[Samba] Tutorial: Samba as NT4 Primary Domain Controller

2005-01-18 Thread Pascal de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm writing a tutorial with which people can easily setup a Samba
machine as a NT4 Primary Domain Controller (using CentOS 3).
I'm handling just about everything that's related:
- - NTP
- - DHCP
- - Samba
- - SNMP
and more...
Note that this is only a preliminary version, it may contain errors.
But I'd really appriciate any kind of feedback!
http://members.home.nl/keizerflipje/sambapdc/samba.pdf
Regards,
Pascal de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB7TweOauq/dYfFnQRAkOrAJ4hw02FRd0ejYXuq6KurKMvDJ8qogCdGZwL
+ojQNeI6ERjtQzBEgHPnCAg=
=joRI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Tutorial: Samba as NT4 Primary Domain Controller

2005-01-18 Thread Pascal de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
| Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
|
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Hello,
|
| I'm writing a tutorial with which people can easily setup a Samba
| machine as a NT4 Primary Domain Controller (using CentOS 3).
|
| I'm handling just about everything that's related:
| - - NTP
| - - DHCP
| - - Samba
| - - SNMP
| and more...
|
| Note that this is only a preliminary version, it may contain errors.
| But I'd really appriciate any kind of feedback!
|
| http://members.home.nl/keizerflipje/sambapdc/samba.pdf
|
|
| I just looked through that document very fast, (as I already have my PDC
| running), but didn't see anything about keeping password in an LDAP
| database.
| As I remember, this part (LDAP) was troublesome for me.
|
| It would be also nice to hear about software
| installation/updates/deploayment on clients, controlled from the PDC/BDC
| - I use WPKG for that - http://wpkg.sf.net
|
| My 3 cents, you asked for that :)
|
|
| Tomek
|
Hi,
Well LDAP is beyond the target scope of my article... It's intended for
small businesses only.
I really didn't want to both with LDAP, as I have no use for it... at
least not yet anyway...
And application deploy might be a thought for the future...
Thanks for your thoughts,
Pascal de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB7VsrOauq/dYfFnQRAjCwAJ49SKfrCt4J03gKly2xbHh5mojF3wCeJlNG
NOaYjnsFritwACD4biPlPco=
=1Du8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba