Re: [Samba] Re: Cannot map guest shares in 'security = SERVER' mode onsamba-3.0.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rene Kapeller wrote: > > Anybody out there, who has a samba server running in 'security = SERVER' > mode, while providing a 'public/guest' share? > > Again, this used to work on samba-2.2.9!!! > > Could it be a bug in samba-3.0.9? > Is there something that has to be changed on XP? > > I am willing to do more testing/trying/debugging > > Config and logs: > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-January/116901.html The problem is that you have map to guest = bad user But the logs from the XP client show: [2006/01/25 10:11:46, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [KAPELLER] -> [KAPELLER] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE ^^^ Not NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER. I believe this is just a limitation with security = server and that if you swap to domain mode security, things will work (assuming that user KAPELLER really does not exist. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD6NJxIR7qMdg1EfYRAgguAJ9xN2JlS8hzTTTZxTyvC5CINEuAVwCgy+cy gB2hHB5xBA9Anf1nYeLFGLo= =bjRq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Cannot map guest shares in 'security = SERVER' mode onsamba-3.0.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rene Kapeller wrote: > > Anybody out there, who has a samba server running in > 'security = SERVER' mode, while providing a 'public/guest' share? > > Again, this used to work on samba-2.2.9!!! > > Could it be a bug in samba-3.0.9? There's a bug logged against security = domain configurations that is probably in the same area of the code. I'll look into it today. cheers, jerry = I live in a Reply-to-All world--- Samba--- http://www.samba.org Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD33qqIR7qMdg1EfYRAhLUAJ0YaBvsHyKEJRCnGRHDMmFB5MzLqwCghTSL nZL4FP6HXjEzh1Yx2Ai7gXs= =C+JQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Cannot map guest shares in 'security = SERVER' mode onsamba-3.0.9
Anybody out there, who has a samba server running in 'security = SERVER'
mode, while providing a 'public/guest' share?
Again, this used to work on samba-2.2.9!!!
Could it be a bug in samba-3.0.9?
Is there something that has to be changed on XP?
I am willing to do more testing/trying/debugging
Config and logs:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-January/116901.html
Thanks for any hint!
Rene
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Kapeller wrote:
I'm running samba-3.0.9-1.3E.3 and the manpage for smb.conf does not
mention anything about 'map to guest = Bad Uid'.
However I did add the line 'map to guest = Bad Uid' an run
'testparm /etc/samba/smb.conf'.
The 'Bad uid' option is only available in 3.0.20 and later iirc.
Also it is really only a supported option for security = {domain,ads}
cheers, jerry
=
I live in a Reply-to-All world---
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD3h/nIR7qMdg1EfYRAssXAJ4lfLLClfMrl9Hk5Fp5MSzxztn/lwCfZp4o
nB6rfxPx2S/FpHl42lz7ijA=
=BSEq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Cannot map guest shares in 'security = SERVER' mode onsamba-3.0.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Kapeller wrote:
> I'm running samba-3.0.9-1.3E.3 and the manpage for smb.conf does not
> mention anything about 'map to guest = Bad Uid'.
>
> However I did add the line 'map to guest = Bad Uid' an run
> 'testparm /etc/samba/smb.conf'.
The 'Bad uid' option is only available in 3.0.20 and later iirc.
Also it is really only a supported option for security = {domain,ads}
cheers, jerry
=
I live in a Reply-to-All world---
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD3h/nIR7qMdg1EfYRAssXAJ4lfLLClfMrl9Hk5Fp5MSzxztn/lwCfZp4o
nB6rfxPx2S/FpHl42lz7ijA=
=BSEq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Cannot map guest shares in 'security = SERVER' mode onsamba-3.0.9
Rene Kapeller wrote: I'm running samba-3.0.9-1.3E.3 and the manpage for smb.conf does not mention anything about 'map to guest = Bad Uid'. Could be a bug in samba-3.0.9 and/or it's documentation. To see the latest docs, at least, refer to: http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html -- Rex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Cannot map guest shares in 'security = SERVER' mode onsamba-3.0.9
> I'm running samba-3.0.9-1.3E.3 and the manpage for smb.conf does not > mention anything about 'map to guest = Bad Uid'. Isn't it "map to guest = bad user"? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Cannot map guest shares in 'security = SERVER' mode onsamba-3.0.9
I'm running samba-3.0.9-1.3E.3 and the manpage for smb.conf does not mention anything about 'map to guest = Bad Uid'. However I did add the line 'map to guest = Bad Uid' an run 'testparm /etc/samba/smb.conf'. No complaines but 'testparm' removes the entire line 'map to guest = Bad Uid' from the config file. H??? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
