Re: Fwd: [Samba] Supporting large file transfers

2008-08-11 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Jeff L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi John, I removed the lines and it fixed the problem.
>>
>> Its weird because in the Oreily samba book they recommend using it?
>>
>> http://oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/appb_02.html
>>
> 
> Probably because the book was written for a 2.2 or 2.4 kernel.

The above link is a reference to the 1st edition.  The third ed.
was released about a year ago.





cheers, jerry
- --
=
Samba--- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software  -  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"  --Balian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIoErSIR7qMdg1EfYRAv8JAKDZDSYVzkp7RN8kDuXP9EUUBP+PGACdF096
FJyF4QohfgeNtZKWVz/Cmyo=
=nxKK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Fwd: [Samba] Supporting large file transfers

2008-08-06 Thread John Drescher
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Jeff L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John, I removed the lines and it fixed the problem.
>
> Its weird because in the Oreily samba book they recommend using it?
>
> http://oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/appb_02.html
>

Probably because the book was written for a 2.2 or 2.4 kernel.
John
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Supporting large file transfers

2008-08-04 Thread Scott Lovenberg

Jeff L wrote:

Samba version 3.0.25b-1.1.cc

I cant seem to transfer files over 40gb from a windows machine --> samba share. 

as far as socket options im using 


socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_KEEPALIVE

Is there any other tweaks I can use to help make this system more reliable?

I get random errors.."network path not found" or something similar.. 



  
Those are nerfed socket buffer settings.  You can remove the 
SO_*BUF=8192, and it should improve performance.

Is the connection collapsing on you?  (you can check with netstat -s)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Supporting large file transfers

2008-08-04 Thread Jeff L
Samba version 3.0.25b-1.1.cc

I cant seem to transfer files over 40gb from a windows machine --> samba share. 

as far as socket options im using 

socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_KEEPALIVE

Is there any other tweaks I can use to help make this system more reliable?

I get random errors.."network path not found" or something similar.. 



=
Aconcagua Expedition with Alpine Ascents
Aconcagua Expedition with America's Guide Service. International expeditions to 
the world's highest peaks. Comprehensive mountaineering school. The Seven 
Summits Company since 1986.
http://a8-asy.a8ww.net/a8-ads/adftrclick?redirectid=9b35cc99a796487659e031c2859d46a8


-- 
Powered by Outblaze
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba