Re: Limitations of Samba-2.2.x as a domain member talking to an ADdomain controller

2003-01-27 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Chere Zhou wrote:

> I had this similar question too.  Apparently a "Domain local group" in the 
> ADS does not show up on my Samba 2.2.5.  Not sure what else would be.  

This should be fixed in Samba 3.0/HEAD.  Known issue in 2.2




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+NaCIIR7qMdg1EfYRAs4SAKCFrvpUxQ4WYg2t872kycnu4QiacwCghf9n
9S7x8GgnMKL/o/2/p3dgNn0=
=NpHo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: Limitations of Samba-2.2.x as a domain member talking to an ADdomain controller

2003-01-26 Thread Damian, G. C. (Gerald)
Richard Sharpe wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Tim Potter wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Damian, G. C. (Gerald) wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Is the any way for our pre 3.0 Samba servers to participate
> > > in AD and how do you set it up?
> >
> > Tridge has written a HOWTO which should be up to date with the
> > latest Samba code.  Look at the file ADS-HOWTO.txt in the Samba
> > distribution.
> 
> Hmmm, that is not how I interpreted that question. For me, the phrase
> 'pre 3.0 Samba' suggested Samba 2.2.x.

Everyone,

Thanks for pointing me to the ADS howto docs. I'll RTFM.

My Samba servers are 2.2.x.

I realized after my posting that I wasn't correctly stating
my problem. I'll try to be more specific.

In setting up my 2.2.x Samba servers in an NT domain 
with a remote PDC and local BDC for user accounts, I
first needed to add machine accounts on a local resource
BDC for the Samba servers before joining our domain via
smbpasswd.

In a mixed mode ADS enviroment with Pre-Windows 2000
compatibility mode I can add Samba servers to Active
Directory as before, as long as I create machine 
acounts before joining the domain. This works fine.

However, as we move to a native mode environment, the
plan is to do away with the local resource BDCs for
machine accounts. Without them I can't join the
domain. Am I wrong in my impression that I won't 
need to create machine accounts in Samba 3.0? Any 
suggestions to get around this problem?!?

---
Jerry Damian -  My opinions != Ford's opinions or policy
Ford Motor Co, 1116 SRL, MD 1074, 2101 Village Road, Dearborn, MI 48124 USA
Planet Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Virgo Supercluster, Observable Universe
Phone: 313 323 8347  Fax: 313 390 4865  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Limitations of Samba-2.2.x as a domain member talking to an ADdomain controller

2003-01-24 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Tim Potter wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Damian, G. C. (Gerald) wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Is the any way for our pre 3.0 Samba servers to participate 
> > in AD and how do you set it up?
> 
> Tridge has written a HOWTO which should be up to date with the
> latest Samba code.  Look at the file ADS-HOWTO.txt in the Samba
> distribution.

Hmmm, that is not how I interpreted that question. For me, the phrase 
'pre 3.0 Samba' suggested Samba 2.2.x.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, 
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com




Re: Limitations of Samba-2.2.x as a domain member talking to an ADdomain controller

2003-01-24 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Chere Zhou wrote:

> 
> I had this similar question too.  Apparently a "Domain local group" in the 
> ADS does not show up on my Samba 2.2.5.  Not sure what else would be.  
> 
> If nobody knows all of it, perhaps those who ever encountered any problem 
> with this situation can just contribute, then we can assemble a list.

Well, there is a list from some MS documentation:

1. You probably don't get Universal and Domain Local groups
2. You probably don't get nested groups
3. Local groups on the PDC emulator system probably don't turn up 
   as Domain Local groups.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, 
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com