Re: Roadmap to 3.0

2002-09-24 Thread abartlet 

On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:45:36AM +0200, Eddie Lania wrote:
> Loadable RPC implementations yes o o o
> 
> Does this mean that it will support KIXTART as well?

I've yet to see a good definition of what KIXTART needs, so I
can't say if we will support it.

Andrew Bartlett

Re: Roadmap to 3.0

2002-09-24 Thread Richard Sharpe 

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:45:36AM +0200, Eddie Lania wrote:
> > Loadable RPC implementations yes o o o
> > 
> > Does this mean that it will support KIXTART as well?
> 
> I've yet to see a good definition of what KIXTART needs, so I
> can't say if we will support it.

I suspect that it has something to do with being violent towards 
prostitutes.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Roadmap to 3.0

2002-09-24 Thread Eddie Lania 

Look here for more information to see what I am talking about:

http://www.kixtart.org

BTW, it is widely used in a lot of production environments.

Eddie.

- Original Message - 
From: "Richard Sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Eddie Lania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Roadmap to 3.0


> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:45:36AM +0200, Eddie Lania wrote:
> > > Loadable RPC implementations yes o o o
> > > 
> > > Does this mean that it will support KIXTART as well?
> > 
> > I've yet to see a good definition of what KIXTART needs, so I
> > can't say if we will support it.
> 
> I suspect that it has something to do with being violent towards 
> prostitutes.
> 
> Regards
> -
> Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Re: Roadmap to 3.0

2002-09-24 Thread Mike Brady 

I have done some very basic testing with login scripts using KIXTART on 
3.0Alpha19 from an NT4 Workstation and all that I did worked.  By basic I 
mean testing for Domain Group memberships, enumerating group membership etc, 
nothing fancy.

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:39, Eddie Lania wrote:
> Look here for more information to see what I am talking about:
>
> http://www.kixtart.org
>
> BTW, it is widely used in a lot of production environments.
>
> Eddie.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Richard Sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Eddie Lania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:40 AM
> Subject: Re: Roadmap to 3.0
>
> > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:45:36AM +0200, Eddie Lania wrote:
> > > > Loadable RPC implementations yes o o o
> > > >
> > > > Does this mean that it will support KIXTART as well?
> > >
> > > I've yet to see a good definition of what KIXTART needs, so I
> > > can't say if we will support it.
> >
> > I suspect that it has something to do with being violent towards
> > prostitutes.
> >
> > Regards
> > -
> > Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Roadmap to 3.0

2002-09-24 Thread Eddie Lania 

On Windows XP it doesn't work properly, or it must be that I have some
misconfigured settings.
These are some of the error messages I get in the apllication log:

- UserGetLocalGroups failed Error : Toegang geweigerd. (0x5/5).
- GetPrimaryGroup failed Error : Er is geen toewijzing uitgevoerd tussen
accountnamen en beveiligings-ID's. (0x534/1332).

Also, KiXtart indetifies me as Guest user when I log in from the XP box,
while I am an Administrator.
For the rest it works ok here too.

Eddie.

- Original Message -
From: "Mike Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eddie Lania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: Roadmap to 3.0


> I have done some very basic testing with login scripts using KIXTART on
> 3.0Alpha19 from an NT4 Workstation and all that I did worked.  By basic I
> mean testing for Domain Group memberships, enumerating group membership
etc,
> nothing fancy.
>
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:39, Eddie Lania wrote:
> > Look here for more information to see what I am talking about:
> >
> > http://www.kixtart.org
> >
> > BTW, it is widely used in a lot of production environments.
> >
> > Eddie.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Richard Sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Eddie Lania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: Roadmap to 3.0
> >
> > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:45:36AM +0200, Eddie Lania wrote:
> > > > > Loadable RPC implementations yes o o o
> > > > >
> > > > > Does this mean that it will support KIXTART as well?
> > > >
> > > > I've yet to see a good definition of what KIXTART needs, so I
> > > > can't say if we will support it.
> > >
> > > I suspect that it has something to do with being violent towards
> > > prostitutes.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > -
> > > Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Re: Roadmap to 3.0

2002-09-25 Thread Gerald Carter 

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Eddie Lania wrote:

> Loadable RPC implementations yes o o o
> 
> Does this mean that it will support KIXTART as well?

This has nothing to do with Win32 applications.  It means 
that the RPC functions for a given RPC service will be
loaded from a shared library.  It is an architectural change, 
not a functional one (yet).




cheers, jerry
 -
 Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team   http://www.samba.org
 --http://www.plainjoe.org
 "Sams Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed.   ISBN 0-672-32269-2
 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--