Re: [Samba] Is Samba supposed to work like this?

2010-08-19 Thread Robert Heller
At Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:01:03 -0500 matt_fr...@cbca.com wrote:

 
 I have Samba 3.0.33-3.28.el5 running on a CentOS 5.5 server. The samba 
 server is added as a Member server of our Windows 2003 AD, and winbind is 
 working OK. 
 
 I have a question about the assigning of permissions via the Windows XP 
 file/folder properties dialog. 
 
 My background is mainly in Windows, but I do grasp the concept of UNIX 
 file permissions. When I attempt to modify the permissions on a folder 
 that is in the share folder, the behavior isn't the same as it would be as 
 if I were doing this on a Windows machine. If my user ID is not the UNIX 
 OWNER of the share folder, then any attempt I make to change permissions 
 gives me an access denied message. The permissions on the share are 775. 
 
 Once I am the owner of the share, When I attempt to add a Windows ACE to 
 the ACL, and give it full permissions, and click the Apply button, the 
 entry remains, but the checkboxes for the permissions have all been 
 cleared. I cannot get the permissions to Stick. Also, the permissions in 
 the security tab are not always listed for a given Access Control Entry. 
 All the checkboxes are blank, except for the Special Permissions box. I 
 would think that If I granted ALL access to the ACE, then it should show 
 all the boxes as checked without me having to go into the advanced screen. 
 
 
 Is SAMBA supposed to be this different from how a Windows server would 
 react, or is there something just not configured right in samba? 
 
 Is there some sort of recommended best practices for configuring samba 
 so it DOES work like a windows server? 

I know virtually nothing about MS-Windows, but my guess is that it has
to do how permissions work inder UNIX vs how they work under MS-Windows.
Specificly how the underlying file system in question handles
permissions and/or ACLs.

It may also be related to how Samba is configured in terms of what
permissions / access levels is it granting clients.

 
 
 
 Follow us on twitter- Get the latest in industry updates, Health Care reform 
 news, and other information at  http://twitter.com/CBCANews.
 
 NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic message, and any 
 attachments accompanying this transmission, may be legally privileged and/or 
 confidential and protected health information. This information is intended 
 only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity identified above. The 
 authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this 
 information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation 
 and is required to protect the information after its stated need has been 
 fulfilled. 
 If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible to 
 deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 disclosure, printing, copying, forwarding, or distributing of this 
 information is strictly prohibited. 
 If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender 
 immediately, by telephone or return fax/email, to advise of wrongful receipt 
 and confirm your understanding of this Notice. Thank You.

-- 
Robert Heller -- Get the Deepwoods Software FireFox Toolbar!
Deepwoods Software-- Linux Installation and Administration
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database
hel...@deepsoft.com   -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk


  
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] Is Samba supposed to work like this?

2010-08-18 Thread Matt_Fries
I have Samba 3.0.33-3.28.el5 running on a CentOS 5.5 server. The samba 
server is added as a Member server of our Windows 2003 AD, and winbind is 
working OK. 

I have a question about the assigning of permissions via the Windows XP 
file/folder properties dialog. 

My background is mainly in Windows, but I do grasp the concept of UNIX 
file permissions. When I attempt to modify the permissions on a folder 
that is in the share folder, the behavior isn't the same as it would be as 
if I were doing this on a Windows machine. If my user ID is not the UNIX 
OWNER of the share folder, then any attempt I make to change permissions 
gives me an access denied message. The permissions on the share are 775. 

Once I am the owner of the share, When I attempt to add a Windows ACE to 
the ACL, and give it full permissions, and click the Apply button, the 
entry remains, but the checkboxes for the permissions have all been 
cleared. I cannot get the permissions to Stick. Also, the permissions in 
the security tab are not always listed for a given Access Control Entry. 
All the checkboxes are blank, except for the Special Permissions box. I 
would think that If I granted ALL access to the ACE, then it should show 
all the boxes as checked without me having to go into the advanced screen. 


Is SAMBA supposed to be this different from how a Windows server would 
react, or is there something just not configured right in samba? 

Is there some sort of recommended best practices for configuring samba 
so it DOES work like a windows server? 



Follow us on twitter- Get the latest in industry updates, Health Care reform 
news, and other information at  http://twitter.com/CBCANews.

NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic message, and any 
attachments accompanying this transmission, may be legally privileged and/or 
confidential and protected health information. This information is intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity identified above. The 
authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this 
information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation 
and is required to protect the information after its stated need has been 
fulfilled. 
If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible to 
deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, printing, copying, forwarding, or distributing of this information 
is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately, by telephone or return fax/email, to advise of wrongful receipt 
and confirm your understanding of this Notice. Thank You.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba