Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] * See wiki * is not clear
Hi Nicodemo, I agree, it's currently frustrating both for the admins (pointing out same issues again and again) and the users (waiting very long and don't know why). I am going to compile a page where all our customary requirements are listed in one single list. Then we can remove the other checkboxes on the register page and accentuate that single link. My suggestion is to get the following message somehow across to the applicant on the register page (not literally): Your project will not be approved until all requirements applicable on this list are met. So you had better spent the 5 minutes to check it or be prepared to wait some weeks. Sebastian On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 17:47 -0500, Nicodemo Alvaro wrote: With the large amount of submissions not complying on first try, maybe it would be better to make it more evident that the See *Wiki* link the registration page could say How to Get Your Project Approved Quickly to make it more inviting. I was having a discussion with the OpenVRML applicant on how come we do not allow open in the name.
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] slightly confused on admitting pending projects
On 8/27/09, Karl Berry k...@freefriends.org wrote: Shall, I tell him to take the notices, from the original file and add it along with his copyright to the files he edited, and leave out the other files? That sounds like the clearest outcome. Now, he plans on distributing a source tarball with the lua files with a patch. I believe Gnuzilla does something similar. I would like to double check if it is required that he update those files included in the source tarball for download and easy compiling as well. Additionally, he claims to need the lua config file customized for his specific environment. I would think he should not distribute those. Is it problematic somehow, if he wants to? Nevermind, I read it wrong. -- Nicodemo
