Re: [Samba] samba 3 EOL ?

2013-10-10 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 17:00 +0200, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The page
>https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Release_Planning
> doesn't really tell the date until samba 3 will receive security 
> updates. It seems that it could end already in 9 months. I find it 
> unlikely that most users will have switched by that time. The 9 month 
> rule is fine for a switch from 3.x to 3.x+1, but the switch from 3 to 4 
> is special. Please consider a longer support.

The switch from 3 to 4 is not special.  That is why longer support won't
be required.  If you are not interested in the new AD features, then
Samba 4.0 is just the next generation of the same file server code that
you find in Samba 3.6.  Think of it like a 3.7 in that respect. 

Also, Samba 3.6 already has a very, very long support life, because
Samba 4.0 took quite some time to finally release. 

I hope this clarifies things,

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT   http://catalyst.net.nz


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] samba 3 EOL ?

2013-10-10 Thread Klaus Hartnegg

Hi,

The page
  https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Release_Planning
doesn't really tell the date until samba 3 will receive security 
updates. It seems that it could end already in 9 months. I find it 
unlikely that most users will have switched by that time. The 9 month 
rule is fine for a switch from 3.x to 3.x+1, but the switch from 3 to 4 
is special. Please consider a longer support.


Klaus
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba