Re: [Samba] SAMBA bringing NFS server to a halt

2013-03-07 Thread Andreas Gaiser
Hey Metthew,


I think you might have a chance.

Did you try clearing binary data stored by samba? There's a whole bunch
of stuff in tdb files in potentially more than one place (on Debian it's
under /var/lib/samba). Parts are temporary data and safe to remove.
Thereof cached data, connection data and I think file locking
information too. Some other files contain credentials and perhaps ID
mapping data you better preserve (was it secrets.tdb?). In my
experience, things can become corrupted and samba fails in some way. You
can always backup that stuff and try after 6 PM.


Andreas

On 06.03.13 12:33, Joseph, Matthew (EXP) wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We have a Red Hat 5.3 SAMBA 3.0.33-3.7 Server that shares a few directories 
> to 4 other servers.
> The other servers are Red Hat 5.3 and one Solaris 10 server.
> 
> I configured SAMBA to do the following for each share;
> 
> Force User: User1
> Force Group: Group1
> 
> Create Mask: 02770
> Security Mask: 02770
> Directory Mask: 02770
> Directory Security Mask: 02770
> 
> Inherit Permissions: Yes
> Inherit ACLS: Yes
> Inherit Owner: Yes
> Guest Okay: Yes
> 
> When the other servers mount the SAMBA shares they work fine until someone 
> starts using SVN or Eclipse.
> This brings the SAMBA server to basically a halt. Looking at the processes I 
> see about 15000 instances of SMB running. I try running top to see a list of 
> processes but it takes about 10 minutes for it to start and then it will hang 
> when it tries to do its first refresh.
> 
> Looking at the logs I don't see anything that really stands out on why it is 
> slowing down.
> 
> Is there something I'm doing wrong in this configuration?
> 
> Thanks.


-- 
Andreas Gaiser
Berlin

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] SAMBA bringing NFS server to a halt

2013-03-06 Thread Andersen, Jan
I disagree.

There can be many reasons why using a later version of a system or an 
application is not possible. Just as an example, I manage a number of UNIX 
servers running a range of very old OSes - Solaris 8, AIX 4 and others. I think 
the oldest operating system we have is a version of MPE/iX. That is part of how 
we make money.

Apart from that, your tone seems to suggest that your mission is not to help 
and support, but to put somebody down and make them feel stupid; not very 
commendable, I think.

/jan

From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] on behalf 
of Jonathan Buzzard [jonat...@buzzard.me.uk]
Sent: 06 March 2013 13:02
To: Joseph, Matthew (EXP)
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] SAMBA bringing NFS server to a halt

On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 06:33 -0500, Joseph, Matthew (EXP) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a Red Hat 5.3 SAMBA 3.0.33-3.7 Server that shares a few directories 
> to 4 other servers.
> The other servers are Red Hat 5.3 and one Solaris 10 server.
>

Stop right there. Nobody here could care less about someone running a
wildly out of date server. There are numerous NFS and Samba fixes in
RHEL 5.9 over 5.3  some of which are critical bugs, performance issues
and others are ones that make your box open to remote root compromises.

Upgrade to RHEL 5.9 and get back if you still have a problem.

JAB.

--
Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
Fife, United Kingdom.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] SAMBA bringing NFS server to a halt

2013-03-06 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 06:33 -0500, Joseph, Matthew (EXP) wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We have a Red Hat 5.3 SAMBA 3.0.33-3.7 Server that shares a few directories 
> to 4 other servers.
> The other servers are Red Hat 5.3 and one Solaris 10 server.
> 

Stop right there. Nobody here could care less about someone running a
wildly out of date server. There are numerous NFS and Samba fixes in
RHEL 5.9 over 5.3  some of which are critical bugs, performance issues
and others are ones that make your box open to remote root compromises.

Upgrade to RHEL 5.9 and get back if you still have a problem.

JAB.

-- 
Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
Fife, United Kingdom.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] SAMBA bringing NFS server to a halt

2013-03-06 Thread Joseph, Matthew (EXP)
Hello,

We have a Red Hat 5.3 SAMBA 3.0.33-3.7 Server that shares a few directories to 
4 other servers.
The other servers are Red Hat 5.3 and one Solaris 10 server.

I configured SAMBA to do the following for each share;

Force User: User1
Force Group: Group1

Create Mask: 02770
Security Mask: 02770
Directory Mask: 02770
Directory Security Mask: 02770

Inherit Permissions: Yes
Inherit ACLS: Yes
Inherit Owner: Yes
Guest Okay: Yes

When the other servers mount the SAMBA shares they work fine until someone 
starts using SVN or Eclipse.
This brings the SAMBA server to basically a halt. Looking at the processes I 
see about 15000 instances of SMB running. I try running top to see a list of 
processes but it takes about 10 minutes for it to start and then it will hang 
when it tries to do its first refresh.

Looking at the logs I don't see anything that really stands out on why it is 
slowing down.

Is there something I'm doing wrong in this configuration?

Thanks.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba