Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
Hi Did anyone found out solution for this problem ? I am trying to install SMS on W2K Server and getting the same error message. Robert Rati wrote: Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:43:34AM -0500, Robert Rati wrote: I have a very similar setup (if not exact) as the original poster and am having the same problem. The only difference there might be is that I am running Windows 2003 SP1, whereas the original poster didn't mention Service Pack level. What I have learned is that SMS 2003 must be installed on a server in a domain but by a user account that has domain write access. The account that SMS is having problems verifying is a administration/maintenance account for SMS, and this account MUST be a domain account. I have tried using my Domain Admin account (the one that was used to added the machine to the domain and is a part of Domain Admin and Admin groups), but I still receive the above mentioned error message. I've included a tcpdump of the traffic to and from the PDC. Would you need a capture of the traffic from the DC to the LDAP server? FYI: A text file does not a capture make :-). We need *binary* files containing the actual network traffic. Look at the tcpdump options for how to make it output the real network traffic, not a text summary of it. Or better still, use ethereal. The attachment on my previous e-mail seems to have disappeared. Here's a gzipped version of the capture file. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
We have same problem with SMS 2003 service account on SAMBA. Any solution? Please, help. Thanks a lot. Dawid -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Rati wrote: > Then how would I make sure the network capture gets sent > to the correct people? Just send it to one person (not the list) > that has responded (ie Jeremy Allison or possibly yourself)? Attachments get striped before being sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list membership but individual CC'd addresses should receive it just fine. If not, ftp or http URLs work well. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCuZHgIR7qMdg1EfYRAv7OAJwI0HdZY5vzpXkUGq+9jYE9jZUsdQCg7uHh NAZexcJmsJ75ay7pIXTTd04= =qH6N -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
Then how would I make sure the network capture gets sent to the correct people? Just send it to one person (not the list) that has responded (ie Jeremy Allison or possibly yourself)? Rob Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Rati wrote: The attachment on my previous e-mail seems to have disappeared. Here's a gzipped version of the capture file. attachments always get stripped from list mail. cheers, jerry = Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) --- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCuY9FIR7qMdg1EfYRAvPSAKDTZpma4/ZyiWB4wMLW0wphwAnm/gCfcVrp EI2eTL3Q7QgnhGIfW1ORXvw= =H2kD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Rati wrote: > The attachment on my previous e-mail seems to have > disappeared. Here's a gzipped version of the capture file. attachments always get stripped from list mail. cheers, jerry = Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) --- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCuY9FIR7qMdg1EfYRAvPSAKDTZpma4/ZyiWB4wMLW0wphwAnm/gCfcVrp EI2eTL3Q7QgnhGIfW1ORXvw= =H2kD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:43:34AM -0500, Robert Rati wrote: I have a very similar setup (if not exact) as the original poster and am having the same problem. The only difference there might be is that I am running Windows 2003 SP1, whereas the original poster didn't mention Service Pack level. What I have learned is that SMS 2003 must be installed on a server in a domain but by a user account that has domain write access. The account that SMS is having problems verifying is a administration/maintenance account for SMS, and this account MUST be a domain account. I have tried using my Domain Admin account (the one that was used to added the machine to the domain and is a part of Domain Admin and Admin groups), but I still receive the above mentioned error message. I've included a tcpdump of the traffic to and from the PDC. Would you need a capture of the traffic from the DC to the LDAP server? FYI: A text file does not a capture make :-). We need *binary* files containing the actual network traffic. Look at the tcpdump options for how to make it output the real network traffic, not a text summary of it. Or better still, use ethereal. The attachment on my previous e-mail seems to have disappeared. Here's a gzipped version of the capture file. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:43:34AM -0500, Robert Rati wrote: I have a very similar setup (if not exact) as the original poster and am having the same problem. The only difference there might be is that I am running Windows 2003 SP1, whereas the original poster didn't mention Service Pack level. What I have learned is that SMS 2003 must be installed on a server in a domain but by a user account that has domain write access. The account that SMS is having problems verifying is a administration/maintenance account for SMS, and this account MUST be a domain account. I have tried using my Domain Admin account (the one that was used to added the machine to the domain and is a part of Domain Admin and Admin groups), but I still receive the above mentioned error message. I've included a tcpdump of the traffic to and from the PDC. Would you need a capture of the traffic from the DC to the LDAP server? FYI: A text file does not a capture make :-). We need *binary* files containing the actual network traffic. Look at the tcpdump options for how to make it output the real network traffic, not a text summary of it. Or better still, use ethereal. Not a problem. People seem to have different definitions of a network capture, and different capabilities for review, so I opted for the lowest common denominator. My appologies if I wasted anyone's time. Here's a binary capture using the -w option with tcpdump. I've used this before and I know ethereal can option the capture file. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:43:34AM -0500, Robert Rati wrote: > > I have a very similar setup (if not exact) as the original poster and am > having the same problem. The only difference there might be is that I > am running Windows 2003 SP1, whereas the original poster didn't mention > Service Pack level. > > What I have learned is that SMS 2003 must be installed on a server in a > domain but by a user account that has domain write access. The account > that SMS is having problems verifying is a administration/maintenance > account for SMS, and this account MUST be a domain account. I have > tried using my Domain Admin account (the one that was used to added the > machine to the domain and is a part of Domain Admin and Admin groups), > but I still receive the above mentioned error message. I've included a > tcpdump of the traffic to and from the PDC. Would you need a capture of > the traffic from the DC to the LDAP server? FYI: A text file does not a capture make :-). We need *binary* files containing the actual network traffic. Look at the tcpdump options for how to make it output the real network traffic, not a text summary of it. Or better still, use ethereal. Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Kristyan Osborne wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has played with Microsoft's SMS 2003? I've got
a Samba 3 PDC using an LDAP backend, and a Windows 2003 server running
SMS 2003. The SMS 2003 setup moans that it cannot verify the service
account in the domain. Its reasons are it cannot connect to the domain
as either the user account does not have access to the domain or the
domain controller is down. I know the PDC is up and running and I have
logged in as root to prove that I have full access.
I was wondering if this is a Samba compatibility issue or whether it's
something else.
Can you get a network capture trace of what the SMS server is trying to
do to the DC ?
I have a very similar setup (if not exact) as the original poster and am
having the same problem. The only difference there might be is that I
am running Windows 2003 SP1, whereas the original poster didn't mention
Service Pack level.
What I have learned is that SMS 2003 must be installed on a server in a
domain but by a user account that has domain write access. The account
that SMS is having problems verifying is a administration/maintenance
account for SMS, and this account MUST be a domain account. I have
tried using my Domain Admin account (the one that was used to added the
machine to the domain and is a part of Domain Admin and Admin groups),
but I still receive the above mentioned error message. I've included a
tcpdump of the traffic to and from the PDC. Would you need a capture of
the traffic from the DC to the LDAP server?
Rob
07:38:23.340046 wdselab-b-61-1.comm.mot.com.netbios-ns >
173.140.255.255.netbios-ns: NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
4500 004e 8248 8011 203d ad8c 3d01
ad8c 0089 0089 003a 6a2d 88a8 0110
0001 2046 4543 4e46 4845
4546 4445 4645 4d45 4245 4343 4143 4143
4143 4143 4143 4142 4c00 0020 0001
07:38:23.341265 wdselab-b-1-100.comm.mot.com.netbios-ns >
wdselab-b-61-1.comm.mot.com.netbios-ns: NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; POSITIVE;
RESPONSE; UNICAST (DF)
4500 005a 4000 4011 a115 ad8c 0164
ad8c 3d01 0089 0089 0046 e0c5 88a8 8580
0001 2046 4543 4e46 4845
4546 4445 4645 4d45 4245 4343 4143 4143
4143 4143 4143 4142 4c00 0020 0001 0003
f480 0006 6000 ad8c 0164
07:38:23.341509 wdselab-b-61-1.comm.mot.com.netbios-dgm >
wdselab-b-1-100.comm.mot.com.netbios-dgm: NBT UDP PACKET(138)
4500 0118 8249 8011 1e0e ad8c 3d01
ad8c 0164 008a 008a 0104 81e7 1002 88a7
ad8c 3d01 008a 00ee 2046 4845 4546
4445 4645 4d45 4245 4343 4e45 4343 4e44
4744 4243 4e44 4243 4141 4100 2046 4543
4e46 4845 4546 4445 4645 4d45 4245 4343
4143 4143 4143 4143 4143 4142 4c00 ff53
4d42 2500
1100
004e 00e8 0300
004e 005c 0003 0001 0001 0002
0065 005c 4d41 494c 534c 4f54 5c4e 4554
5c4e 4554 4c4f 474f 4e00 0700 5744 5345
4c41 422d 422d 3631 2d31 005c 4d41 494c
534c 4f54 5c4e 4554 5c47 4554 4443 3837
3000 5700 4400 5300 4500 4c00 4100 4200
2d00 4200 2d00 3600 3100 2d00 3100
0b00 0010
07:38:23.342789 wdselab-b-1-100.comm.mot.com.netbios-dgm >
wdselab-b-61-1.comm.mot.com.netbios-dgm: NBT UDP PACKET(138) (DF)
4500 0118 4000 4011 a057 ad8c 0164
ad8c 3d01 008a 008a 0104 6c5d 100a 562d
ad8c 0164 008a 00ee 2046 4845 4546
4445 4645 4d45 4245 4343 4e45 4343 4e44
4243 4e44 4244 4144 4141 4100 2046 4845
4546 4445 4645 4d45 4245 4343 4e45 4343
4e44 4744 4243 4e44 4243 4141 4100 ff53
4d42 2500
1100
004e
004e 005c 0003 0001 0001 0002
0065 005c 4d41 494c 534c 4f54 5c4e 4554
5c47 4554 4443 3837 3000 0c00 5744 5345
4c41 422d 422d 312d 3130 3000 5700 4400
5300 4500 4c00 4100 4200 2d00 4200 2d00
3
Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Kristyan Osborne wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if anyone has played with Microsoft's SMS 2003? I've got > a Samba 3 PDC using an LDAP backend, and a Windows 2003 server running > SMS 2003. The SMS 2003 setup moans that it cannot verify the service > account in the domain. Its reasons are it cannot connect to the domain > as either the user account does not have access to the domain or the > domain controller is down. I know the PDC is up and running and I have > logged in as root to prove that I have full access. > > I was wondering if this is a Samba compatibility issue or whether it's > something else. Can you get a network capture trace of what the SMS server is trying to do to the DC ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has played with Microsoft's SMS 2003? I've got a Samba 3 PDC using an LDAP backend, and a Windows 2003 server running SMS 2003. The SMS 2003 setup moans that it cannot verify the service account in the domain. Its reasons are it cannot connect to the domain as either the user account does not have access to the domain or the domain controller is down. I know the PDC is up and running and I have logged in as root to prove that I have full access. I was wondering if this is a Samba compatibility issue or whether it's something else. Cheers -- Kristyan Osborne - IT Technician Longhill High School 01273 391672 / 304086 --- Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows. Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
