Re: [Samba] RH7.3 compatibility with SRPMS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Bartlett wrote: | On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:10, Chris McKeever wrote: | |>I just rebuilt the Redhat SRPMS using 7.3 - I am noticed in the SPEC |>file some RH8/9 specific shell scripts. So far it seems to be working |>fine - just wondering if there is any conflicts with this..thanks in |>advance. | | | RH 7.3 is getting quite old now, and I doubt it's | being tested. In any case, these scripts are not required | if the rebuild works, they just remove Net::LDAP from | the 'requires' statement of the binary RPM. Actually, ths SRPMS is built on RedHat 7.3 for just this reason. So that people can rebuild it. I don't release the 7.3 RPM since the demand is pretty low these days. But the SRPMS should be fine. cheer,s jerry - - Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) --- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song"--Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBOwMjIR7qMdg1EfYRAq8PAJ9j7WDkJcARmaWfNXL/suUIxT9pHACghAiT ua9Ba5TSjE2EFHwdOKZCXR4= =IkoI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] RH7.3 compatibility with SRPMS
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:10, Chris McKeever wrote: > I just rebuilt the Redhat SRPMS using 7.3 - I am noticed in the SPEC > file some RH8/9 specific shell scripts. So far it seems to be working > fine - just wondering if there is any conflicts with this..thanks in > advance. RH 7.3 is getting quite old now, and I doubt it's being tested. In any case, these scripts are not required if the rebuild works, they just remove Net::LDAP from the 'requires' statement of the binary RPM. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Developer, Samba Teamhttp://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RH7.3 compatibility with SRPMS
I just rebuilt the Redhat SRPMS using 7.3 - I am noticed in the SPEC file some RH8/9 specific shell scripts. So far it seems to be working fine - just wondering if there is any conflicts with this..thanks in advance. # Don't depend on Net::LDAP # one filter for RH 8 and one for 9 Source998: filter-requires-samba_rh8.sh Source999: filter-requires-samba_rh9.sh # Working around perl dependency problem from docs # Only > RH 8.0 seems to care here echo "rpm_version == %{rpm_version}" if [ "%{rpm_version}" == "42" ]; then %define __perl_requires %{SOURCE999} echo "%{__perl_requires}" elif [ "%{rpm_version}" == "41" ]; then %define __find_requires %{SOURCE998} echo "%{__find_requires}" fi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba