[Samba] Security ADS and clearcase
Hello @List, We have a pretty complex problem; In our company AD is the one and only directory service, all other clients need to follow the given settings and guidelines. We are connected via security ADS , but every patch session on the PDC `s is a nightmare , does it still work or not. So we think about alternatives to the existent situation, pls note , we do not have any influence on AD settings. Only security ads is allowed , due to security guidelines from HQ. Now my question, is there a way to bypass this situation, we thought about an ldap gateway, or install an standalone PDC in a dummy domain ,which sources the AD for passwd and group settings , because we need a seamless mounting of samba shares in order to provide our clearcase vobs to the XP clients. Maybe someone is in a similar situation and can shre his (here) knowledge to the community. Thanks in advanceMartin Schreiber Martin Schreiber Siemens IT Solutions and Services GmbH Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Tel: +43(0)51707 47565 Fax: +43(0) 51707 57560 martin.a.schrei...@siemens.com http://www.siemens.at/it-solutions Siemens IT Solutions and Services GmbH, DVR 1009192, FN 180547k, Handelsgericht Wien, Firmensitz Wien Wichtiger Hinweis: Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. Important Note: This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] net groupmap add problems since 3.0.23 version
Hello List, As I didnt receive any answers on my first request regarding the new groupmap mechanism since samba version 3.0.23 I try it once again and more detailed. Situation before upgrade to samba 3.0.28: We run a solaris 9 server with samba 3.0.21 which serves a share named backup to which all domain users belonging to a special active directory group can connect and save their mail db and other data. This runs without any interaction, just net use x: \\servername\sharename. No users exist in /etc/passwd , access is handled only by Active Directory groups and the associated unix group(s). That has been realised via the net groupmap add command and worked perfectly over the years since samba version 3.0.7a ! . Due to security riscs in samba we where forced to upgrade to version 3.0.28 (all the same problems since version 3.0.24) I studied the whats changed logs and samba howto`s and think I ´ve done it right , but I fear I ´ve overlooked something essential. Output from net groupmap list: --- # net groupmap list Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1454471165-527237240-682003330-513) - users sbs_ors (S-1-5-21-1454471165-527237240-682003330-133792) - sbs_ors_ux Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1454471165-527237240-682003330-514) - nobody Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - 10 adv (S-1-5-21-1454471165-527237240-682003330-48325) - adv Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1454471165-527237240-682003330-512) - ntadmin Users (S-1-5-32-545) - 11 output from net groupmap add command: # net groupmap add sid=S-1-5-21-1454471165-527237240-682003330-133792 ntgroup=sbs_ors unixgroup=sbs_ors_ux type=d Successfully added group sbs_ors to the mapping db as a domain group This is a major group with some nested groups and I ´m a member of one , Since version 3.0.7a nested groups are supported , but I ´m not able to connect , all I get is a pop up login window , also net view \\servername fails with access denied. Now my question ; does that configuration is still supported at all , or has it broken due to security riscs ; if not pls tell me how to proceed with new samba version, what did I overlook Best Regards Martin Schreiber Martin Schreiber Siemens IT Solutions and Services GmbH Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Tel: +43(0)51707 47565 Fax: +43(0) 51707 57560 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.siemens.at/it-solutions Siemens IT Solutions and Services GmbH, DVR 1009192, FN 180547k, Handelsgericht Wien, Firmensitz Wien Wichtiger Hinweis: Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. Important Note: This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] net groupmap add
Hi List, We have a pretty complex samba configuration running version 3.0.21 , this worked for about 2 years , but due to security reasons we need to upgrade to latest version 3.0.28. I have no local unix users created on our host all access is regulated via the valid user = @AD+group statement . and the net groupmap add command. This worked great , but seems broken in latest versions since 3.0.23 I checked the latest howtos , but no success , seems that i overlooked some essentials... Now my smb.conf (only the relevant lines) workgroup = WWxxx server string = [EMAIL PROTECTED] security = DOMAIN netbios name = ATWS26QC encrypt passwords = Yes client schannel = no client use spnego = no server signing = auto config file = /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf password server = vieg10wa passdb expand explicit = no password level = 1 winbind uid = 10-13 winbind gid = 10-12 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes winbind separator = + winbind use default domain = yes winbind nested groups = yes #the shares [home2] path = /home2 valid users@sbs_ors_ux @sbs_ors read only = no browseable = yes -- output from net groupmap list -- # bin/net groupmap list Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - 10 sbs_ors (S-1-5-21-3932861455-2822179577-2594212704-125693) - sbs_ors_ux thats the relevant group Users (S-1-5-32-545) - 11 But I cant get it to work , I´m allways asked for a password , but should work seemless , as it does with old samba version Hope theres someone who can give me some hints , like a working smb.conf and or a howto to manage the net groupmap add command in the proper way Best regardsMartin Martin Schreiber Siemens IT Solutions and Services GmbH Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Tel: +43(0)51707 47565 Fax: +43(0) 51707 57560 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.siemens.at/it-solutions Siemens IT Solutions and Services GmbH, DVR 1009192, FN 180547k, Handelsgericht Wien, Firmensitz Wien Wichtiger Hinweis: Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. Important Note: This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Subject: [Samba] Query a Windows 2003 AD server for specific
Hello - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 The Question: What command do I use to query a Windows 2003 AD server to return the Organizational Unit of a specific users? Also, what would be the command that would return the Home Directory path as specified in the Account Properties of the Windows 2003 account? The Environment: Windows 2003 Domain with 1 plus users 8000 Windows 2k/XP workstations 1100 Terminal Clients connecting to SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 Authentication between Linux and Windows using Samba Version 3.0.24-2.28-1354-SUSE-CODE10 Winbind Version 3.0.24-2.28-1354-SUSE-CODE10 All users have a home directory located on a Windows server. The path is set in their AD account and mapped to H: When they login to a XP or 2000 workstation. This is setup in a school district. Users can be either logged into windows or into Linux. The path to the home directory is ODD at best. I didn't set it up, nor can I change it. For teachers they are mapped to \\server\teachers\username For students it is a little more complicated. Each school has it own OU. Therefor, the Windows admins created a path that is similar to this \\server\OUname\username The problem is there are 1 students divided between 30 OUs. Thanks in advance. --- You need to get dsquery and dsget , should be part of the bonus pack of Win2003 Server, then you can create queries like following dsquery user -samid $uid|dsget user -hmdir and you get that: $uid stands for accountname \\$server\userdirs$\$username Or dsquery user -name $user_name*|dsget user -hmdir and you will see that output $user_name stands for the real name \\$server\userdirs$\$username It's a really powerfull command combination If you want(must) run that from UNIX you need ldapsearch BR Martin Schreiber BR Martin Schreiber -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Winbindd dies in samba 64 bit solaris9
Hello List !! We have a strange und urgent problem OS = solaris9 , sparc Samba = v3.0.21a , selfcompiled with gcc 3.4.3 with option -m64 We use that server as a backupserver for xp-clients , all about 300 users, disk capacity is about 1.6 Terra Strange behaviour occured after upgrade from samba 3.0.14a 32 bit(normal) to samba 3.0.21a 64 bit. Smb.conf remained the same , also all under ./var/locks. Starting and connecting to domain didnt show any error, filetransfer bigger then 2GB no problem , all seemed well..., but in real life problems showed up, winbindd is dying several times a day and needs to be restarted. Also i had to disable any locking in smb.conf espacially posix locking.That seems to be a 2GB issue in solaris too. Winbind functionallity is essential for us , because access is only handled via net groupmapping from ADS, no local users in /etc/passwd. Are there any known issues with version 3.0.21a and solaris 64 bit ?. Any help or hints would be very appreciated Kind regardsMartin Schreiber -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Subject: [Samba] filesize problem...
Hello List, We had the same problem on solaris 8 + 9 , on solaris use native cc with appropriate 64 bit options , on linux use gcc -m64 option , i fear, you will need to compile it from source..., but maybe the debian apt utility can rebuild it, dont know. CFLAGS=-m64 Export CFLAGS Hope that helps Kind regardsmartin schreiber -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] winbindd_idmap.tdb
Hello list, I want to migrate from samba 3.0.14a to 3.0.2* . Now my question ; is it possible to keep the winbindd_idmap.tdb with new installation, because keeping that relations is a __MUST__ , otherwise i would have to run some unix scripts over the user directories to fix uids and gids of them. Thanks in advance for your hints. kind regardsmartin schreiber -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Subject: [Samba] Samba / Windows server 2003 SP1 conflict
Hi, Try that in smb.conf , global section Client schannel = no Server schannel = auto For me that works... Kind regardsmartin schreiber -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba compatibility with NetAPP filers
Hello, We had the same problem after upgrading to samba =3.10. Disabling of signing did solve the problem Just add the lines client signing = no server signing = no to the global section of smb.conf kind regardsmartin schreiber -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Files =2GB
Hello to the list, We have installed samba 3.0.12 on a solaris sparc server , mainly acting as a backup-server. Now the problem: Some user want to save whole disk-images on their shares which exceed the 2 GB limit. Now my question: Do i need to compile with option -m64 , or is the underlaying FS responseable for a successful action Kind regardsmartin schreiber -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] share permissions for AD groups
Hello, We have following environment Win2k AD with endless number of groups (should be more then 1000) , on the other site solaris9 samba3.0.7 compiled with all relevant optins , winbind , ads and so on , installations is ok , we joined AD domain w.o problems , getent * shows all like expected same for wbinfo The big problem remaining is , we want to restrict access to shares to given AD groups that way: valid users = @ADDOMAIN+ADGROUP that doesnt work in any combination, the other way valid users = @ADDOMAIN+ADUSERNAME works without any probem there is no user or groupmapping at all ---output from level 10 log-- 2004/10/21 17:16:44, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(533) user_in_list: checking user |WW300+atw113c9| against |admoss| [2004/10/21 17:16:44, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(533) user_in_list: checking user |WW300+atw113c9| against |ww300+csi| [2004/10/21 17:16:44, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(610) user_in_list: checking if user |WW300+atw113c9| is in winbind group |ww300+csi| [2004/10/21 17:16:49, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_winbind_group_list(412) user_in_winbind_group_list: using groups -- 30001 30002 30003 30004 30005 30006 30007 30008 30009 300 10 30011 30012 30013 30014 30015 30016 [2004/10/21 17:16:49, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(314) user 'WW300+atw113c9' (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (pst) [2004/10/21 17:16:49, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(129) - as i think winbind can only reflect to first 16 or 17 groups user_in_list checks the right group name , in this case ww300+admoss , but user_in_winbind_group_list shows only the first 16 mapped groups , as we have more then 1000 or 2000 and nested groups i can never be authenticated Now my Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration Fax +43 5 1707 57560 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbs.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] AW: share permissions for AD groups
Hello, We have following environment Win2k AD with endless number of groups (should be more then 1000) , on the other site solaris9 samba3.0.7 compiled with all relevant optins , winbind , ads and so on , installations is ok , we joined AD domain w.o problems , getent * shows all like expected same for wbinfo The big problem remaining is , we want to restrict access to shares to given AD groups that way: valid users = @ADDOMAIN+ADGROUP that doesnt work in any combination, the other way valid users = @ADDOMAIN+ADUSERNAME works without any probem there is no user or groupmapping at all ---output from level 10 log-- 2004/10/21 17:16:44, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(533) user_in_list: checking user |WW300+atw113c9| against |admoss| [2004/10/21 17:16:44, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(533) user_in_list: checking user |WW300+atw113c9| against |ww300+csi| [2004/10/21 17:16:44, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(610) user_in_list: checking if user |WW300+atw113c9| is in winbind group |ww300+csi| [2004/10/21 17:16:49, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_winbind_group_list(412) user_in_winbind_group_list: using groups -- 30001 30002 30003 30004 30005 30006 30007 30008 30009 300 10 30011 30012 30013 30014 30015 30016 [2004/10/21 17:16:49, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(314) user 'WW300+atw113c9' (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (pst) [2004/10/21 17:16:49, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(129) -- --- as i think winbind can only reflect to first 16 or 17 groups user_in_list checks the right group name , in this case ww300+admoss , but user_in_winbind_group_list shows only the first 16 mapped groups , as we have more then 1000 or 2000 and nested groups i can never be authenticated my uid range is 10-12 gid range is 3-5 Now my second question ; the only workaround in this siuations is to do a valid user statement to every user who should connect So is there a limitation to the string length of valid users = I fear i need 4 to 500 users at all Any help or workaround is pretty appreciated kind regards martin schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration Fax +43 5 1707 57560 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbs.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] winbind AD group non primary group permissions
Hello, In our company we need to setup a samba-server for store the pst files in a dedicated share on our samba server. A very important goal is zero administration Samba Server is a sun running solaris 9 , samba-3.0.7 is installed with winbind , all is running as expected , users can connect to the share , if the share isnt already created , it is created by preexec script --- sniplet of smb.conf [pst] root preexec = /bin/ksh -c mkdir /export/home/pst/%u path = /export/home/pst/%u read only = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 available = yes public = no and now th problem As all is running so well , customers become hungry on advanced features ... One of the features is , they want acces to the share be restricted to a special group(AD) which is not the user's primary group. I searched google etc etc all faqs and so on , but nothing. I tried around with preexec scripts , using getent group|grep $usr ; without success, maybe the failure is in my scripts , so my question ; is there anybody out , who had success in that case described All help is much apreciated , kind regardsmartin schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration Fax +43 5 1707 57560 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbs.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
Hi Jerry, thanks a lot for your replay , but ... I think its my mistake , my problem description wasnt the best i fear, so let me try again; situation is as following : AD users can connect to a given share without any problem , the users are pure (AD)NT-USERS , without any unix-pendant . Now the problem; I am not able to restrict connections to a given AD group , getent group $group|grep $usr shows me the user is in the requested AD group, but valid users = domain\group fails in every combination Additionally i have to make clear , that this groups only exist in AD , not on unix host , maybe thats the problem I also tried to expand the valid users directive like valid users = `getent groups $groupname` think i have overlooked an important point..., but may be theres a workaround thanks in advance for your efforts kind regardsmartin schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration Fax +43 5 1707 57560 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbs.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] strange behaviour of smbpasswd after upgrade to samba.3.0.0
Hello, I have a serious problem after upgrading from samba.2.2.8a - 3.0.0(1) We have security = domain in both samba-versions ; for normal domain users nothing has changed , but we need to authenticate external users , who are not members of our native win2k domain via the smbpasswd mechanism. The user got a login-screen and authenticated himself via his unix-login and the smbpasswd program. Under samba.2.2.8a no problems at all. After upgrading to samba.3.0.0(1) that never works... --logfile-entry--- domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user lruser in domain WW300 to Domain controller \\VIES12KA. Error was NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER. [2004/01/09 09:53:25, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(627) Can't become connected user! -- We run that 2 versions with identical smb.conf files, and it is reproducable on other servers too , when i go back to older version it works again. Seems to be there are changes in the authentication procedure. How can commit these changes , ore if not can give me some hints to resolve this problem ?? Thanks in advance for your efforts. kind regardsMartin Schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration Fax +43 5 1707 57560 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbs.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] reliant-unix-5.45 samba-3.0.0
Hello to the list, Is there anyone who had successfull compiled samba-3.0.0 on reliant-unix 5.45 , with latest supported gcc3.0.2. We need that , because we are changing to ads with smb signing , so we need samba 3.0.0 . It was really a pain to get the gcc running under reliant , but now the really problems begin... Thanks in advance for your efforts kind regardsmartin schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration Fax +43 5 1707 57560 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbs.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] solaris 9 and compiling
Hello, I have a problem to build the samba_3.0 sources for sol9 , i am running gcc-3.3. It works , but the binaries became huge , the samba.pkg is about 450 MB . Now my question; do i need any compiler flags ? i did it with default-settings. But as i said , it works , i can join domains , hope there is a sun-guru. kind regardsmartin schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration Fax +43 5 1707 57560 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbs.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
AW: [Samba] solaris 9 and compiling
Hello, _BINGO_ !! thanks a lot kind regardsmartin schreiber -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Jelmer Vernooij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 29. September 2003 16:03 An: Schreiber Martin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [Samba] solaris 9 and compiling On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 15:40, Schreiber Martin wrote: Hello, I have a problem to build the samba_3.0 sources for sol9 , i am running gcc-3.3. It works , but the binaries became huge , the samba.pkg is about 450 MB . Now my question; do i need any compiler flags ? i did it with default-settings. Samba 3.0.0 always put in debugging symbols. This will be fixed in 3.0.1. For now, try using the 'strip' utility on the binaries. Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij - http://jelmer.vernstok.nl/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba and .NET (WIN 2003)
Hello, is there any information about new windows version .NET or winxp server or whatever the name will be. Does it run with samba 2.2.7a or must i wait until version 3.0 is released. kind regardsmartin schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration Fax +43 5 1707 57560 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbs.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba.2.2.7a clearcase solaris 8 Too many open files
Hello, We ran a big mixed win2k unix environment. We use latest samba-version (2.2.7a) and clearcase v2002 (latest version). Our vob and view servers are sol 8 boxes , clients ran win2k. Since a week or 2 i can see the following error or warning messages in the logs: ## Unable to open new log file /usr/local/samba/log.leipzig2: Too many open files ## I tuned the filedescriptor settings in /etc/system to set rlim_fd_max=8192 set rlim_fd_cur=4096 and the samba max open settings tomax open files = 16384 , but that settings seam to be useless , no affect. In the clearcase logs no errors or warnings are indicated , now my question , may i forget it , or is that a serious behaviour. kind regardsmartin schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration Fax +43 5 1707 57560 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbs.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
