Re: [Samba] Samba extremely slow on XP
malcolm wrote: On Monday 17 October 2005 15:16, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote: malcolm escreveu: I have a linux machine (1.4GHz) which shares filesystems to two Windows machines, (a) Windows 2000 (300MHz) and (b) Windows XP (2.4GHz). The XP machine, which should be faster, is about 10 times slower than the 2000 machine. Hmmm... I know that the processor speed is really different (eight times faster), but there are other things that you should consider on this, NIC, RAM memory, network infra structure and specially configuration. =) Yes but it's the machine which has a processor eight times faster that is six times slower, i.e. 48 times slower than expected. Anybody any ideas. [...] Also came to my mind things like DNS and WINS, which should affect w2k and xp in different ways. Kind regards, [...] What about Anti-Virus Software? From some I know, that they examine every file mounted on a network drive. This can slow down the performance significantly. If there's a difference between your systems, you might verify this by tracing the network traffic and looking, if the opened files are scanned backwards and forwards. Bye, Martin -- Martin Zielinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Development SEH Computertechnik GmbH www.seh.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba extremely slow on XP
Hi, there is a problem with some version of norton antivirus that do a dns lookup. So if your net is outside the internet or your dns does't resolve norton request the machine goes slow. Regards MIchael Quoting Martin Zielinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: malcolm wrote: On Monday 17 October 2005 15:16, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote: malcolm escreveu: I have a linux machine (1.4GHz) which shares filesystems to two Windows machines, (a) Windows 2000 (300MHz) and (b) Windows XP (2.4GHz). The XP machine, which should be faster, is about 10 times slower than the 2000 machine. Hmmm... I know that the processor speed is really different (eight times faster), but there are other things that you should consider on this, NIC, RAM memory, network infra structure and specially configuration. =) Yes but it's the machine which has a processor eight times faster that is six times slower, i.e. 48 times slower than expected. Anybody any ideas. [...] Also came to my mind things like DNS and WINS, which should affect w2k and xp in different ways. Kind regards, [...] What about Anti-Virus Software? From some I know, that they examine every file mounted on a network drive. This can slow down the performance significantly. If there's a difference between your systems, you might verify this by tracing the network traffic and looking, if the opened files are scanned backwards and forwards. Bye, Martin -- Martin Zielinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Development SEH Computertechnik GmbH www.seh.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba extremely slow on XP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Hi, there is a problem with some version of norton antivirus that do a dns lookup. So if your net is outside the internet or your dns does't resolve norton request the machine goes slow. Which the version of norton makes this? -- .''`. Márcio Dantas - SP : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'` http://java.sun.com `- Java is rules: write once and run anywhere! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba extremely slow on XP
I have a linux machine (1.4GHz) which shares filesystems to two Windows
machines, (a) Windows 2000 (300MHz) and (b) Windows XP (2.4GHz).
The XP machine, which should be faster, is about 10 times slower than the 2000
machine.
Anybody any ideas.
Malcolm
% cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = MALCOLM.NET
server string = Samba Server
cups options = raw
interfaces = eth1, 192.168.15.1/255.255.255.0
map to guest = Bad User
log level = 3
log file = /var/log/samba/%m
time server = Yes
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
printcap name = CUPS
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -c Machine -d /var/lib/nobody
-s /bin/false %m$
domain logons = Yes
os level = 65
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
locking = Yes
posix locking = Yes
strict locking = No
oplocks = No
kernel oplocks = No
blocking locks = No
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/
local master = Yes
security = user
wins support = yes
name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba extremely slow on XP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 malcolm escreveu: I have a linux machine (1.4GHz) which shares filesystems to two Windows machines, (a) Windows 2000 (300MHz) and (b) Windows XP (2.4GHz). The XP machine, which should be faster, is about 10 times slower than the 2000 machine. Hmmm... I know that the processor speed is really different (eight times faster), but there are other things that you should consider on this, NIC, RAM memory, network infra structure and specially configuration. =) Anybody any ideas. [...] socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY What about add: SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 to socket options, in GNU/Linux systems it should bring better results to you. ;) Also came to my mind things like DNS and WINS, which should affect w2k and xp in different ways. Kind regards, - -- // // Felipe Augusto van de Wiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] // CTI/Suporte - SEDU/PARANACIDADE // http://www.paranacidade.org.br/ // -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDU6QzCj65ZxU4gPQRAhAjAKC4Gva9d2fm8aAgC7Dmlrju4LnhawCfeY3S B6WfxmjcLAt/QvXr6rBveBk= =g1DC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba extremely slow on XP
On Monday 17 October 2005 15:16, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote: malcolm escreveu: I have a linux machine (1.4GHz) which shares filesystems to two Windows machines, (a) Windows 2000 (300MHz) and (b) Windows XP (2.4GHz). The XP machine, which should be faster, is about 10 times slower than the 2000 machine. Hmmm... I know that the processor speed is really different (eight times faster), but there are other things that you should consider on this, NIC, RAM memory, network infra structure and specially configuration. =) Yes but it's the machine which has a processor eight times faster that is six times slower, i.e. 48 times slower than expected. Anybody any ideas. [...] socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY What about add: SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 to socket options, in GNU/Linux systems it should bring better results to you. ;) That makes perhaps a 3% improvement. Also came to my mind things like DNS and WINS, which should affect w2k and xp in different ways. Kind regards, -- // // Felipe Augusto van de Wiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] // CTI/Suporte - SEDU/PARANACIDADE // http://www.paranacidade.org.br/ // -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
