Re: [Samba] samba for solaris

[Spike Burkhardt]

Emilio,

  go to www.sunfreeware.com.  You'll find a whole bunch of stuff
including Samba 3.0.10 for solaris 9!

spike

Emilio Brusa wrote:

> Hi:
> I need install in one solaris9-sparc Samba, but in the
> http://us4samba.org/ftp/Binary_Packages/solaris/
> 
> I dont see the binaries.
>
> Somebody could please help me to find samba for solaris sparc.
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> E.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] 16-bit application

[Spike Burkhardt]

  I've got a really weird problem.  A user is running a 16-bit
application called Jetform V2.2, originally from Delrina but now
supported by Adobe.  The user is storing the data files on their local
disk but the forms sit on a samba share.  We have moved the data files
to samba as well and this is where the weirdness comes in.  When the
application tries to open a file it brings down a pulldown list and in
the list is the DOS filename.  When the files were local the names
listed were the Windows filenames.  The same behavior is shown when the
data files are on a Novell volume so it seems like it's not a Samba
issue.  Does anyone have a clue on how to get the Windows filename to be
listed?  Thanks for the help.

spike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] reload configuration without a stop ?

[Spike Burkhardt]

By default Samba will read the configuration file every 60 seconds so no HUP
is needed.  I have however done this without affecting currently connected
users.  The caveat is that if configuration changes are made to shares that
users are already connected to, those changes will not be seen.  If changes
to the underlying UNIX file system is changed(protectecions primarily) then
another set of problems may occur.

HTH,

spike

David Landgren wrote:

> You can send all the processes a HUP and they will reload the config.
> Ordinarily this should not affect them (unless the config change is,
> for instance, the suppression of a share they happen to be using).
>
> smbstatus -p | tail +5 | awk '{print $1}' | xargs kill -HUP
>
> The above should do the trick. Yes, there are probably killall or
> killproc commands that do this, but they have the same name from one
> OS or distro to another.
>
> David
>
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:46:21 +0100, fluppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > i am planning to use samba in my company, first on a test system and
> > later on operational.
> > I have a question about reloading the configuration file.
> >
> > When i do some changes in the configuration file about mappings etc for
> > new users, new folders on request etc and i have to reload the
> > configuration, is that a problem for the connected users ?
> >
> > Will they lose their connection while they are writing or saving or
> > whatever ?
> >
> > cheers,
> > Phil.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Re: Best practices for long-running Samba server

[Spike Burkhardt]

Paul & David,

  Good points that I agree with but at least at three managers I've had want to 
the uptime get bigger & bigger.  Something about the 99.95% uptime
"industry standard." :-(((  Ridiculous.

spike

Paul Gienger wrote:

> David Landgren wrote:
>
> >>The client running our first Samba3 PDC production server had an uptime of 
> >>115 days, then the uptime got spoiled by them moving to a new building.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I'm not quite sure what the fascination is with long uptimes. It's
> >good to reboot the system from time to time, not because it needs it,
> >but just to prove that you still can.
> >
> >
> Here here.  I've seen it posted elsewhere and it makes a good point -
> long uptimes show that the machine hasn't had its updates run on the
> core OS.  Until you can find a way to reload the kernel without
> rebooting (oxymoron) long uptimes are a mark of lazyness.
>
> What I'd rather see is longest stretch of not having to be rebooted
> between the hours of 7am and 6pm.  Unfortunately the uptime command
> doesn't tell us that ;)
>
> --
> --
> Paul GiengerOffice: 701-281-1884
> Applied Engineering Inc.
> Systems Architect   Fax:701-281-1322
> URL: www.ae-solutions.com   mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Unable to map drives to samba shares

[Spike Burkhardt]

Alistair,

  Caveat:   I have no experience on SCO but if it were Solaris I'd look at
/etc/system. the IPC and semaphore count.  Additionally look at your system log
file.  For Solaris it's /var/adm/messages.  It seems to me like a system
resource limitation problem, not Samba.  I'll also give you the "pat" answer -
upgrade samba to at least 2.2.12, preferrably 3.0.10

HTH

spike

"Lord, Alistair J." wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Nobody responded to my original query - is this because it's unsolvable?
>
> I'd be extremely grateful for any help that could be given on this issue...
>
> Many thanks,
> Alistair Lord
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ] On Behalf Of Lord, Alistair J.
> > Sent: 21 January 2005 16:22
> > To: samba@lists.samba.org
> > Subject: [Samba] Unable to map drives to samba shares
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We're running SCO open server 5.0.6 and Samba 2.2.0 and get
> > recurring problems when people try to map drives. Windows
> > produces the error: "No more connections can be made to this
> > remote computer at this time [...] already as many
> > connections as the computer can accept."
> >
> > The "max connections" parameter is not set in our smb.conf
> > file. From what the man page says, it defaults to 0, and
> > should mean there is no restriction on the number of connections, but
> > we don't have a vast number of people connecting anyway
> > (currently smbstatus -S shows about
> > 11 shares).
> >
> > Does anyone know how to resolve this issue?
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Alistair Lord
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] how to limit the size of a samba 3 share?

[Spike Burkhardt]

Mark,

  I think there's a way to do it from smb.conf but I've used Solaris quotas with
no problems.  Just be sure to build samba with "--with-quotas" and then use the
OS quota system.  HTH

Spike

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hello Samba list,
>
> I have a customer that really needs to have its Samba shares hard-limited to
> a
> certain size.
> We migrated them from Novell Netware 5 to Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3 with
> Samba 3 with LDAP backend.
> We've set UNIX acls on the share folders and subfolders, since they have
> specific wishes that cannot be covered with standard permissions (multiple
> groups should be able to read and/or write)
> The need for this and the share size limit comes from their Novell
> experiences, with which this is all possible.
> I've been able to cover all their 'access' wishes, but the share size
> limitation remains.
> The shares are all now simply on one partition.
>
> As far as I've been able to research, there is no possibility to really set
> a harddisk limit on a share (or a directory).
> Am I correct? Have to admit that I was surprised by this, I expected that
> this would be possible, to me it occurs as a logical wish / need for many
> server admins.
> There seem to have been attempts for Samba 2.x but they are not
> available/working for 3.x.?!
>
> As far as I can judge, user and group quotas will not help me here, they
> have a lot of different groups and users are in multiple groups.
> All users have "Domain Users" as their primary group
>
> How can I achieve the (more or less) the same result?
> I thought of repartitioning the drive and placing every share on its own
> partition.
> Does this make sense? I need to be able to adjust the sizes easily.
> Does LVM help me here?
>
> Can I somehow maybe limit the size of a directory instead?
> Are there any other mechanisms that I've overseen or does somebody know any
> workarounds.
>
> I know, a lot of questions, but they remains unanswered after reading a lot
> of docs (including Samba 3 by Example, great book John)
> So any feedback will really be appreciated
>
> TIA
>
> Mark van den Bogaard
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] About access the samba server through VPN connection

[Spike Burkhardt]

John,

  The only difference between using samba normally & VPN would be thru
Security.  We found that if Security = Domain, the machine would need to be
registered in the domain.  We decided that we didn't want that kind of
management overhead so we use Security = Server.

HTH,

spike

John Wong wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Is there any restriction for access the samba server through the VPN
> connection.
>
> We are trying to do the remote access the samba server through the VPN
> client.  And the VPN server isn't apply any rule for blocking any service.
>
> Any suggestion we can do???
>
> Best regards,
> John Wong
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas M. Skeren III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 9:43 AM
> To: John Wong
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Samba] About access the samba server through VPN
> connection
>
> John Wong wrote:
>
> >Dear all,
> >
> >We are facing the problem for accessing the samba server through the VPN
> >connection.
> >
> >
> How's the VPN done?
>
> >And  also using the samba-2.2.3a-6 with the Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Kernel
> >2.4.18-3).
> >
> >
> Really old version. You should upgrade.
>
> >Any solution can provide??
> >
> >Best regards,
> >John
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] General Samba Questions

[Spike Burkhardt]

John,

  Just last month we setup a AD network with Samba 3.0.10 on Solaris 8 & 9 and
it worked the first time!  I didn't have anything to do with setting up AD but
I was responsible for samba.  I installed the MIT Kerberos 1.3.5 libraries,
built Samba 3.0.10 with --with-ads.  Worked excellantly :-))

spike

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We've been having lots of issues with our Linux based Samba servers since
> the Windows domains have migrated to AD. We were hoping and expecting
> that, at least in the short term, we could run in "mixed" mode and not
> have to make any changes to our Samba servers. However, things just aren't
> working well. Also, I've posted several issues to this list over the last
> several weeks and many of the issues I've encountered have gone
> unresolved.
>
> So, the question(s) I have is what is the recommended/suggested Samba
> version and configuration we should consider deploying in an
> infrastructure running with Windows 2003 servers and AD? We are running
> primarily RedHat 9 and RedHat ES 30 and a majority of our Samba servers
> are currently running 3.0.7 with some running 2.2.7a, (both of which are
> RedHat's distributions). We've had all kinds of problems varying from
> intermittent "password server not available" issues, to smbd locking up
> and most recently having problems changing a server from server to domain
> security style. Interestingly, (or maybe not), none of these problems
> existed prior to the AD upgrades
>
> I'm considering making an effort to go full ads mode on the samba servers,
> however, I've also seen that others have had issues doing this.
>
> I'm open to suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Except for parsing "smb.conf", how can I get a share's full settings?

[Spike Burkhardt]

Iap,

  Try testparm!

spike

"Iap, Singuan" wrote:

> Such settings as valid users, write list, comments, path.
>
> by utilities in samba/bin/net, wbinfo,...
>
> ("net rpc shares" seems not what I am looking for)
>
> Any hints are very appreciated.
>
> Iap
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] samba v3 slow with 'security = server'

[Spike Burkhardt]

Anthony,

  I don't think changing authentication to 'security = Domain' would help a
performance problem.  I'd make sure that you're not running into memory,
disk or network congestion problems.  I forget the number but there is a
recommended amount of memory/user so knowing the number of connections is
important.  Memory usage can make a huge difference in a Solaris
environment.  Make sure there hasn't been any changes in usage either. There
are lots of areas that could affect this but those would be my starting
points.

spike

Anthony Iano-Fletcher wrote:

> We were running samba v2.2.x with the 'security = server' option and
> everything worked wonderfully.
>
> We upgraded to samba 3.0.10 with the same configuration. Everything
> still works but it's very very slow. Opening a file can take 15 to 30
> seconds or more. I changed the security option to 'user' and everything
> is fast again.  Clearly something has changed between 2.x.x and 3.x.x to
> slow this down immensely.
>
> Is there any way we can run with security set to server but cache the
> results of the server conversation? Am I missing a new option that can
> set?
>
> Would 'security = Domain' help? or will it suffer from the same issue.
>
> Anthony.
>
> --
> Anthony R Iano-Fletcher
>   Room 2033, Building 12A,http://dcb.cit.nih.gov/~arif
>   National Institutes of Health,  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   12A South Drive, Bethesda,  Phone: (+1) 301 402 1741.
>   MD 20892-5624, USA.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Issues with Solaris 9, and ADS

[Spike Burkhardt]

David & all,

   It seems like there's 2 problems.  In my understanding of Samba a UNIX
account is required in any case.   As to the second problem with the realm,
could you please post your smb.conf?  I'm not sure what would cause that problem
other than being in the wrong workgroup or pointing to the wrong AD server.

spike

David Wruck wrote:

> I have been working with this for a little over a month now, and here's
> where we are at:
>
> We have 3 domains, 2 of them are sending SIDs to the Solaris box, and
> Kerbos is compiled and working (we can authenticate to any of the 3
> domains), we can get user IDs from any of the 3 domains, however none of
> the users can gain access to the share unless we give them a Unix account.
>
> Samba was compiled with ADS support, and the make file shows that krb5
> and ADS are both 1, however when we add the 'realm =' to the config file
> we get an error with Samba claiming it does not understand the realm
> setting.
>
> We are using 3.0.9, and the exact error is that the AD user is not
> found, yet wbinfo can find the user accounts just fine. The AD is a 2000 AD.
>
> We have followed steps in the docs, and on more mailing lists than I
> care to remember at this point. If anyone could point out any possible
> flaw, I'd appreciate it. I apologize for not having cut and paste
> messages and such, but I'm not anywhere near the machine at the moment,
> however I could post anything that would be useful later.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Migrating from Samba 2.2.8 to 3.x on different machine

[Spike Burkhardt]

Jorick,

  If you're having problems then I'd scale back on all the changes.  Basically
I'd install the 3.0.10 software, copy over the smb.conf and first see if that
works.  I'd then do the domain name, switch to ldap & finally to the rename.
This last part depends on whether ldap has the desired username.  See below
for how I'd attack the problem.

Jorick Astrego wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> Samba 2.x has been running for a while now but now it's time to upgrade. I
> tried everything (Google, Books, HOWTO's, etc.) but for the last month
> I've been unable to perform a succesfull migration. Maybe I try to do to
> many things at once but I cannot get the following to work:
>
> - Move the samba domain from a 2.x server to 3.x on a different machine

Do this first.

   * Install 3.0.10 on the new machine.
   * Copy the smb.conf file from the old machine to the new machine.
   * Startup and test.
   * If it fails, post the results with the appropriate log entries and your
 smb.conf file.

 - switch to a ldap backend

Do this third.

   * After the first two steps are successfully completed, populate LDAP with
 the appropriate info without the renaming of accounts.
   * Make your smb.conf changes.  This could be where changing company names
 would make a difference.  You'll need to know this information such as
 OU, admin password...
   * Verify that samba is connecting to the LDAP server.  Even at the lowest
 levels of log messages, you should see a "connected" message.
   * After successfully connecting and mounting a share with LDAP add the new
 usernames without taking out the old ones.

>
> - change the domain name (our company name has changed)

Do this second.
Are you saying that the workgroup has changed?  If so then change it in
smb.conf.  If the workgroup hasn't changed then there is no need.

>
> - rename all the users from firstname to first initial + lastname
>
> I installed and configured a 3.x server on the machine with OpenLdap as
> backend, then I tried to join the old Samba domain so I could use net
> vampire but I get the message: error setting trust account password:
> NT_ACCESS_DENIED

Do this last.

   * Instead of renaming the LDAP usernames, add the new usernames.
   * Mount a share with the new username
   * If not successful then post the results with the appropriate log entries
 and your smb.conf file

HTH.

spike

>
>
> When I try net vampire I get the message: Failed to fetch Domain database:
> NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
>
> Regards,
>
> Jorick Astrego
> IBM Certified System Administrator - Lotus Notes and Domino
>
> Quality On-Line®
> Hengelosestraat 501
> P.O. Box 1414
> NL-7500 BK  Enschede
> the Netherlands
> Phone  +31 53 4809090
> Fax+31 53 4342040
> Internet   http://www.qualityonline.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] time for a poll -- does anyone use the testprns tool ?

[Spike Burkhardt]

Nope, don't use it but of course we are just starting to use samba for
printing!

spike

"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mostly for print server admins:
>
> I am considering marking testprns as deprecated (or just
> remove it).  It doesn't seem to be that useful anymore.  Does
> anyone use it on a regular basis and would therefore be distraught
> if it were gone in a future 3.0.x release ?
>
> cheers, jerry
> - -
> Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm)  --- http://www.samba.org
> GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
> "If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song"--Switchfoot (2003)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFByxh9IR7qMdg1EfYRAlijAJ0Wqe6qCTP+HAZ5Zs9Fp8KJH5vd3QCfREqK
> qivp49gJVWCZZ8Lu6tEusaM=
> =g68q
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Question about win2000 and samba

[Spike Burkhardt]

Bart,

  I'm not sure about this answer but I think that the red cross means that 
Windows thinks they are not available.  In other words I think if you did a 
refresh from Windows Explorer -> View
the red crosses would go away.

spike

Bart Hendrix wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I setup Samba 3.09 with LDAP and everything seems to work fine. (shres, 
> permissions, startscripts)
>
> But we have the following problem on Win2000 machines: If you start the 
> machine and Login on the domain everythings seems to go fine. Then the 
> startscript will be loaded and works fine.
> When I go to my computer, I see a red cross in every sharemapping. But when I 
> click on the sharemapping it seems to work fine end I can see al files.
> Windows XP works fine, and doesn't show the red cross.
>
> Any idea why the red cross is showed?
>
> Thanks
>
> Bart
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] samba ldap?

[Spike Burkhardt]

Tim,

  It would help if  you could include the smb.conf file!

spike

Tim Tyler wrote:

>Samba Ldap experts,
> I am trying to recompile samba to support ldap.  After compiling samba
> with --with-ldapsam, I had no errors with configure or
> compilation.  However, after starting up smbd and nmbd, I get these errors
> in the log.smbd file when I try to connect to the server:
>
> [2004/12/20 13:57:02, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(590)
>Unable to open new log file /var/log/samba/smbd.log: No such file or
> directory
> [2004/12/20 13:57:02, 0] passdb/pdb_interface.c:make_pdb_methods_name(664)
>No builtin nor plugin backend for ldapsam found
> [2004/12/20 13:57:02, 1] passdb/pdb_interface.c:make_pdb_context_list(765)
>Loading ldapsam:ldap://lincon.beloit.edu failed!
> [2004/12/20 13:57:05, 0] passdb/pdb_interface.c:make_pdb_methods_name(664)
>No builtin nor plugin backend for ldapsam found
> [2004/12/20 13:57:05, 1] passdb/pdb_interface.c:make_pdb_context_list(765)
>Loading ldapsam:ldap://lincon.beloit.edu failed!
>
> Is this a problem on the samba side or the ldap server side which is on
> another server?  Any  hints about resolving it?
> I am just not sure where to begin to look.
>
> Tim Tyler
> Network Engineer - Beloit College
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Compiling samba on Solaris 8 --with-ads

[Spike Burkhardt]

Imed,

  For ADS support, you need ldap.  I don't know if the kerberos stuff is
confusing the issue but I do know that when I compiled Samba for ADS, I needed
the Open_ldap libraries.  In my configuration I did not specify any kerberos.

spike

Imed Ben Aleya wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to Compile Samba with ADS support on Solaris 8. I have installed
> without any problems:
>
> /opt/cifs/bdb -> .bdb-4.2.52
> /opt/cifs/heimdal -> .heimdal-0.6.3
> /opt/cifs/openldap -> .openldap-2.1.25
> /opt/cifs/openssl -> .openssl-0.9.7e
> /opt/cifs/samba -> .samba-3.0.9
>
> and I'm configuring samba with:
>
> LDFLAGS="-L/opt/cifs/openldap/lib -L/opt/cifs/heimdal/lib"
> export LDFLAGS
> CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/cifs/openldap/include -I/opt/cifs/heimdal/include"
> export CPPFLAGS
> ./configure \
> --prefix=/opt/cifs/.samba-3.0.9 \
> --with-krb5=/opt/cifs/heimdal \
> --with-ads
>
> but I'm getting the following error message von the configure script:
>
> ...
> checking for krb5_c_enctype_compare... no
> checking for krb5_enctypes_compatible_keys... no
> checking for krb5_encrypt_block type... no
> checking for addrtype in krb5_address... no
> checking for addr_type in krb5_address... yes
> checking for enc_part2 in krb5_ticket... no
> checking for keyblock in krb5_creds... no
> checking for session in krb5_creds... yes
> checking for keyvalue in krb5_keyblock... yes
> checking for ENCTYPE_ARCFOUR_HMAC_MD5... yes
> checking for KEYTYPE_ARCFOUR_56... yes
> checking for AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY... yes
> checking for KV5M_KEYTAB... no
> checking for the krb5_princ_component macro... no
> checking for key in krb5_keytab_entry... no
> checking for keyblock in krb5_keytab_entry... yes
> configure: error: libkrb5 is needed for Active Directory support
>
> Can anyone help?
>
> Thanks in Advance!
> Imed
>
> --
> GMX ProMail mit bestem Virenschutz http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
> +++ Empfehlung der Redaktion +++ Internet Professionell 10/04 +++
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: Simple Samba connection question to new Active Directory

[Spike Burkhardt]

Lev,

>
>
> Hello all!
> I currently have a small Windows NT 4 domain (named OLD_NETWORK).
> All files are stored on a UNIX server (running Solaris) running
> Samba 2.2. Runs perfect. No problems. Samba's only job in my network is JUST
> TO STORE AND SERVE OUT FILES to PCs. Samba does not run as a PDC. Merely
> validates valid users to get their files off UNIX server.
> I believe this is the simplest possible Samba scenario!

Agreed!

>
> I am going to join a neighboring departement's new Active Directory
> (named NEW_NETWORK).
> I already merged one PC and one user into the new AD using
> Microsoft's Active Directory Migration Tool. The user and computer migrated
> perfectly. The user logs onto the new AD (NEW_NETWORK) and can get their
> files off UNIX server via Samba just as before. Perfect! It's like nothing
> has changed!
> But what will happen when I turn off the OLD_NETWORK NT 4 servers???
> I assume the users I migrated will still be able to access their
> files right (I can just pull the network cables from OLD_NETWORK to test
> that out)?

I'll make some assumptions here.
1.  First is that the samba server is the same server in NEW_NETWORK as in 
OLD_NETWORK.
2.   All accounts in OLD_NETWORK have been migrated to AD realm on NEW_NETWORK.
3.  Authentication and authorization are currently done on the NT4 servers.
4.  Authentication and authorization will be done on the AD servers.

When you turn off the NT 4 servers, you will need to change the smb.conf file 
to reflect the new AD stuff.  For instance, you'll need to point to the new 
password server; specify the AD realm (realm = xxx) and the workgroup the 
server is in.

>
> Also, with OLD_NETWORK turned off, how will I be able to add a new
> user and still have Samba let them in to read/write files on UNIX server?

Don't know.  In our environment, a new user get's an account created on the AD 
server and then on the samba server.  Both are manual processes.

>
> Right now Samba is currently validating users by looking at the PDC
> of OLD_NETWORK.
> Can I change how Samba validates users? Maybe I can list them out
> user by user for Samba?

See above.  If validation will occur on the AD server, smb.conf will need to 
get modified.  I have tested validating to a NT server on a AD network with no 
issues at all.  Samba is simply amazing!

HTH.

spike

>
> HELP!
>
> Thanks,
> Keith
> Rochester, NY
>
>   
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] writeable vs readonly precedence

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  I've got a user in two different UNIX groups.  I have a share defined
in my smb.conf file where one of the groups has read-only access and the
other group has writeable=Yes access.  The share is defined as this:

[db_apps]
 path = /db_apps
 valid users = @tc_users @tc_adm
 write list = @tc_adm
 read list = @tc_users
 force group = tc_adm
 browseable = no
 writeable = Yes

My question is this:  which permissions will the user who is in both
groups have?  Thanks for your help!

spike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] print que not updating

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  There was a similar thread in August but I'm not sure if this is the
same problem.  Basically what's happening is that I'm printing a desktop
file(Word/Excel/IE) to a printer served up on my samba server.  The job
prints, the file get deleted on the server but in my system tray, it
seems like the job never gets removed from the que or it's extremely
slow. Sometimes the job does get deleted from the que.  It seems like
once the job doesn't get removed from the que it won't unless I
specifically cancel the job or I restart the samba server.  I'm running
3.0.6 on Solaris 8.  The desktop is NT 4 SP6.   Can anyone help me out?
Thanks!

spike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] netlogon scripts

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  If I want to specify a logon script, does security need to be set to
Domain?  The issue is that we have authentication at the PDC/BDC so that
our VPN users can map drives on their home PC's.  Is there a different
way to do a logon script other than setting the SECURITY = DOMAIN?

  I am running 2.2.8a (planning on 2.2.12) on Solaris 8.  Thanks for
your help.

spike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] LDAP with Netscape 4 & Solaris 8

[Spike Burkhardt]

Hey all,

  I'm trying to get Samba 3.0.4 to work with Netscape Directory Server
4.x  with LDAP.  The problem is that I'm not getting authenticated thru
LDAP.  I've tried searching the archives(MARC), google and can find some
info but nothing seems to fix it. I've loaded the Netscape V4 schema
from the examples/LDAP.

  Included at the end is both my smb.conf file and my LDIF record.  I
think I'm fairly close.  In my LDIF record, I don't see anything about
sambaSamAccount.  Once I insert the schema into LDAP, do I need to do
anything else with the directory server?  I just want to use LDAP for
password authentitcation.   I can connect to ldap server.  In
troubleshooting I've increased the log level to 9 and when I do a

pdbedit -Lv burkharr

here's the partial output:

Trying to load: ldapsam:ldap://tgabrielho.ssd.loral.com:389
Attempting to register passdb backend ldapsam
Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam'
Attempting to register passdb backend ldapsam_compat
Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam_compat'
Attempting to register passdb backend smbpasswd
Successfully added passdb backend 'smbpasswd'
Attempting to register passdb backend tdbsam
Successfully added passdb backend 'tdbsam'
Attempting to register passdb backend guest
Successfully added passdb backend 'guest'
Attempting to find an passdb backend to match
ldapsam:ldap://tgabrielho.ssd.loral.com:389 (ldapsam)
Found pdb backend ldapsam
Searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=SPIKEMAN))]
smbldap_search: base => [o=Loral SpaceCom Corp,c=US], filter =>
[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=SPIKEMAN))], scope => [2]
smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server
The LDAP server is succesful connected
pdb backend ldapsam:ldap://tgabrielho.ssd.loral.com:389 has a valid init

Attempting to find an passdb backend to match guest (guest)
Found pdb backend guest
pdb backend guest has a valid init
Netbios name list:-
my_netbios_names[0]="SPIKEMAN"
Trying to load: ldapsam:ldap://tgabrielho.ssd.loral.com:389
Attempting to find an passdb backend to match
ldapsam:ldap://tgabrielho.ssd.loral.com:389 (ldapsam)
Found pdb backend ldapsam
Searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=SPIKEMAN))]
smbldap_search: base => [o=Loral SpaceCom Corp,c=US], filter =>
[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=SPIKEMAN))], scope => [2]
smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server
The LDAP server is succesful connected
pdb backend ldapsam:ldap://tgabrielho.ssd.loral.com:389 has a valid init

Attempting to find an passdb backend to match guest (guest)
Found pdb backend guest
pdb backend guest has a valid init
smbldap_search: base => [o=Loral SpaceCom Corp,c=US], filter =>
[(&(uid=burkharr)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))], scope => [2]
ldapsam_getsampwnam: Unable to locate user [burkharr] count=0
Username not found!

