[Samba] When did the Take Ownership (O) for No permissions ACE goaway?

2003-04-03 Thread dowlime
We have upgraded from 2.0.6 to 2.2.8 and now NT clients no longer show group or other 
in the permissions dialog if they have no permissions.  Before, the (O) take Ownership 
permission was overloaded to mean no permission and group and other were shown.  Now 
we only see a line for the owner but now the group and other.  Is there a way to get 
the group and other lines to still show up like it did before?  What is causing this?  
Is there a file from a previous version I can drop in to bring this functionality back?-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Request - security patch for 2.0.6

2003-03-31 Thread dowlime
Is there a plan for a patch for 2.0.6 to address the security bug announced 3/14/03?
If not, I am requesting such a patch, as upgrading to 2.2.8 will cause difficulty in 
our environment.
(the Take Ownership overloading no longer works in 2.2.8, so emply ACE's don';t show 
up in the permission dialog in NT)

The release notes for 2.2.8 says As this is a security issue, patches for this flaw 
specific to earlier
versions of Samba will be posted on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list as requested.




[Samba] 2.2.8 - can't view or change permissions from NT clients

2003-03-27 Thread dowlime
We were using 2.0.6 on a SunOS 5.6 server, using domain security in an NT domain, and 
have upgraded to 2.2.8 for the security fix.  Now, when the file permissions are 
displayed on an NT client, ACL's are only shown for user/group/other if there are R,W, 
or X permissions.  If u, g, or o have no rights, the ACL is not displayed for them. 

Example, 
in 2.0.6, with a file with r--r- permissions (440), the NT permissions display 
would have an ACL for the owner with R permissions, an ACL for the group with R 
permissions, and the Everyone group would show as O for no permissions.
In 2.2.8 with the same file, the NT permissions dialog only shows an ACL line for the 
owner, and an ACL line for the group, but NO ACL line for Everyone since they have no 
permissions
If a file had r permissions, there won't be an ACL line for the group either.

In addition, we can't Add an ACL for the ones not displayed - In other words, in the 
first example, we couldn't Add the Everyone group with R prrmissions to give world 
read.

Is this normal behavior in 2.2.8, or should we see the same displays as before?
How can we get the displays to show as before, or what might we have missed?
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


2.2.8 - can't view/change permissions from NT clients

2003-03-27 Thread dowlime
We were using 2.0.6 on a SunOS 5.6 server, using domain security in an NT domain, and 
have upgraded to 2.2.8 for the security fix.  Now, when the file permissions are 
displayed on an NT client, ACL's are only shown for user/group/other if there are R,W, 
or X permissions.  If u, g, or o have no rights, the ACL is not displayed for them. 

Example, 
in 2.0.6, with a file with r--r- permissions (440), the NT permissions display 
would have an ACL for the owner with R permissions, an ACL for the group with R 
permissions, and the Everyone group would show as O for no permissions.
In 2.2.8 with the same file, the NT permissions dialog only shows an ACL line for the 
owner, and an ACL line for the group, but NO ACL line for Everyone since they have no 
permissions
If a file had r permissions, there won't be an ACL line for the group either.

In addition, we can't Add an ACL for the ones not displayed - In other words, in the 
first example, we couldn't Add the Everyone group with R prrmissions to give world 
read.

Is this normal behavior in 2.2.8, or should we see the same displays as before?
How can we get the displays to show as before, or what might we have missed?


[Samba] 2.2.8 - Permissions display differently

2003-03-26 Thread dowlime
We were using 2.0.6 on a SunOS 5.6 server, using domain security in an NT domain, and 
have upgraded to 2.2.8 for the security fix.  Now, when the file permissions are 
displayed on an NT client, ACL's are only shown for user/group/other if there are R,W, 
or X permissions.  If u, g, or o have no rights, the ACL is not displayed for them. 

Example, 
in 2.0.6, with a file with r--r- permissions (440), the NT permissions display 
would have an ACL for the owner with R permissions, an ACL for the group with R 
permissions, and the Everyone group would show as O for no permissions.
In 2.2.8 with the same file, the NT permissions dialog only shows an ACL line for the 
owner, and an ACL line for the group, but NO ACL line for Everyone since they have no 
permissions
If a file had r permissions, there won't be an ACL line for the group either.

In addition, we can't Add an ACL for the ones not displayed - In other words, in the 
first example, we couldn't Add the Everyone group with R prrmissions to give world 
read.

Is this normal behavior in 2.2.8, or should we see the same displays as before?
How can we get the displays to show as before, or what might we have missed?
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba