[Samba] sid not rid - Arrgh~!
Nevermind. I found it. Once I realized I was looking for an sid and not an rid it was much easier to find. :-) Jim C wrote: There is a command that will get the rid number that the convertSambaAccount script needs. I've seen it and even used it but now I can't find it or remember it to save my life. Could someone remind me please? Jim C. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SID when joining samba domain
I'm using a Debian woody based system (partially upgraded to 'testing' in order to use tls with ldap), with samba_2.2.7 source built by debian/rules with LDAP turned on, using gcc 3.0.4, libldap2-tls_2.0.23-14, and libldap2_2.0.23-14. I'm setting up PDC service -- when I try to join a windows machine (this is XP) to the domain, I get 'specified user does not exist' on the windows system and the following lines appear in log.smbd (with -d 5): [2002/12/04 11:01:01, 2, pid=22667] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:get_single_attribute(360) get_single_attribute: [rid] = [3357] Here the rid of the machine account (3357) is retrieved from the ldap server. Then later, this: [2002/12/04 11:01:01, 5, pid=22667] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_lookup_names(1191) _samr_lookup_names: looking name on SID S-1-5-21-1231883349-2047018666-1483395064 . . . [2002/12/04 11:01:01, 5, pid=22667] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(588) 000c rid[00] : 1e22 (== 7714) . . . [2002/12/04 11:01:01, 5, pid=22667] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(588) 0018 user_rid : 1e22 . . . [2002/12/04 11:01:01, 2, pid=22667] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldap_search_one_user(262) ldap_search_one_user: searching for:[rid=7714] [2002/12/04 11:01:01, 0, pid=22667] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:pdb_getsampwrid(907) We don't find this rid [7714] count=0 And the join fails. Where is it getting the SID that seems to be related to the incorrect rid? How can I get it working? Thanks. Don Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mote Marine Laboratory Office: 941.388.4441 Cell: 941.302.4982 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway Fax: 941.388.4312 Sarasota, FL 34236 See: http://www.mote.org Independent, non-profit, marine and estuarine research and education facility. For PGP public key do: http://www.mote.org/~don/donpgp.asc use "DISCLAIMER"; # We run Debian Linux Taxes feed the starving and clothe the naked. Don Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mote Marine Laboratory Office: 941.388.4441 Cell: 941.302.4982 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway Fax: 941.388.4312 Sarasota, FL 34236 See: http://www.mote.org Independent, non-profit, marine and estuarine research and education facility. For PGP public key do: http://www.mote.org/~don/donpgp.asc use "DISCLAIMER"; # We run Debian Linux Taxes feed the starving and clothe the naked. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SID of windows an issue with samba??
hi all windows uses a SID to have an unique identifier for a machine - does winbind map this ID, too or is this id ignored with samba? I'm asking because i like to image my machine that runs with samba3 within a ads managed domain and will copy it on other machines that shall be added to the domain, too. is it ok to simply change the hostname of the other machines and adding them into the ads later? thanks stefan - Gesendet von http://mail.yahoo.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] sid->username conversion on beta2 as a domain member in asamba domain?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We run a samba-2.2.x+LDAP domain, and I have been experimenting with samba3 as a member server on one of our production servers (when it has no open connections). I also have samba-2.2.x on it, which works fine. However, beta2 seems to not resolve sids to usernames, so the security tab in the file properties dialog from a windows box shows the sid, and not the username. 2.2.x shows the username. Since we use ACLs quite a bit, this is enough to prevent me running beta2 full-time, I haven't even tested if file permissions/ACLs work on beta2 for user-based access controls. Anyone else seen this? I can provide logs if necessary, but can't spend the time now to investigate (maybe tomorrow). Regards, Buchan - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/CctMrJK6UGDSBKcRAnYHAJ9bLdXz1bjbexzKbNN9V0p9tLTt6QCfR9YV DVMvrqkDelgVCrvkXHdzR3A= =rpTd -END PGP SIGNATURE- ** Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
