RE: [Samba] [CSI] smb.conf share definition "force group =" option
I've used : 0775 root.samba /home/samba/shares/files regards > -Original Message- > From: MList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:15 PM > To: Thiago Lima ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Samba] [CSI] smb.conf share definition "force > group =" option > > > i know others have it working finedon't know why i can't > get it right > > how did you setup permission for your folders in Linux? > what does ls-al > say > > > p.s. users are not logging into the samba machine directly, > only thru thier > win9x clients... > > -- > Regards, > MList > "Sharing The Power Of IT Through Linux" > > >On Wednesday 03 December 2003 05:09, Thiago Lima wrote: > > I'm using it here in samba 3.0.1 and it is working allright > > > > [companyfiles] > > path = "/home/samba/shares/files" > > valid users = @samba > > force group = samba > > write list = user1 user2 @group1 @group2 > > read list = @group3 > > > > > > Setting a 0777 in a directory is something really insecure. > > > > The above is secure only if you DONT have users in samba group > > logging into your machine. They should use just use samba. > > > > regards > > thiago. > > > > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] [CSI] smb.conf share definition "force group =" option
i know others have it working finedon't know why i can't get it right how did you setup permission for your folders in Linux? what does ls-al say p.s. users are not logging into the samba machine directly, only thru thier win9x clients... -- Regards, MList "Sharing The Power Of IT Through Linux" >On Wednesday 03 December 2003 05:09, Thiago Lima wrote: > I'm using it here in samba 3.0.1 and it is working allright > > [companyfiles] > path = "/home/samba/shares/files" > valid users = @samba > force group = samba > write list = user1 user2 @group1 @group2 > read list = @group3 > > > Setting a 0777 in a directory is something really insecure. > > The above is secure only if you DONT have users in samba group > logging into your machine. They should use just use samba. > > regards > thiago. > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] [CSI] smb.conf share definition "force group =" option
I'm using it here in samba 3.0.1 and it is working allright [companyfiles] path = "/home/samba/shares/files" valid users = @samba force group = samba write list = user1 user2 @group1 @group2 read list = @group3 Setting a 0777 in a directory is something really insecure. The above is secure only if you DONT have users in samba group logging into your machine. They should use just use samba. regards thiago. > -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > rg] On Behalf Of Mlist > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 3:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Samba] [CSI] smb.conf share definition "force > group =" option > > > > Dear John, i am wondering whether u have solved thisi had > problems earlier > with options such as; > > 1. only user > 2. force create mode > 3.force directory mode > > the options didn't seem to work ( on samba v 2.2.7a). > > I solved the problem for our club by just working on chmod > 0777 and using > option "valid user , write list " to make files/folders > writable for certain > individuals who are working on similar things... > > bye, > mlist. > > > > >On Tuesday 02 December 2003 19:37, J. Nyhuis wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I am using samba-3.0.1pre3-1, and have noticed that the > "force group" > > and "force user" option no longer seems to work. In spite of the > > option being set, the files copied are set to the current > users user > > and primary group. Am I missing something with regards to > how this is > > supposed to work or is this a bug? > > > > This is one of my share definitions for a team of > people where this > > option does not work. If I copy a file in as a user that > is a member > > of the cellbio group (e.g. testuser), the unix permissions > of the file > > are set to testuser:testuser, not testuser:cellbio as I > would expect, > > denying access to the file for everyone else in the cellbio group. > > > > [cellbio] > > comment = Filespace for the Cell Biology Team > > path = /share/teams/CellBio/ > > browseable = yes > > valid users = +&cellbio > > read only = yes > > force group = cellbio > > write list = @cellbio # read only, except for people in the > > "cellbio" group > > > > If folks could point out anything I am missing I would > appreciate the > > advice. Thanks on advance. John N. > > CSI > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] [CSI] smb.conf share definition "force group =" option
Dear John, i am wondering whether u have solved thisi had problems earlier with options such as; 1. only user 2. force create mode 3.force directory mode the options didn't seem to work ( on samba v 2.2.7a). I solved the problem for our club by just working on chmod 0777 and using option "valid user , write list " to make files/folders writable for certain individuals who are working on similar things... bye, mlist. >On Tuesday 02 December 2003 19:37, J. Nyhuis wrote: > Greetings, > > I am using samba-3.0.1pre3-1, and have noticed that the "force > group" and "force user" option no longer seems to work. In spite of the > option being set, the files copied are set to the current users > user and primary group. Am I missing something with regards to how this > is supposed to work or is this a bug? > > This is one of my share definitions for a team of people where > this option does not work. If I copy a file in as a user that is a > member of the cellbio group (e.g. testuser), the unix permissions of the > file are set to testuser:testuser, not testuser:cellbio as I would expect, > denying access to the file for everyone else in the cellbio group. > > [cellbio] > comment = Filespace for the Cell Biology Team > path = /share/teams/CellBio/ > browseable = yes > valid users = +&cellbio > read only = yes > force group = cellbio > write list = @cellbio # read only, except for people in the > "cellbio" group > > If folks could point out anything I am missing I would appreciate > the advice. Thanks on advance. > John N. > CSI > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] [CSI] smb.conf share definition "force group =" option
Greetings, I am using samba-3.0.1pre3-1, and have noticed that the "force group" and "force user" option no longer seems to work. In spite of the option being set, the files copied are set to the current users user and primary group. Am I missing something with regards to how this is supposed to work or is this a bug? This is one of my share definitions for a team of people where this option does not work. If I copy a file in as a user that is a member of the cellbio group (e.g. testuser), the unix permissions of the file are set to testuser:testuser, not testuser:cellbio as I would expect, denying access to the file for everyone else in the cellbio group. [cellbio] comment = Filespace for the Cell Biology Team path = /share/teams/CellBio/ browseable = yes valid users = +&cellbio read only = yes force group = cellbio write list = @cellbio # read only, except for people in the "cellbio" group If folks could point out anything I am missing I would appreciate the advice. Thanks on advance. John N. CSI [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
