this update ? We do have W2k AD. And Samba Member-Server. This is done via Winbind without using Kerberos. After installing the Update to our AD-Servers. It seems that winbind lost its connectivity. wbinfo -t worked. wbinfo -u showed errors. After removing the update from all our servers, winbind works again. Should I move our configuration to kerberos ? Thanks. Oktay Akbal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Point'n'Print works for NT4 but not for XP?
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:24:13 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Steve Salvini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi - Last week I mailed the list saying I was having trouble getting > "Point'n'Print" to work for XP clients. > > Today, as an experiment, I installed NT4 on a spare machine and > "point'n'print" works fine for it.This suggest that the problem is > specific to XP (although I haven't tried a W2k machine). There is a new Policy in WinXP Sp1 that is called something like "Point and Print Restrictions". This needed to be set in our case (AD). Oktay Akbal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] PATCH: downloading drivers from Solaris [was Re: SoSAMBA no longer ...]
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > OK. after more time than I would like to admit, here the's fix. > The bug is obvious now that I see it. Sorry for the headaches > this caused. Sorry, if I missed something, but is this really only a problem with solaris or might this be a problem on linux ? Oktay Akbal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: AW: [Samba] Samba server in a failover environment
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Oktay Akbal wrote: > > > shared-storage or nfs (however this is made redundant in his case). > > Both servers would then have the same tdbs. > > Hm, this would mean he'd need to introduce a third server which holds > the shared storage. And to have this server be secured, he should have > a fourth server which is a clone of the third server. > > I don't think this is a good idea... If I remember the original posting right, he already uses samba-failover to "re-export" nfs from a third-server. In his case this should not be wrong. But generally you are right. But I don't see, why you should sync the tdbs, when you do not have redundant storage. Making Samba HA without the data on the shares is a bit mysterious to me. Oktay Akbal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: AW: [Samba] Samba server in a failover environment
> And it is worse... You could probably (r)sync smb.conf, MACHINE.SID plus the > domain password (secrets.tdb?) between the two servers and things would work > for a while. But you need to do this on a regular basis as the password is > updated to a new random password every now and then (default once a week?) > and the secondary server would be out of sync. Well, this sounds like he should have the samba-environment lying on shared-storage or nfs (however this is made redundant in his case). Both servers would then have the same tdbs. Oktay Akbal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba server in a failover environment
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Hsu, Cheng (Consultant) wrote: > The failover environment works like this: > . I manually start up Samba daemons (smbd and nmbd) on server-a > . Users are able to map Samba shares to their PCs, and they can read and > write > . While users have their files open, I manually stop all Samba daemons on > server-a > . Then, I manually start up Samba daemons (smbd and nmbd) on server-b > (note that server-a and server-b have the same smb.conf file under > /usr/local/samba/lib) > Our UNIX SAs and NT SAs told me that it is not required to explicitly join > the NT domain > after failover.But my experiment shows that I MUST explicitly join the > NT domain > in order for everything to work. Just a guess: Make sure that the server do not only have the same smb.conf, but also the same SID (MACHINE.SID or whatever setup of samba you use) __ Oktay Akbal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Office XP slow (again)
Hello, We do experience some Problems with samba-2.2.7 and Office-Xp users with win2000sp3 opening files on it. The whole opening and editing is extremly slow. When files are copied to a win2000-server word responds normal. I have seen some people have this kind of problems, but never found a solution to it. Office97 seems to work without problems. When setting debug level to 3. The only thing i can see is, endless messages of type: [2003/01/29 15:25:38, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBreadX (pid 9864) [2003/01/29 15:25:38, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (500, 100) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/01/29 15:25:38, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(334) 1 user groups: 100 [2003/01/29 15:25:38, 3] smbd/reply.c:send_file_readX(2553) send_file_readX fnum=6443 max=512 nread=512 [2003/01/29 15:25:38, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(878) Transaction 17803 of length 63 [2003/01/29 15:25:38, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBreadX (pid 9864) [2003/01/29 15:25:38, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (500, 100) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/01/29 15:25:38, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(334) 1 user groups: 100 [2003/01/29 15:25:38, 3] smbd/reply.c:send_file_readX(2553) send_file_readX fnum=6443 max=256 nread=256 These messages do not seem to stop, even when doing nothing with the text, just starring at it. Please help (with tips for debugging). Oktay Akbal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
