Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue - trick
In fact, that makes sense- why recompile multiple times if you don't need to do. It should be fine as long as the dependent libraries versions (e.g. glibc, openldap, kerberos etc) are the same or at least close enough. If you had a library mismatch you would probably find that out as soon as you ran it. It is odd though- if your environments are the same then the compilation should not have been an issue. On 05/24/12 01:20, prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Hi, I have just copied the compiled samba directory from other machine :). 3.4.17 is working now and it joined to AD domain too. I know it is not the correct procedure. Do you think it will create any issue in future? -Prabu -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
Thanks 3.4.2 is starting now.I made the following entries. smb passwd file = /opt/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd private dir = /opt/usr/local/samba/private lock directory = /opt/usr/local/samba/var/locks state directory = /opt/usr/local/samba/var/locks cache directory = /opt/usr/local/samba/var/locks pid directory = /opt/usr/local/samba/var/locks usershare path = /opt/usr/local/samba/var/locks/usershares Regarding 3.4.17. Is there any other way like editing configure file and skip libtalloc? “./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no” is not skipping the libtalloc. Thanks, Prabu -Original Message- From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 6:15 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue I didn't know about the smbd -i option. That is useful. In your smb.conf file you may want to specify that your locks directory is set to /usr/local/samba/var/locks. The testparm -v will show your current settings. There are a lot of settings that can be set in smb.conf. It seems that since you installed in an alternative path, the locks directory is not in the default path. Or you could add some sym links. I have run into similar issue when changing from samba from sunfreeware to samba from source to samba from oracle. On my server tbash-3.00# testparm -v | more Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf ... smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd private dir = /etc/samba/private ... lock directory = /var/samba/locks state directory = /var/samba/locks cache directory = /var/samba/locks pid directory = /var/samba/locks usershare path = /var/samba/locks/usershares ... PS. You should backup your locks and private directories when changing versions or reinstalling samba. -Original Message- From: prabu.muru...@emc.com [mailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 12:30 PM To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue Forgot to mention.after reinstallation also smbd is referring to /usr. On 19-May-2012, at 9:52 PM, Murugan, Prabu prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Smbd -i gives interactive output. It is referring to /usr/local. Not sure why. bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -i -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf creating lame upcase table creating lame lowcase table Unable to setup corepath for smbd: No such file or directory smbd version 3.4.2 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2009 Failed to load /usr/local/samba/lib/valid.dat - No such file or directory creating default valid table tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: could not open file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/messages.tdb: No such file or directory ERROR: Failed to initialise messages database: No such file or directory messaging_tdb_init failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND Could not init smbd messaging context. I tried this option to reinstall since it was not showing in pkginfo. I think I am messing up things. bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep samba system SUNWsmbaSsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source) system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) bash-3.2# mv /opt/usr/local/samba/ /opt/usr/local/samba-error bash-3.2# mv /opt/var/sadm/pkg/SMCsamba /opt/var/sadm/pkg/SMCsamba.tmp bash-3.2# pkgadd -R /opt -d samba-3.4.2-sol10-sparc-local Processing package instance SMCsamba from /var/tmp/samba-3.4.2-sol10-sparc-local The following files are already installed on the system and are being used by another package: /opt/usr/local/samba/bin/ …. Installation of SMCsamba.tmp was successful bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep SMCsamba bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep samba system SUNWsmbaSsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source) system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:33 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Cc: samba@lists.samba.orgmailto:samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue I don’t know if installing Samba in an alternate path could cause an issue with dependencies. But It doesn’t seem like it.If “smbd –V” works then I would think this is not an issue. So it The “testparm –v “ command should also let you verify that
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
I didn't know about the smbd -i option. That is useful. In your smb.conf file you may want to specify that your locks directory is set to /usr/local/samba/var/locks. The testparm -v will show your current settings. There are a lot of settings that can be set in smb.conf. It seems that since you installed in an alternative path, the locks directory is not in the default path. Or you could add some sym links. I have run into similar issue when changing from samba from sunfreeware to samba from source to samba from oracle. On my server tbash-3.00# testparm -v | more Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf ... smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd private dir = /etc/samba/private ... lock directory = /var/samba/locks state directory = /var/samba/locks cache directory = /var/samba/locks pid directory = /var/samba/locks usershare path = /var/samba/locks/usershares ... PS. You should backup your locks and private directories when changing versions or reinstalling samba. -Original Message- From: prabu.muru...@emc.com [mailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 12:30 PM To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue Forgot to mention.after reinstallation also smbd is referring to /usr. On 19-May-2012, at 9:52 PM, Murugan, Prabu prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Smbd -i gives interactive output. It is referring to /usr/local. Not sure why. bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -i -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf creating lame upcase table creating lame lowcase table Unable to setup corepath for smbd: No such file or directory smbd version 3.4.2 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2009 Failed to load /usr/local/samba/lib/valid.dat - No such file or directory creating default valid table tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: could not open file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/messages.tdb: No such file or directory ERROR: Failed to initialise messages database: No such file or directory messaging_tdb_init failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND Could not init smbd messaging context. I tried this option to reinstall since it was not showing in pkginfo. I think I am messing up things. bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep samba system SUNWsmbaSsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source) system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) bash-3.2# mv /opt/usr/local/samba/ /opt/usr/local/samba-error bash-3.2# mv /opt/var/sadm/pkg/SMCsamba /opt/var/sadm/pkg/SMCsamba.tmp bash-3.2# pkgadd -R /opt -d samba-3.4.2-sol10-sparc-local Processing package instance SMCsamba from /var/tmp/samba-3.4.2-sol10-sparc-local The following files are already installed on the system and are being used by another package: /opt/usr/local/samba/bin/ …. Installation of SMCsamba.tmp was successful bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep SMCsamba bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep samba system SUNWsmbaSsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source) system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:33 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Cc: samba@lists.samba.orgmailto:samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue I don’t know if installing Samba in an alternate path could cause an issue with dependencies. But It doesn’t seem like it.If “smbd –V” works then I would think this is not an issue. So it The “testparm –v “ command should also let you verify that the password file, private directory, and locks directory are correct. You may also want to increase the log level to 10 to see if samba will tell you why it is quitting. Or maybe run the “/opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd –F –d 10” command.You may also want to try running “truss /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd” to see if that shows you anything. Does /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/nmbd or /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/winbind run ? From: prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com [mailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:32 AM To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.commailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.orgmailto:samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue When we install as a package we do it under /opt and compilation under /usr/local. Log directory (/opt/usr/local/samba/log) is empty ☹.
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
Thanks a lot for your reply. I was going crazy because of this issue. Let me answer your questions. Can you cat talloc.pc- make sure the config file shows the correct path. bash-3.2# more /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/talloc.pc prefix=/usr/local/samba-extras exec_prefix=${prefix} libdir=${prefix}/lib includedir=${prefix}/include Name: talloc Description: A hierarchical pool based memory system with destructors Version: 2.0.7 Libs: -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/samba-extras/lib -L${libdir} -ltalloc Cflags: -I${includedir} URL: http://talloc.samba.org/ I wonder what the significant difference is between your two solaris 10 machines. Which gcc are you using. Do either of them have the sunfreeware versions of samba? Or the sun bundled versions of samba. Maybe one machine already has libtalloc installed.What does pkginfo | grep -i samba show? I think samba 3.0x. binaries from Sun/Oracle may have been in /usr/sfw/bin not /usr/bin. On the working server /usr/local/bin/gcc version is 3.4.6. Here /bin/gcc is 3.4.3. path and version are different. Non working machine bash-3.2# pkginfo | grep -i samba application SMCsamba samba == 3.5.3 system SUNWsmbaSsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source) system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) Working machine bash-3.00# pkginfo |grep samba application SMCsamba samba == 3.0.24 system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) == system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) system sambaSMB based file/printer sharing What is the current version of samba you are running. Did you compile that or is if from a package? Is the current version in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH when compiling the new one? Working machine we were compiled samba 3.0.21b. now compiled 3.4.17. Non working machine current version 3.4.2(as package, not from source code) since 3.0.21b was not getting compiled. Working machine OS is Solaris 10_update 5. Non-working machine is latest OS Solaris 10_update 10. PS The samba 3.4.17 source code includes talloc. But it might be 1.0.x Maybe try downloading and compiling 1.0.x instead. And I would try building it into the same directory that you are building the rest of samba. I don't see 1.0.x under http://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/. So I tried with 2.0.7. bash-3.2# pwd /usr/local/talloc-2.0.7 bash-3.2# ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba-3.4.17/source/ Is the current version in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH when compiling the new one? No they are not included in the new one. bash-3.2# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/ bash-3.2# echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/ 3.4.2 were under /usr/local/samba/. I moved as /usr/local/samba-3.4.2. Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 3:52 AM To: Murugan, Prabu; Samba Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue On 05/17/12 18:18, Gaiseric Vandal wrote: On 05/17/12 11:15, prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Hi, As a security concern we are upgrading samba to 3.4.17. I tried all possible option to compile samba 3.4.17 on Solaris 10_U10. But it is not going through. User requirement is to compile samba 3.4.17 to support their application. 3.4.17 is working on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10_U5. But not on Solaris 10_U10. ./configure and make gives error related to talloc. I have set the PKG_CONFIG_PATH. Still the error is same. I tried the solution provided by you on URL http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-June/156711.html Can you help me with this issue. bash-3.2# pwd /usr/local/samba-3.4.17/source3 bash-3.2# more config.err Package talloc was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `talloc.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'talloc' found bash-3.2# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/ bash-3.2# echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/ bash-3.2# ls -l /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/ total 6 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 334 May 16 19:13 pytalloc-util.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 324 May 16 19:13 talloc.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 277 May 16 19:17 tdb.pc bash-3.2# ls -l /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/ total 188 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so - libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7 lrwxrwxrwx 1
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
smbd -V is showing the version. bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.2 ld is picking from /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# which ld /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# /usr/local/bin/ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.21. I don't remember whether it gave error regarding dependencies while installing 3.4.2. But I installed all the dependencies as a prerequisite. Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:25 PM To: Murugan, Prabu; Samba Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue your configure syntax looks correct One major issue I ran into was the ld (linker) command. Gcc on Solaris (either from sun freeware tools cd or from www.sunfreeware.comhttp://www.sunfreeware.com) was built with /usr/ccs/bin/ld - which is an old version. A lot of software expects gnu ld or at least a newer version of ld. I could sometimes force stuff by sym linking /usr/ccs/bin/ld to /usr/local/bin/ld or /usr/sfw/bin/gld. /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V didn't show any output? Does /usr/sbin/smbd -V show output (that would be the sun/oracle version. Probably not relevant if it does work.) When you installed samba from sunfreeware did it warn about any missing dependencies? On 05/18/12 12:36, prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: I ran ./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no Issue is same. Above command is fine? I compiled talloc 1.3.0. still make gives the same error. I have attached output of make errors. Reinstalling 3.4.2 didn't help:(. Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 9:22 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue Your configure options (./configure --help) include --enable-external-libtalloc Enable external talloc [default=auto] --with-libtalloc Build the libtalloc shared library (default=yes if shared libs supported) You should be able to set to =no Or try building talloc 1.3.x with Samba 3.4.x. Do either of the following work? /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b /opt/usr/local/samba/testparm -v -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf You may want to have /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ at the beginning of your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. You may want to reinstall the Sunfreeware version of samba 3.4.2 if you need to get samba up and running quickly on this machine. On 05/18/12 10:31, prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Yes the 3.5.10 is from Sun/Oracle. How to disable talloc while running ./configure? Smbd -F doesn't give any error. bash-3.2# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -F -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf bash-3.2# ps -ef |grep smbd root 7201 7167 0 19:32:20 pts/1 0:00 grep smbd bash-3.2# which pkg-config /bin/pkg-config bash-3.2# /bin/pkg-config --version 0.15.0 When I try to compile talloc-2.0.7. I get this error. Waf: Entering directory `/usr/local/talloc-2.0.7/bin' [15/28] Compiling lib/replace/test/testsuite.c ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: error: syntax error before torture_local_replace ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1058: error: syntax error before torture_local_replace ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c: In function `torture_local_replace': ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: `bool' undeclared (first use in this function) ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: for each function it appears in.) ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: syntax error before ret ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1061: error: `ret' undeclared (first use in this function) Waf: Leaving directory `/usr/local/talloc-2.0.7/bin' Build failed: - task failed (err #1): {task: cc testsuite.c - testsuite_3.o} make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all' Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 6:57 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Cc: samba@lists.samba.orgmailto:samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue This is a lot to keep track off. So the 3.5.10 is from Sun/Oracle? I see on sunfreeware.com that 3.4.2 is still their latest version. But I thought it would have installed in /usr/local/. If you moved renamed the directory, you may need to update your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. You may want to try running smbd with -F (foreground) instead of -D and see if that provides more errors. What does which pkg-config show on each machine? I see there is a sunfreeware.com version of pkg-config. The latest sun/oracle one is 0 .15 which the one one sunfreeware.com is 0.25. FYI when I compile samba I will usually
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
When we install as a package we do it under /opt and compilation under /usr/local. Log directory (/opt/usr/local/samba/log) is empty :(. /var/samba/log contains logs for oracle samba. These are standalone servers. hardware is Sunfire V490. Created softlink to gnu ld file. Still same error. Not sure why libtalloc is still considered when we run ./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no. Am I missing something here? Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:42 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue When you installed samba did you specify an alternate path? I don't understand why it is in /opt/usr/local Since you can at least run it with -V, it indicates that the binary and the library paths are good. You may want to look at your samba log files (/var/samba/logs and /var/log/samba ) to see if there is some other issue - maybe with your config files, local cache or locks, or local db files. gcc will be harddwired to use /usr/ccs/bin/ld. You can try the following #mv /usr/ccs/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld.bak #ln -s /usr/local/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld This is not generally a good idea BUT it might help identify if your linker is a problem. Are these standalone servers or domain members or domain controllers? On 05/18/12 13:02, prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: smbd -V is showing the version. bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.2 ld is picking from /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# which ld /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# /usr/local/bin/ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.21. I don't remember whether it gave error regarding dependencies while installing 3.4.2. But I installed all the dependencies as a prerequisite. Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:25 PM To: Murugan, Prabu; Samba Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue your configure syntax looks correct One major issue I ran into was the ld (linker) command. Gcc on Solaris (either from sun freeware tools cd or from www.sunfreeware.comhttp://www.sunfreeware.com) was built with /usr/ccs/bin/ld - which is an old version. A lot of software expects gnu ld or at least a newer version of ld. I could sometimes force stuff by sym linking /usr/ccs/bin/ld to /usr/local/bin/ld or /usr/sfw/bin/gld. /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V didn't show any output? Does /usr/sbin/smbd -V show output (that would be the sun/oracle version. Probably not relevant if it does work.) When you installed samba from sunfreeware did it warn about any missing dependencies? On 05/18/12 12:36, prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: I ran ./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no Issue is same. Above command is fine? I compiled talloc 1.3.0. still make gives the same error. I have attached output of make errors. Reinstalling 3.4.2 didn't help:(. Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 9:22 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue Your configure options (./configure --help) include --enable-external-libtalloc Enable external talloc [default=auto] --with-libtalloc Build the libtalloc shared library (default=yes if shared libs supported) You should be able to set to =no Or try building talloc 1.3.x with Samba 3.4.x. Do either of the following work? /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b /opt/usr/local/samba/testparm -v -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf You may want to have /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ at the beginning of your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. You may want to reinstall the Sunfreeware version of samba 3.4.2 if you need to get samba up and running quickly on this machine. On 05/18/12 10:31, prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Yes the 3.5.10 is from Sun/Oracle. How to disable talloc while running ./configure? Smbd -F doesn't give any error. bash-3.2# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -F -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf bash-3.2# ps -ef |grep smbd root 7201 7167 0 19:32:20 pts/1 0:00 grep smbd bash-3.2# which pkg-config /bin/pkg-config bash-3.2# /bin/pkg-config --version 0.15.0 When I try to compile talloc-2.0.7. I get this error. Waf: Entering directory `/usr/local/talloc-2.0.7/bin' [15/28] Compiling lib/replace/test/testsuite.c ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: error: syntax error before torture_local_replace ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1058: error: syntax error before torture_local_replace ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c: In function `torture_local_replace':
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
Smbd -i gives interactive output. It is referring to /usr/local. Not sure why. bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -i -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf creating lame upcase table creating lame lowcase table Unable to setup corepath for smbd: No such file or directory smbd version 3.4.2 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2009 Failed to load /usr/local/samba/lib/valid.dat - No such file or directory creating default valid table tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: could not open file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/messages.tdb: No such file or directory ERROR: Failed to initialise messages database: No such file or directory messaging_tdb_init failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND Could not init smbd messaging context. I tried this option to reinstall since it was not showing in pkginfo. I think I am messing up things. bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep samba system SUNWsmbaSsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source) system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) bash-3.2# mv /opt/usr/local/samba/ /opt/usr/local/samba-error bash-3.2# mv /opt/var/sadm/pkg/SMCsamba /opt/var/sadm/pkg/SMCsamba.tmp bash-3.2# pkgadd -R /opt -d samba-3.4.2-sol10-sparc-local Processing package instance SMCsamba from /var/tmp/samba-3.4.2-sol10-sparc-local The following files are already installed on the system and are being used by another package: /opt/usr/local/samba/bin/ Installation of SMCsamba.tmp was successful bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep SMCsamba bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep samba system SUNWsmbaSsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source) system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:33 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue I don't know if installing Samba in an alternate path could cause an issue with dependencies. But It doesn't seem like it.If smbd -V works then I would think this is not an issue. So it The testparm -v command should also let you verify that the password file, private directory, and locks directory are correct. You may also want to increase the log level to 10 to see if samba will tell you why it is quitting. Or maybe run the /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -F -d 10 command.You may also want to try running truss /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd to see if that shows you anything. Does /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/nmbd or /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/winbind run ? From: prabu.muru...@emc.com [mailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:32 AM To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue When we install as a package we do it under /opt and compilation under /usr/local. Log directory (/opt/usr/local/samba/log) is empty :(. /var/samba/log contains logs for oracle samba. These are standalone servers. hardware is Sunfire V490. Created softlink to gnu ld file. Still same error. Not sure why libtalloc is still considered when we run ./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no. Am I missing something here? Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:42 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Cc: samba@lists.samba.orgmailto:samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue When you installed samba did you specify an alternate path? I don't understand why it is in /opt/usr/local Since you can at least run it with -V, it indicates that the binary and the library paths are good. You may want to look at your samba log files (/var/samba/logs and /var/log/samba ) to see if there is some other issue - maybe with your config files, local cache or locks, or local db files. gcc will be harddwired to use /usr/ccs/bin/ld. You can try the following #mv /usr/ccs/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld.bak #ln -s /usr/local/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld This is not generally a good idea BUT it might help identify if your linker is a problem. Are these standalone servers or domain members or domain controllers? On 05/18/12 13:02, prabu.muru...@emc.commailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: smbd -V is showing the version. bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.2 ld is picking from /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# which ld /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# /usr/local/bin/ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.21. I don't
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
I dont know if installing Samba in an alternate path could cause an issue with dependencies. But It doesnt seem like it.If smbd V works then I would think this is not an issue. So it The testparm v command should also let you verify that the password file, private directory, and locks directory are correct. You may also want to increase the log level to 10 to see if samba will tell you why it is quitting. Or maybe run the /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd F d 10 command.You may also want to try running truss /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd to see if that shows you anything. Does /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/nmbd or /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/winbind run ? From: prabu.muru...@emc.com [mailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:32 AM To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue When we install as a package we do it under /opt and compilation under /usr/local. Log directory (/opt/usr/local/samba/log) is empty L. /var/samba/log contains logs for oracle samba. These are standalone servers. hardware is Sunfire V490. Created softlink to gnu ld file. Still same error. Not sure why libtalloc is still considered when we run ./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no. Am I missing something here? Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:42 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue When you installed samba did you specify an alternate path? I don't understand why it is in /opt/usr/local Since you can at least run it with -V, it indicates that the binary and the library paths are good. You may want to look at your samba log files (/var/samba/logs and /var/log/samba ) to see if there is some other issue - maybe with your config files, local cache or locks, or local db files. gcc will be harddwired to use /usr/ccs/bin/ld. You can try the following #mv /usr/ccs/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld.bak #ln -s /usr/local/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld This is not generally a good idea BUT it might help identify if your linker is a problem. Are these standalone servers or domain members or domain controllers? On 05/18/12 13:02, prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: smbd -V is showing the version. bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.2 ld is picking from /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# which ld /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# /usr/local/bin/ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.21. I dont remember whether it gave error regarding dependencies while installing 3.4.2. But I installed all the dependencies as a prerequisite. Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:25 PM To: Murugan, Prabu; Samba Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue your configure syntax looks correct One major issue I ran into was the ld (linker) command. Gcc on Solaris (either from sun freeware tools cd or from www.sunfreeware.com) was built with /usr/ccs/bin/ld - which is an old version. A lot of software expects gnu ld or at least a newer version of ld. I could sometimes force stuff by sym linking /usr/ccs/bin/ld to /usr/local/bin/ld or /usr/sfw/bin/gld. /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V didn't show any output? Does /usr/sbin/smbd -V show output (that would be the sun/oracle version. Probably not relevant if it does work.) When you installed samba from sunfreeware did it warn about any missing dependencies? On 05/18/12 12:36, prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: I ran ./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no Issue is same. Above command is fine? I compiled talloc 1.3.0. still make gives the same error. I have attached output of make errors. Reinstalling 3.4.2 didnt helpL. Thanks, Prabu From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 9:22 PM To: Murugan, Prabu Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue Your configure options (./configure --help) include --enable-external-libtalloc Enable external talloc [default=auto] --with-libtalloc Build the libtalloc shared library (default=yes if shared libs supported) You should be able to set to =no Or try building talloc 1.3.x with Samba 3.4.x. Do either of the following work? /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b /opt/usr/local/samba/testparm -v -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf You may want to have /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ at the beginning of your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. You may want to reinstall the Sunfreeware version of samba 3.4.2 if you need to get samba up and running quickly on this machine. On 05/18/12 10:31, prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Yes the 3.5.10 is from Sun/Oracle. How to disable talloc while running
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
http://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/ - has talloc 1.3.x not 1.0.x (my mistake.) For the non working machine - which package are you using for 3.4.2? SMCsamba is the package from Sunfreeware.com.I am unclear if you non-working has 3.4.2 or 3.5.3. SUNWsmb* packages are from Sun/Oracle. I am also guessing that on the working machine you have gcc from sunfreeware (based on the /usr/local path.) Depending on how your LD_LIBRARY_PATH was set and which gcc you were using, the SMCsamba packages could have provided some required libraries when building software. My guess is that samba 3.5.x uses a newer libtalloc than 3.4.x and that was causing some of the problems.Although LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH should have let you specify the version you wanted. I wonder if the wrong gcc isnt picking it up correctly- so using the same gcc as the working machine may matter. Are you on a sparc or x86_64 system? I believe that sunfreeware gcc on sparc compiles 64-bit by default but on x86_64 will compile 32-bit by default (even on a 64-bit machine.) I still think the simplest thing is to just use the latest Sun/Oracle samba and skip compiling. You should be able to download the Samba patches from Oracle without having to install the full patch cluster. PS. I noticed that samba 3.4.x and higher enforce the Solaris NGROUPS_MAX parameter. You probably want to have set ngroups_max=32 in /etc/system- otherwise default is 16. If you have the latest kernel patches (147440-10 or 147441-10 as of 2-3 months ago) you can set this even higher. From: prabu.muru...@emc.com [mailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:25 AM To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue Thanks a lot for your reply. I was going crazy because of this issue. Let me answer your questions. Can you cat talloc.pc- make sure the config file shows the correct path. bash-3.2# more /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/talloc.pc prefix=/usr/local/samba-extras exec_prefix=${prefix} libdir=${prefix}/lib includedir=${prefix}/include Name: talloc Description: A hierarchical pool based memory system with destructors Version: 2.0.7 Libs: -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/samba-extras/lib -L${libdir} -ltalloc Cflags: -I${includedir} URL: http://talloc.samba.org/ I wonder what the significant difference is between your two solaris 10 machines. Which gcc are you using. Do either of them have the sunfreeware versions of samba? Or the sun bundled versions of samba. Maybe one machine already has libtalloc installed.What does pkginfo | grep -i samba show? I think samba 3.0x. binaries from Sun/Oracle may have been in /usr/sfw/bin not /usr/bin. On the working server /usr/local/bin/gcc version is 3.4.6. Here /bin/gcc is 3.4.3. path and version are different. Non working machine bash-3.2# pkginfo | grep -i samba application SMCsamba samba è 3.5.3 system SUNWsmbaSsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source) system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) Working machine bash-3.00# pkginfo |grep samba application SMCsamba samba è 3.0.24 system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) è system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root) system SUNWsmbausamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr) system sambaSMB based file/printer sharing What is the current version of samba you are running. Did you compile that or is if from a package? Is the current version in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH when compiling the new one? Working machine we were compiled samba 3.0.21b. now compiled 3.4.17. Non working machine current version 3.4.2(as package, not from source code) since 3.0.21b was not getting compiled. Working machine OS is Solaris 10_update 5. Non-working machine is latest OS Solaris 10_update 10. PS The samba 3.4.17 source code includes talloc. But it might be 1.0.x Maybe try downloading and compiling 1.0.x instead. And I would try building it into the same directory that you are building the rest of samba. I dont see 1.0.x under http://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/. So I tried with 2.0.7. bash-3.2# pwd /usr/local/talloc-2.0.7 bash-3.2# ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba-3.4.17/source/ Is the current version in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH when compiling the new one? No they are not included in the new one. bash-3.2# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
your configure syntax looks correct One major issue I ran into was the ld (linker) command. Gcc on Solaris (either from sun freeware tools cd or from www.sunfreeware.com) was built with /usr/ccs/bin/ld - which is an old version. A lot of software expects gnu ld or at least a newer version of ld. I could sometimes force stuff by sym linking /usr/ccs/bin/ld to /usr/local/bin/ld or /usr/sfw/bin/gld. /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V didn't show any output? Does /usr/sbin/smbd -V show output (that would be the sun/oracle version. Probably not relevant if it does work.) When you installed samba from sunfreeware did it warn about any missing dependencies? On 05/18/12 12:36, prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: I ran ./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no Issue is same. Above command is fine? I compiled talloc 1.3.0. still make gives the same error. I have attached output of make errors. Reinstalling 3.4.2 didn't helpL. *Thanks,* *Prabu* *From:*Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, May 18, 2012 9:22 PM *To:* Murugan, Prabu *Subject:* Re: Samba compilation issue Your configure options (./configure --help) include --enable-external-libtalloc Enable external talloc [default=auto] --with-libtalloc Build the libtalloc shared library (default=yes if shared libs supported) You should be able to set to =no Or try building talloc 1.3.x with Samba 3.4.x. Do either of the following work? /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b /opt/usr/local/samba/testparm -v -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf You may want to have /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ at the beginning of your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. You may want to reinstall the Sunfreeware version of samba 3.4.2 if you need to get samba up and running quickly on this machine. On 05/18/12 10:31, prabu.muru...@emc.com mailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Yes the 3.5.10 is from Sun/Oracle. How to disable talloc while running ./configure? Smbd --F doesn't give any error. bash-3.2# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -F -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf bash-3.2# ps -ef |grep smbd root 7201 7167 0 19:32:20 pts/1 0:00 grep smbd bash-3.2# which pkg-config /bin/pkg-config bash-3.2# /bin/pkg-config --version 0.15.0 When I try to compile talloc-2.0.7. I get this error. Waf: Entering directory `/usr/local/talloc-2.0.7/bin' [15/28] Compiling lib/replace/test/testsuite.c ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: error: syntax error before torture_local_replace ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1058: error: syntax error before torture_local_replace ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c: In function `torture_local_replace': ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: `bool' undeclared (first use in this function) ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: for each function it appears in.) ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: syntax error before ret ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1061: error: `ret' undeclared (first use in this function) Waf: Leaving directory `/usr/local/talloc-2.0.7/bin' Build failed: - task failed (err #1): {task: cc testsuite.c - testsuite_3.o} make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all' *Thanks,* *Prabu* *From:*Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, May 18, 2012 6:57 PM *To:* Murugan, Prabu *Cc:* samba@lists.samba.org mailto:samba@lists.samba.org *Subject:* Re: Samba compilation issue This is a lot to keep track off. So the 3.5.10 is from Sun/Oracle? I see on sunfreeware.com that 3.4.2 is still their latest version. But I thought it would have installed in /usr/local/. If you moved renamed the directory, you may need to update your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. You may want to try running smbd with -F (foreground) instead of -D and see if that provides more errors. What does which pkg-config show on each machine? I see there is a sunfreeware.com version of pkg-config. The latest sun/oracle one is 0 .15 which the one one sunfreeware.com is 0.25. FYI when I compile samba I will usually compile in /usr/local/samba-version. Once I have it compiled I can delete or rename the previous version and then symlink /usr/local/samba to the new version. Can you do make talloc from with in the samba source code directory to build, in advance, the talloc that is bundled in?Or can you just disable talloc when you configure? Although I would be interested if you then get warnings that tdb is unavailable.
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
When you installed samba did you specify an alternate path? I don't understand why it is in /opt/usr/local Since you can at least run it with -V, it indicates that the binary and the library paths are good. You may want to look at your samba log files (/var/samba/logs and /var/log/samba ) to see if there is some other issue - maybe with your config files, local cache or locks, or local db files. gcc will be harddwired to use /usr/ccs/bin/ld. You can try the following #mv /usr/ccs/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld.bak #ln -s /usr/local/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld This is not generally a good idea BUT it might help identify if your linker is a problem. Are these standalone servers or domain members or domain controllers? On 05/18/12 13:02, prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: smbd -V is showing the version. bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.2 ld is picking from /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# which ld /usr/local/bin/ld bash-3.2# /usr/local/bin/ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.21. I don't remember whether it gave error regarding dependencies while installing 3.4.2. But I installed all the dependencies as a prerequisite. *Thanks,* *Prabu* *From:*Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, May 18, 2012 10:25 PM *To:* Murugan, Prabu; Samba *Subject:* Re: Samba compilation issue your configure syntax looks correct One major issue I ran into was the ld (linker) command. Gcc on Solaris (either from sun freeware tools cd or from www.sunfreeware.com http://www.sunfreeware.com) was built with /usr/ccs/bin/ld - which is an old version. A lot of software expects gnu ld or at least a newer version of ld. I could sometimes force stuff by sym linking /usr/ccs/bin/ld to /usr/local/bin/ld or /usr/sfw/bin/gld. /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V didn't show any output? Does /usr/sbin/smbd -V show output (that would be the sun/oracle version. Probably not relevant if it does work.) When you installed samba from sunfreeware did it warn about any missing dependencies? On 05/18/12 12:36, prabu.muru...@emc.com mailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: I ran ./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no Issue is same. Above command is fine? I compiled talloc 1.3.0. still make gives the same error. I have attached output of make errors. Reinstalling 3.4.2 didn't helpL. *Thanks,* *Prabu* *From:*Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, May 18, 2012 9:22 PM *To:* Murugan, Prabu *Subject:* Re: Samba compilation issue Your configure options (./configure --help) include --enable-external-libtalloc Enable external talloc [default=auto] --with-libtalloc Build the libtalloc shared library (default=yes if shared libs supported) You should be able to set to =no Or try building talloc 1.3.x with Samba 3.4.x. Do either of the following work? /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b /opt/usr/local/samba/testparm -v -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf You may want to have /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ at the beginning of your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. You may want to reinstall the Sunfreeware version of samba 3.4.2 if you need to get samba up and running quickly on this machine. On 05/18/12 10:31, prabu.muru...@emc.com mailto:prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Yes the 3.5.10 is from Sun/Oracle. How to disable talloc while running ./configure? Smbd --F doesn't give any error. bash-3.2# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -F -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf bash-3.2# ps -ef |grep smbd root 7201 7167 0 19:32:20 pts/1 0:00 grep smbd bash-3.2# which pkg-config /bin/pkg-config bash-3.2# /bin/pkg-config --version 0.15.0 When I try to compile talloc-2.0.7. I get this error. Waf: Entering directory `/usr/local/talloc-2.0.7/bin' [15/28] Compiling lib/replace/test/testsuite.c ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: error: syntax error before torture_local_replace ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1058: error: syntax error before torture_local_replace ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c: In function `torture_local_replace': ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: `bool' undeclared (first use in this function) ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: for each function it appears in.) ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: syntax error before ret ../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1061: error: `ret' undeclared (first use in this function) Waf: Leaving directory
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
On 05/17/12 11:15, prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Hi, As a security concern we are upgrading samba to 3.4.17. I tried all possible option to compile samba 3.4.17 on Solaris 10_U10. But it is not going through. User requirement is to compile samba 3.4.17 to support their application. 3.4.17 is working on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10_U5. But not on Solaris 10_U10. ./configure and make gives error related to talloc. I have set the PKG_CONFIG_PATH. Still the error is same. I tried the solution provided by you on URL http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-June/156711.html Can you help me with this issue. bash-3.2# pwd /usr/local/samba-3.4.17/source3 bash-3.2# more config.err Package talloc was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `talloc.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'talloc' found bash-3.2# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/ bash-3.2# echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/ bash-3.2# ls -l /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/ total 6 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 334 May 16 19:13 pytalloc-util.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 324 May 16 19:13 talloc.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 277 May 16 19:17 tdb.pc bash-3.2# ls -l /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/ total 188 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so - libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so.2 - libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9412 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 May 16 19:14 libtalloc.so - libtalloc.so.2.0.7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 May 16 19:14 libtalloc.so.2 - libtalloc.so.2.0.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79556 May 16 19:14 libtalloc.so.2.0.7 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 512 May 16 19:19 pkgconfig drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 512 May 16 19:14 python2.6 Thanks, Prabu I see on http://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/ that there is both talloc 1.3.x and talloc 2.0.x.I am looking through some of my old builds and my old build notes. With samba I seem to have compiled talloc 2.0.x separately (I have the pkgconfig files.) I think samba 3.4.x I have just compiled with out talloc. Can you cat talloc.pc- make sure the config file shows the correct path. I wonder what the significant difference is between your two solaris 10 machines. Which gcc are you using. Do either of them have the sunfreeware versions of samba? Or the sun bundled versions of samba. Maybe one machine already has libtalloc installed.What does pkginfo | grep -i samba show? I think samba 3.0x. binaries from Sun/Oracle may have been in /usr/sfw/bin not /usr/bin. What is the current version of samba you are running. Did you compile that or is if from a package? Is the current version in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH when compiling the new one? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba compilation issue
On 05/17/12 18:18, Gaiseric Vandal wrote: On 05/17/12 11:15, prabu.muru...@emc.com wrote: Hi, As a security concern we are upgrading samba to 3.4.17. I tried all possible option to compile samba 3.4.17 on Solaris 10_U10. But it is not going through. User requirement is to compile samba 3.4.17 to support their application. 3.4.17 is working on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10_U5. But not on Solaris 10_U10. ./configure and make gives error related to talloc. I have set the PKG_CONFIG_PATH. Still the error is same. I tried the solution provided by you on URL http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-June/156711.html Can you help me with this issue. bash-3.2# pwd /usr/local/samba-3.4.17/source3 bash-3.2# more config.err Package talloc was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `talloc.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'talloc' found bash-3.2# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/ bash-3.2# echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/ bash-3.2# ls -l /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/ total 6 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 334 May 16 19:13 pytalloc-util.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 324 May 16 19:13 talloc.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 277 May 16 19:17 tdb.pc bash-3.2# ls -l /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/ total 188 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so - libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so.2 - libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9412 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 May 16 19:14 libtalloc.so - libtalloc.so.2.0.7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 May 16 19:14 libtalloc.so.2 - libtalloc.so.2.0.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79556 May 16 19:14 libtalloc.so.2.0.7 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 512 May 16 19:19 pkgconfig drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 512 May 16 19:14 python2.6 Thanks, Prabu I see on http://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/ that there is both talloc 1.3.x and talloc 2.0.x.I am looking through some of my old builds and my old build notes. With samba I seem to have compiled talloc 2.0.x separately (I have the pkgconfig files.) I think samba 3.4.x I have just compiled with out talloc. Can you cat talloc.pc- make sure the config file shows the correct path. I wonder what the significant difference is between your two solaris 10 machines. Which gcc are you using. Do either of them have the sunfreeware versions of samba? Or the sun bundled versions of samba. Maybe one machine already has libtalloc installed.What does pkginfo | grep -i samba show? I think samba 3.0x. binaries from Sun/Oracle may have been in /usr/sfw/bin not /usr/bin. What is the current version of samba you are running. Did you compile that or is if from a package? Is the current version in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH when compiling the new one? PS The samba 3.4.17 source code includes talloc. But it might be 1.0.x Maybe try downloading and compiling 1.0.x instead. And I would try building it into the same directory that you are building the rest of samba. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba