[sane-devel] Support for Canon LiDE 80

2008-08-23 Thread Vital Mission Software
On Friday 22 August 2008 21:36, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:

> I don't remember exactly how far the two attempts got, skimming the
> emails i get the impression that the motor control worked, but the
> optical system could not be coaxed to deliver data.


> Regards,
>Pierre

Thank you for this.

Keith.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080823/14cb6c00/attachment.pgp
 


[sane-devel] Support for Canon LiDE 80

2008-08-22 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Hi Keith,

Vital Mission Software schrieb:
> I would like to see if I can get my LiDE 80 to work. It is marked as 
> unsupported since 2007-01-28. It appears in the udev/libsane.rules, but 
> not in genesys_devices.c. However, that does include support for LiDE 
> up to 60 and I note that the tables for 50 and 60 differ in only one 
> number.
> 
> Would it be safe to copy the 60 table and call it the 80 table?
> 
> If so, is it likely to work?

That does not work out of the box, see the thread starting at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2005-December/015752.html

Here is another attempt to get it to work:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2008-February/020959.html

I don't remember exactly how far the two attempts got, skimming the 
emails i get the impression that the motor control worked, but the 
optical system could not be coaxed to deliver data.

 > Keith Harwood.

Regards,
   Pierre



[sane-devel] Support for Canon LiDE 80

2008-08-22 Thread Vital Mission Software
I would like to see if I can get my LiDE 80 to work. It is marked as 
unsupported since 2007-01-28. It appears in the udev/libsane.rules, but 
not in genesys_devices.c. However, that does include support for LiDE 
up to 60 and I note that the tables for 50 and 60 differ in only one 
number.

Would it be safe to copy the 60 table and call it the 80 table?

If so, is it likely to work?

Keith Harwood.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080822/592c53d6/attachment.pgp