[samba] AD group membership limits?
Hello All, I read a post on patching kernel 2.4.x to get more groups. I currently cannot upgrade my RHEL3 as RHEL4 is not supported but need to take advantage of additional groups over 32. I read a similar post that a patch more_groups_simple.patch can be applied. I have no success in patching though.. linux-2.4]# patch -p1 --dry-run -i more_groups_simple.patch Just wondering if anyone has success in patching using this patch? If so any direction would be much appreciated. Thanks Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] AD group membership limits?
Marc, Thanks for the info (and sorry about my delay in posting back). I've just tested FC3 running the 2.6 kernel and it does resolve the issue. So in an ideal world I'd prefer to wait for RHEL4 but because of required third party drivers and apps that are required it looks like I'm going to have to recompile with the patches. I've downloaded the patches from the paths you gave me but I'm not to sure how to apply them as I've never had to do anything like this before. Have you (or anyone else out there) got any good pointers - specifically for these patches. Thanks for your help. Simon From: Kaplan, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:24:28 -0800 To: Gibbs, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] AD group membership limits? Simon, Yes, I have recompiled the kernel with support for a static NGROUPS with a patch from tridge and Rusty Russell. This does not seem to cause any problems at all on Samba servers, or with the Linux box in general and it does properly allow more supplementary groups. Here is what I used IIRC: http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/more_groups_simple.patch http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/maxgroups.patch Though I just checked on this, and maybe support for dynamic NGROUPS is now in the 2.6 kernel? See: http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/changelog/v2.6/4/ -Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibbs, Simon Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:58 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] AD group membership limits? Hi, I'm running Samba 3.0.11 on RedHat ES 3 kernel version 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp and have a quick question about AD group membership limits Am I right in assuming that Samba is limited by the group membership parameters (ie NGROUP = 32) imposed by the Linux kernel? Is there any workaround in Samba for this? At the moment if a user is a member of more then 32 domain groups they cannot access any shares. If I remove some of the groups to below the 32 group limit everything is fine. If there isn't a workaround in Samba has anyone reliably recompiled the kernel and run Samba after changing the group parameters? I guess this must be a fairly common problem in a lot of sites? Any help with this much appreciated. Cheers, Simon ** ** The information contained in this email message may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of viruses, no responsibility is accepted by TF Informa for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use thereof. Messages to and from the company are monitored for operational reasons and in accordance with lawful business practices. If you have received this message in error, please notify us by return and delete the message and any attachments. Further enquiries/returns can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] AD group membership limits?
I've just attempted to apply (in dry-run mode) the supplied kernel patch but received a number of errors. Does anyone know if these are critical errors? Thanks Here is the output: [ukfs02 linux-2.4]# patch -p1 --dry-run -i more_groups_simple.patch patching file arch/i386/kernel/init_task.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 11 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line). patching file arch/s390/kernel/init_task.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 17 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line). patching file include/asm-i386/param.h patching file include/asm-i386/processor.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 452. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-i386/processor.h.rej patching file include/asm-s390/param.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 19 (offset 3 lines). patching file include/asm-s390/processor.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 144. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-s390/processor.h.rej patching file include/linux/limits.h patching file include/linux/mm.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 454. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/mm.h.rej patching file include/linux/sched.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 520 (offset 146 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 546 (offset 76 lines). Hunk #3 FAILED at 587. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1143 (offset 196 lines). 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/sched.h.rej patching file kernel/fork.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 580. Hunk #2 FAILED at 601. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/fork.c.rej patching file kernel/sched.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 1314. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/sched.c.rej patching file mm/page_alloc.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 439. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/page_alloc.c.rej From: Gibbs, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:19:22 + To: Kaplan, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] AD group membership limits? Marc, Thanks for the info (and sorry about my delay in posting back). I've just tested FC3 running the 2.6 kernel and it does resolve the issue. So in an ideal world I'd prefer to wait for RHEL4 but because of required third party drivers and apps that are required it looks like I'm going to have to recompile with the patches. I've downloaded the patches from the paths you gave me but I'm not to sure how to apply them as I've never had to do anything like this before. Have you (or anyone else out there) got any good pointers - specifically for these patches. Thanks for your help. Simon From: Kaplan, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:24:28 -0800 To: Gibbs, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] AD group membership limits? Simon, Yes, I have recompiled the kernel with support for a static NGROUPS with a patch from tridge and Rusty Russell. This does not seem to cause any problems at all on Samba servers, or with the Linux box in general and it does properly allow more supplementary groups. Here is what I used IIRC: http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/more_groups_simple.patch http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/maxgroups.patch Though I just checked on this, and maybe support for dynamic NGROUPS is now in the 2.6 kernel? See: http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/changelog/v2.6/4/ -Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibbs, Simon Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:58 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] AD group membership limits? Hi, I'm running Samba 3.0.11 on RedHat ES 3 kernel version 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp and have a quick question about AD group membership limits Am I right in assuming that Samba is limited by the group membership parameters (ie NGROUP = 32) imposed by the Linux kernel? Is there any workaround in Samba for this? At the moment if a user is a member of more then 32 domain groups they cannot access any shares. If I remove some of the groups to below the 32 group limit everything is fine. If there isn't a workaround in Samba has anyone reliably recompiled the kernel and run Samba after changing the group parameters? I guess this must be a fairly common problem in a lot of sites? Any help with this much appreciated. Cheers, Simon ** ** The information contained in this email message may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of viruses, no responsibility is accepted by TF Informa for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use thereof. Messages to and from the company are monitored for operational reasons and in accordance with lawful business practices. If you have received this message in error, please notify us by return and delete the message and any
[Samba] AD group membership limits?
Hi, I'm running Samba 3.0.11 on RedHat ES 3 kernel version 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp and have a quick question about AD group membership limits Am I right in assuming that Samba is limited by the group membership parameters (ie NGROUP = 32) imposed by the Linux kernel? Is there any workaround in Samba for this? At the moment if a user is a member of more then 32 domain groups they cannot access any shares. If I remove some of the groups to below the 32 group limit everything is fine. If there isn't a workaround in Samba has anyone reliably recompiled the kernel and run Samba after changing the group parameters? I guess this must be a fairly common problem in a lot of sites? Any help with this much appreciated. Cheers, Simon The information contained in this email message may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of viruses, no responsibility is accepted by TF Informa for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use thereof. Messages to and from the company are monitored for operational reasons and in accordance with lawful business practices. If you have received this message in error, please notify us by return and delete the message and any attachments. Further enquiries/returns can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] AD group membership limits?
Simon, Yes, I have recompiled the kernel with support for a static NGROUPS with a patch from tridge and Rusty Russell. This does not seem to cause any problems at all on Samba servers, or with the Linux box in general and it does properly allow more supplementary groups. Here is what I used IIRC: http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/more_groups_simple.patch http://ccache.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/maxgroups.patch Though I just checked on this, and maybe support for dynamic NGROUPS is now in the 2.6 kernel? See: http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/changelog/v2.6/4/ -Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibbs, Simon Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:58 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] AD group membership limits? Hi, I'm running Samba 3.0.11 on RedHat ES 3 kernel version 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp and have a quick question about AD group membership limits Am I right in assuming that Samba is limited by the group membership parameters (ie NGROUP = 32) imposed by the Linux kernel? Is there any workaround in Samba for this? At the moment if a user is a member of more then 32 domain groups they cannot access any shares. If I remove some of the groups to below the 32 group limit everything is fine. If there isn't a workaround in Samba has anyone reliably recompiled the kernel and run Samba after changing the group parameters? I guess this must be a fairly common problem in a lot of sites? Any help with this much appreciated. Cheers, Simon ** ** The information contained in this email message may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of viruses, no responsibility is accepted by TF Informa for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use thereof. Messages to and from the company are monitored for operational reasons and in accordance with lawful business practices. If you have received this message in error, please notify us by return and delete the message and any attachments. Further enquiries/returns can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba