[sane-devel] Proposed patch for the snapscan semaphore issue

2008-03-15 Thread Julien BLACHE 
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 03_snapscan_usb_ftok_fix.dpatch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4878 bytes
Desc: snapscan ftok() patch
Url : 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080315/33972d1d/attachment.bin

[sane-devel] Formulardaten

2008-03-15 Thread cgi-mai...@kundenserver.de 


===
== Neuer Eintrag
===

  
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---

1. Your email address:
   'maxsalvetti at gmail.com'
2. Manufacturer (e.g. "Mustek"):
   'hp'
3. Model name (e.g. ScanExpress 1200UB):
   'G2410'
4. Bus type:
   'USB'
5. Vendor id (e.g. 0x001):
   '0x03f0'
6. Product id (e.g. 0x0002):
   '0x0a01'
7. Chipset (e.g. lm9831):
   'GL646_HP'
8. Comments (e.g. similar to Mustek 1234):
   ''
9. Data (e.g. sane-find-scanner -v -v):
   '
bLength   18
bDescriptorType   1
bcdUSB1.10
bDeviceClass  255
bDeviceSubClass   255
bDeviceProtocol   255
bMaxPacketSize0   8
idVendor  0x03F0
idProduct 0x0A01
bcdDevice 1.01
iManufacturer 1 (Hewlett-Packard)
iProduct  2 (hp scanjet scanner)
iSerialNumber 12 (CC79GS20Z3)
bNumConfigurations1
 
 bLength  9
 bDescriptorType  2
 wTotalLength 39
 bNumInterfaces   1
 bConfigurationValue  1
 iConfiguration   0 ()
 bmAttributes 192 (Self-powered)
 MaxPower 48 mA
  
   
   bLength9
   bDescriptorType4
   bInterfaceNumber   0
   bAlternateSetting  0
   bNumEndpoints  3
   bInterfaceClass255
   bInterfaceSubClass 255
   bInterfaceProtocol 255
   iInterface 0 ()

bLength   7
bDescriptorType   5
bEndpointAddress  0x81 (in 0x01)
bmAttributes  2 (bulk)
wMaxPacketSize64
bInterval 0 ms
bRefresh  0
bSynchAddress 0

bLength   7
bDescriptorType   5
bEndpointAddress  0x02 (out 0x02)
bmAttributes  2 (bulk)
wMaxPacketSize64
bInterval 0 ms
bRefresh  0
bSynchAddress 0

bLength   7
bDescriptorType   5
bEndpointAddress  0x83 (in 0x03)
bmAttributes  3 (interrupt)
wMaxPacketSize1
bInterval 8 ms
bRefresh  0
bSynchAddress 0


found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [Hewlett-Packard], product=0x0a01 [hp scanjet 
scanner], chip=GL646_HP) at libusb:001:005

'

[sane-devel] SANE backend epson2 and Epson Perfection V700 Photo

2008-03-15 Thread Alessandro Zummo 
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:42:18 +0100
Adolf Winterer  wrote:

> > > 2. What function is currently NOT supported in the epson2 backend for the
> > > V700 Photo?
> >
> >  dunno, maybe Olaf knows..
> 
> Is Olaf reading the sane-devel list? Can I contact him?

 He is reading and it usually answers quickly, I believe he is just
 busy.
 
> > > 3. Is there currently any work in progress for the V700 Photo in the
> > > epson2 backend?
> >
> >  no.
> >
> > > If the answer to question 3 is "no", how can I help with this (I'm not a
> > > C programmer)?
> >
> >  by testing the backend with debugging enabled an providing log files if
> >  something does not work.
> 
> Can I damage my hardware with that kind of work?

 You're safe at 99%, however no one is going to guarantee that :)

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

[sane-devel] SANE backend epson2 and Epson Perfection V700 Photo

2008-03-15 Thread Adolf Winterer 

Thank you for your answer, Alessandro.

Am Freitag, 14. M?rz 2008 15:17 schrieb Alessandro Zummo:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:50:27 +0100
>
> Adolf Winterer  wrote:
> > Can anyone on the list please help me with the following questions?
> >
> > 1. What is missing from the epson2 backend to reach the "complete" status
> > for the Epson V700 Photo?
>
>  maybe some particular features of the scanner are missing. I myself
>  don't own one, but given that is has been listed as good on epson backend
>  it should work well on epson2 too.

I've not yet made up my mind. Maybe I just take the risk and buy the device.

> > 2. What function is currently NOT supported in the epson2 backend for the
> > V700 Photo?
>
>  dunno, maybe Olaf knows..

Is Olaf reading the sane-devel list? Can I contact him?

> > 3. Is there currently any work in progress for the V700 Photo in the
> > epson2 backend?
>
>  no.
>
> > If the answer to question 3 is "no", how can I help with this (I'm not a
> > C programmer)?
>
>  by testing the backend with debugging enabled an providing log files if
>  something does not work.

Can I damage my hardware with that kind of work?

Best regards,
   Adolf

[sane-devel] Formulardaten

2008-03-15 Thread cgi-mai...@kundenserver.de 


===
== Neuer Eintrag
===

  
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---

1. Your email address:
   'tonkayeep at hotmail.com'
2. Manufacturer (e.g. "Mustek"):
   'canon'
3. Model name (e.g. ScanExpress 1200UB):
   'canonscan fb620u'
4. Bus type:
   'USB'
5. Vendor id (e.g. 0x001):
   'f912900'
6. Product id (e.g. 0x0002):
   'cxd213794'
7. Chipset (e.g. lm9831):
   ''
8. Comments (e.g. similar to Mustek 1234):
   ''
9. Data (e.g. sane-find-scanner -v -v):
   ''