Kernel 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64 noise
Hi I've just installed the security and fastbugs updates for SL7.7 and when booting the new kernel I get the following message on screen twice, but nothing is shown in the logs. ERROR: No symbol table Press any key to continue The boot process continues OK whether I press a key or not, so I guess this is just noise. Any idea where this comes from? -- Cheers Bill
RE: EXT: Re: 7x fastbugs (was: Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64)
Gotcha -- I take it the version SRPMS directories are softlinked to 7x. Hmmm... gonna have to tweak scripts on our end. Thanks! -- Andy -Original Message- From: Stephan Wiesand Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 5:17 PM To: Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare) Cc: scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov Subject: EXT: Re: 7x fastbugs (was: Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64) > On 3. Sep 2019, at 23:23, Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare) > wrote: > > Next question -- I saw Farhan's email about fastbugs being made available in > the 7x repository. We pull fastbugs from 7.6/updates/fastbugs; when I > reposync'ed with your 7.6 repos, I got the sources for these fastbug fixes > from 7.6/SRPMS, but not the associated fastbug binary packages themselves > from 7.6/updates/fastbugs. Does this mean that I can expect to see these > fastbug binaries turn up in 7.6/updates/fastbugs at some point, or is > something screwy going on? Neither nor. I think fastbugs errata are only issued for the latest minor release - which currently is 7.7. -- Stephan
Re: 7x fastbugs (was: Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64)
> On 3. Sep 2019, at 23:23, Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare) > wrote: > > Next question -- I saw Farhan's email about fastbugs being made available in > the 7x repository. We pull fastbugs from 7.6/updates/fastbugs; when I > reposync'ed with your 7.6 repos, I got the sources for these fastbug fixes > from 7.6/SRPMS, but not the associated fastbug binary packages themselves > from 7.6/updates/fastbugs. Does this mean that I can expect to see these > fastbug binaries turn up in 7.6/updates/fastbugs at some point, or is > something screwy going on? Neither nor. I think fastbugs errata are only issued for the latest minor release - which currently is 7.7. -- Stephan
RE: EXT: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64
Yeah, I see what you mean. Next question -- I saw Farhan's email about fastbugs being made available in the 7x repository. We pull fastbugs from 7.6/updates/fastbugs; when I reposync'ed with your 7.6 repos, I got the sources for these fastbug fixes from 7.6/SRPMS, but not the associated fastbug binary packages themselves from 7.6/updates/fastbugs. Does this mean that I can expect to see these fastbug binaries turn up in 7.6/updates/fastbugs at some point, or is something screwy going on? Thanks, -- Andy -Original Message- From: Pat Riehecky Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 2:27 PM To: Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare) ; scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov Subject: EXT: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64 I believe that SL7 is currently in sync with what RH publishes. The cockpit packages are a bit of a mess in what they produce and if they go into extras, base, or neither Pat On 9/3/19 2:17 PM, Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare) wrote: > I notice that cockpit-selinux, cockpit-packagekit, and cockpit-tests were not > included in this update. Will those packages be rebuilt so that they stay in > sync? > > Thanks, > -- Andy > > -Original Message- > From: owner-scientific-linux-err...@listserv.fnal.gov > On Behalf Of Farhan > Ahmed > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 12:38 PM > To: scientific-linux-err...@listserv.fnal.gov > Subject: EXT: Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64 > > Synopsis: Moderate: cockpit security update > Advisory ID: SLSA-2019:0482-1 > Issue Date:2019-03-13 > CVE Numbers: CVE-2019-3804 > -- > > Security Fix(es): > > * cockpit: Crash when parsing invalid base64 headers (CVE-2019-3804) > -- > > SL7 >x86_64 > cockpit-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm > cockpit-bridge-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm > cockpit-debuginfo-173.2-1.el7.i686.rpm > cockpit-debuginfo-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm > cockpit-ws-173.2-1.el7.i686.rpm > cockpit-ws-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm > cockpit-doc-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm > cockpit-173.2-1.el7.src.rpm >noarch > cockpit-system-173.2-1.el7.noarch.rpm > cockpit-machines-ovirt-173.2-1.el7.noarch.rpm > > - Scientific Linux Development Team -- Pat Riehecky Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory http://www.fnal.gov https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.scientificlinux.org=DwIGaQ=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A=nMXz4qgc_-GP4LUVoNfsAnZwsT_IUai4rY8kGhjbS7k=-qSDvWIiHFrdfmdf0hJ2A9xl2KJM3lG10vEJ_GLb-tE=
Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64
I believe that SL7 is currently in sync with what RH publishes. The cockpit packages are a bit of a mess in what they produce and if they go into extras, base, or neither Pat On 9/3/19 2:17 PM, Peed, Andrew (GE Healthcare) wrote: I notice that cockpit-selinux, cockpit-packagekit, and cockpit-tests were not included in this update. Will those packages be rebuilt so that they stay in sync? Thanks, -- Andy -Original Message- From: owner-scientific-linux-err...@listserv.fnal.gov On Behalf Of Farhan Ahmed Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 12:38 PM To: scientific-linux-err...@listserv.fnal.gov Subject: EXT: Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64 Synopsis: Moderate: cockpit security update Advisory ID: SLSA-2019:0482-1 Issue Date:2019-03-13 CVE Numbers: CVE-2019-3804 -- Security Fix(es): * cockpit: Crash when parsing invalid base64 headers (CVE-2019-3804) -- SL7 x86_64 cockpit-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-bridge-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-debuginfo-173.2-1.el7.i686.rpm cockpit-debuginfo-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-ws-173.2-1.el7.i686.rpm cockpit-ws-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-doc-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-173.2-1.el7.src.rpm noarch cockpit-system-173.2-1.el7.noarch.rpm cockpit-machines-ovirt-173.2-1.el7.noarch.rpm - Scientific Linux Development Team -- Pat Riehecky Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory www.fnal.gov www.scientificlinux.org
RE: Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64
I notice that cockpit-selinux, cockpit-packagekit, and cockpit-tests were not included in this update. Will those packages be rebuilt so that they stay in sync? Thanks, -- Andy -Original Message- From: owner-scientific-linux-err...@listserv.fnal.gov On Behalf Of Farhan Ahmed Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 12:38 PM To: scientific-linux-err...@listserv.fnal.gov Subject: EXT: Security ERRATA Moderate: cockpit on SL7.x x86_64 Synopsis: Moderate: cockpit security update Advisory ID: SLSA-2019:0482-1 Issue Date:2019-03-13 CVE Numbers: CVE-2019-3804 -- Security Fix(es): * cockpit: Crash when parsing invalid base64 headers (CVE-2019-3804) -- SL7 x86_64 cockpit-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-bridge-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-debuginfo-173.2-1.el7.i686.rpm cockpit-debuginfo-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-ws-173.2-1.el7.i686.rpm cockpit-ws-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-doc-173.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm cockpit-173.2-1.el7.src.rpm noarch cockpit-system-173.2-1.el7.noarch.rpm cockpit-machines-ovirt-173.2-1.el7.noarch.rpm - Scientific Linux Development Team
