Re: SPNEGO and multiple authentication types ...

2002-08-27 Thread Jim McDonough


Luke Howard wrote:
  >46 06   10:   OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 2 840 113554 1 2 2 3'
  >
>The first is Microsoft's bodged Kerberos OID, which appears to be used
>in the SPNEGO negotiation only. The next is the real Kerberos OID. Not
>sure about the one afther that. The final one is NTLMSSP.

Steve French posted this on samba-technical a couple of weeks ago:

>Kerberos when going to Win2K.  The missing oid is 10 bytes - 2a 86 48 86
f7
>12 01 02 02 03 which appears to be an interesting subdialect of ("user to
>user") Kerberos ticket exchange which is even documented. Take a look at:
>http://www.wedgetail.com/jcsi/2.2/kerberos/apidocs/com/dstc/security/kerberos/gssapi/package-summary.html
 >which mentions draft-swift-win2k-krb-user2user-02.txt



Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
Samba Team
6 Minuteman Drive
Scarborough, ME 04074
USA

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: (207) 885-5565
IBM tie-line: 776-9984





Re: SPNEGO and multiple authentication types ...

2002-08-26 Thread Luke Howard


>Am I right in thinking that SPNEGO allows for multiple authentication 
>types by including multiple OIDs, for example KRB5, NTLMSSP, NTLM, etc?

Yes, for example the following OIDs are included in a DCE RPC SPNEGO
authentication:

  24 069:   OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 2 840 48018 1 2 2'
  35 069:   OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 2 840 113554 1 2 2'
  46 06   10:   OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 2 840 113554 1 2 2 3'
  58 06   10:   OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10'

The first is Microsoft's bodged Kerberos OID, which appears to be used
in the SPNEGO negotiation only. The next is the real Kerberos OID. Not
sure about the one afther that. The final one is NTLMSSP.

-- Luke

--
Luke Howard | lukehoward.com
PADL Software | www.padl.com



SPNEGO and multiple authentication types ...

2002-08-26 Thread Richard Sharpe

Hi,

Am I right in thinking that SPNEGO allows for multiple authentication 
types by including multiple OIDs, for example KRB5, NTLMSSP, NTLM, etc?

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]