[Samba] Re: Samba Server [Solaris 8] on Windows 2K/2003 [ADS] network

2005-04-26 Thread TimS
CHRISTOPH:

I've never done that. How do you do it?

Tim


"Christoph Kaegi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 22.04-10:18, Eric Boehm wrote:
>
>> Tim>  -Is it possible to
>> Tim> set up a test environment for the new Samba release in
>> Tim> another location on the same UNIX box?
>>
>> Not sure what you mean here. Do you mean you want to separate Samba
>> installs on the same box? If so, you would need at least two network
>> interfaces. You can't run two instances of Samba on the same
>> interface/IP address.
>>
>
> You don't need a second network interface, you can just define
> a second IPaddress on the same interface.
>
> -- 
> --
> Christoph Kaegi   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> 



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: Re: Samba Server [Solaris 8] on Windows 2K/2003 [ADS]network

2005-04-22 Thread TimS
ERIC:

Once again, most helpful... Thanks.
I'll be taking the "ClearCase" link home with me this afternoon for weekend 
study...

Tim


"Eric Boehm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 10:03:46AM -0500, TimS wrote:
>>>>>>> "Tim" == TimS  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ERIC:
>
>Tim> Thanks for taking pity... :-) This is great news! I knew from
>Tim> the reading I've done that the ADS features code was put into
>Tim> Samba 3; but what I didn't pick up on is that it would work
>Tim> whether the Samba server is on the Windows domain or not.
>
> Yes, you do have to create a machine account for the Samba server in
> the Windows domain in order for security = domain to work. However,
> Active Directory domain controllers will talk to the Samba
> server. You may have to have your domain admins check a box that says
> something like
>
> Allow pre-Windows 2000 authentication
>
> when they create the machine account.
>
>Tim> Our Solaris box has two network adapters, one RJ-45 and one
>Tim> fiber, but but we can only use the RJ-45 connection due to
>Tim> the powers-that-be nixing our request to drop a line for the
>Tim> fiber connection -- even though There is a vacant fiber
>Tim> plug-in on the switch.
>
>Tim> However..., we also have a Linux Box [RedHat 9] in our
>Tim> unit. Couldn't we upgrade the Samba installation on it
>Tim> [...come to think of it, one of our other guys just rebuilt
>Tim> that box a few weeks ago, and I don't know for sure which
>Tim> Samba release is on it now...] and do the testing there?
>
> You certainly could. BTW, I forgot to mention that you could also use
> Samba 2.2.8a in your environment if you couldn't find a binary for
> Samba 3. Samba 2.x can work in an ADS environment -- we're using
> 2.2.8a with a Native Active Directory environment.
>
>Tim> Speaking of that, can you tell me off the top of your head
>Tim> the quickest way to determine which Samba release is
>Tim> currently running on the Linux box?
>
> /path/to/smbd -V -- e.g., /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -V
>
> As a side note, I made a presentation about setting up Samba
> (including building it) with ClearCase. However, the material is
> applicable even if you aren't using ClearCase.
>
> You can find it at
>
> http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/5769.html
>
> If you follow the link at the right hand side that says "Related
> Presentation Files"
>
> http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/content/04August/3033/3033_SCM04.zip
>
> you can download the presentation and related templates and the web
> site that I developed and that the presentation is based on. Again,
> much of the material is applicable even if you aren't using
> ClearCase. You can browse the web files through the filesystem -- you
> don't need a web server. Any browser will work.
>
>
> -- 
> Eric M. Boehm  /"\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   \ /  No HTML or RTF in mail
>X   No proprietary word-processing
> Respect Open Standards / \  files in mail
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> 



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: Samba Server [Solaris 8] on Windows 2K/2003 [ADS] network

2005-04-22 Thread TimS
ERIC:

Thanks for taking pity... :-)

This is great news! I knew

from the reading I've done

that the ADS features code

was put into Samba 3; but

what I didn't pick up on is

that it would work whether

the Samba server is on the

Windows domain or not.

Our Solaris box has two

network adapters, one RJ-45 and

one fiber, but but we can only

use the RJ-45 connection due to

the powers-that-be nixing our

request to drop a line for the

fiber connection -- even though

There is a vacant fiber plug-in

on the switch.

However...,

we also have a Linux Box [RedHat 9] in

our unit. Couldn't we upgrade the

Samba installation on it [...come to

think of it, one of our other guys

just rebuilt that box a few weeks ago, and

I don't know for sure which Samba release

is on it now...] and do the testing there?

Speaking of that, can you tell me

off the top of your head the quickest

way to determine which Samba release

is currently running on the Linux box?

Thanks again,

Tim


"Eric Boehm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 08:22:14AM -0500, TimS wrote:
>>>>>> "Tim" == TimS  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Tim> ALL: Please forgive my ignorance. I am not just naive
>Tim> regarding Samba..., or Solaris..., or UNIX, or Windows
>Tim> Networking..., the naivity courses through my veins
>Tim> abundantly in all IT related matters. :-)
>
>Tim> Our work unit is the lone UNIX [Samba server 2.2 on Solaris
>Tim> 8] installation on the organizational Windows WAN. None of
>Tim> the analysts in our unit have domain admin rights. The sys
>Tim> manager in our unit [my boss] has steadfastly refused to add
>Tim> our UNIX [Samba] server to the windows domain.
>
>Tim> Password synchronization has been a thorn in our side from
>Tim> day one. A SSO solution is the ultimate, but from what I'm
>Tim> reading, that isn't possible unless/until our Samba server is
>Tim> added to the domain.
>
>Tim> QUESTIONS: -Would upgrading to the lastest Samba release help
>Tim> at all on this issue?  -I don't see a binary available at the
>Tim> Samba download site for Solaris 8.  Our SysMgr could
>
> You just need Samba 3.
>
>Tim> certainly do the upgrade without the binary, but I have not
>Tim> ever done the make/build routine before.
>
> That could be tricky. I've built Samba 3 with kerberos and ldap and
> the various components needs for ADS but it is decidedly non-trivial.
>
> However, you don't need to use 'security = ads' to participate. You
> can use just 'security = domain' which would be a plain vanilla
> build. We have several servers participating in an ADS network with
> 'security=domain'. You would then be able to pass authentication
> through to the Windows domain controllers.
>
>Tim>  -Is it possible to
>Tim> set up a test environment for the new Samba release in
>Tim> another location on the same UNIX box?
>
> Not sure what you mean here. Do you mean you want to separate Samba
> installs on the same box? If so, you would need at least two network
> interfaces. You can't run two instances of Samba on the same
> interface/IP address.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> -- 
> Eric M. Boehm  /"\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   \ /  No HTML or RTF in mail
>X   No proprietary word-processing
> Respect Open Standards / \  files in mail
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> 



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba Server [Solaris 8] on Windows 2K/2003 [ADS] network

2005-04-22 Thread TimS
ALL:

Please forgive my ignorance. I am not just naive regarding Samba..., or 
Solaris..., or UNIX, or Windows Networking..., the naivity courses through 
my veins abundantly in all IT related matters. :-)

Our work unit is the lone UNIX [Samba server 2.2 on Solaris 8] installation 
on the organizational Windows WAN. None of the analysts in our unit have 
domain admin rights. The sys manager in our unit [my boss] has steadfastly 
refused to add our UNIX [Samba] server to the windows domain.

Password synchronization has been a thorn in our side from day one. A SSO 
solution is the ultimate, but from what I'm reading, that isn't possible 
unless/until our Samba server is added to the domain.

QUESTIONS:
-Would upgrading to the lastest Samba release help at all on this issue?
-I don't see a binary available at the Samba download site for Solaris 8. 
Our SysMgr could certainly do the upgrade without the binary, but I have not 
ever done the make/build routine before.
-Is it possible to set up a test environment for the new Samba release in 
another location on the same UNIX box?

DOH!
TimS



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba