[sane-devel] ENABLE_LOCKING
Hi Gerhard Gerhard Jaeger wrote: On Monday 25 July 2005 02:49, Paul Smedley wrote: Hi all, On OS/2 - enable_locking gets enabled by configure, however as far as I can tell, this is only used in sanei_access.c, and then, only by the plustek backend - and the code doesn't work on OS/2. I know that I can run configure with a switch to disable locking, but can configure be changed such that ENABLE_LOCKING is not set on os/2.. snip Try the patch below... For what it's worth - I just tried this and it works perfectly - is it possible to get the patch checked in? Cheers, Paul.
[sane-devel] re: 2480 Transparency Issues
Still trying to resolve the issues with the 2480 scanner when using the transparency unit. Using gimp and the Acquire Image... with xsane also results in messed up preview area. The scans are still not usable, but getting closer. From Gimp, the number of color bands is reduced by half. I'm not sure why, but the resulting scans are still not usable. Still looking for any pointers. ken
[sane-devel] ENABLE_LOCKING
Hi Paul, On Monday 08 August 2005 07:49, Paul Smedley wrote: Hi Gerhard Gerhard Jaeger wrote: On Monday 25 July 2005 02:49, Paul Smedley wrote: Hi all, On OS/2 - enable_locking gets enabled by configure, however as far as I can tell, this is only used in sanei_access.c, and then, only by the plustek backend - and the code doesn't work on OS/2. I know that I can run configure with a switch to disable locking, but can configure be changed such that ENABLE_LOCKING is not set on os/2.. snip Try the patch below... For what it's worth - I just tried this and it works perfectly - is it possible to get the patch checked in? yup - already done, pls cross-check. ciao, Gerhard Cheers, Paul.
[sane-devel] Anon cvs problems
HI All, Anyone else seeing this error when trying to update cvs via anonymous login? cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane co sane-backends cvs [checkout aborted]: unrecognized auth response from cvs.alioth.debian.org: cvs: WARNING: Read-only repository access mode selected via `cvs -R'. Cheers, Paul.
[sane-devel] Anon cvs problems
Cit?t Paul Smedley p...@smedley.info: HI All, Anyone else seeing this error when trying to update cvs via anonymous login? cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane co sane-backends cvs [checkout aborted]: unrecognized auth response from cvs.alioth.debian.org: cvs: WARNING: Read-only repository access mode selected via `cvs -R'. I was experiencing the same yesterday. s. -- http://stefan.agentfarms.net First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
[sane-devel] Re: Is reverse engineering legal ?
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 17:29 +0200, Julien HENRY wrote: No, I don't include ASM in my program. I just inspect ASM to understand USB logs, and I write my personnal C code that imitate what ASM does. Yeah. And they can claim that they developed the algorithms and thus you're violating their Copyright. By actually looking at their code you're tainted. Ultimately, it's your choice (and possibly problem). I wouldn't do it that way for the given reasons. johannes -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20050808/be6d7bef/attachment.pgp From p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk Mon Aug 8 09:31:36 2005 From: p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul F. Johnson) Date: Mon Aug 8 09:52:27 2005 Subject: [sane-devel] Re: Is reverse engineering legal ? In-Reply-To: 1123491622.6068.16.camel@localhost References: 20050806152904.58093.qm...@web26610.mail.ukl.yahoo.com 1123491622.6068.16.camel@localhost Message-ID: ikwd4o.shf...@webmail.all-the-johnsons.co.uk Hi, No, I don't include ASM in my program. I just inspect ASM to understand USB logs, and I write my personnal C code that imitate what ASM does. Yeah. And they can claim that they developed the algorithms and thus you're violating their Copyright. By actually looking at their code you're tainted. Depends on if you're in the EU or not. In the EU, if either the company has gone to the wall or the software will not work on your specific hardware, you can (in some circumstances) reverse engineer the source to fix it. IANAL, but looking at logs doesn't taint anyone - logs just tell you what messages have been sent, nothing about the code etc. Ultimately, it's your choice (and possibly problem). I wouldn't do it that way for the given reasons. That's always the choice. I know I've reverse engineered the odd scanner printer or three, released the source and nothing has happened (I even offered it to the company who made the scanner!) TTFN Paul -- Logic, my dear Zoe, is merely the ability to be wrong with authority - Dr Who
[sane-devel] genesys gl841 patch
Hi, This is the newest and hopefully final version of my genesys_com patch. This patch makes the bulk transfer functions chip specific and completes the gl841 side with a gamma bulk transfer function. It also moves the last two occurances of send_slope_table inside the chip specific init functions. Lastly it corrects the register arrays for gl841. Please check it does not break anything on the gl646 side. If there are no complaints this patch can go into cvs. Regards, Pierre -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: genesys_com.diff.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 6982 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20050808/d6811883/genesys_com.diff-0001.bin From an...@pfeiffer.edu Mon Aug 8 13:26:35 2005 From: an...@pfeiffer.edu (m. allan noah) Date: Mon Aug 8 13:27:33 2005 Subject: [sane-devel] latest sane screwed up my hoary box In-Reply-To: c18d39a20508060936df4f...@mail.gmail.com References: c18d39a20508060936df4f...@mail.gmail.com Message-ID: pine.lnx.4.61.0508080922130.25...@limos.pfeiffer.edu On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Jon Dodson wrote: so i downloaded the latest sane to support my astra scanner. i ran configure, no worries, ran make, no worries. ran sudo checkinstall -D and my whole box went crazy. windows started popping up, then all my gnome icons were X'ed out. finally i can not login in it says Cannot cd to /home/jdodson I cant login with any other user. I downloaded sane via your website, WTF kind of software is this? Some sort of trojan? it was the sanebackend 1.0.15 from here: ftp://ftp.sane-project.org/pub/sane/sane-backends-1.0.15/ I am using an old laptop because all I can do it go into single user mode on my ubuntu machine, a little help here as you caused the issue in the first place? woah, back off buddy. checkinstall is not part of sane. if running the command 'checkinstall' caused all sorts of crazy problems, then i recommend you start with that, since it presumably does not _run_ any part of sane either. btw I install packages from source all the time, first issue i have ever had. if you do this all the time, wtf is up with you not following the directions that come with the source? the directions that dont mention checkinstall, i might add. you went off into the weeds own your own, now you get to find your way back to the trail on your own. allan -- so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls - Max Cavalera
[sane-devel] scanimage/saned segfault
I'm playing with network scanning. I have a Linksys NSLU2 running Unslung (the opened-up firmware) acting as the scanner server (for an Epson Perfection 1670, backend is snapscan) scanner. Local scanning works fine at 8.5x11 (large debug output): http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/scanimage-local-8.5x11.txt Network scanning works fine at a size of 6x4 (more debug output): http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/saned-6x4.txt http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/scanimage-net-6x4.txt However, when I try a network scan at 8.5x11, scanimage dies with a broken pipe and saned segfaults (yet more debug output): http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/saned-8.5x11.txt http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/scanimage-net-8.5x11.txt Thoughts? -- Scott Hazen Mueller | sc...@zorch.sf-bay.org or zorch!scott Boycott Internet Spam: See URL:http://spam.abuse.net/.
[sane-devel] scanimage/saned segfault
scott, not enough data from the debug logs there. with both the endianness and alignment issues of gcc on the slug, it could be a host of things. can you try doing some differences in color depth and resolution, and see if it is truly size based, or rather data size based. can you verify that your setup works with an x86 linux box in place of the slug? can you try openslug? allan nslu2-linux moderator, and sane backend maintainer. On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Scott Hazen Mueller wrote: I'm playing with network scanning. I have a Linksys NSLU2 running Unslung (the opened-up firmware) acting as the scanner server (for an Epson Perfection 1670, backend is snapscan) scanner. Local scanning works fine at 8.5x11 (large debug output): http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/scanimage-local-8.5x11.txt Network scanning works fine at a size of 6x4 (more debug output): http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/saned-6x4.txt http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/scanimage-net-6x4.txt However, when I try a network scan at 8.5x11, scanimage dies with a broken pipe and saned segfaults (yet more debug output): http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/saned-8.5x11.txt http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/scanimage-net-8.5x11.txt Thoughts? -- so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls - Max Cavalera