Changing mail id
Hello Jeremy, I want to change my mailing id. from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can you tell me how to do it? Regards Sastry __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com
smbmount with big file sizes
Dear All, I am mounting NTFS file system from few of my windows NT m/cs to Linux backup server. Few files among them are very big in size around 5 GB. My problem is, when i does 'ls -l /ntfs-share' then it shows weird size of that file i.e [root@backup yash]# ls /mnt-sybase/ -l total 6609656 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 521011200 Jun 18 09:18 DataApplication20020617_2346.dat -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 210982912 Jun 25 09:19 DataApplication20020624_2347.dat -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 18446744072370819072 Jun 18 09:28 DataCCPRO20020617_2348.dat -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 18446744072455077888 Jun 25 09:28 DataCCPRO20020624_2348.dat -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 272384 Jun 25 09:32 LogApplication20020625_0002.dat -rwxr-xr-x1 root root22528 Jun 25 09:46 LogApplication20020625_0016.dat -rwxr-xr-x1 root root26624 Jun 25 10:01 LogApplication20020625_0031.dat As shown in third and fourth row of files. Is there any limitation to 'smbmount' that it does't recognises after a definite size of a file ? I have also tried: http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/index.html with exactly the steps whatever they are: But no luck i have used kernel 2.4.16 and samba 2.2.2. Can anyone help! Regards -Yash
[PATCH] Libsmbclient.c
Damn, mailing is hard :(
Again, an attempt to mail a 2 line patch.
Yours,
--
Tom Jansen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ninja ISD -- www.ninja.nl
Index: libsmbclient.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/libsmb/libsmbclient.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27.2.21
diff -u -r1.27.2.21 libsmbclient.c
--- libsmbclient.c 1 Jul 2002 17:03:13 - 1.27.2.21
+++ libsmbclient.c 2 Jul 2002 10:54:27 -
@@ -1302,14 +1302,14 @@
dir-dir_end-next = malloc(sizeof(struct smbc_dir_list));
- if (!dir-dir_end) {
+ if (!dir-dir_end-next) {
SAFE_FREE(dirent);
dir-dir_error = ENOMEM;
return -1;
}
- ZERO_STRUCTP(dir-dir_end);
+ ZERO_STRUCTP(dir-dir_end-next);
dir-dir_end = dir-dir_end-next;
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
It did join successfully though, as far as I can tell (net scrolls debug information now for some reason). It says joined INS domain at the end. Things like getent passwd/group work. There just is no sessionid.tdb.. . On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, David Shapiro wrote: Thanks. Any idea on why wbinfo -t fails? Is it related to sessionid.tdb missing? How do I get this file? I did remove myself from INS domain and rejoined again. Typically that fails because you have not joined the domain properly, or you cannot connect to th DC (ie, name lookup fails). -Original Message- From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:08 PM To: David Shapiro Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, David Shapiro wrote: Hello, The latest samba head as of 6/30/02 seems to not provide sessionid.tdb and gives me the following errors: I see this information in the log: 6/28 16:35:59, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_check_machine_acct(91) secret is good [2002/06/28 16:35:59, 5] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_check_machine_acct(100) Checking the trust account password returned NT_STATUS_OK [2002/06/28 16:35:59, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:client_write(456) client_write: wrote 1300 bytes. [2002/06/28 16:35:59, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(408) client_read: read 0 bytes. Need 1304 more for a full request. [2002/06/28 16:35:59, 5] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(415) read failed on sock 13, pid 1002: EOF It is a little confusing. It says secret is good in the log, but it has some error about not reading enough bytes and a sock 13 error. This just means that the client of winbindd closed the socket/whatever and stopped talking to winbindd. In addition, which may be related to the above, it looks for davidsha instead of INS+DavidSha even though smb.conf has it set to not have the server in INS by default. David E. Shapiro Senior Unix Admin BTi - the future of communications 4300 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, NC 27609 -- Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
getent group shows davidsha is in domain admin. I list using a net from a server I buildt 3 months ago and have not updated, and the new net command from yesterday cvs build of head. Both report I joined the domain, but I do not have a sessionid.tdb after it is done. I can not access shares as it stands now... Using newly compiled net command: # net rpc join -UDavidSha shows: (skipped some start stuff) . . . 02/07/02 08:16:28, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(590) 0020 neg_flags: 01ff [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_ntstatus(620) 0024 status: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 1] libsmb/cli_netlogon.c:new_cli_nt_setup_creds(201) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 1] libsmb/trust_passwd.c:just_change_the_password(43) just_change_the_password: unable to setup creds (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED)! [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 1] utils/net_rpc.c:run_rpc_command(150) rpc command function failed! (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(483) write_socket(3,45) [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(486) write_socket(3,45) wrote 45 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(539) got smb length of 35 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(272) size=35 smb_com=0x4 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=51201 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(278) smb_tid=2048 smb_pid=7649 smb_uid=2048 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(288) smb_bcc=0 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] libsmb/namequery.c:internal_resolve_name(781) internal_resolve_name: looking up INS#1b [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_wins(608) resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name INS0x1b [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 6] lib/wins_srv.c:wins_srv_ip_tag(307) Current wins server for tag '*' with source 0.0.0.0 is 10.1.4.11 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_wins(647) resolve_wins: using WINS server 10.1.4.11 and tag '*' [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(720) bind succeeded on port 0 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(741) Sending a packet of len 50 to (10.1.4.11) on port 137 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_udp_socket(184) read_udp_socket: lastip 10.1.4.11 lastport 137 read: 62 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] libsmb/nmblib.c:parse_nmb(470) parse_nmb: packet id = 27580 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(719) Received a packet of len 62 from (10.1.4.11) port 137 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 4] libsmb/nmblib.c:debug_nmb_packet(106) nmb packet from 10.1.4.11(137) header: id=27580 opcode=Query(0) response=Yes header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=Yes rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=Yes header: rcode=0 qdcount=0 ancount=1 nscount=0 arcount=0 answers: nmb_name=INS1b rr_type=32 rr_class=1 ttl=0 answers 0 char `. hex 6A010404 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 2] libsmb/namequery.c:name_query(394) Got a positive name query response from 10.1.4.11 ( 10.1.4.4 ) [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] libsmb/namequery.c:internal_resolve_name(884) internal_resolve_name: returning 1 addresses: 10.1.4.4 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] libsmb/namequery.c:name_status_find(174) name_status_find: looking up INS#1c at 10.1.4.4 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(720) bind succeeded on port 0 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(741) Sending a packet of len 50 to (10.1.4.4) on port 137 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_udp_socket(184) read_udp_socket: lastip 10.1.4.4 lastport 137 read: 301 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 10] libsmb/nmblib.c:parse_nmb(470) parse_nmb: packet id = 23591 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(719) Received a packet of len 301 from (10.1.4.4) port 137 [2002/07/02 08:16:28, 4] libsmb/nmblib.c:debug_nmb_packet(106) nmb packet from 10.1.4.4(137) header: id=23591 opcode=Query(0) response=Yes header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=No trunc=No auth=Yes header: rcode=0 qdcount=0 ancount=1 nscount=0 arcount=0 answers: nmb_name=INS1c rr_type=33 rr_class=1 ttl=0 answers 0 char .PDC hex 0A504443202020202020202020202020 answers 10 char D.PDC hex 20440050444320202020202020202020 answers 20 char .D.INS hex 2020004400494E532020202020202020 answers 30 char ...INS hex 2020202000C400494E53202020202020 answers 40 char ...INS hex 2020202020201CC400494E5320202020 answers 50 char .D.INS hex 20202020202020201B4400494E532020 answers 60 char ...PDC hex 202020202020202020201EC400504443 answers 70 char .D.R hex 20202020202020202020202003440052 answers 80 char OOT .L hex 4F4F542020202020202020202020034C answers 90 char .INS
Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
David Shapiro wrote: getent group shows davidsha is in domain admin. I list using a net from a server I buildt 3 months ago and have not updated, and the new net command from yesterday cvs build of head. Both report I joined the domain, but I do not have a sessionid.tdb after it is done. I can not access shares as it stands now... Joined domain INS. So it joined fine. sessionid.tdb is not related to this at all - and should be created on the first login to the server. Look into the smbd logs for connections, not the domain join. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Thank you Andrew. I was looking at joining because it was mentioned that to get sessionid.tdb, you needed to join domain. I looked ing smbd.log and saw a connection from davidsha, and then in my workstation log and saw at the bottom: user_in_list: checking user |INS+DavidSha| against |INS+DavidSha| [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(223) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is ins+davidsha [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(251) Get_Pwnam_internals did find user [INS+DavidSha]! [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(513) Couldn't find group @Users [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(523) Connect path is /usr/local/samba/lib [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(241) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(279) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(273) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 8127 (3.0-alpha17) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === I also keep getting an xterm session pop up that says: xterm: Can't execvp /usr/local/bin/gdb I think this comes from the line in smb.conf: panic action = /usr/openwin/bin/xterm -display $DISPLAY -e /usr/local/bin/gbd -p %d gdb is in /usr/local/bin. What does it mean it can't execvp it? -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:36 AM To: David Shapiro Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre David Shapiro wrote: getent group shows davidsha is in domain admin. I list using a net from a server I buildt 3 months ago and have not updated, and the new net command from yesterday cvs build of head. Both report I joined the domain, but I do not have a sessionid.tdb after it is done. I can not access shares as it stands now... Joined domain INS. So it joined fine. sessionid.tdb is not related to this at all - and should be created on the first login to the server. Look into the smbd logs for connections, not the domain join. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
SMS/SAM winbind
Approach to handle the SID mapping.
I preferr to have a database (or config options in smb.conf) for the
following DATA:
(Builtin and OurDomain):
SID: S-1-5-21-4158354609-2045536973-4240204567
uid: 2-3
gid: 15000-25000
TrustDomainA: (with NT4 Server)
SID: S-1-5-21-4158354609-2045536973-4240204567
uid: 2-3
gid: 15000-25000
TrustDomainB: (with ADS Server)
SID: S-1-5-21-1354354609-4598675973-4240286745
uid: 4-5
gid: 4-5
--
I would preferr that every SAM packend has it's own sid mapping for the
secified domain SID or {u,g}id range. (e.g. sam_ldap would store it's
mapping's in ldap, sam_tdb stores it in a tdb, or do it with algorithmic
backend...)
And for Trusted domains winbind is doing the mapping for the domain sid and
{u,g}id ranges.
__
take a look at www.metzemix.de/projects/samba/index.html
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
David Shapiro wrote: Thank you Andrew. I was looking at joining because it was mentioned that to get sessionid.tdb, you needed to join domain. I looked ing smbd.log and saw a connection from davidsha, and then in my workstation log and saw at the bottom: === [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 8127 (3.0-alpha17) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === I also keep getting an xterm session pop up that says: xterm: Can't execvp /usr/local/bin/gdb I think this comes from the line in smb.conf: panic action = /usr/openwin/bin/xterm -display $DISPLAY -e /usr/local/bin/gbd -p %d gdb is in /usr/local/bin. What does it mean it can't execvp it? I dunno - but just make it a simple 'panic action = /bin/sleep 9000' and attach manually. Then lets look at it from there. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: smbmount with big file sizes
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have also tried: http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/index.html with exactly the steps whatever they are: But no luck i have used kernel 2.4.16 and samba 2.2.2. You have probably not patched both the kernel and samba, rebuilt and reinstalled both. If either samba or the kernel you are using[1] is unpatched you will not get large file support. Also note that there is a 2.4.18 version available. I don't remember that anything changed from the 2.4.16 patch, but I do know that a lot of people have had success with the 2.4.18 one. /Urban [1] - There is a difference between using and have installed. You can have multiple versions installed but use the wrong one.
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
I am fairly new to gdb. After I sleep it for 9000 or during that time, what should I collect? I did an smbstatus and saw the pid it reported for the connection and ran gdb smbd pid#. I stepped a bit through it and saw the stuff here (not sure if this is enough): Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0xff19c724 in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) n Single stepping until exit from function _libc_kill, which has no line number information. procfs: couldn't stop process 76253: wait returned -1 (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n procfs: fetch_registers, get_gregs line 3514, /proc/10717/lwp/1: No such file or directory. (gdb) n -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:01 AM To: David Shapiro Cc: 'Andrew Bartlett'; 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre David Shapiro wrote: Thank you Andrew. I was looking at joining because it was mentioned that to get sessionid.tdb, you needed to join domain. I looked ing smbd.log and saw a connection from davidsha, and then in my workstation log and saw at the bottom: === [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 8127 (3.0-alpha17) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === I also keep getting an xterm session pop up that says: xterm: Can't execvp /usr/local/bin/gdb I think this comes from the line in smb.conf: panic action = /usr/openwin/bin/xterm -display $DISPLAY -e /usr/local/bin/gbd -p %d gdb is in /usr/local/bin. What does it mean it can't execvp it? I dunno - but just make it a simple 'panic action = /bin/sleep 9000' and attach manually. Then lets look at it from there. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Hi David, It looks like you might have misspelt gdb in your smb.conf line (in your message it is spelt gbd Don -Original Message- From: David Shapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:56 To: 'Andrew Bartlett'; David Shapiro Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre Thank you Andrew. I was looking at joining because it was mentioned that to get sessionid.tdb, you needed to join domain. I looked ing smbd.log and saw a connection from davidsha, and then in my workstation log and saw at the bottom: user_in_list: checking user |INS+DavidSha| against |INS+DavidSha| [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(223) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is ins+davidsha [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(251) Get_Pwnam_internals did find user [INS+DavidSha]! [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(513) Couldn't find group @Users [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(523) Connect path is /usr/local/samba/lib [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(241) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(279) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(273) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 8127 (3.0-alpha17) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === I also keep getting an xterm session pop up that says: xterm: Can't execvp /usr/local/bin/gdb I think this comes from the line in smb.conf: panic action = /usr/openwin/bin/xterm -display $DISPLAY -e /usr/local/bin/gbd -p %d gdb is in /usr/local/bin. What does it mean it can't execvp it? -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:36 AM To: David Shapiro Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre David Shapiro wrote: getent group shows davidsha is in domain admin. I list using a net from a server I buildt 3 months ago and have not updated, and the new net command from yesterday cvs build of head. Both report I joined the domain, but I do not have a sessionid.tdb after it is done. I can not access shares as it stands now... Joined domain INS. So it joined fine. sessionid.tdb is not related to this at all - and should be created on the first login to the server. Look into the smbd logs for connections, not the domain join. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Trying to get better at this gdb here. I see a segmentation fault: which has no line number information. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xff132e84 in strcmp () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function strcmp, which has no line number information. 0xff1544ec in _tzload () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function _tzload, which has no line number information. 0xff152df8 in _ltzset_u () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function _ltzset_u, which has no line number information. 0xff152994 in mktime () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function mktime, which has no line number information. 0xff1736dc in strftime () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function strftime, which has no line number information. 0x136db0 in timestring () (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function timestring, -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:01 AM To: David Shapiro Cc: 'Andrew Bartlett'; 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre David Shapiro wrote: Thank you Andrew. I was looking at joining because it was mentioned that to get sessionid.tdb, you needed to join domain. I looked ing smbd.log and saw a connection from davidsha, and then in my workstation log and saw at the bottom: === [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 8127 (3.0-alpha17) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === I also keep getting an xterm session pop up that says: xterm: Can't execvp /usr/local/bin/gdb I think this comes from the line in smb.conf: panic action = /usr/openwin/bin/xterm -display $DISPLAY -e /usr/local/bin/gbd -p %d gdb is in /usr/local/bin. What does it mean it can't execvp it? I dunno - but just make it a simple 'panic action = /bin/sleep 9000' and attach manually. Then lets look at it from there. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
A note to this: The share is: [samba] comment = samba smb.conf path = /usr/local/samba/lib read only = No valid users = INS+DavidSha force create mode=775 force group= users Note that I can get into the share called home: [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Thanks. I checked, and it was my note that had the error, but the line in
smb.conf was fine. I wrote a script called smbpanic.sh and tried using it,
but I get the same error about execvp:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl -w
my $pid = shift;
my @program = `/usr/bin/ps -efo pid,comm`;
foreach (@program) {
if (/$pid/) {
my ($space,$pid2,$comm) = split(/\s+/);
my @split = split(/\//,$comm);
$comm = pop @split;
if ($comm and $pid) {
my $cmd = /usr/local/bin/gdb $comm $pid;
system($cmd) or die Failed to run command:
$cmd\n;
}
exit;
}
}
It doesn't seem to want to run anything. In the interim, I run smbstatus
and see the pid. This pid changes a few times before a window opens as if
it is about to show the share. Once the window opens, that is the one I was
able to quickly run my script against to get some debug information. It
seems to have a segmentation error during a strcmp and halts during the
fault_report.
David
-Original Message-
From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:11 AM
To: 'David Shapiro'; 'Andrew Bartlett'
Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Hi David,
It looks like you might have misspelt gdb in your smb.conf line
(in your message it is spelt gbd
Don
-Original Message-
From: David Shapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:56
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'; David Shapiro
Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Thank you Andrew. I was looking at joining because it was mentioned that to
get sessionid.tdb, you needed to join domain. I looked ing smbd.log and saw
a connection from davidsha, and then in my workstation log and saw at the
bottom:
user_in_list: checking user |INS+DavidSha| against |INS+DavidSha|
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(223)
Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is ins+davidsha
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(251)
Get_Pwnam_internals did find user [INS+DavidSha]!
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(513)
Couldn't find group @Users
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(523)
Connect path is /usr/local/samba/lib
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(241)
push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(279)
push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(273)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
===
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 8127 (3.0-alpha17)
Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution
[2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
===
I also keep getting an xterm session pop up that says:
xterm: Can't execvp /usr/local/bin/gdb
I think this comes from the line in smb.conf:
panic action = /usr/openwin/bin/xterm -display $DISPLAY -e
/usr/local/bin/gbd -p %d
gdb is in /usr/local/bin. What does it mean it can't execvp it?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:36 AM
To: David Shapiro
Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
David Shapiro wrote:
getent group shows davidsha is in domain admin. I list using a net from a
server I buildt 3 months ago and have not updated, and the new net command
from yesterday cvs build of head. Both report I joined the domain, but I
do
not have a sessionid.tdb after it is done. I can not access shares as it
stands now...
Joined domain INS.
So it joined fine. sessionid.tdb is not related to this at all - and
should be created on the first login to the server.
Look into the smbd logs for connections, not the domain join.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 clientgen.c clilist.c libsmbclient.c Log Message: Include the patches by Tom Jansen. I have fixed a couple of problems, and it compiles, but I have not tested it. However, this week I will, because I need the new functionality. Revisions: clientgen.c 1.162.4.11 = 1.162.4.12 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/clientgen.c?r1=1.162.4.11r2=1.162.4.12 clilist.c 1.6.8.5 = 1.6.8.6 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/clilist.c?r1=1.6.8.5r2=1.6.8.6 libsmbclient.c1.27.2.20 = 1.27.2.21 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/libsmbclient.c?r1=1.27.2.20r2=1.27.2.21 Richard, Is there a reason that this has to go into SAMBA_2_2? It looks like it could potentially de-stablize the libsmbclient library and I would prefer not to do on 2.2. Can we make these changes in HEAD? SAMBA_2_2 should be in a bug fix only mode. This means testing against HEAD and only backporting minimal changes to SAMBA_2_2 as necessary (such as in severely broken functionality in the latter branch). I'll post some summary information on branch maintainence later today. My fault for not doing so sooner. cheers, jerry
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Title: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre Don't step at that point. The process has already run the CPU into the wrong segment, or accessed memory using a bad pointer. Stepping will only destroy information. Do a 'bt' instead. That will dump the call stack, and show what path the code ran to get to this point. What I expect to see is somewhere above the strcmp routine, a Samba routine will call strcmp with a bad pointer, or a non-terminated string buffer. We need to know which routine did that. -Original Message- From: David Shapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:17 AM To: 'Andrew Bartlett'; David Shapiro Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre Trying to get better at this gdb here. I see a segmentation fault: which has no line number information. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xff132e84 in strcmp () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function strcmp, which has no line number information. 0xff1544ec in _tzload () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function _tzload, which has no line number information. 0xff152df8 in _ltzset_u () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function _ltzset_u, which has no line number information. 0xff152994 in mktime () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function mktime, which has no line number information. 0xff1736dc in strftime () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function strftime, which has no line number information. 0x136db0 in timestring () (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function timestring, -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:01 AM To: David Shapiro Cc: 'Andrew Bartlett'; 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre David Shapiro wrote: Thank you Andrew. I was looking at joining because it was mentioned that to get sessionid.tdb, you needed to join domain. I looked ing smbd.log and saw a connection from davidsha, and then in my workstation log and saw at the bottom: === [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 8127 (3.0-alpha17) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2002/07/02 08:40:53, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === I also keep getting an xterm session pop up that says: xterm: Can't execvp /usr/local/bin/gdb I think this comes from the line in smb.conf: panic action = /usr/openwin/bin/xterm -display $DISPLAY -e /usr/local/bin/gbd -p %d gdb is in /usr/local/bin. What does it mean it can't execvp it? I dunno - but just make it a simple 'panic action = /bin/sleep 9000' and attach manually. Then lets look at it from there. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: corrupt sessionid.tdb
On 28 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote: I may be wrong but I remember a fix in 2.2.5, I think jeremy or jerry may tell you more however. Not for tdb corruption. On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 11:11, Volker Lendecke wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 11:08:00AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - From time to time at a customer's site the sessionid.tdb seems to be corrupt. Using tdbtool, dump says it's empty, insert/store/fetch/whatever fail. What can I do to diagnose this? Sorry for my own reply: I have a corrupt sessionid.tdb here, if anybody wants to look at that. Jeremy? Volker cheers, jerry -- - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
Re: corrupt sessionid.tdb
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:43:36AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: On 28 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote: I may be wrong but I remember a fix in 2.2.5, I think jeremy or jerry may tell you more however. Not for tdb corruption. Thanks. I recently got another error message from that machine, running 2.2.4: [2002/07/01 07:56:17, 0, pid=3781] passdb/passdb.c:pdb_init_sam(116) pdb_init_sam: error while allocating memory This essentially means that process 3781 can not malloc about 13k of memory. Either Samba is severely broken, or this machine has a hardware problem. It runs about 500 users on a 2GB Fujitsu X86 with Linux 2.4.18 Volker msg01765/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: corrupt sessionid.tdb
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Volker Lendecke wrote: Thanks. I recently got another error message from that machine, running 2.2.4: [2002/07/01 07:56:17, 0, pid=3781] passdb/passdb.c:pdb_init_sam(116) pdb_init_sam: error while allocating memory This essentially means that process 3781 can not malloc about 13k of memory. Either Samba is severely broken, or this machine has a hardware problem. It runs about 500 users on a 2GB Fujitsu X86 with Linux 2.4.18 This is the first report I've seen of failed memory allocation, so my bet is that there is a hardware problem What is the load on the machine at this time? I mean, if one malloc fails, you would expect to see more if it was just resource exhaustion. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Just for test of the samba. -Original Message- From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:56 PM To: David Shapiro Cc: 'Andrew Bartlett'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, David Shapiro wrote: A note to this: The share is: [samba] comment = samba smb.conf path = /usr/local/samba/lib read only = No valid users = INS+DavidSha force create mode=775 force group= @users Hmmm, why do you have a share pointing at the directory where Samba keeps its config info etc? Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard, Is there a reason that this has to go into SAMBA_2_2? I don't work in any other area at the moment. It looks like it could potentially de-stablize the libsmbclient library and I would prefer not to do on 2.2. If we get it right, it should be compatible. Can we make these changes in HEAD? SAMBA_2_2 should be in a bug fix only mode. This means testing against HEAD and only backporting minimal changes to SAMBA_2_2 as necessary (such as in severely broken functionality in the latter branch). It would be nice if the two were in step, though, as far as libsmbclient is concerned. I'll post some summary information on branch maintainence later today. My fault for not doing so sooner. cheers, jerry -- Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba VFS
I am trying to make the vscan-sophos module(from www.openantivirus.org) work on IBM AIX 5.1L but it will not load as it does on Linux (RedHat7.3 distribution). I have it working "out of the box" on Linux but it seems like there is some problem with loadingthe module when it is linked to the Sophos API library. Without the library linked it loads fine.I am having trouble finding where in the code VFS modules are loaded, could anyone point me in the right direction?Kind regardsBjorn
archive bit in xattr possible/exist?
I know it is possible to use map archive to keep track of archive bits, but this is not very useful if you have real UNIX users. I.e. I can't have samba arbitrarily playing with the execute bits. Does anyone know of any attempted implementation of archive bits through extended attributes? This would probably need a VFS layer, to get and set them appropriately. If no one has looked into this is there a better/different way of tracking archive bits? David Orman Network Administrator ISU Center for Nondestructive Evaluation
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Title: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre Okay, correct me if I did it wrong... I ran smbstatus, saw the pid of my connection, ran gdb smbd pid #gdb smbd 17294GNU gdb 5.0Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you arewelcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.Type "show copying" to see the conditions.There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.This GDB was configured as "sparc-sun-solaris2.8".../usr/local/bin/17294: No such file or directory.Attaching to program `/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd', process 17294Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsec.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsec.so.1Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgen.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgen.so.1Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpam.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpam.so.1Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libc.so.1Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libdl.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libdl.so.1Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libmp.so.2...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libmp.so.2Reading symbols from /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/lib/libc_psr.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/lib/libc_psr.so.1Reading symbols from /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1Reading symbols from /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1...done.Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1Retry #1:Retry #2:Retry #3:Retry #4:[New LWP 1]Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libsec.so.1Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libgen.so.1Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libpam.so.1Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libc.so.1Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libdl.so.1Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libmp.so.2Symbols already loaded for /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/lib/libc_psr.so.1Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.10xff19a138 in _poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1(gdb) stepSingle stepping until exit from function _poll, which has no line number information.0xff14cfb4 in select () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1(gdb) nextSingle stepping until exit from function select, which has no line number information.0x14aafc in sys_select ()(gdb) stepSingle stepping until exit from function sys_select, which has no line number information.0x73004 in receive_message_or_smb ()(gdb) stepSingle stepping until exit from function receive_message_or_smb, which has no line number information.0x74610 in smbd_process ()(gdb) stepSingle stepping until exit from function smbd_process, which has no line number information. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.0xff132e84 in strcmp () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1(gdb) bt#0 0xff132e84 in strcmp () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1#1 0xff194efc in process_cstr () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1#2 0xfefe20c0 in _nss_files_do_all () from /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1#3 0xff149290 in nss_search () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1#4 0xff194bf8 in _getgroupsbymember () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1#5 0xff140c20 in initgroups () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1#6 0x6b5d8 in initialise_groups ()#7 0x75a4c in make_connection_snum ()#8 0x76874 in make_connection ()#9 0x4f16c in reply_tcon_and_X ()#10 0x73854 in switch_message ()#11 0x738e0 in construct_reply ()#12 0x73bc0 in process_smb ()#13 0x7462c in smbd_process ()#14 0x357c8 in main ()(gdb) ---Original Message-From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:10 AMTo: 'David Shapiro'; 'Andrew Bartlett'Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre Don't step at that point. The process has already run the CPU into the wrong segment, or accessed memory using a bad pointer. Stepping will only destroy information. Do a 'bt' instead. That will dump the call stack, and show what path the code ran to get to this point. What I expect to see is somewhere above the strcmp routine, a Samba routine will call strcmp with a bad pointer, or a non-terminated string buffer. We need to know which routine did that. -Original Message- From: David Shapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:17 AM To: 'Andrew Bartlett'; David
RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, David Shapiro wrote: Okay, correct me if I did it wrong... I think that Donald Fagan would say that line should be Sue me if I played it wrong. However, you do appear to have a traceback. Would have been more useful if there were line numbers, but for that you will need to rebuild Samba (frob the Makefile to include -g in CFLAGS). I ran smbstatus, saw the pid of my connection, ran gdb smbd pid #gdb smbd 17294 GNU gdb 5.0 Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as sparc-sun-solaris2.8... /usr/local/bin/17294: No such file or directory. Attaching to program `/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd', process 17294 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsec.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsec.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgen.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgen.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpam.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpam.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libc.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libdl.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libmp.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/lib/libc_psr.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/lib/libc_psr.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1 Retry #1: Retry #2: Retry #3: Retry #4: [New LWP 1] Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libsec.so.1 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libgen.so.1 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libpam.so.1 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libc.so.1 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 Symbols already loaded for /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/lib/libc_psr.so.1 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1 Symbols already loaded for /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1 0xff19a138 in _poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function _poll, which has no line number information. 0xff14cfb4 in select () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) next Single stepping until exit from function select, which has no line number information. 0x14aafc in sys_select () (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function sys_select, which has no line number information. 0x73004 in receive_message_or_smb () (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function receive_message_or_smb, which has no line number information. 0x74610 in smbd_process () (gdb) step Single stepping until exit from function smbd_process, which has no line number information. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xff132e84 in strcmp () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) bt #0 0xff132e84 in strcmp () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #1 0xff194efc in process_cstr () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #2 0xfefe20c0 in _nss_files_do_all () from /usr/lib/nss_files.so.1 #3 0xff149290 in nss_search () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #4 0xff194bf8 in _getgroupsbymember () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #5 0xff140c20 in initgroups () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #6 0x6b5d8 in initialise_groups () #7 0x75a4c in make_connection_snum () #8 0x76874 in make_connection () #9 0x4f16c in reply_tcon_and_X () #10 0x73854 in switch_message () #11 0x738e0 in construct_reply () #12 0x73bc0 in process_smb () #13 0x7462c in smbd_process () #14 0x357c8 in main () (gdb) ---Original Message- From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:10 AM To: 'David Shapiro'; 'Andrew Bartlett' Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre Don't step at that point. The process has already run the CPU into the wrong segment, or accessed memory using a bad pointer. Stepping will only destroy information. Do a 'bt' instead. That will dump the call stack, and show what path the code ran to get to this point. What I expect to see is somewhere above the strcmp routine, a Samba routine will call strcmp with a bad pointer, or
RE: [Samba] RE: FW: samba woes
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Johnston, Christopher (DCSA) wrote: Excellent.. however we are attempting to try and put together an LDAP solution here at ML to keep a centralized database of SID-UID mappings.. than letting the LDAP client make calls against the database for a UID.. what we would need is a backend script/program to make calls against winbind using wbinfo.. and than passing that info off to the LDAP server.. not sure if that would work.. but it is something management here has been talking about asking me to implement.. I've got some LDAP code I started on with. Looked like it would work technically. Don't know about performance cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
Re: CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote: Is there a reason that this has to go into SAMBA_2_2? I don't work in any other area at the moment. That's not a real good reason IMO. The libsmbclient code should be sync'd between HEAD and SAMBA_2_2 so you should be able to work in either branch. We really need to leave SAMBA_2_2 alone It looks like it could potentially de-stablize the libsmbclient library and I would prefer not to do on 2.2. If we get it right, it should be compatible. That's a bug **if** though. What effect will this have on someone running a client written to use libsmbclient.so delivered with 2.2.x after they upgrade? It would be nice if the two were in step, though, as far as libsmbclient is concerned. See comments above. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
Re: archive bit in xattr possible/exist?
David Orman wrote: I know it is possible to use map archive to keep track of archive bits, but this is not very useful if you have real UNIX users. I.e. I can't have samba arbitrarily playing with the execute bits. Does anyone know of any attempted implementation of archive bits through extended attributes? This would probably need a VFS layer, to get and set them appropriately. Samba 2.0.6 for OpenVMS. If no one has looked into this is there a better/different way of tracking archive bits? Tracking the bit to meaningfully give the state is operating system dependent. And may even depend on optional backup products installed. OpenVMS has the last recorded backup date as an attribute for the file, so SAMBA 2.0.6 for OpenVMS has it implemented as a O.S. specific hack to report the backup state of the file. At this time, SAMBA 2.0.6 for OpenVMS does not allow the client to manipulate the backup date, as there is no public A.P.I. to do it. A VFS layer may be a way to do this. -John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only
Re: archive bit in xattr possible/exist?
David Orman wrote: I know it is possible to use map archive to keep track of archive bits, but this is not very useful if you have real UNIX users. I.e. I can't have samba arbitrarily playing with the execute bits. Does anyone know of any attempted implementation of archive bits through extended attributes? This would probably need a VFS layer, to get and set them appropriately. Samba 2.0.6 for OpenVMS. If no one has looked into this is there a better/different way of tracking archive bits? Tracking the bit to meaningfully give the state is operating system dependent. And may even depend on optional backup products installed. OpenVMS has the last recorded backup date as an attribute for the file, so SAMBA 2.0.6 for OpenVMS has it implemented as a O.S. specific hack to report the backup state of the file. At this time, SAMBA 2.0.6 for OpenVMS does not allow the client to manipulate the backup date, as there is no public A.P.I. to do it. A VFS layer may be a way to do this. -John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only
Re: Draft of branch maintainence and release plans....
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: Everyone, Here are the plans for getting 3.0 ready for release and the maintainence plans for SAMBA_2_2. Comments welcome. I would love to see this out sometime during the Fall of this year. Of course, none of this will get done without everyone's help :-) Roadmap to 3.0 -- The following features are planned for inclusion in 3.0. This list was compiled based on previous promises during 2.2 development and believed future directions of Samba * Internationalization - The UNICODE support is done. Jeremy thinks we will probably need some auditing and testing before release. * Full Windows NT 4.0 PDC support - Trust relationships - SAM replication I don't see this being in 3.0. Maybe a later release, but there is more work 'todo' in this area that you might expect. Natrually, Samba-Samba replication will be fully supported. These features will allow for full replacement and migration from Windows NT 4.0 domain controllers. Both of these features are partially completed. * Windows 2000 domain client support - Done. * NTLMv2 Sign/Seal of RPC packets - NTLMv2 should be ok, the sign/seal is yet to be done. This gets messy - in particular the 'netlogon' problem isn't related to NTLMv2 at all, its another associated mess... * Winbind idmap storage central idmap repository (for clusters, nfs, etc...) * Winbind working with Samba DC * Group Mapping support (pluggable?) The folks on #samba-technical (kai, metze, ctrlsoft, idra and I) are working on a new SAM interface (fully pluggable etc), and we will bring discussions here shortly on how to move this towards the mythical 'Samba 3.0'. * Printer attribute publishing using 'net' * pluggable passwd support - Done. Other possible feature which may be included depending on time/resources. Probably in later 3.x release. * Background updates of print queue caches * WINS replication * loadable library support for named pipes * non-blocking winbind implementation * Printer attribute publishing via smbd * SAM Replication over NT4 RPC protocols. SAMBA_2_2 maintainence -- The SAMBA_2_2 will only be updated to include fixes for severe bugs or security exploits. All testing will be done against HEAD at this point. No new features/functionality are to added due to the risk of destabilizing the branch. There will be a 2.2.6 release most likely, but all efforts should be concentrated on HEAD. Finally! :-) Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote: On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Just watch in that sync-up - tridge fixed up some (quite serious) bugs in the HEAD version (wins *registrations* in the client) and we don't want them 'merged back'. Hey, watch it with the flagrant misuse of adjectives there. They were not (quite serious) bugs, more like sub-optimalities :-) Yeah. Sorry. Captain Pedantic (Chris) already called me on that one :-) cheers, jerry
Re: Draft of branch maintainence and release plans....
Jerry- I have a good start on the following, and putting it on the list will help keep it on my radar :). For 3.0 --- *Conversion to NTSTATUS for return codes Wishlist *Pluggable backend for storing WINS entries (ie SQL, LDAP) Matt Pavlovich Message: 8 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:54:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Draft of branch maintainence and release plans Everyone, Here are the plans for getting 3.0 ready for release and the maintainence plans for SAMBA_2_2. Comments welcome. I would love to see this out sometime during the Fall of this year. Of course, none of this will get done without everyone's help :-) Roadmap to 3.0 -- The following features are planned for inclusion in 3.0. This list was compiled based on previous promises during 2.2 development and believed future directions of Samba * Internationalization - The UNICODE support is done. Jeremy thinks we will probably need some auditing and testing before release. * Full Windows NT 4.0 PDC support - Trust relationships - SAM replication These features will allow for full replacement and migration from Windows NT 4.0 domain controllers. Both of these features are partially completed. * Windows 2000 domain client support - Done. * NTLMv2 Sign/Seal of RPC packets - NTLMv2 should be ok, the sign/seal is yet to be done. * Winbind idmap storage central idmap repository (for clusters, nfs, etc...) * Winbind working with Samba DC * Group Mapping support (pluggable?) * Printer attribute publishing using 'net' * pluggable passwd support - Done. Other possible feature which may be included depending on time/resources. Probably in later 3.x release. * Background updates of print queue caches * WINS replication * loadable library support for named pipes * non-blocking winbind implementation * Printer attribute publishing via smbd SAMBA_2_2 maintainence -- The SAMBA_2_2 will only be updated to include fixes for severe bugs or security exploits. All testing will be done against HEAD at this point. No new features/functionality are to added due to the risk of destabilizing the branch. There will be a 2.2.6 release most likely, but all efforts should be concentrated on HEAD. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- --__--__-- Message: 9 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:54:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ADS-HOWTO.sgml On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: Hi jerry, Here's the ADS HOWTO converted to sgml.. Adding it to HEAD now. Thanks. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
Re: smbmount with big file sizes
Is there a reason this hasn't made it into the Samba and mnt.smbfs main trees yet? I would have use of it, but it seems odd that it isn't included in many default kernel builds or in the main Samba build - I don't want to mess up a production box by doing so. Thanks, Les Barstow On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Urban Widmark wrote: Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:40:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Urban Widmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: smbmount with big file sizes On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have also tried: http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/index.html with exactly the steps whatever they are: But no luck i have used kernel 2.4.16 and samba 2.2.2. You have probably not patched both the kernel and samba, rebuilt and reinstalled both. If either samba or the kernel you are using[1] is unpatched you will not get large file support. Also note that there is a 2.4.18 version available. I don't remember that anything changed from the 2.4.16 patch, but I do know that a lot of people have had success with the 2.4.18 one. /Urban [1] - There is a difference between using and have installed. You can have multiple versions installed but use the wrong one. -- Les Barstow: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.faerealm.com They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin
