On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Guy Roussin wrote: > Under win2k, if a user create a file in this share, it has well the unix > permissions 0600 and the correct correspondence under win2k (no > permission for the group and everyone). All is well. > > So now, if the user modifies the file with gvim.exe for example. I note > that the permission are deeply modified. I can see now that the user > "root" (???) is present twice: once with no permission and once with > read and write permissions !
One is a user and the other is a group. > AFTER: > lct5{root}[/home5]: getfacl n600.txt > # file: n600.txt > # owner: guy > # group: lct > user::rw- > user:root:rw- #effective:rw- > group::--- #effective:--- > group:root:--- #effective:--- > mask:rwx > other:--- > > > How to avoid this behavior ? In a general way i don't understand well > the equivalence of the permissions managed by samba between Win2k and > Unix (with or without support acl). Where can i found information above > it ? Source code is really the only place, but you might want to check under the slides section of http://samba.org/ (under Documentation). Jeremy did a talk on Samba ACLs last year at the CIFS conference and I think I uploaded the slides in PS format. cheers, jerry