Here is my smb.conf file:
spikeman:/apps/samba/bin> testparm
Load smb config files from /apps/samba/lib/smb.conf
Processing section "[homes]"
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = ALPS
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://tgabrielho.ssd.loral.com:389
password level = 8
log level = 3
log file = /var/samba/log/log.%m
ldap suffix = "o=Loral SpaceCom Corp,c=US"
ldap user suffix = ou=SS/L
ldap admin dn = "cn=Directory Manager"

[homes]
comment = %u Home Directory
read only = No

LDIF record
uid=burkharr,ou=SS/L, o=Loral SpaceCom Corp,c=us
sn=Burkhardt
telephonenumber=24787
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
uid=burkharr
ntuserdomainid=WORLD:burkharr
ntuserdeleteaccount=TRUE
ntusercreatenewaccount=TRUE
employeenumber=5479
maildeliveryoption=mailbox
mailhost=thercho.ssd.loral.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
objectclass=top
objectclass=person
objectclass=organizationalPerson
objectclass=inetOrgPerson
objectclass=nTUser
objectclass=mailrecipient
objectclass=nsmessagingserveruser
objectclass=ctCalUser
objectclass=icsCalendarUser
ctcalpasswordrequired=1
ctcalxitemid=11000:05464
ou=SS/L
ctcalflags=0
ctcallanguageid=0
ctcalsysopcanwritepassword=1
ctcaldefaulttaskreminder=0:0
ctcalrefreshprefs=1:60
ctcaltimezone=0
givenname=Richard
cn=Spike Burkhardt
ctcalnotifmechanism=1

ctcaloperatingprefs=0:255:0:0:0:0:450:960:420:960:0:450:960:420:960:0:450:960:420:960:0:450:960:420:960:0:450:960:420:960:0:450:960:420:960:0:450:960:420:960

ctcaldefaultnotereminder=1:0
ctcaldefaultreminder=1:60
ctcaldisplayprefs=4:420:1080:1:30:62:2
icscalendar=burkharr
icssubscribed=burkharr$burkharr
icscalendarowned=burkharr$


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] ACL propogation

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  I have a share defined as such:

[sharename]
  path = /projects/tc
  valid users = @tc_users
  force group = tc_users
  writeable = Yes

everything works fine with this.  I have been asked to modify this
definition such that there will be a subdirectory /projects/tc/draco
where access to /projects/tc/draco is by users in the UNIX group
tc_draco.  Only users in this group can have write access.  This is on a
Solaris 8 system.  My question is this:  Short of having Solaris ACL's,
is there a way to do this in samba without defining a share for this one
directory?

Thanks for you help.


spike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Domain problem with NT4 & Samba 3.0.2a

[Spike Burkhardt]

Jon,

  I'm using the Security = SERVER due to the fact that the machines that will be used
aren't in the domain.  I'm not using the smbpasswd file.  I have not joined the
domain but on the two other servers I've setup I haven't had to.  I'll try it and let
you know.  As to the authenticating, how can I tell if it's using smbpasswd?

spike

Jonathan Johnson wrote:

> The first thing that jumps out at me is the line beginning with
> Domain=[WORKGROUP] in the results of 'smbclient -L moon". It appears to
> me that in looking for the browse list, your user may be attempting to
> authenticate against the local smbpasswd database instead of
> authenticating against the PDC or BDC. A bug, a feature, or a
> misunderstanding? I don't know.
>
> Have you joined this server to the domain?
>
> You'll want to read this section of the Samba 3 HOWTO if you haven't
> already:
> http://us2.samba.org/samba/docs/man/howto/domain-member.html#domain-member-server
>
> This section says to use Security = DOMAIN instead of Security =
> SERVER, and explains why. Looking at your smb.conf, it looks like
> you're on the right track.
>
> I'd recommend investigating winbind to create users on the fly when
> auth'd against the domain controller. As samba still requires a local
> user database, winbind and appropriate scripts will automatically
> maintain this local user database for you.
>
> And, of course, there's always the recommendation to go with Samba
> 3.0.4 (or 3.0.5 if it's out soon).
>
> --Jon Johnson
> Sutinen Consulting, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Spike Burkhardt wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> >   I really need some help.  I'm putting samba up on a new windows domain
> > called SIERRA.  I'm using Samba 3.0.2a on Solaris 8.  I'm barely
> > knowledgeable on Windows NetBIOS... but am good with Solaris.  The
> > status is that I've got the daemons running and working normally.  I
> > have 1 desktop with 1 PDC & 1 BDC in the SIERRA domain.  On the desktop,
> > I can see both DC's but not the samba server.  As a non-priviledged
> > account, when I issue a smbclient -L moon I get the following output:
> >
> > moon:/home/burkharr> smbclient -L moon
> > Password:
> >
> > Anonymous login successful
> > Domain=[SIERRA] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.2a]
> >
> > Sharename  Type  Comment
> >  -  ---
> > rcbtest Disk  Spike's testing
> > IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba 3.0.2a)
> > ADMIN$IPC   IPC Service (Samba 3.0.2a)
> > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[SunOS 5.8 sun4u] Server=[LAN Manager 2.1]
> > tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password
> > pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.)
> > NetBIOS over TCP disabled -- no workgroup available
> >
> >
> > When I issue the same command substituting localhost for moon I get the
> > following output:
> > moon:/home/burkharr> smbclient -L localhost
> > Password:
> >
> > Anonymous login successful
> > Domain=[SIERRA] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.2a]
> >
> > Sharename  Type  Comment
> > -    ---
> > rcbtestDisk  Spike's testing
> > IPC$  IPC   IPC Service (Samba 3.0.2a)
> >ADMIN$IPC   IPC Service (Samba 3.0.2a)
> > Anonymous login successful
> > Domain=[SIERRA] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.2a]
> >
> > Server   Comment
> > ----
> > EPN32-237
> > MOON Samba 3.0.2a
> > ROHAN
> > SHADOWFAX
> >
> > WorkgroupMaster
> > ----
> > SIERRAMOON
> >
> >
> > Notice that I don't get any NetBIOS errors which makes sense because I'm
> > not going out on the network.
> >
> > Here's my smb.conf file:
> > moon:/home/burkharr> more /apps/samba/lib/smb.conf
> > # Global parameters
> > [global]
> > workgroup = SIERRA
> > netbios name = moon
> > security = SERVER
> > encrypt passwords = Yes
> > password server = rohan shadowfax
> > wins server = 172.22.2.251
> > password level = 8
> > #admin log = Yes
> > log level = 1
> > log file = /var/samba/log/log.%m
> > create mask = 775
> >
> > [rcbtest]
> > comment = Spike's testing
> > path = /dbd00/spike
> > valid users = @webadmin
> > force group = webadmin
> > create mask = 740
> > writeable = Yes
> >
> > Any thoughts?  Thanks for your help.
> >
> > spike
> >
> >
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Domain problem with NT4 & Samba 3.0.2a

