[Samba] GPFS, samba, robocopy and timestamps
Hi list, I'm trying to use robocopy to move some files over to a samba share backed by GPFS. I keep getting "ERROR 50 (0x0032) Time-stamping destination file ... The network request is not supported." What is strange is that the files are still coped over, even though robocopy believes the copy failed, and in the smb log I don't have any errors or erroneous NT_STATS messages. From all indications on the server it looks like the copy was good. Any ideas? Anyone know if GPFS doesn't support the correct precision of timestamps that samba is trying to apply? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] ACLs in windows clients w/ GPFS
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Orlando Richards
wrote:
> On -10/01/37 20:59, big beer wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I've got a ctdb cluster working against a GPFS cluster. I've got ACLs
>> going and have set the default/active ACLs on my folders. The ACLs
>> seem to be working fine, they are correctly limiting/allowing access
>> to the said folders/files.
>>
>> My issue is that when using the windows client to view/change the ACLs
>> everything goes south. When trying to view the ACLs via right clicking
>> on the folder in windows and going to the security tab only shows the
>> basic unix permissions (owner/group/other). If I try to add a new user
>> to the ACL via windows it still won't show up in the security window
>> after adding. When going back to a shell and looking at the ACLs on
>> the folder in question the new user is present, but the previous ACLs
>> have been removed.
>>
>> Any thoughts on how to get these ACLs to show/work through a windows
>> client?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> Hi Big (!),
>
> I've got it working at the moment - here are some relevant settings from my
> smb.conf. Make sure your filesystem is set to use NFSv4 ACLs ("-k nfs4", or
> possibly "-k all").
>
> vfs objects = gpfs fileid shadow_copy2
> nfs4: mode = special
> nfs4: chown = yes
> nfs4: acedup = merge
> force unknown acl user = yes
> acl group control = true
> map acl inherit = yes
> inherit acls = no
> dos filemode = no
>
> I'm using samba 3.4.5-42
>
> --
> Orlando.
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Dr Orlando Richards
> Information Services
> IT Infrastructure Division
> Unix Section
> Tel: 0131 650 4994
>
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland,
> with registration number SC005336.
>
It was the -k setting on the FS. I was running with -k all and trying
to use POSIX ACLs. After changing over to -k nfs4 and putting nfs4
ACLs on the FS it works as expected.
I guess the GPFS module doesn't work with POSIX ACLs?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] ACLs in windows clients w/ GPFS
Hello list, I've got a ctdb cluster working against a GPFS cluster. I've got ACLs going and have set the default/active ACLs on my folders. The ACLs seem to be working fine, they are correctly limiting/allowing access to the said folders/files. My issue is that when using the windows client to view/change the ACLs everything goes south. When trying to view the ACLs via right clicking on the folder in windows and going to the security tab only shows the basic unix permissions (owner/group/other). If I try to add a new user to the ACL via windows it still won't show up in the security window after adding. When going back to a shell and looking at the ACLs on the folder in question the new user is present, but the previous ACLs have been removed. Any thoughts on how to get these ACLs to show/work through a windows client? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] ACL madness
Hello list, I'm having a "fun" time trying to figure out my ACL problems. I've gone through the default ACL settings and the mask settings on the filesystem to ensure that the user I am using does indeed have access to the filesystem that is being shared out. My issue is that I am unable to overwrite a file that already exists with another file of the same name. I get the windows dialog "Are you sure you want to overwrite this file" but when selecting "yes" it fails with a big fat "The request is not supported". I can edit/rename/delete this file so I think I have the right ACLs on the folder it is in and on the file itself. Here is the ACL on the folder that contains the file: ~ getfacl test # file: test # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::r-x group:DOMAIN\134domain\040admins:rwx mask::rwx other::r-x default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:group:DOMAIN\134domain\040admins:rwx default:mask::rwx default:other::r-x And here is the ACL on the actual file: ~ getfacl New\ Text\ Document.txt # file: New\040Text\040Document.txt # owner: DOMAIN\134Myuser # group: DOMAIN\134domain\040users user::rwx group::r-x group:DOMAIN\134domain\040admins:rwx mask::rwx other::r-- Here is the output from the logfile when I click yes to the dialog to overwrite the file: [2010/05/07 03:34:38.392475, 3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb) Transaction 422 of length 144 (0 toread) [2010/05/07 03:34:38.392572, 3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message) switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 11135) conn 0x7fa8cc722b40 [2010/05/07 03:34:38.392670, 3] smbd/vfs.c:851(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name [test/New Text Document.txt] [/gpfs1] [2010/05/07 03:34:38.392724, 3] smbd/vfs.c:1008(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name: test/New Text Document.txt reduced to /gpfs1/test/New Text Document.txt [2010/05/07 03:34:38.392752, 3] smbd/vfs.c:851(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name [test/New Text Document.txt] [/gpfs1] [2010/05/07 03:34:38.392792, 3] smbd/vfs.c:1008(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name: test/New Text Document.txt reduced to /gpfs1/test/New Text Document.txt [2010/05/07 03:34:38.392833, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:166(unix_mode) unix_mode(test/New Text Document.txt) returning 0764 [2010/05/07 03:34:38.392859, 3] smbd/vfs.c:851(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name [test/New Text Document.txt] [/gpfs1] [2010/05/07 03:34:38.392899, 3] smbd/vfs.c:1008(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name: test/New Text Document.txt reduced to /gpfs1/test/New Text Document.txt [2010/05/07 03:34:38.393030, 1] modules/vfs_gpfs.c:961(gpfs_get_xattr) gpfs_get_xattr:name is user.SAMBA_PAI [2010/05/07 03:34:38.393133, 2] smbd/open.c:631(open_file) DOMAIN\Myuser opened file test/New Text Document.txt read=No write=Yes (numopen=2) [2010/05/07 03:34:38.393339, 3] smbd/error.c:80(error_packet_set) error packet at smbd/error.c(160) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED I should also note that if I try to overwrite a folder with a folder of the same name instead of a file with a file of the same name, it is successful. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Bigbeer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
