[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Tymoteusz pisze:
> Ren? Rebe pisze:
>> Tymoteusz wrote:
>>> Ren? Rebe pisze:
Hi,
Tymoteusz wrote:
> Ren? Rebe pisze:
>> Tymoteusz wrote:
>>> Rene Rebe pisze:
Hi,
On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote:
> m. allan noah pisze:
>> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote:
>>
Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much.
However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or
variant) or even
the console text terminal to check your basic image processing
functionality ...
Yours,
--
Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org |
http://rene.rebe.name
>>> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've
>>> compiled old
>>> sane-backends 1.0.18
>>> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for
>>> now, but i
>>> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway
>>> to solve
>>> this problem ?
>>>
>> yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously
>>
>> allan
>>
>> when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a
>>
>>> bit more this issue.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>>> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my
> previous post
> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday
found a similar
problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround
when done.
Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the
scanner warm
it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend?
Yours,
>>> Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any
>>> difference.
>>> Regards.
>>
>> Where is the log to take a look?
>>
>> Btw. I just noticed in the source I have on the screen the 7400
>> is marked as AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS, which essentially ignores the
>> light warmup state in the code. Can you review if your backend
>> source you installed from contains this?
>>
>> Yours,
>>
> Hmm
>
> AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS appears in:
>
> /backend/
>767:avision.c
>2477:avision.c
>107:avision.h
>
>
> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
> 7400_old.log is previous log
> 7400.log is new one.
>
> also i'm sure that something had triggered lamp warmup because
> after 40min scanner was very hot (much warmer then after 30 scan's
> committed with old version of avison).
So, still waiting for the light. Can you add a return
SANE_STATUS_GOODM;
in the beginning of your wait_4_light() function in avision.c?
If I find some time I'll send you some workaround for testing, as
maybe the silicon would report a correct status if polled less often.
If you have free time you could also test upfront if changing the
sleep(1) that should be in your function to sleep(10) or sleep(20)
fixes light detection for your scanner.
Yours,
>>> hmm i need some more info becuse i had
>>>
>>> avision.c: In function 'wait_4_light':
>>> avision.c:2439: error: 'SANE_STATUS_GOODM' undeclared (first use in
>>> this function)
>>>
>>>
>>> i had puted this here:
>>>
>>> wait_4_light (Avision_Scanner* s)
>>> {
>>> return SANE_STATUS_GOODM; <<
>>> Avision_Device* dev = s->hw;
>>>
>>> /* read stuff */
>>> struct command_read rcmd;
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>
>> Sorry, the trailing M was a typo from my side. SANE_STATUS_GOOD
>> (taking a 2nd look) it should be.
>>
>> Depending on your compiler you might have to move the return after
>> the variable declarations ...
>>
>> Yours,
>>
> Well thats gives difference.
> Scanner have moved his head and started initialization.
> But then stoped.
> new log (7400_1.log) is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
>
> Regards
>
>
Hello after while. I would like to ask about this problem, did there is
available any fix for this yet ?
Regards
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
HI, in the meantime we found the bug, some assignments got lost during some merge window. I'll commit the a fix to CVS today. On 07.04.2008, at 02:42, Gabriele Gorla wrote: > I don't have the debug log (I can post it later if > necessary), but I the backend stopped working for me > too on a completely different configuration. > OS: debian testing > CPU: alpha ev68 > Xorg: 7.2 > video: matrox millennium II > > thanks, > GG > > Tymoteusz wrote: >> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment >> i've compiled old >> sane-backends 1.0.18 >> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's >> working for now, but i >> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there >> anyway to solve >> this problem ? when i catch some more time i will try >> to investigate a >> bit more this issue. >> >> Regards >> >>> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. >>> >>> However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm >> (or variant) or even >>> the console text terminal to check your basic image >> processing >>> functionality ... >>> >>> Yours, >>> >>> -- >>> Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, >> Berlin >>> http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | >>> http://rene.rebe.name -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
I don't have the debug log (I can post it later if necessary), but I the backend stopped working for me too on a completely different configuration. OS: debian testing CPU: alpha ev68 Xorg: 7.2 video: matrox millennium II thanks, GG Tymoteusz wrote: >Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment >i've compiled old >sane-backends 1.0.18 >and my scaner had return to previous state, it's >working for now, but i >think that this situation is not so fine. Is there >anyway to solve >this problem ? when i catch some more time i will try >to investigate a >bit more this issue. > >Regards > >> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. >> >> However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm >(or variant) or even >> the console text terminal to check your basic image >processing >> functionality ... >> >> Yours, >> >> -- >> Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, >Berlin >> http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | >>http://rene.rebe.name You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Ren? Rebe pisze:
> Tymoteusz wrote:
>> Ren? Rebe pisze:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Tymoteusz wrote:
Ren? Rebe pisze:
> Tymoteusz wrote:
>> Rene Rebe pisze:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote:
>>>
m. allan noah pisze:
> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote:
>
>>> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much.
>>>
>>>
>>> However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or
>>> variant) or even
>>> the console text terminal to check your basic image processing
>>> functionality ...
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
>>> http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org |
>>> http://rene.rebe.name
>>>
>> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've
>> compiled old
>> sane-backends 1.0.18
>> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for
>> now, but i
>> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway
>> to solve
>> this problem ?
>>
> yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously
>
> allan
>
> when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a
>
>> bit more this issue.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> --
>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>
>>
>
>
oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous
post
log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
>>> It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday found
>>> a similar
>>> problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround when
>>> done.
>>>
>>> Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the scanner
>>> warm
>>> it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend?
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>>
>> Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any
>> difference.
>> Regards.
>
> Where is the log to take a look?
>
> Btw. I just noticed in the source I have on the screen the 7400
> is marked as AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS, which essentially ignores the
> light warmup state in the code. Can you review if your backend
> source you installed from contains this?
>
> Yours,
>
Hmm
AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS appears in:
/backend/
767:avision.c
2477:avision.c
107:avision.h
log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
7400_old.log is previous log
7400.log is new one.
also i'm sure that something had triggered lamp warmup because
after 40min scanner was very hot (much warmer then after 30 scan's
committed with old version of avison).
>>>
>>> So, still waiting for the light. Can you add a return
>>> SANE_STATUS_GOODM;
>>> in the beginning of your wait_4_light() function in avision.c?
>>>
>>> If I find some time I'll send you some workaround for testing, as
>>> maybe the silicon would report a correct status if polled less often.
>>>
>>> If you have free time you could also test upfront if changing the
>>> sleep(1) that should be in your function to sleep(10) or sleep(20)
>>> fixes light detection for your scanner.
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>>
>> hmm i need some more info becuse i had
>>
>> avision.c: In function 'wait_4_light':
>> avision.c:2439: error: 'SANE_STATUS_GOODM' undeclared (first use in
>> this function)
>>
>>
>> i had puted this here:
>>
>> wait_4_light (Avision_Scanner* s)
>> {
>> return SANE_STATUS_GOODM; <<
>> Avision_Device* dev = s->hw;
>>
>> /* read stuff */
>> struct command_read rcmd;
>>
>>
>> Regards
>
> Sorry, the trailing M was a typo from my side. SANE_STATUS_GOOD
> (taking a 2nd look) it should be.
>
> Depending on your compiler you might have to move the return after
> the variable declarations ...
>
> Yours,
>
Well thats gives difference.
Scanner have moved his head and started initialization.
But then stoped.
new log (7400_1.log) is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
Regards
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Tymoteusz wrote:
> Ren? Rebe pisze:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tymoteusz wrote:
>>> Ren? Rebe pisze:
Tymoteusz wrote:
> Rene Rebe pisze:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote:
>>
>>> m. allan noah pisze:
On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote:
>> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much.
>>
>>
>> However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant)
>> or even
>> the console text terminal to check your basic image processing
>> functionality ...
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> --
>> Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
>> http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org |
>> http://rene.rebe.name
>>
> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've
> compiled old
> sane-backends 1.0.18
> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for
> now, but i
> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to
> solve
> this problem ?
>
yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously
allan
when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a
> bit more this issue.
>
> Regards
>
>
> --
> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>
>
>>> oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous post
>>> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
>> It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday found a
>> similar
>> problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround when
>> done.
>>
>> Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the scanner warm
>> it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend?
>>
>> Yours,
>>
> Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any
> difference.
> Regards.
Where is the log to take a look?
Btw. I just noticed in the source I have on the screen the 7400
is marked as AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS, which essentially ignores the
light warmup state in the code. Can you review if your backend
source you installed from contains this?
Yours,
>>> Hmm
>>>
>>> AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS appears in:
>>>
>>> /backend/
>>>767:avision.c
>>>2477:avision.c
>>>107:avision.h
>>>
>>>
>>> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
>>> 7400_old.log is previous log
>>> 7400.log is new one.
>>>
>>> also i'm sure that something had triggered lamp warmup because after
>>> 40min scanner was very hot (much warmer then after 30 scan's
>>> committed with old version of avison).
>>
>> So, still waiting for the light. Can you add a return SANE_STATUS_GOODM;
>> in the beginning of your wait_4_light() function in avision.c?
>>
>> If I find some time I'll send you some workaround for testing, as
>> maybe the silicon would report a correct status if polled less often.
>>
>> If you have free time you could also test upfront if changing the
>> sleep(1) that should be in your function to sleep(10) or sleep(20)
>> fixes light detection for your scanner.
>>
>> Yours,
>>
> hmm i need some more info becuse i had
>
> avision.c: In function 'wait_4_light':
> avision.c:2439: error: 'SANE_STATUS_GOODM' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
>
>
> i had puted this here:
>
> wait_4_light (Avision_Scanner* s)
> {
> return SANE_STATUS_GOODM; <<
> Avision_Device* dev = s->hw;
>
> /* read stuff */
> struct command_read rcmd;
>
>
> Regards
Sorry, the trailing M was a typo from my side. SANE_STATUS_GOOD
(taking a 2nd look) it should be.
Depending on your compiler you might have to move the return after
the variable declarations ...
Yours,
--
Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Ren? Rebe pisze:
> Hi,
>
> Tymoteusz wrote:
>> Ren? Rebe pisze:
>>> Tymoteusz wrote:
Rene Rebe pisze:
> Hi,
>
> On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote:
>
>> m. allan noah pisze:
>>> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote:
>>>
> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much.
>
>
> However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant)
> or even
> the console text terminal to check your basic image processing
> functionality ...
>
> Yours,
>
> --
> Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
> http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org |
> http://rene.rebe.name
>
Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've
compiled old
sane-backends 1.0.18
and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for
now, but i
think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to
solve
this problem ?
>>> yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously
>>>
>>> allan
>>>
>>> when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a
>>>
bit more this issue.
Regards
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>>
>>>
>> oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous post
>> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
> It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday found a
> similar
> problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround when
> done.
>
> Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the scanner warm
> it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend?
>
> Yours,
>
Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any
difference.
Regards.
>>>
>>> Where is the log to take a look?
>>>
>>> Btw. I just noticed in the source I have on the screen the 7400
>>> is marked as AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS, which essentially ignores the
>>> light warmup state in the code. Can you review if your backend
>>> source you installed from contains this?
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>>
>> Hmm
>>
>> AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS appears in:
>>
>> /backend/
>>767:avision.c
>>2477:avision.c
>>107:avision.h
>>
>>
>> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
>> 7400_old.log is previous log
>> 7400.log is new one.
>>
>> also i'm sure that something had triggered lamp warmup because after
>> 40min scanner was very hot (much warmer then after 30 scan's
>> committed with old version of avison).
>
> So, still waiting for the light. Can you add a return SANE_STATUS_GOODM;
> in the beginning of your wait_4_light() function in avision.c?
>
> If I find some time I'll send you some workaround for testing, as
> maybe the silicon would report a correct status if polled less often.
>
> If you have free time you could also test upfront if changing the
> sleep(1) that should be in your function to sleep(10) or sleep(20)
> fixes light detection for your scanner.
>
> Yours,
>
hmm i need some more info becuse i had
avision.c: In function 'wait_4_light':
avision.c:2439: error: 'SANE_STATUS_GOODM' undeclared (first use in this
function)
i had puted this here:
wait_4_light (Avision_Scanner* s)
{
return SANE_STATUS_GOODM; <<
Avision_Device* dev = s->hw;
/* read stuff */
struct command_read rcmd;
Regards
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Hi, Tymoteusz wrote: > Ren? Rebe pisze: >> Tymoteusz wrote: >>> Rene Rebe pisze: Hi, On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote: > m. allan noah pisze: >> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote: >> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or even the console text terminal to check your basic image processing functionality ... Yours, -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name >>> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've >>> compiled old >>> sane-backends 1.0.18 >>> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for now, >>> but i >>> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to >>> solve >>> this problem ? >>> >> yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously >> >> allan >> >> when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a >> >>> bit more this issue. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> -- >>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org >>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel >>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" >>> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org >>> >>> >> >> > oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous post > log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday found a similar problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround when done. Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the scanner warm it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend? Yours, >>> Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any difference. >>> Regards. >> >> Where is the log to take a look? >> >> Btw. I just noticed in the source I have on the screen the 7400 >> is marked as AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS, which essentially ignores the >> light warmup state in the code. Can you review if your backend >> source you installed from contains this? >> >> Yours, >> > Hmm > > AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS appears in: > > /backend/ >767:avision.c >2477:avision.c >107:avision.h > > > log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A > 7400_old.log is previous log > 7400.log is new one. > > also i'm sure that something had triggered lamp warmup because after > 40min scanner was very hot (much warmer then after 30 scan's committed > with old version of avison). So, still waiting for the light. Can you add a return SANE_STATUS_GOODM; in the beginning of your wait_4_light() function in avision.c? If I find some time I'll send you some workaround for testing, as maybe the silicon would report a correct status if polled less often. If you have free time you could also test upfront if changing the sleep(1) that should be in your function to sleep(10) or sleep(20) fixes light detection for your scanner. Yours, -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Susanne Klaus, Ren? Rebe Sitz: Berlin, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 105 123 B USt-IdNr.: DE251602478 http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Ren? Rebe pisze: > Tymoteusz wrote: >> Rene Rebe pisze: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote: >>> m. allan noah pisze: > On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote: > >>> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. >>> >>> >>> However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) >>> or even >>> the console text terminal to check your basic image processing >>> functionality ... >>> >>> Yours, >>> >>> -- >>> Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin >>> http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | >>> http://rene.rebe.name >>> >> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've >> compiled old >> sane-backends 1.0.18 >> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for now, >> but i >> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to >> solve >> this problem ? >> > yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously > > allan > > when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a > >> bit more this issue. >> >> Regards >> >> >> -- >> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel >> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" >> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org >> >> > > oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous post log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A >>> It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday found a >>> similar >>> problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround when done. >>> >>> Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the scanner warm >>> it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend? >>> >>> Yours, >>> >> Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any difference. >> Regards. > > Where is the log to take a look? > > Btw. I just noticed in the source I have on the screen the 7400 > is marked as AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS, which essentially ignores the > light warmup state in the code. Can you review if your backend > source you installed from contains this? > > Yours, > Hmm AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS appears in: /backend/ 767:avision.c 2477:avision.c 107:avision.h log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A 7400_old.log is previous log 7400.log is new one. also i'm sure that something had triggered lamp warmup because after 40min scanner was very hot (much warmer then after 30 scan's committed with old version of avison). Regards
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Tymoteusz wrote: > Rene Rebe pisze: >> Hi, >> >> On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote: >> >>> m. allan noah pisze: On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote: >> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. >> >> >> However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or >> even >> the console text terminal to check your basic image processing >> functionality ... >> >> Yours, >> >> -- >> Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin >> http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name >> > Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've compiled > old > sane-backends 1.0.18 > and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for now, > but i > think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to solve > this problem ? > yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously allan when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a > bit more this issue. > > Regards > > > -- > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > > >>> oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous post >>> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A >> It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday found a >> similar >> problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround when done. >> >> Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the scanner warm >> it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend? >> >> Yours, >> > Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any difference. > Regards. Where is the log to take a look? Btw. I just noticed in the source I have on the screen the 7400 is marked as AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS, which essentially ignores the light warmup state in the code. Can you review if your backend source you installed from contains this? Yours, -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Susanne Klaus, Ren? Rebe Sitz: Berlin, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 105 123 B USt-IdNr.: DE251602478 http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Rene Rebe pisze: > Hi, > > On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote: > >> m. allan noah pisze: >>> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote: >>> > Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. > > > However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or > even > the console text terminal to check your basic image processing > functionality ... > > Yours, > > -- > Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin > http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name > Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've compiled old sane-backends 1.0.18 and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for now, but i think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to solve this problem ? >>> >>> yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously >>> >>> allan >>> >>> when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a >>> bit more this issue. Regards -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org >>> >>> >>> >> oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous post >> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A > > It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday found a > similar > problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround when done. > > Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the scanner warm > it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend? > > Yours, > Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any difference. Regards.
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Hi, On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote: > m. allan noah pisze: >> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote: >> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or even the console text terminal to check your basic image processing functionality ... Yours, -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http:// rene.rebe.name >>> >>> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've >>> compiled old >>> sane-backends 1.0.18 >>> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for now, >>> but i >>> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to >>> solve >>> this problem ? >>> >> >> yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously >> >> allan >> >> when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a >> >>> bit more this issue. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> -- >>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org >>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel >>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" >>> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org >>> >>> >> >> >> > oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous post > log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday found a similar problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround when done. Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the scanner warm it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend? Yours, -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
m. allan noah pisze: > On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote: > >>> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. >>> >> > >> > However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or even >> > the console text terminal to check your basic image processing >> > functionality ... >> > >> > Yours, >> > >> > -- >> > Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin >> > http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name >> > >> >> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've compiled old >> sane-backends 1.0.18 >> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for now, but i >> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to solve >> this problem ? >> > > yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously > > allan > > when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a > >> bit more this issue. >> >> Regards >> >> >> -- >> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel >> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" >> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org >> >> > > > oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous post log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A Regards
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. > > However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or even > the console text terminal to check your basic image processing > functionality ... > > Yours, > > -- > Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin > http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name > Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've compiled old sane-backends 1.0.18 and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for now, but i think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to solve this problem ? when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a bit more this issue. Regards
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
HI, On 03.04.2008, at 17:28, blizzi wrote: > Hi i've got some more info about crash of kooka & xsane. > its looks like you were right. > > this is part of my Xorg.0.log > > SetClientVersion: 0 9 > SetClientVersion: 0 9 > (II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket) > (II) APM registered successfully > (II) NVIDIA(0): Initialized GART. > (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "1280x1024 at 75" > > Backtrace: > 0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x7e) [0x80c780e] > 1: [0xb7fc4420] > 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//nvidia_drv.so(_nv001216X+0xe5) > [0xb71dc711] > 3: [0x1] > > Fatal server error: > Caught signal 11. Server aborting > > so it can be nvidia..., anyway i will take a look on problem at my old > matrox g400. > here is also part of kern.log > > "Apr 3 17:13:03 static- kernel: [16920.863423] Xorg[7461]: > segfault at 68978bfc eip 080c671b esp bffe6600 error 4" Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or even the console text terminal to check your basic image processing functionality ... Yours, -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote: > > Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. > > > > However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or even > > the console text terminal to check your basic image processing > > functionality ... > > > > Yours, > > > > -- > > Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin > > http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name > > > > Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've compiled old > sane-backends 1.0.18 > and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for now, but i > think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway to solve > this problem ? yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously allan when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a > bit more this issue. > > Regards > > > -- > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Hi i've got some more info about crash of kooka & xsane. its looks like you were right. this is part of my Xorg.0.log SetClientVersion: 0 9 SetClientVersion: 0 9 (II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket) (II) APM registered successfully (II) NVIDIA(0): Initialized GART. (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "1280x1024 at 75" Backtrace: 0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x7e) [0x80c780e] 1: [0xb7fc4420] 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//nvidia_drv.so(_nv001216X+0xe5) [0xb71dc711] 3: [0x1] Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting so it can be nvidia..., anyway i will take a look on problem at my old matrox g400. here is also part of kern.log "Apr 3 17:13:03 static- kernel: [16920.863423] Xorg[7461]: segfault at 68978bfc eip 080c671b esp bffe6600 error 4" Regards
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Ok thx for fast replay. i've uploaded logs here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A I hope that this issue with xsane & kooka is not driver fault (nvidia-96xx here). Regards.
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Yes, the debug log would be welcome. Sidenot: a backend, mine specifically, should not be able to interfere with Xorg. If Xorg crashes than more likely due to an bug allocating an overly large pixmap from XSane or Kooka or something like that. Though of corse Xorg (the X server or an driver) should neither crash in that case ... :-) On 03.04.2008, at 13:22, m. allan noah wrote: > Try getting a debug log of the avision backend, at the console, run > all on one line: > > SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7 scanimage >foo.pnm 2>7400.log > > and then lets see whats in that log. > > allan > > ps- i've also cc'd the backend author for help. > > On 4/2/08, Tymoteusz wrote: >> Hi all >> recently my hp7400c stop working after sane upgrade. >> i have tested problem on arch linux and ubuntu 8.04 >> both of them have kernel 2.6.24 and both have recent sane-backends >> i'm attaching log from scanimage -d avision:libusb:001:002 with set >> SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7. >> Effect is not always the same if i try to scan trough xsane or >> kooka then >> i'm getting crash not only of xsane but whole xorg. I will snoop >> this aspect >> of problem. If i catch something then i'll send info. >> if someone have any ideas how to solve problem i will be pleased to >> hear >> it. >> Regards. -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Try getting a debug log of the avision backend, at the console, run all on one line: SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7 scanimage >foo.pnm 2>7400.log and then lets see whats in that log. allan ps- i've also cc'd the backend author for help. On 4/2/08, Tymoteusz wrote: > Hi all > recently my hp7400c stop working after sane upgrade. > i have tested problem on arch linux and ubuntu 8.04 > both of them have kernel 2.6.24 and both have recent sane-backends > i'm attaching log from scanimage -d avision:libusb:001:002 with set > SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7. > Effect is not always the same if i try to scan trough xsane or kooka then > i'm getting crash not only of xsane but whole xorg. I will snoop this aspect > of problem. If i catch something then i'll send info. > if someone have any ideas how to solve problem i will be pleased to hear > it. > Regards. > > > -- > sane-devel mailing list: > sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > > -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
[sane-devel] hp7400c won't work with latest sane ?
Hi all recently my hp7400c stop working after sane upgrade. i have tested problem on arch linux and ubuntu 8.04 both of them have kernel 2.6.24 and both have recent sane-backends i'm attaching log from scanimage -d avision:libusb:001:002 with set SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7. Effect is not always the same if i try to scan trough xsane or kooka then i'm getting crash not only of xsane but whole xorg. I will snoop this aspect of problem. If i catch something then i'll send info. if someone have any ideas how to solve problem i will be pleased to hear it. Regards. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: debug.log.gz Type: application/gzip Size: 4381 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080403/6a8c8a92/attachment.bin
