Re: Next alpha of 3.0 planned for Friday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is just a heads up for everyone. I'm planning the 3.0alpha23 release for this Friday. If you have code that needs to be merged of commited to the SAMBA_3_0 cvs tree, please get in checked in by 8am EST on Friday of the week. I've hit a few small bugs (one in RH packaging and one in smbpasswd). As soon as I get those cleaned up, 3.0alpha23 will be on its way. Hopefully tomorrow. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE+hNGSIR7qMdg1EfYRAlv+AKDWJbF5ZBK5IPE104O/ZPmD6nFwIgCfckUG 6oCiLf1R6SKsDsu4FkgS+PI= =A0L2 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Next alpha of 3.0 planned for Friday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Tomoki AONO wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just a heads up for everyone. I'm planning the 3.0alpha23 release for this Friday. If you have code that needs to be merged of commited to the SAMBA_3_0 cvs tree, please get in checked in by 8am EST on Friday of the week. Would someone take a look at CIDR-like notation problem by Mr. Takeda (and following mail by me) ? If this is right, example config described in securing-samba.sgml will not work as expected. (http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2003-March/042993.html) Fixed. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE+hG2DIR7qMdg1EfYRAv+ZAJ446QsKK2fNTJQMUaEanz0rbJoCCACeNcuH Mxs352anoxclJKqT4TwrrLI= =JAQm -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Next alpha of 3.0 planned for Friday
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just a heads up for everyone. I'm planning the 3.0alpha23 release for this Friday. If you have code that needs to be merged of commited to the SAMBA_3_0 cvs tree, please get in checked in by 8am EST on Friday of the week. Would someone take a look at CIDR-like notation problem by Mr. Takeda (and following mail by me) ? If this is right, example config described in securing-samba.sgml will not work as expected. (http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2003-March/042993.html) Tomoki AONO ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Next alpha of 3.0 planned for Friday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FYI... This is just a heads up for everyone. I'm planning the 3.0alpha23 release for this Friday. If you have code that needs to be merged of commited to the SAMBA_3_0 cvs tree, please get in checked in by 8am EST on Friday of the week. I'm also planning on spending some time reviewing how soon we can turn the alpha releases into beta. I'll post a plan to the samba-technical list early next week. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE+gmSFIR7qMdg1EfYRAj50AJ9CQSMyN6oxr9OaPp0DgLT2RqGW1QCgo2I7 jUBQ3/OVT+7un5NTh3foLlA= =9NPP -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Next alpha of 3.0 planned for Friday
At 20:40 26.03.2003 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FYI... This is just a heads up for everyone. I'm planning the 3.0alpha23 release for this Friday. If you have code that needs to be merged of commited to the SAMBA_3_0 cvs tree, please get in checked in by 8am EST on Friday of the week. I'm not sure if the new LDAP modify stuff works without problems. I have problems with that I can't change user entries via usrmgr.exe the LDAP server returns 'can't add attribute' (here the attribute should be modified) and before this changes all works well (I hvae not touched the ldap server) It would be nice if this could be fixed till alpha23 metze - Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