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  I really need some help.  I'm putting samba up on a new windows domain
called SIERRA.  I'm using Samba 3.0.2a on Solaris 8.  I'm barely
knowledgeable on Windows NetBIOS... but am good with Solaris.  The
status is that I've got the daemons running and working normally.  I
have 1 desktop with 1 PDC & 1 BDC in the SIERRA domain.  On the desktop,
I can see both DC's but not the samba server.  As a non-priviledged
account, when I issue a smbclient -L moon I get the following output:

moon:/home/burkharr> smbclient -L moon
Password:

Anonymous login successful
Domain=[SIERRA] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.2a]

Sharename  Type  Comment
 -  ---
rcbtest Disk  Spike's testing
IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba 3.0.2a)
ADMIN$IPC   IPC Service (Samba 3.0.2a)
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[SunOS 5.8 sun4u] Server=[LAN Manager 2.1]
tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password
pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.)
NetBIOS over TCP disabled -- no workgroup available


When I issue the same command substituting localhost for moon I get the
following output:
moon:/home/burkharr> smbclient -L localhost
Password:

Anonymous login successful
Domain=[SIERRA] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.2a]

Sharename  Type  Comment
-    ---
rcbtestDisk  Spike's testing
IPC$  IPC   IPC Service (Samba 3.0.2a)
   ADMIN$IPC   IPC Service (Samba 3.0.2a)
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[SIERRA] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.2a]

Server   Comment
----
EPN32-237
MOON Samba 3.0.2a
ROHAN
SHADOWFAX

WorkgroupMaster
----
SIERRAMOON


Notice that I don't get any NetBIOS errors which makes sense because I'm
not going out on the network.

Here's my smb.conf file:
moon:/home/burkharr> more /apps/samba/lib/smb.conf
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = SIERRA
netbios name = moon
security = SERVER
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = rohan shadowfax
wins server = 172.22.2.251
password level = 8
#admin log = Yes
log level = 1
log file = /var/samba/log/log.%m
create mask = 775

[rcbtest]
comment = Spike's testing
path = /dbd00/spike
valid users = @webadmin
force group = webadmin
create mask = 740
writeable = Yes

Any thoughts?  Thanks for your help.

spike

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Object class violation

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  I am trying to use our Netscape LDAP server(V4) for username and
password authentication.  I am successfully connecting to the server but
then I get the following messages:

[2004/04/07 15:15:48, 2] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open_connection(626)
  smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
[2004/04/07 15:15:48, 3] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(793)
  ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server
[2004/04/07 15:15:48, 3] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_domain_info(1342)
  Got no domain info entries for domain
[2004/04/07 15:15:48, 3] lib/smbldap.c:add_new_domain_info(1234)
  Adding new domain
[2004/04/07 15:15:48, 1] lib/smbldap.c:add_new_domain_info(1301)
  failed to add domain dn= sambaDomainName=SPIKEMAN,o= with: Object
class violation

[2004/04/07 15:15:48, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_domain_info(1350)
  Adding domain info for SPIKEMAN failed with NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
[2004/04/07 15:15:48, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:pdb_init_ldapsam(2361)
  pdb_init_ldapsam: WARNING: Could not get domain info, nor add one to
the domain

Do I need to add the amba schema definitions to the ldap server or do I
have another problem?

TIA

Spike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] LDAP & Samba 3.0.2a on Solaris 8

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  I'm a little stuck.  I've tried searching through the archives with no
success.  I'm trying to get Samba 3.0.2a to use LDAP simply to do
username & password validation.  I don't want to save the samba
information in LDAP.  I built samba with the following options:

./configure --with-acl-support --with-automount --with-ldapsam
--with-logfilebase=/var/samba/log --with-quotas
--prefix=/usr/local/samba

After configuring the smb.conf file I try to start smbd and get the
following message:

ld.so.1: /usr/local/sbin/smbd: fatal: libldap.so.2: open failed: No such
file or directory

>From truss, it's telling me that it can't find the libldap.so.2 in
/usr/lib and in fact the file isn't there.  Can anyone help me out?

TIA
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] stupid question but need the answer!

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  I just installed Samba 3.0.2a  into /usr/local instead of
/usr/local/samba.  I am assuming that I need to remove it and go thru
the configuration/make process again.  What's the best way to do this?
Thanks!

spike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba 2.2.8a with Solaris 8 & NIS

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  The basic info is that I'm running Samba 2.2.8a on a Solaris 8 machine
with NIS.  The hostname is altair and is a NIS slave.  As a standard
practice every employee get's a NIS account and altair is their samba
home.  NIS is set to compatibility mode in /etc/nsswitch.conf.  Samba
security is set to server.  It appears that for users to map to their
samba share, we need to have an entry for them in the netgroup file.
The side effect of this is that they also get command line access which
we don't want.  Does anyone have a solution for this problem?

TIA,

Spike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] smbcontrol

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  I want to be able to disconnect a user from a samba share.  I'm using
Samba 2.2.8a on Solaris 8.  If I'm reading OReilly correctly, I should
be able to use smbcontrol with the SMBD process id of the user who has
the share mounted.  Here's an example:

ascmdev  nguyenal tcmsdev   5654   orton(158.184.58.145) Tue
Dec  9 14:14:10 2003
burkharr burkharr other26688   le15970  (158.184.88.151) Mon
Dec  8 08:08:55 2003
wanggwanggother 4846   summersun (158.184.88.138) Tue
Dec  9 12:06:10 2003

ps -ef|grep 5654 yields:
root  5654   890  0 14:14:06 ?0:00 /apps/samba/sbin/smbd -D

I want to disconnect nguyenal from the ascmdev share. Shouldn't I be
able to do a:

smbcontrol 5654 close-share ascmdev

TIA,

Spike

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba 2.2.8a ldap compile problem with pdb_ldap.c

[Spike Burkhardt]

All,

  I am trying to compile 2.2.8a with the ldapsam, acl-support & pam.
The make appears to go ok but  the compile part doesn't.  At the
beginning of the compiles it lists out the flags:

Using FLAGS =  -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx
-I./smbwrapper -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-DLOGFILEBASE="/apps/samba/var" -DCONFIGFILE="/apps/samba/lib/smb.conf"
-DLMHOSTSFILE="/apps/samba/lib/lmhosts" -DSWATDIR="/apps/samba/swat"
-DSBINDIR="/apps/samba/sbin" -DLOCKDIR="/apps/samba/var/locks"
-DCODEPAGEDIR="/apps/samba/lib/codepages"
-DDRIVERFILE="/apps/samba/lib/printers.def" -DBINDIR="/apps/samba/bin"
-DPIDDIR="/apps/samba/var/locks" -DLIBDIR="/apps/samba/lib"
-DHAVE_INCLUDES_H -DPASSWD_PROGRAM="/usr/bin/passwd"
-DSMB_PASSWD_FILE="/apps/samba/private/smbpasswd"
-DTDB_PASSWD_FILE="/apps/samba/private/smbpasswd.tdb"
Using FLAGS32 =  -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx
-I./smbwrapper -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-DLOGFILEBASE="/apps/samba/var" -DCONFIGFILE="/apps/samba/lib/smb.conf"
-DLMHOSTSFILE="/apps/samba/lib/lmhosts" -DSWATDIR="/apps/samba/swat"
-DSBINDIR="/apps/samba/sbin" -DLOCKDIR="/apps/samba/var/locks"
-DCODEPAGEDIR="/apps/samba/lib/codepages"
-DDRIVERFILE="/apps/samba/lib/printers.def" -DBINDIR="/apps/samba/bin"
-DPIDDIR="/apps/samba/var/locks" -DLIBDIR="/apps/samba/lib"
-DHAVE_INCLUDES_H -DPASSWD_PROGRAM="/usr/bin/passwd"
-DSMB_PASSWD_FILE="/apps/samba/private/smbpasswd"
-DTDB_PASSWD_FILE="/apps/samba/private/smbpasswd.tdb"
Using LIBS = -lsec -lgen -lsocket -lnsl  -lpam

I get the following error messages:

passdb/secrets.c: In function `secrets_fetch':
passdb/secrets.c:59: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from
pointer target type
passdb/secrets.c: In function `secrets_store':
passdb/secrets.c:74: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from
pointer target type
passdb/secrets.c:76: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from
pointer target type
passdb/secrets.c: In function `secrets_delete':
passdb/secrets.c:89: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from
pointer target type
Compiling passdb/pass_check.c
Compiling passdb/smbpassfile.c
Compiling passdb/machine_sid.c
Compiling passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c
Compiling passdb/pampass.c
passdb/pampass.c: In function `make_pw_chat':
passdb/pampass.c:220: warning: passing arg 1 of `next_token' from
incompatible pointer type
passdb/pampass.c:231: warning: passing arg 1 of `next_token' from
incompatible pointer type
passdb/pampass.c: In function `smb_setup_pam_conv':
passdb/pampass.c:418: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type

Compiling passdb/pdb_tdb.c
Compiling passdb/pdb_ldap.c
passdb/pdb_ldap.c: In function `rebindproc_with_state':
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:276: `ldap_state' undeclared (first use in this
function)
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:276: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once

passdb/pdb_ldap.c:276: for each function it appears in.)
passdb/pdb_ldap.c: In function `pdb_getsampwnam':
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:938: warning: passing arg 2 of `standard_sub_advanced'
discards qualifiers from pointer target type
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `passdb/pdb_ldap.o'

Can anyone help me out?

Spike

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] delete user script is not working from usrmgr

[Spike Burkhardt]

Hi,

  I am very new to Samba but I do know Solaris.  The /usr/sbin/userdel
is expecting a username that is in the /etc/passwd file.  The -r is to
delete the specified users home directory tree.  The %u is Samba"ese"
designating the username but none of the shells in Solaris(ksh, csh, sh)
know what %u is.  Am I making sense?  What I'm trying to say is that you
can't mix up Samba variables in the Solaris command line interface.  I
hope this helps!

Spike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] administration

[Spike Burkhardt]

Hi!

  I have a question.  We are going to make SAMBA our production file
server for the NT desktops.  I need some functionality where multiple
users may need access to SWAT for configuration purposes.  We don't want
to give out the root password.  At first I thought it would be the
"admin users" option but that's not it.  Firstly, does Samba have this
functionality and if so, how do I configure it?

Thanks!

Spike Burkhardt
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba