RE: [Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers?
Jeremy, Would it be a big deal for you to find out the exact release version of the NetApp software you could successfully run smbclient against? Oleg -Original Message- From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/13/2004 19:58 To: Kalnichevski, Oleg Cc: Jeremy Allison; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers? On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: > > Jeremy > I really appreciate your response. Please find the debug trace below. > > Just a few notes: I upgraded the filer's operating system from release 6.3.2 to > 6.4.4R1 prior to running the test. It did not make much of a difference but I did > get a different error message this time around. I am going to upgrade to the > NetApp's latest and greatest stable release (6.5.1R1) and post you on the results I did test here in the lab yesterday with the version NetApp had brought - I'm assuming it was the latest stable version - and had no problems connecting with smbclient. It looks like it might be a bug in their older implementations. Jeremy. *** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your system. *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: > > Jeremy > I really appreciate your response. Please find the debug trace below. > > Just a few notes: I upgraded the filer's operating system from release 6.3.2 to > 6.4.4R1 prior to running the test. It did not make much of a difference but I did > get a different error message this time around. I am going to upgrade to the > NetApp's latest and greatest stable release (6.5.1R1) and post you on the results I did test here in the lab yesterday with the version NetApp had brought - I'm assuming it was the latest stable version - and had no problems connecting with smbclient. It looks like it might be a bug in their older implementations. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers?
00 2E 00 42 00 45 00 41 00 ..D.E.V. ..B.E.A. [0B0] 52 00 49 00 4E 00 47 00 50 00 4F 00 49 00 4E 00 R.I.N.G. P.O.I.N. [0C0] 54 00 2E 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 03 00 4E 00 62 00 T...C.O. M...N.b. [0D0] 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 00 66 00 70 00 30 00 31 00 e.z.r.h. f.p.0.1. [0E0] 2E 00 62 00 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 00 6C 00 61 00 ..b.e.z. r.h.l.a. [0F0] 62 00 2E 00 64 00 65 00 76 00 2E 00 62 00 65 00 b...d.e. v...b.e. [100] 61 00 72 00 69 00 6E 00 67 00 70 00 6F 00 69 00 a.r.i.n. g.p.o.i. [110] 6E 00 74 00 2E 00 63 00 6F 00 6D 00 00 00 00 00 n.t...c. o.m. [120] A3 82 01 01 04 81 FE 4E 54 4C 4D 53 53 50 00 02 ...N TLMSSP.. [130] 00 00 00 10 00 10 00 30 00 00 00 05 02 89 00 4E ...0 ...N [140] 55 2C 79 5A CE CF 1A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 BE U,yZ [150] 00 BE 00 40 00 00 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] .E.Z.R.H [160] 00 4C 00 41 00 42 00 02 00 10 00 42 00 45 00 5A .L.A.B.. ...B.E.Z [170] 00 52 00 48 00 4C 00 41 00 42 00 01 00 12 00 42 .R.H.L.A .B.B [180] 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 46 00 50 00 30 00 31 .E.Z.R.H .F.P.0.1 [190] 00 04 00 3A 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 4C ...:.B.E .Z.R.H.L [1A0] 00 41 00 42 00 2E 00 44 00 45 00 56 00 2E 00 42 .A.B...D .E.V...B [1B0] 00 45 00 41 00 52 00 49 00 4E 00 47 00 50 00 4F .E.A.R.I .N.G.P.O [1C0] 00 49 00 4E 00 54 00 2E 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 03 .I.N.T.. .C.O.M.. [1D0] 00 4E 00 62 00 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 00 66 00 70 .N.b.e.z .r.h.f.p [1E0] 00 30 00 31 00 2E 00 62 00 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 .0.1...b .e.z.r.h [1F0] 00 6C 00 61 00 62 00 2E 00 64 00 65 00 76 00 2E .l.a.b.. .d.e.v.. Got challenge flags: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x00890205 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 NTLMSSP_CHAL_TARGET_INFO NTLMSSP: Set final flags: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x00080215 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 NTLMSSP challenge set by NTLM2 challenge is: [000] 26 4C 6B 86 3A AA E2 1C &Lk.:... NTLMSSP Sign/Seal - Initialising with flags: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x00080215 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 write_socket(3,252) write_socket(3,252) wrote 252 got smb length of 158 size=158 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=34823 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=2749 smb_uid=2048 smb_mid=3 smt_wct=4 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 3]= 23 (0x17) smb_bcc=115 [000] A1 15 30 13 A0 03 0A 01 00 A1 0C 06 0A 2B 06 01 ..0. .+.. [010] 04 01 82 37 02 02 0A 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F ...7...W .i.n.d.o [020] 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 .w.s. .5 ...0...W [030] 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 .i.n.d.o .w.s. .2 [040] 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 .0.0.0. .L.A.N. [050] 00 4D 00 61 00 6E 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 .M.a.n.a .g.e.r.. [060] 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 4C 00 41 00 42 .B.E.Z.R .H.L.A.B [070] 00 00 00 ... size=158 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=34823 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=2749 smb_uid=2048 smb_mid=3 smt_wct=4 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 3]= 23 (0x17) smb_bcc=115 [000] A1 15 30 13 A0 03 0A 01 00 A1 0C 06 0A 2B 06 01 ..0. .+.. [010] 04 01 82 37 02 02 0A 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F ...7...W .i.n.d.o [020] 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 .w.s. .5 ...0...W [030] 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 .i.n.d.o .w.s. .2 [040] 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 .0.0.0. .L.A.N. [050] 00 4D 00 61 00 6E 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 .M.a.n.a .g.e.r.. [060] 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 4C 00 41 00 42 .B.E.Z.R .H.L.A.B [070] 00 00 00 ... spnego_parse_auth_response failed at 9 Failed to parse auth response SPNEGO login failed: Unexpected information received lang_tdb_init: /usr/lib/samba/en_US.UTF-8.msg: No such file or directory session setup failed: SUCCESS - 0 -Original Message- From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:03 PM To: Kalnichevski, Oleg Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers? On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:35:16PM +0100, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: > > Good ${time of the day} > > I have just been wondering if anyone would know if Samba is compatible with the CIFS > implementation of the Network Appliance DataONTAP filers? > > http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/ontap.html > > I have so far unable to connect to any shared folder on the NetApp filer that > require authentication. An attempt to access or list shared resources on the NetApp > filer f
Re: [Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:35:16PM +0100, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: > > Good ${time of the day} > > I have just been wondering if anyone would know if Samba is compatible with the CIFS > implementation of the Network Appliance DataONTAP filers? > > http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/ontap.html > > I have so far unable to connect to any shared folder on the NetApp filer that > require authentication. An attempt to access or list shared resources on the NetApp > filer fails with the following error message. > > session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE > > I am running Fedora Core 2 > * kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 > * samba client 3.0.3-5 > > NetApp F85 filer running NetApp Release 6.3.2 > > Did anyone have better luck getting Samba to work with NetApp filers? Yes, can you send a debug level 10 trace please ? We're here in the CIFS interop lab along with NetApp, so now is a good time to do this. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers?
Good ${time of the day} I have just been wondering if anyone would know if Samba is compatible with the CIFS implementation of the Network Appliance DataONTAP filers? http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/ontap.html I have so far unable to connect to any shared folder on the NetApp filer that require authentication. An attempt to access or list shared resources on the NetApp filer fails with the following error message. session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE I am running Fedora Core 2 * kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 * samba client 3.0.3-5 NetApp F85 filer running NetApp Release 6.3.2 Did anyone have better luck getting Samba to work with NetApp filers? Any pointers would be really appreciated Oleg PS: I'll happily produce the debug trace if that could help pinpoint the problem *** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your system. *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba