how to change the CD mount point

2013-10-15 Thread Edison, Arul (GE Healthcare)
HI,
I am porting my application from Redhat to Scientific Linux 6.3 
In Scientific Linux, the CD is mounted to mount point /media/CDROM_
I would like to change the mount point location to /mnt/cdrom
Any idea what is the configuration to change this?

Thanks,
Arul


Re: how to change the CD mount point

2013-10-15 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Um well that's not a porting issue that's a basic sysadmin issue.If the CD isn't being automouted by a GUI like they usually are nowadays then look at '/etc/fstab'.-- Sent from my HP Pre3On Oct 15, 2013 8:07, Edison, Arul (GE Healthcare) aruljeyananth.jamesedi...@ge.com wrote: HI,
I am porting my application from Redhat to Scientific Linux 6.3 
In Scientific Linux, the CD is mounted to mount point /media/CDROM_
I would like to change the mount point location to /mnt/cdrom
Any idea what is the configuration to change this?

Thanks,
Arul

Re: how to change the CD mount point

2013-10-15 Thread Chris Jones

Hi,

Mounting in /media is pretty standard these days. If you want your 
application to work on any SLC6 machine, you should instead be looking 
to fix your application to look in /media (as well as /mnt). This is not 
something your application can change, its a system setting.


Chris

On 15/10/13 13:06, Edison, Arul (GE Healthcare) wrote:

HI,
 I am porting my application from Redhat to Scientific Linux 6.3
In Scientific Linux, the CD is mounted to mount point /media/CDROM_
I would like to change the mount point location to /mnt/cdrom
Any idea what is the configuration to change this?

Thanks,
Arul



Re: blue griffon current production successfully built

2013-10-15 Thread Yasha Karant

From a terminal application within gnome, my default Python is:

[ykarant@jb344 ~]$ python
Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Feb 21 2013, 19:26:11)
[GCC 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.


despite having to install whatever the BlueGriffon build required.

A number of the responses concerning the build of BlueGriffon further 
underscore the general lack of polymorphism and encapsulation in the 
Linux environment as distributed.  In a proper modern OS environment, an 
application that requires non-system versions of applications (other 
than the core libraries required by the OS itself, a more daunting 
problem) would have only these in the path of both the building steps 
and during the execution of the built application, preferably still 
allowing a dynamic rather than a static image of the built application.


Yasha Karant

On 10/15/2013 12:06 AM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:

 Python2.7 can be installed in, say, /usr/local/..., while leaving
2.6 (or for SL5, 2.4) as the default version.  When you then need to use
version 2.7 there may be some pain with libraries, but perhaps not too
much to endure.

Steven Yellin

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:


I took a look a thte Fedora SRPM's, which unfortunately ended about 3
years
ago with a very out of date release. The current release requires Python
2.7, which is begging for pain to install on an SL 6 system.

SL 7 should be much more compatible with current releases.


On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu wrote:


On 10/14/2013 04:20 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:


On 10/14/2013 04:18 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:


I now have built from source BlueGriffon for X86-64 SL6x, version
1.7.2.99.20130729, Build 20131013142156, Codename 'Cla-de-Lue'

I can provide detailed instructions or just a copy of both the
mozconfig
file used for the build and the typescript of the building.

I have had to add a few RPMs to SL6x from other distributions.  There
was a query on a different thread (same general topic, but a different
subject line) as to why I used a 5x CentOS RPM for one of the
dependencies of the build.  I could not find a 6x EL version.  The
application was not a systems application that would
overwrite/override
other files, and seemed to be constrained with a unique
identifier.  My
experience is that many EL 5 and even EL 4 applications still work
with EL 6, as did this.  Presumably, if the EL 6 version is available,
that too would work.

Yasha Karant



Do you have a place to download the RPM?



I have the full directory as well as the built files -- but the source
code did not come with any obvious configuration/script software to
build a
RPM.  Moreover, I do not have the personnel resources to support this
application for future updates, although I expect that the steps that
I did
will work for such updates.

I have not built this for the IA-32 platform, only X86-64.  Is anyone
with
an IA-32 SL6x development system willing to repeat the exercise to
produce
an IA-32 platform version?

Can you supply the necessary information to build a RPM as well as
properly specify dependencies?

Yasha Karant





Re: blue griffon current production successfully built

2013-10-15 Thread Oleg Sadov
Python 2.7 may be installed from Software Collections 1.0 for SL6:

http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1309L=scientific-linux-develT=0P=501

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu wrote:
 From a terminal application within gnome, my default Python is:

 [ykarant@jb344 ~]$ python
 Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Feb 21 2013, 19:26:11)
 [GCC 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)] on linux2
 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.


 despite having to install whatever the BlueGriffon build required.

 A number of the responses concerning the build of BlueGriffon further
 underscore the general lack of polymorphism and encapsulation in the Linux
 environment as distributed.  In a proper modern OS environment, an
 application that requires non-system versions of applications (other than
 the core libraries required by the OS itself, a more daunting problem) would
 have only these in the path of both the building steps and during the
 execution of the built application, preferably still allowing a dynamic
 rather than a static image of the built application.

 Yasha Karant


 On 10/15/2013 12:06 AM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:

  Python2.7 can be installed in, say, /usr/local/..., while leaving
 2.6 (or for SL5, 2.4) as the default version.  When you then need to use
 version 2.7 there may be some pain with libraries, but perhaps not too
 much to endure.

 Steven Yellin

 On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

 I took a look a thte Fedora SRPM's, which unfortunately ended about 3
 years
 ago with a very out of date release. The current release requires Python
 2.7, which is begging for pain to install on an SL 6 system.

 SL 7 should be much more compatible with current releases.


 On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu wrote:

 On 10/14/2013 04:20 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:

 On 10/14/2013 04:18 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:

 I now have built from source BlueGriffon for X86-64 SL6x, version
 1.7.2.99.20130729, Build 20131013142156, Codename 'Cla-de-Lue'

 I can provide detailed instructions or just a copy of both the
 mozconfig
 file used for the build and the typescript of the building.

 I have had to add a few RPMs to SL6x from other distributions.  There
 was a query on a different thread (same general topic, but a different
 subject line) as to why I used a 5x CentOS RPM for one of the
 dependencies of the build.  I could not find a 6x EL version.  The
 application was not a systems application that would
 overwrite/override
 other files, and seemed to be constrained with a unique
 identifier.  My
 experience is that many EL 5 and even EL 4 applications still work
 with EL 6, as did this.  Presumably, if the EL 6 version is available,
 that too would work.

 Yasha Karant


 Do you have a place to download the RPM?


 I have the full directory as well as the built files -- but the source
 code did not come with any obvious configuration/script software to
 build a
 RPM.  Moreover, I do not have the personnel resources to support this
 application for future updates, although I expect that the steps that
 I did
 will work for such updates.

 I have not built this for the IA-32 platform, only X86-64.  Is anyone
 with
 an IA-32 SL6x development system willing to repeat the exercise to
 produce
 an IA-32 platform version?

 Can you supply the necessary information to build a RPM as well as
 properly specify dependencies?

 Yasha Karant





Re: how to change the CD mount point

2013-10-15 Thread Paul Robert Marino
The automount tools in the GUI usually use the label of the CD as the mount point so the only way to ensure the name is the same regardless of the label is to specify it in the /etc/fstab file.And yes that line should work in SL6-- Sent from my HP Pre3On Oct 15, 2013 17:09, Steven J. Yellin yel...@slac.stanford.edu wrote:  Here's a line from /etc/fstab on an SL5 machine.  It might work for 
SL6, too, assuming you have a /mnt/cdrom directory:

/dev/cdrom   /mnt/cdrom   udf,iso9660   noauto,owner,kudzu,ro   0 0

Or maybe it would work to instead make make /media/CDROM_ into a symbolic 
link to /mnt/cdrom before loading the CD.

Steven Yellin

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Edison, Arul (GE Healthcare) wrote:

 HI,
I am porting my application from Redhat to Scientific Linux 6.3
 In Scientific Linux, the CD is mounted to mount point /media/CDROM_
 I would like to change the mount point location to /mnt/cdrom
 Any idea what is the configuration to change this?

 Thanks,
 Arul


Re: how to change the CD mount point

2013-10-15 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 15 October 2013 23:36, Paul Robert Marino prmari...@gmail.com wrote:
 The automount tools in the GUI usually use the label of the CD as the mount
 point so the only way to ensure the name is the same regardless of the label
 is to specify it in the /etc/fstab file.
 And yes that line should work in SL6

Just remember to remove 'kudzu' from the options for SL6:

/dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom udf,iso9660 noauto,owner,ro 0 0