Re: [Samba] samba and the application of MS patch KB852004 - madness may follow
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:08:11AM +, mwfol...@gmail.com wrote: Where I work recently (about a week ago) applied the patch KB852004 to their XP Pro boxes and things in the samba world are now broken. Sorry, I could not find that kb-article. Volker pgpxZxYCIRLOr.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] samba and the application of MS patch KB852004 - madness may follow
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Volker Lendecke volker.lende...@sernet.de wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:08:11AM +, mwfol...@gmail.com wrote: Where I work recently (about a week ago) applied the patch KB852004 to their XP Pro boxes and things in the samba world are now broken. Sorry, I could not find that kb-article. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/952004 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] samba and the application of MS patch KB852004 - madness may follow
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:48:51AM -0400, John Drescher wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Volker Lendecke volker.lende...@sernet.de wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:08:11AM +, mwfol...@gmail.com wrote: Where I work recently (about a week ago) applied the patch KB852004 to their XP Pro boxes and things in the samba world are now broken. Sorry, I could not find that kb-article. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/952004 That's 952004, not 852004 as the subject says. Volker pgpuqUJGE6sW2.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] samba and the application of MS patch KB852004 - madness may follow
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Volker Lendecke volker.lende...@sernet.de wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:48:51AM -0400, John Drescher wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Volker Lendecke volker.lende...@sernet.de wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:08:11AM +, mwfol...@gmail.com wrote: Where I work recently (about a week ago) applied the patch KB852004 to their XP Pro boxes and things in the samba world are now broken. Sorry, I could not find that kb-article. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/952004 That's 952004, not 852004 as the subject says. Its probably a typing error. Because the link that the OP sent points to a forum that talks about how 952004 breaks samba and links to the KB article for 952004. John -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] samba and the application of MS patch KB852004 - madness may follow
Where I work recently (about a week ago) applied the patch KB852004 to their XP Pro boxes and things in the samba world are now broken. The setup has been working for quite a while - a Linux box with a samba 3.0.24 server on it to allow WIndows users to access shares on the system. The only other things about it is that the server does kerberos authentication and security = server so its not really joined to the domain. Please bear with me here - its not a standard domain and joining to the domain has been problematic in the past. I am assured and believe the structure of the domain has not been altered in over a month so things are pointing to the patch but it seems not to be totally black and white. Essentially I have one XP Pro box that still can browse/access files on the server and many others, actually ALL, can't. Both XP boxes show that the patch is installed. The server is on a separate subnet. By-the-by, the one XP Pro 64bit system I have works fine against the samba server. A co-worker used a packet sniffer to watch connections to the server and here is what he sent me: From what I see, xxx.x.12.10 (the box that fails) is connecting to samba server but is getting rejected. The packet is interpreted as “NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED”. Then the connection closes. So it doesn't look like a network issue, but rather an authentication issue. For xxx.x.12.12, which works, the same error message displays, but then xxx.x.12.12 sends the user name. 12.10 never sends the user name. Looking at this issue there is another thread elsewhere: http://www.vistax64.com/windows-updates/222302-kb952004-breaks-samba-sharing.html it seems that this is also a problem with vista. So, my questions - Is the patch KB852004 really the cause of this problem? Is there a workaround that I can add to the systems smb.conf file that will save me from rebuilding dozes of otherwise productive systems? Thanks - Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
