RE: [Samba] Performance Issues with GBit LAN

2004-10-12 Thread Tom Hibbert

Hi Steffen
>At first: Thanks for the response.

>Here are the performance Measures of my Harddisks in the Server. As the
>Harddisks are not connected to the Onboard IDE, they're not limited to
9
>MB/sec

>/dev/sdb is the RAID 0, Connected to the PCI Raid Controller Card. The
only
>Share Samba provides is on the RAID, so performance should be enough.

>/dev/sdb:
>Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  1.55 seconds = 41.29 MB/sec

>(Redhat9.0, 256 SD-RAM, 300MHz PII, RTL8169 NIC, 2x Western Digital
WD200JB >RAID 0) to my Windows-PC(AMD Athlon XP 1800+, 1024 MB DDR-RAM,
WINXP PRO, >RTL8169 NIC, 2x Western Digital WD080JB RAID 0)

Looking at the configuration of the server PC, you have a Realtek
network card and an unspecified RAID card on a P2 300. I'm guessing that
the machine is based on an LX or BX chipset with PC66 or PC100 ram.
You have 66mhz bandwidth to play with in the PCI bus. You also have
66mhz FSB thanks to the PII 300 CPU. All the benchmarking you have done
(both Iperf and hdparm) both test the two subsystems individually, not
together. My initial guess is that your PCI bus and/or CPU cannot drive
this system at its full potential. Look at the load average on the
server during transfer.

Secondly you are running Redhat 9 with a Realtek 8169. There were a
number of issues with the stock Redhat 9 kernel versus a Realtek 8169,
see here
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&threadid=14975
1&highlight=8169. In fact these users are reporting only 8-10mb
throughput which is exactly what you are describing.

My advice to you is to roll a custom kernel for your system (optimized
for Pentium 2, raid and network drivers built into kernel instead of
modules). Then perform a proper hard disk benchmark using Bonnie++ so
you know what the disks are truly capable of (hdparm -t doesn't cut it
in this respect).
Then I would compare the difference between throughput serving from both
your SCSI disk (sda) and RAID array with the benchmark data given by
bonnie++. This may reveal a CPU or FSB bottleneck.


Good luck and thanks

Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba and NtBackup 3.0.7: Revenge of NtBackup

2004-09-15 Thread Tom Hibbert
Hi all

I noticed that 3.0.7 is out (another security release)... does this contain the fixes 
for NtBackup connecting to a share?
Currently I have to use ftp to copy the data to the server before backing up... not 
ideal.

Thanks in advance


 
Tom Hibbert
    Technical Specialist
 
Phone: +64-9-306-0230
Technical Helpdesk: +64-9-306-0234
Mobile: +64-274-307-784
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.nsp.co.nz
 
The information in this email and any attachments is confidential. This information 
may be subject to legal, professional, or other privilege. It must not be disclosed to 
any person without our authority. If you are not the intended recipient you are not 
authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any 
part of it. Please return this message to the sender immediately and delete any and 
all copies from your system.  


 
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] file permissions head-ache on Samba V3.0.4

2004-08-26 Thread Tom Hibbert
Hi Paul,

You probably want to ensure you have EXT3 ACL support on your server, if
it isn't already.. not sure if Redhate Enterprise supports this out of
the box.

I've found that editing permissions from a Windows NT 4.0 box leads to
acls being set incorrectly on Samba - use win2k or higher.

You probably also want to chown the directories to root, as once the
users specified in the 'admin users' directive in smb.conf authenticate
to the server they will be mapped in as root (you can see this when you
ps aux |grep smbd). I've found the best way to start permissions wise is
with owner root:root and permissions 0777 on the directory, and from the
ACL editor in Windows restrict permissions that way.

Hope this helps

Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PaulD
Sent: Thursday, 26 August 2004 11:06 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] file permissions head-ache on Samba V3.0.4

Hi,

I hope that this is a quick answer, as it's probably
been answered many times before and I'm just missing a
very minor setting in my config.

I have just setup a samba server(ver 3.0.4) on a
Redhat Enterprise Linux Box ES3. The box has been
setup as a member of a Windows NT4 domain, it's to be
used as a fileserver for users on the NT domain.

I have configured samba to use domain security, and
have winbind working correctly (I think!!) - I can get
the domain users and groups to show from a 'wbinfo -u
or wbinfo -g.

I have been trying (unsucessfully) to configure the
/home directory so that the domain admins here can
manage the subfolders and the permissions, from the
server administrator or management console on their NT
/ 2000 workstations. 

I have used the following commands on the /home volume
so that the domain admins/users can have access to the
volume:
chown DOMAIN+Administrator /home
chgrp "DOMAIN+Domain Users" /home
(both commands threw back no errors)

I'm guessing that the problem may down to the smb.conf
file but I'm not sure what I'm missing.. would be
grateful if someone could assist.

TIA



Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" 
your friends today! Download Messenger Now 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba vs NtBackup Round 3.0.5

2004-08-03 Thread Tom Hibbert
I don't really want to break my nice Debian setup so I will try and
debianise 3.0.5rc1 and post the reagents here.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruno
Gimenes Pereti
Sent: Tuesday, 3 August 2004 12:23 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba vs NtBackup Round 3.0.5

>Hi Tom! Hi Jeremy! Hi list!

>I don't know what exaclty caused the problem but when I upgraded to
Samba
>3.0.5rc1 my NTBackup started working again. I'll show what i'm using
here
>and maybe somebody can figure out why it helped to me and not to you.
>I compiled Samba 3.0.5rc1 from source with this options:

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba vs NtBackup Round 3.0.5

2004-08-03 Thread Tom Hibbert
Curses!

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, 2 August 2004 6:31 p.m.
To: Tom Hibbert
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba vs NtBackup Round 3.0.5

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 02:28:31PM +1200, Tom Hibbert wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I experienced the same problem with 3.0.4 that Jeremy and Bruno were
discussing - NTBackup unable being to connect to shares and erroring out
with 'Access Denied'. I have today upgraded to 3.0.5 (using the Debian
Woody packages) and that didn't fix the problem. Was the fix in 3.0.5r1
only applicable to 2000/2003 server? I am stuck in the dark ages of NT 4
here, maybe that is a problem...
> 
> Any help would be very much appreciated as we are now 2 months without
a backup :/

3.0.5 doesn't contain the fix for this bug. 3.0.5 fixes 2 security
bugs *only*. Not even obvious fixes like the NTbackup bigfix were
included - this is to allow sites to know exactly what changes go
into a security release.

3.0.6preXX will contain this fix.

Sorry,

Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba vs NtBackup Round 3.0.5

2004-08-01 Thread Tom Hibbert
Hi all,

I experienced the same problem with 3.0.4 that Jeremy and Bruno were discussing - 
NTBackup unable being to connect to shares and erroring out with 'Access Denied'. I 
have today upgraded to 3.0.5 (using the Debian Woody packages) and that didn't fix the 
problem. Was the fix in 3.0.5r1 only applicable to 2000/2003 server? I am stuck in the 
dark ages of NT 4 here, maybe that is a problem...

Any help would be very much appreciated as we are now 2 months without a backup :/

Tom



 
Tom Hibbert
    Technical Specialist
 
Phone: +64-9-306-0230
Technical Helpdesk: +64-9-306-0234
Mobile: +64-274-307-784
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.nsp.co.nz
 
The information in this email and any attachments is confidential. This information 
may be subject to legal, professional, or other privilege. It must not be disclosed to 
any person without our authority. If you are not the intended recipient you are not 
authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any 
part of it. Please return this message to the sender immediately and delete any and 
all copies from your system.  


 
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] (no subject)

2004-07-22 Thread Tom Hibbert

Hi guys

 

I have a Samba server running as a member server on an NT 4.0 domain, using winbind to 
bring users across. All Windows NT services are able to connect to the server, except 
for NTBackup. NTBackup can see the mapped drives but does not see anything inside them.

 

Any ideas?s

 
Tom Hibbert
    Technical Specialist
 
Phone: +64-9-306-0230
Technical Helpdesk: +64-9-306-0234
Mobile: +64-274-307-784
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.nsp.co.nz
 
The information in this email and any attachments is confidential. This information 
may be subject to legal, professional, or other privilege. It must not be disclosed to 
any person without our authority. If you are not the intended recipient you are not 
authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any 
part of it. Please return this message to the sender immediately and delete any and 
all copies from your system.  


 
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0.5 pre1 cannot ad windows xp machine to domain

2004-06-10 Thread Tom Hibbert
There is a registry file included in the Samba distribution that
disables the local policy entry requiring server side "sealing" of the
join process. I believe Samba does not support this process yet so the
only way to go is disable it through policy.

The file is named something like "WinXPSignOrSeal.reg". Merge it,
reboot, and you should be good to go (provided your mechanisms for
creating machine accounts are working correctly).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn
Arnold
Sent: Thursday, 10 June 2004 12:58 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Samba 3.0.5 pre1 cannot ad windows xp machine to domain

Hi all,

I can add my W2K machines to the Samba 3.0.5pre1 with no problems, but I
can not add my XP machines.  Existing XP machines work fine, but when I
try to add new XP machine it does not work.  Here is my smb.conf and pc
from the log.smbd

Thanks
-Glenn
[global]
netbios name = HSFNP01
workgroup = MTHCS
security = user
os level = 64
domain master = yes
local master = yes
preferred master = yes
time server = yes
;passdb backend = tdbsam
passdb backend = tdbsam
unix extensions = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
domain logons = yes
logon script = logon.bat
logon drive = H:
logon home = \\%L\%U
logon path =
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192
SO_SNDBUF=8192
wins support = no
wins server = 10.100.0.10
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/
lanman auth = yes
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m %u
delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel -r %u
add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd %g
delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel %g
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 502 -c 'Machine
Account' -s /bin/false -M %u
oplocks = yes
load printers = yes
printing = cups
printer admin = Administrator, @ntadmin
idmap uid = 15000-2
idmap gid = 15000-2
winbind separator = -
winbind use default domain = No

[netlogon]
path = /smbsrvr/netlogon/scripts
guest ok = yes
write list = ntadmin

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
read only = no
hide dot files = yes
veto files =
/*.mp3/*.exe/*.com/*.js/*.bat/*.cmd/*.wsh/*.lnk/*.scr/*.zip/.*/
dos file times = yes

[C$]
valid users = @root
path = /smbsrvr
read only = no
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force group = +ntadmin
force directory mode = 0770
dos file times = yes

[Apps]
read only = no
path = /smbsrvr/Apps

[Students]
path = /smbsrvr/Students
read only = no
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force group = +HSSTUDENTS
force create mode = 0770
force directory mode = 0770
dos filetimes = yes

[AdminTools$]
path = /smbsrvr/AdminTools
read only = no
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force group = Domain Administrators
force create mode = 0770
force directory mode = 0770
dos filetimes = yes

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = yes
browseable = no
guest ok = yes

[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /var/lib/samba/drivers
browseable = yes
guest ok = no
read only = yes
write list = root, @ntadmin


[%G]
path = /home/groups/%G/
read only = no
force group = %G

[home$]
writeable = yes
write list = +ntadmin,@"MTHS-Domain Admins",@ntadmin,@root
path = /home
force directory mode = 0770
force group = +ntadmin
dos file times = yes
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
valid users = +ntadmins,+root,@"MTHS-Domain
Admins",@ntadmin,@root

[ezaudit]
path = /smbsrvr/ezaudit
read only = no
browseable = yes
available = yes
write list = +HSBUILDING,+HSSTAFF,+HSSTUDENTS
admin users = +ntadmin,+wheel

[HSGUIDANCE]
path = /smbsrvr/Guidance
writelist = +HSGUIDANCE
read only = no
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force group = +HSGUIDANCE
force create mode = 0770
force directory mode = 0770
dos filetimes = yes

[HS PRINCIPAL]
path = /smbsrvr/hsprincipal
writelist = +HSPRINCIPAL
read only = no
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force group = +HSPRINCIPAL
force create mode = 0770
force directory mode = 0770
dos filetimes = yes

[CIP]
path = /smbsrvr/CIP
writelist = +HSSTAFF
read only = no
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force group = +HSSTAFF
force create mode = 0770
force directory mode = 0770
dos filetimes = yes

[POISE ISSUES]
path = /smbsrvr/Poise Issues
writelist = +BUILDING SECRETARIES
read only = no
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force group = +BUILDING SECRETARIES
force create mode = 0770
force directory mode = 0770
dos filetimes = yes

[HSDISCIPLINE]
path = /smbsrvr/Discipline
writelist = +BUILDING SECRETARIES
read only = no
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force group = +BUILDING SECRETARIES
force create mode = 0770
force directory mode = 0770
dos filetimes = yes

[YEARBOOK]
path = /smbsrvr/yearbook
writelist = +HSYEARBOOK
read only = no
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
force group = +HSYEARBOOK
force create mode = 0770
force directory mode = 0770
dos filetimes = yes

[INSTALL]
comm

RE: [Samba] Reasonable Throughput

2004-06-09 Thread Tom Hibbert
On 100mbit networks I regularly get speeds of 9.1MBps (Samba or FTP have
equal speeds which is good). This is common even when using low end
network cards like the Realtek 8139. Comparably with the same hardware
and WinXP involved on at least one side of the link I get 5.4MBps.

Last year I had the opportunity to do some real world throughput testing
using some fairly high end gear. Both machines were connected with Intel
Pro1000 network cards through a 3com switch. Using a P4 workstation
running Windows 2000 and a Xeon server running Samba 3.0a I achieved a
throughput of 440MBps, the theoretical maximum of the hardware (3ware
Escalade raid controller). Using the same server and workstation I could
only push 200MBps. This speed was achieved under the Airbox TV broadcast
software sucking down multiple MPEG2 streams off the RAID array. I also
ran Netbench to verify the throughput speeds.

If you are experiencing lower throughput than this the first place to
look is cabling. Also be wary of the Davicom and Macronix network cards
as I often found specimens that were sub standard and could only push
5MBps. Also the switch is a contributing factor so try crossing over and
comparing speeds.


Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh
Skains
Sent: Thursday, 10 June 2004 7:48 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Reasonable Throughput

One thing that it seems hard to define is what a reasonable expectation
of throughput on a 100Mbps Ethernet that a samba server should be
running at. Currently, I seem to be getting about 4.8Mbps for a single
client (NetBench).

There is a switch between the server and the client I was testing with.
Thoughts?

Thanks,
JMS
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0.3 breaks domain somehow.

2004-05-06 Thread Tom Hibbert
I have a similar problem, except I get the error NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
checking the trust account password. Again downgrading to 3.0.2a worked
fine. Looks like bit rot has creeped into the code between .2a and .3.

Tom

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Dickson
Sent: Friday, 7 May 2004 12:01 p.m.
To: samba mailing list
Subject: [Samba] Samba 3.0.3 breaks domain somehow.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

After upgrading from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 in a Windows 2000 Native Domain
environment, 9x clients can't connect and wbinfo -t doesn't work:

bash-2.05a# wbinfo -t
checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed
error code was NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE (0xc0ac)
Could not check secret

Downgrading to 3.0.2 fixes this.

I can get log files, but they don't seem to have anything very useful in
them.

Server: Windows 2000 Native Domain
Client: Windows ME or Mac OS X

smb.conf follows:

#=== Global Settings
=

[global]
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = no
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
encrypt passwords = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
dns proxy = no
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd
min password length = 3
logon path = ""

# override some defaults
enhanced browsing = no
map archive = no
max connections = 1000
max smbd processes = 1000
follow symlinks = no

username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
winbind separator = +
winbind enum users = yes
winbind enum groups = yes
template shell = /sbin/nologin
template homedir = /dev/null

#
# smbv3.0+
#
create mask = 0700
directory mask = 0700
directory security mask = 0700
#
map acl inherit = yes
inherit permissions = yes
inherit acls = yes

force group = nobody
# Changable Global Settings
==
~ password server = WIN2KNATIVE
~ winbind uid = 1-1
~ map to guest = never
~ security = ads
~ realm = NATIVEDOMAIN.LOCAL
~ domain logons = no
~ server string =
~ workgroup = NATIVEDOMAIN
~ winbind gid = 1-1
~ netbios name = inlab
~ admin users = "@NATIVEDOMAIN.LOCAL+Domain Admins"

[terabyte]
~ path = /mnt/H00/terabyte
~ comment = terabyte
~ valid users =
~ read only = no
~ available = yes
~ admin users = !
~ write list =

Thank you!

More random output:

bash-2.05a# wbinfo -t
checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed
error code was NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE (0xc0ac)
Could not check secret
bash-2.05a# wbinfo --get-auth-user
NATIVEDOMAIN.LOCAL+nasadmin%nas
bash-2.05a# wbinfo -a NATIVEDOMAIN.LOCAL+nasadmin%nas
plaintext password authentication failed
error code was NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE (0xc0ac)
error messsage was: Named pipe not available
Could not authenticate user NATIVEDOMAIN.LOCAL+nasadmin%nas with
plaintext password
challenge/response password authentication failed
error code was NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE (0xc0ac)
error messsage was: Named pipe not available
Could not authenticate user NATIVEDOMAIN.LOCAL+nasadmin with
challenge/response

wbinfo -u works fine, and connections from the windows 2000 CLIENT
works, also, so kerberos tickets seem to be happy

times and dates:

net time ; date
Thu May  6 17:04:56 2004
Thu May  6 17:04:37 PDT 2004

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFAmtHF2dxAfYNwANIRAomLAJdEM/PBdg8OA8m17gQP5QTIo5XtAKCNt6p7
wGxOx7PDN1WAVPNVbk5esg==
=Cxcf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] (no subject)

2004-03-16 Thread Tom Hibbert

Hi all,

I'm building a Linux application server to replace 98% of the windows workstations in 
an enterprise. I'm using
Winbind to auth users logging into the server (through kdm/xdmcp) against the existing 
win2k AD PDC.

There are more than 50 different login scripts for the different users and groups. 
Because this company has
no in house Linux support I want to keep it as simple and easy as possible for their 
existing NT admin to
work with the new application server, and I want him to be able to admin the login 
scripts the same way he has always done.

The main thing that the login scripts are used for is mounting drives. So what I am 
thinking of doing is somehow downloading the login scripts when a user goes to log in, 
piping that through some fancy python and creating the
links to the relevant shares on the relevant servers on their KDE desktop. The thing 
that I am stuck on is how to retrieve the name of the login script that should be run 
when a user logs in. Since I cannot find any information on how to do this I am 
thinking of talking directly to the PDC's LDAP and retrieving the record from there. 
Unless of course you Samba gurus have already implemented a way to do this easily and 
painlessly ;)

Thanks in advance,



 
Tom Hibbert
    Technical Specialist
 
Phone: +64-9-306-0230
DDI: +64-9-306-0234
Mobile: +64-27-430-7784
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.nsp.co.nz
 
The information in this email and any attachments is confidential. This information 
may be subject to legal, professional, or other privilege. It must not be disclosed to 
any person without our authority. If you are not the intended recipient you are not 
authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any 
part of it. Please return this message to the sender immediately and delete any and 
all copies from your system.  


 
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Migrating from Samba 2.2 smbpasswd to Samba 3 LDAP

2003-10-06 Thread Tom Hibbert
Hi there,

Does anyone have any experience with this? I was wondering about importing
data from a Samba 2.2 smbpasswd file to a Samba 2.2 style LDAP and then
using some perl scripting to update the schemas to samba 3. However there
isnt really much info about migrating user data and stuff from smbpasswd to
LDAP at all.. Somewhere there must be a nice howto or something ;)

Cheers

Tom



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba, LDAP as active directory controller

2003-06-03 Thread Tom Hibbert

Hey all,

What I have been reading is all quite confusing. Can someone tell me
if it is actually possible to replace a top level Active Directory
server with a Samba+LDAP+Kerberos one, and at what loss of
functionality?

Thanks,

Tom Hibbert
Home: +649 815 1838
Obtain my GPG Key from: http://cryptocracy.hn.org/pubkey.txt

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba