[samba] AD group membership limits?

2006-08-21 Thread Scott Comboni

Hello All,

I read a post on patching kernel 2.4.x to get more groups.  I  
currently cannot upgrade my RHEL3 as RHEL4 is not supported but need  
to take advantage of additional groups over 32.


I read a similar post that a patch
more_groups_simple.patch can be applied.  I have no success in  
patching though..

linux-2.4]# patch -p1 --dry-run -i more_groups_simple.patch

Just wondering if anyone has success in patching using this patch?   
If so any direction would be much appreciated.




Thanks Scott



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] AD group membership limits?

2005-03-09 Thread Gibbs, Simon
Marc,

Thanks for the info (and sorry about my delay in posting back).

I've just tested FC3 running the 2.6 kernel and it does resolve the issue.
So in an ideal world I'd prefer to wait for RHEL4 but because of required
third party drivers and apps that are required it looks like I'm going to
have to recompile with the patches.

I've downloaded the patches from the paths you gave me but I'm not to sure
how to apply them as I've never had to do anything like this before.

Have you (or anyone else out there) got any good pointers - specifically for
these patches.

Thanks for your help.

Simon


 From: Kaplan, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:24:28 -0800
 To: Gibbs, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba@lists.samba.org
 Subject: RE: [Samba] AD group membership limits?
 
 Simon,
 
 Yes, I have recompiled the kernel with support for a static NGROUPS with
 a patch from tridge and Rusty Russell. This does not seem to cause any
 problems at all on Samba servers, or with the Linux box in general and
 it does properly allow more supplementary groups.
 
 Here is what I used IIRC:
 http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/more_groups_simple.patch
 http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/maxgroups.patch
 
 Though I just checked on this, and maybe support for dynamic NGROUPS is
 now in the 2.6 kernel? See:
 http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/changelog/v2.6/4/
 
 -Marc
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:samba-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibbs,
 Simon
 Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:58 AM
 To: samba@lists.samba.org
 Subject: [Samba] AD group membership limits?
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm running Samba 3.0.11 on RedHat ES 3 kernel version
 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp
 and have a quick question about AD group membership limits
 
 Am I right in assuming that Samba is limited by the group membership
 parameters (ie NGROUP = 32) imposed by the Linux kernel? Is there any
 workaround in Samba for this?
 
 At the moment if a user is a member of more then 32 domain groups they
 cannot access any shares. If I remove some of the groups to below the
 32
 group limit everything is fine.
 
 If there isn't a workaround in Samba has anyone reliably recompiled
 the
 kernel and run Samba after changing the group parameters?
 I guess this must be a fairly common problem in a lot of sites?
 
 Any help with this much appreciated.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Simon
 
 
 
 
 
 
 **
 **
 The information contained in this email message may be confidential.
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with,
 disclosure
 or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. Although
 this
 message and any attachments are believed to be free of viruses, no
 responsibility is accepted by TF Informa for any loss or damage
 arising
 in any way from receipt or use thereof.  Messages to and from the
 company
 are monitored for operational reasons and in accordance with lawful
 business practices.
 If you have received this message in error, please notify us by return
 and
 delete the message and any attachments.  Further enquiries/returns can
 be
 sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] AD group membership limits?

2005-03-09 Thread Gibbs, Simon
I've just attempted to apply (in dry-run mode) the supplied kernel patch but
received a number of errors. Does anyone know if these are critical errors?

Thanks

Here is the output:

[ukfs02 linux-2.4]# patch -p1 --dry-run -i more_groups_simple.patch
patching file arch/i386/kernel/init_task.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 11 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
patching file arch/s390/kernel/init_task.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 17 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
patching file include/asm-i386/param.h
patching file include/asm-i386/processor.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 452.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
include/asm-i386/processor.h.rej
patching file include/asm-s390/param.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 19 (offset 3 lines).
patching file include/asm-s390/processor.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 144.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
include/asm-s390/processor.h.rej
patching file include/linux/limits.h
patching file include/linux/mm.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 454.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/mm.h.rej
patching file include/linux/sched.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 520 (offset 146 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 546 (offset 76 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 587.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1143 (offset 196 lines).
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/sched.h.rej
patching file kernel/fork.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 580.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 601.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/fork.c.rej
patching file kernel/sched.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1314.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/sched.c.rej
patching file mm/page_alloc.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 439.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/page_alloc.c.rej


 From: Gibbs, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:19:22 +
 To: Kaplan, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba@lists.samba.org
 Subject: Re: [Samba] AD group membership limits?
 
 Marc,
 
 Thanks for the info (and sorry about my delay in posting back).
 
 I've just tested FC3 running the 2.6 kernel and it does resolve the issue. So
 in an ideal world I'd prefer to wait for RHEL4 but because of required third
 party drivers and apps that are required it looks like I'm going to have to
 recompile with the patches.
 
 I've downloaded the patches from the paths you gave me but I'm not to sure how
 to apply them as I've never had to do anything like this before.
 
 Have you (or anyone else out there) got any good pointers - specifically for
 these patches.
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 Simon
 
 
 From: Kaplan, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:24:28 -0800
 To: Gibbs, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba@lists.samba.org
 Subject: RE: [Samba] AD group membership limits?
 
 Simon,
 
 Yes, I have recompiled the kernel with support for a static NGROUPS with
 a patch from tridge and Rusty Russell. This does not seem to cause any
 problems at all on Samba servers, or with the Linux box in general and
 it does properly allow more supplementary groups.
 
 Here is what I used IIRC:
 http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/more_groups_simple.patch
 http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/maxgroups.patch
 
 Though I just checked on this, and maybe support for dynamic NGROUPS is
 now in the 2.6 kernel? See:
 http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/changelog/v2.6/4/
 
 -Marc
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:samba-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibbs,
 Simon
 Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:58 AM
 To: samba@lists.samba.org
 Subject: [Samba] AD group membership limits?
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm running Samba 3.0.11 on RedHat ES 3 kernel version
 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp
 and have a quick question about AD group membership limits
 
 Am I right in assuming that Samba is limited by the group membership
 parameters (ie NGROUP = 32) imposed by the Linux kernel? Is there any
 workaround in Samba for this?
 
 At the moment if a user is a member of more then 32 domain groups they
 cannot access any shares. If I remove some of the groups to below the
 32
 group limit everything is fine.
 
 If there isn't a workaround in Samba has anyone reliably recompiled
 the
 kernel and run Samba after changing the group parameters?
 I guess this must be a fairly common problem in a lot of sites?
 
 Any help with this much appreciated.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Simon
 
 
 
 
 
 
 **
 **
 The information contained in this email message may be confidential.
 If
 you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with,
 disclosure
 or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. Although
 this
 message and any attachments are believed to be free of viruses, no
 responsibility is accepted by TF Informa for any loss or damage
 arising
 in any way from receipt or use thereof.  Messages to and from the
 company
 are monitored for operational reasons and in accordance with lawful
 business practices.
 If you have received this message in error, please notify us by return
 and
 delete the message and any

[Samba] AD group membership limits?

2005-03-02 Thread Gibbs, Simon
Hi,

I'm running Samba 3.0.11 on RedHat ES 3 kernel version 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp
and have a quick question about AD group membership limits

Am I right in assuming that Samba is limited by the group membership
parameters (ie NGROUP = 32) imposed by the Linux kernel? Is there any
workaround in Samba for this?

At the moment if a user is a member of more then 32 domain groups they
cannot access any shares. If I remove some of the groups to below the 32
group limit everything is fine.

If there isn't a workaround in Samba has anyone reliably recompiled the
kernel and run Samba after changing the group parameters?
I guess this must be a fairly common problem in a lot of sites?

Any help with this much appreciated.

Cheers,

Simon





The information contained in this email message may be confidential. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying 
of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. Although this message and any 
attachments are believed to be free of viruses, no responsibility is accepted 
by TF Informa for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use 
thereof.  Messages to and from the company are monitored for operational 
reasons and in accordance with lawful business practices. 
If you have received this message in error, please notify us by return and 
delete the message and any attachments.  Further enquiries/returns can be sent 
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] AD group membership limits?

2005-03-02 Thread Kaplan, Marc
Simon,

Yes, I have recompiled the kernel with support for a static NGROUPS with
a patch from tridge and Rusty Russell. This does not seem to cause any
problems at all on Samba servers, or with the Linux box in general and
it does properly allow more supplementary groups.

Here is what I used IIRC:
http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/more_groups_simple.patch
http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/maxgroups.patch

Though I just checked on this, and maybe support for dynamic NGROUPS is
now in the 2.6 kernel? See:
http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/changelog/v2.6/4/

-Marc
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:samba-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibbs,
Simon
 Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:58 AM
 To: samba@lists.samba.org
 Subject: [Samba] AD group membership limits?
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm running Samba 3.0.11 on RedHat ES 3 kernel version
2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp
 and have a quick question about AD group membership limits
 
 Am I right in assuming that Samba is limited by the group membership
 parameters (ie NGROUP = 32) imposed by the Linux kernel? Is there any
 workaround in Samba for this?
 
 At the moment if a user is a member of more then 32 domain groups they
 cannot access any shares. If I remove some of the groups to below the
32
 group limit everything is fine.
 
 If there isn't a workaround in Samba has anyone reliably recompiled
the
 kernel and run Samba after changing the group parameters?
 I guess this must be a fairly common problem in a lot of sites?
 
 Any help with this much appreciated.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Simon
 
 
 
 


**
 **
 The information contained in this email message may be confidential.
If
 you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with,
disclosure
 or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. Although
this
 message and any attachments are believed to be free of viruses, no
 responsibility is accepted by TF Informa for any loss or damage
arising
 in any way from receipt or use thereof.  Messages to and from the
company
 are monitored for operational reasons and in accordance with lawful
 business practices.
 If you have received this message in error, please notify us by return
and
 delete the message and any attachments.  Further enquiries/returns can
be
 sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba