Re: [Samba] CTDB and LDAP: anyone?

2008-03-07 Thread Alex Crow
Andrew,

Apologies for not thanking you earlier; I missed your reply amongst the
other stuff. So Cheers!

Since 3.2.0 will be out soon I'll probably wait for that before even
considering deployment. I will test with the preview releases.

Thanks for the help.

Alex

On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 07:51 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
 On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 11:01 +, Alex Crow wrote:
  Hi there,
  
  I am looking into using CTDB between a PDC and a BDC. I assume this is
  possible!
  
  However I have a few questions:
  
  1: Do I have to use tdb2 as an Idmap backend? Can I not stay with ldap?
  (from the CTDB docs:
  
  A clustered Samba install must set some specific configuration
  parameters 
  clustering = yes
idmap backend = tdb2
private dir = /a/directory/on/your/cluster/filesystem
  It is vital that the private directory is on shared storage.)
 
 LDAP should be fine...
 
  2. I have got the git tree as mentioned on the CTDB pages; however it
  seems like 3.2.0pre1 will also support this; which should I go with?
  
  3. Do I have to use IP takeover? All I am trying to do in this case is
  to consistently provide the home directories and profiles on both the
  PDC and BDC (I'm using GFS over iSCSI).
  
  It doesn't matter if the IP address of either box vanishes - since they
  are both domain controllers the still-living box should be used anyway
  (background - I am using passdb expand explicit = yes and in LDAP I
  have home and profile paths specified prefixed by \\%L, so the user's
  profile and home dir are mapped to whatever the logon server is for that
  session).
  
  I can see how for sharing domain member services around a cluster that
  IP takeover is required, but the PDC/BDC relationship means (IMHO) it's
  not required in this instance.
 
 This looks like a perfectly good reason not to require IP takeover.
 
 Andrew Bartlett
 
-- 
This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain 
confidential information.  Unless you are that person, you may not 
disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested to delete 
the message along with any attachments and notify us immediately. 

Transact is operated by Integrated Financial Arrangements plc 
Domain House, 5-7 Singer Street, London  EC2A 4BQ 
Tel: (020) 7608 4900 Fax: (020) 7608 1200
(Registered office: as above; Registered in England and Wales under
number: 3727592) 
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (entered on
the FSA Register; number: 190856)


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] CTDB and LDAP: anyone?

2008-02-20 Thread Andrew Bartlett

On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 11:01 +, Alex Crow wrote:
 Hi there,
 
 I am looking into using CTDB between a PDC and a BDC. I assume this is
 possible!
 
 However I have a few questions:
 
 1: Do I have to use tdb2 as an Idmap backend? Can I not stay with ldap?
 (from the CTDB docs:
 
 A clustered Samba install must set some specific configuration
 parameters 
 clustering = yes
   idmap backend = tdb2
   private dir = /a/directory/on/your/cluster/filesystem
 It is vital that the private directory is on shared storage.)

LDAP should be fine...

 2. I have got the git tree as mentioned on the CTDB pages; however it
 seems like 3.2.0pre1 will also support this; which should I go with?
 
 3. Do I have to use IP takeover? All I am trying to do in this case is
 to consistently provide the home directories and profiles on both the
 PDC and BDC (I'm using GFS over iSCSI).
 
 It doesn't matter if the IP address of either box vanishes - since they
 are both domain controllers the still-living box should be used anyway
 (background - I am using passdb expand explicit = yes and in LDAP I
 have home and profile paths specified prefixed by \\%L, so the user's
 profile and home dir are mapped to whatever the logon server is for that
 session).
 
 I can see how for sharing domain member services around a cluster that
 IP takeover is required, but the PDC/BDC relationship means (IMHO) it's
 not required in this instance.

This looks like a perfectly good reason not to require IP takeover.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] CTDB and LDAP: anyone?

2008-02-12 Thread Alex Crow
Hi there,

I am looking into using CTDB between a PDC and a BDC. I assume this is
possible!

However I have a few questions:

1: Do I have to use tdb2 as an Idmap backend? Can I not stay with ldap?
(from the CTDB docs:

A clustered Samba install must set some specific configuration
parameters 
clustering = yes
  idmap backend = tdb2
  private dir = /a/directory/on/your/cluster/filesystem
It is vital that the private directory is on shared storage.)

2. I have got the git tree as mentioned on the CTDB pages; however it
seems like 3.2.0pre1 will also support this; which should I go with?

3. Do I have to use IP takeover? All I am trying to do in this case is
to consistently provide the home directories and profiles on both the
PDC and BDC (I'm using GFS over iSCSI).

It doesn't matter if the IP address of either box vanishes - since they
are both domain controllers the still-living box should be used anyway
(background - I am using passdb expand explicit = yes and in LDAP I
have home and profile paths specified prefixed by \\%L, so the user's
profile and home dir are mapped to whatever the logon server is for that
session).

I can see how for sharing domain member services around a cluster that
IP takeover is required, but the PDC/BDC relationship means (IMHO) it's
not required in this instance.

Looking forward to any advice I receive,

Cheers

Alex 

-- 
This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain 
confidential information.  Unless you are that person, you may not 
disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested to delete 
the message along with any attachments and notify us immediately. 

Transact is operated by Integrated Financial Arrangements plc 
Domain House, 5-7 Singer Street, London  EC2A 4BQ 
Tel: (020) 7608 4900 Fax: (020) 7608 1200
(Registered office: as above; Registered in England and Wales under
number: 3727592) 
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (entered on
the FSA Register; number: 190856)


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba