Re: [Savannah-hackers] [yeupou@gnu.org: Re: apparently something lost at gnueval [jemarch@es.gnu.org: hurdppc as a GNU package]]
The message was never passed to evaluators, it was sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. We at gnueval haven't received the request. That localizes the problem, so I will investigate there. Thanks. ___ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
Re: [Savannah-hackers] [yeupou@gnu.org: Re: apparently something lost at gnueval [jemarch@es.gnu.org: hurdppc as a GNU package]]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The message was never passed to evaluators, it was sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. We at gnueval haven't received the request. Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did you receive the cc'd the message saying that the request had > been passed to the evaluators? > > From: Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: apparently something lost at gnueval [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hurdppc as a > GNU package] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 08 Sep 2003 18:46:36 +0200 > > Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > Can you tell me why Jose did not get a response? > > > How did our system drop his request, and how can we > > > change it so that won't happen again. > > > > > > Loic, can you please take charge of making sure the > > > system is corrected? > > > > It's not a Savannah bug (apparently each time something is lost, > > Savannah get the blame). > > The following mail has been sent to gnueval the 21 Jun, when the > > project was register, so you should ask to the gnueval team for an > > explanation. > > > > When you send something to gnueval, do you also ack to the person who > > made the request, and tell him that you have asked the evaluators to > > look at it? > > The person who made the request is automatically added in Cc. > This mail is generated so, as long as we trust our software, there's > no doubt here -- as each time we use this tool, mail get sent with > correct headers, I think we can trust our software. > > Regards, > > - -- > Mathieu Roy > > Homepage: > http://yeupou.coleumes.org > Not a native english speaker: > http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english > -- > > > > ___ > Savannah-hackers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers > > - -- Hugo Gayosso -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/ao2uMNObVRBZveYRAitmAKCHvW/x+OZAJ/b2+daJuqp3wg3UvQCfa7qB 1lE63NucARuFhBUqBGXuPjQ= =O4WL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
[Savannah-hackers] [yeupou@gnu.org: Re: apparently something lost at gnueval [jemarch@es.gnu.org: hurdppc as a GNU package]]
Did you receive the cc'd the message saying that the request had been passed to the evaluators? --- Start of forwarded message --- From: Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: apparently something lost at gnueval [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hurdppc as a GNU package] X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B60 6F7C 39D6 B03C 9024 CD52 365F 7FF7 2DA1 99B9 Date: 08 Sep 2003 18:46:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Can you tell me why Jose did not get a response? > > How did our system drop his request, and how can we > > change it so that won't happen again. > > > > Loic, can you please take charge of making sure the > > system is corrected? > > It's not a Savannah bug (apparently each time something is lost, > Savannah get the blame). > The following mail has been sent to gnueval the 21 Jun, when the > project was register, so you should ask to the gnueval team for an > explanation. > > When you send something to gnueval, do you also ack to the person who > made the request, and tell him that you have asked the evaluators to > look at it? The person who made the request is automatically added in Cc. This mail is generated so, as long as we trust our software, there's no doubt here -- as each time we use this tool, mail get sent with correct headers, I think we can trust our software. Regards, - -- Mathieu Roy Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org Not a native english speaker: http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english --- End of forwarded message --- ___ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
