Re: [Samba] NTLMv2 in Sun's 'official' Samba 3.0.37?

2010-01-05 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
It didn't work for me on Sun with Samba 3.0.37 either.I was under 
the impression (quite possibly wrong)  that for Win 7 support you would 
need Samba 3.3.x or 3.4.x anyway.I have been testing the 
sunfreeware.com version of samba 3.4.x (full zfs support seems to be 
missing) and compiling it from scratch (getting kerberos enabled is a 
problem.)  And hoping that a Sun-provided build of 3.4.x comes out 
sometime in the next 6 months.  3.0.x line is hitting a dead end.
(Dell has made our life easier in 2009 by still shipping us machines 
with XP.)I have an open ticket with Sun on separate issue with 
3.0.37 so I am hoping this will let me find out what their plans are.







On 12/27/09 19:29, Jake Carroll wrote:

Hi all.

Just looking for some guidance as to what works, and what doesn't.

Recently I've noticed that no matter what I do, I can't seem to get NTLMv2 to 
negotiate using Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Mac OS X 10.6.x against Solaris 10 
Samba 3.0.37.

If I 'tune' the client OS that it only negotiates with NTLMv1, all is well. In 
my global block, on the Solaris Samba server, I have:

[global]
client lanman auth=no
client ntlmv2 auth=yes
ntlm auth = no

  Now, I'd have thought that this would be enough to make NTLMv2 work along 
it's merry way - but apparently not. Whenever I attempt to connect and 
negotiate using NTLMv2, the client OS is given a generic 'incorrect username or 
password' response.

So - the question. Does 3.0.37 actually even support NTLMv2? Am I doing 
something wrong in trying to turn it 'on'? Sun aren't talking, but I'm sure 
somebody here would know the history behind this...

Thanks all.

JC




   


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] NTLMv2 in Sun's 'official' Samba 3.0.37?

2010-01-05 Thread David Whitney
From everything I've read and experienced, version 3.3.4 was the earliest
Samba version that was demonstrated to be able to support Windows 7 (with
the proper registry entries).

Blessings,
David


On Jan 5, 2010 10:04 AM, Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
wrote:

It didn't work for me on Sun with Samba 3.0.37 either.I was under the
impression (quite possibly wrong)  that for Win 7 support you would need
Samba 3.3.x or 3.4.x anyway.I have been testing the
sunfreeware.comversion of samba 3.4.x (full zfs support seems to be
missing) and compiling
it from scratch (getting kerberos enabled is a problem.)  And hoping that a
Sun-provided build of 3.4.x comes out sometime in the next 6 months.  3.0.x
line is hitting a dead end.(Dell has made our life easier in 2009 by
still shipping us machines with XP.)I have an open ticket with Sun on
separate issue with 3.0.37 so I am hoping this will let me find out what
their plans are.

On 12/27/09 19:29, Jake Carroll wrote:   Hi all.   Just looking for some
guidance as to w...
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] NTLMv2 in Sun's 'official' Samba 3.0.37?

2010-01-05 Thread Paul
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 08:04, Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
 It didn't work for me on Sun with Samba 3.0.37 either.    I was under the
 impression (quite possibly wrong)  that for Win 7 support you would need
 Samba 3.3.x or 3.4.x anyway.    I have been testing the sunfreeware.com
 version of samba 3.4.x (full zfs support seems to be missing) and compiling
 it from scratch (getting kerberos enabled is a problem.)  And hoping that a
 Sun-provided build of 3.4.x comes out sometime in the next 6 months.  3.0.x
 line is hitting a dead end.    (Dell has made our life easier in 2009 by
 still shipping us machines with XP.)    I have an open ticket with Sun on
 separate issue with 3.0.37 so I am hoping this will let me find out what
 their plans are.

Their plans are to push 3.4:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=120279tstart=15

-- 
It's time to finish going metric.
http://gometric.us
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] NTLMv2 in Sun's 'official' Samba 3.0.37?

2009-12-27 Thread Jake Carroll
Hi all.

Just looking for some guidance as to what works, and what doesn't.

Recently I've noticed that no matter what I do, I can't seem to get NTLMv2 to 
negotiate using Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Mac OS X 10.6.x against Solaris 10 
Samba 3.0.37.

If I 'tune' the client OS that it only negotiates with NTLMv1, all is well. In 
my global block, on the Solaris Samba server, I have:

[global]
client lanman auth=no
client ntlmv2 auth=yes
ntlm auth = no

 Now, I'd have thought that this would be enough to make NTLMv2 work along it's 
merry way - but apparently not. Whenever I attempt to connect and negotiate 
using NTLMv2, the client OS is given a generic 'incorrect username or password' 
response.

So - the question. Does 3.0.37 actually even support NTLMv2? Am I doing 
something wrong in trying to turn it 'on'? Sun aren't talking, but I'm sure 
somebody here would know the history behind this...

Thanks all.

JC




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba