[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

2017-10-13 Thread Nicolas Darnis 
Follow-up Comment #21, task #14578 (project administration):

Oups... All Makefile.am fixed.

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library

2017-10-13 Thread JoëlKrähemann 
Follow-up Comment #11, task #14667 (project administration):

Recently I have stated that libags_server.so is licensed under the terms of
the GNU AGPLv3+. The person corrected me and told we license source files and
not binaries.

You are complaining about copyright of generated files. I think it is
questionable if you can license them at all.

Another problem is more that as you run `autoreconf -fi` new versions of the
files are going to be installed. So copyright notice would be in first
instance misleading. Uncertain copyright fits the situation best since it is
up to upstream to make copyright decisions.

Recently I read about RMS arguing with free software license you should obtain
a patent, too. Is this yet solved?


___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14640] Submission of Generic GPM

2017-10-13 Thread Ineiev 
Update of task #14640 (project administration):

  Status: In Progress => Cancelled  
 Open/Closed:Open => Closed 

___

Follow-up Comment #3:

No response; cancelling.

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library

2017-10-13 Thread Ineiev 
Follow-up Comment #10, task #14667 (project administration):

I'm surely misunderstand your explanation: how do you justify files of
uncertain copyright status (which means those files are forbidden to
distribute) in your tarball?

Unfortunately, the submission of gsequencer doesn't clarify that very much.

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/